Prevalence and clinical correlates of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Exercise has a deleterious effect on the phenotypic expression of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and increases the risk of sudden death. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence and correlates of exercise-induced arrhythmias during exercise tolerance test (ETT) in patients with ARVC. Between 2010 and 2019, 30 (47% males, mean age 42 ± 12 years) consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC underwent a full genotypic and phenotypic characterization at our center. Exercise-induced arrhythmic response (EIAR) was defined by the development of complex or repetitive ventricular arrhythmias after stage 2 of exercise. A heart rate ≥ 85% of predicted was achieved by 23 (77%) patients. In 16 (53%) cases, a desmosomal pathogenic variant was found [most commonly PKP2 (n = 7) and DSP (n = 3)]. In 12 (40%) cases, an EIAR was observed. In 2 (6%) patients, ETT was interrupted due to the onset of ventricular tachycardia (sustained with a LBBB/inferior axis pattern in one case, and non-sustained LBBB/superior axis pattern in the other). Mean body surface area (BSA)-indexed left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volumes (EDV) were higher in the EIAR group (92 ± 12 ml/m2 vs 80 ± 7 ml/m2, p = 0.002), as well as right ventricular EDV/BSA (110 ± 18 ml/m2 vs 91 ± 27 ml/m2, p = 0.04). Subepicardial/mid-wall LV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was more common in the EIAR group (67% vs 22%, p = 0.01). ARVC patients commonly exhibit exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Patients with more significant RV remodeling and LV involvement (based on the presence of LV dilatation and LGE) appear more susceptible to exercise-induced arrhythmias.

Cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with ARVC and family members: the potential role of native T1 mapping.

Left ventricular (LV) involvement in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is not evaluated in the revised Task Force Criteria, possibly leading to underdiagnosis. This study explored the diagnostic role of myocardial native T1 mapping in patients with ARVC and their first-degree relatives. Thirty ARVC patients (47% males, mean age 45 ± 27 years) and 59 first-degree relatives not meeting diagnostic criteria underwent CMR with native T1 mapping. C MR was abnormal in 26 (87%) patients with ARVC. The right ventricle was affected in isolation in 13 (43%) patients. Prior to T1 mapping assessment, 2 (7%) patients exhibited isolated LV involvement and 11 (36%) patients showed features of biventricular disease. Left ventricular involvement was manifest as detectable LV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in 12 out of 13 cases. According to pre-specified inter-ventricular septal (IVS) T1 mapping thresholds, 11 (37%) patients revealed raised native T1 values including 5 out of the 17 patients who would otherwise have been classified as exhibiting a normal LV by conventional imaging parameters. Native septal T1 values were elevated in 22 (37%) of the 59 first-degree relatives included. Biventricular involvement is commonly observed in ARVC; native myocardial T1 values are raised in more than one third of patients, including a significant proportion of cases that would have been otherwise classified as exhibiting a normal LV using conventional CMR techniques. The significance of abnormal T1 values in first-degree relatives at risk will need validation through longitudinal studies.