AF driver detection in pulmonary vein area by electropcardiographic imaging: Relation with a favorable outcome of pulmonary vein isolation.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most successful treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) nowadays. However, not all AF patients benefit from PVI. In this study, we evaluate the use of ECGI to identify reentries and relate rotor density in the pulmonary vein (PV) area as an indicator of PVI outcome. Rotor maps were computed in a set of 29 AF patients using a new rotor detection algorithm. The relationship between the distribution of reentrant activity and the clinical outcome after PVI was studied. The number of rotors and proportion of PSs in different atrial regions were computed and compared retrospectively in two groups of patients: patients that remained in sinus rhythm 6 months after PVI and patients with arrhythmia recurrence. The total number of rotors obtained was higher in patients returning to arrhythmia after the ablation (4.31 ± 2.77 vs. 3.58 ± 2.67%, p = 0.018). However, a significantly higher concentration of PSs in the pulmonary veins was found in patients that remained in sinus rhythm (10.20 ± 12.40% vs. 5.19 ± 9.13%, p = 0.011) 6 months after PVI. The results obtained show a direct relationship between the expected AF mechanism and the electrophysiological parameters provided by ECGI, suggesting that this technology offers relevant information to predict the clinical outcome after PVI in AF patients.

Robustness of imageless electrocardiographic imaging against uncertainty in atrial morphology and location.

INTRODUCTION: Electrocardiographic Imaging is a non-invasive technique that requires cardiac Imaging for the reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity. In this study, we explored imageless ECGI by quantifying the errors of using heart meshes with either an inaccurate location inside the thorax or an inaccurate geometry. METHODS: Multiple­lead body surface recordings of 25 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were recorded. Cardiac atrial meshes were obtained by segmentation of medical images obtained for each patient. ECGI was computed with each patient's segmented atrial mesh and compared with the ECGI obtained under errors in the atrial mesh used for ECGI estimation. We modeled both the uncertainty in the location of the atria inside the thorax by artificially translating the atria inside the thorax and the geometry of the atrial mesh by using an atrial mesh in a reference database. ECGI signals obtained with the actual meshes and the translated or estimated meshes were compared in terms of their correlation coefficients, relative difference measurement star, and errors in the dominant frequency (DF) estimation in epicardial nodes. RESULTS: CC between ECGI signals obtained after translating the actual atrial meshes from the original position by 1 cm was above 0.97. CC between ECGIs obtained with patient specific atrial geometry and estimated atrial geometries was 0.93 ± 0.11. Mean errors in DF estimation using an estimated atrial mesh were 7.6 ± 5.9%. CONCLUSION: Imageless ECGI can provide a robust estimation of cardiac electrophysiological parameters such as activation rates even during complex arrhythmias. Furthermore, it can allow more widespread use of ECGI in clinical practice.

Electrocardiographic imaging in the atria.

The inverse problem of electrocardiography or electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is a technique for reconstructing electrical information about cardiac surfaces from noninvasive or non-contact recordings. ECGI has been used to characterize atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Although it is a technology with years of progress, its development to characterize atrial arrhythmias is challenging. Complications can arise when trying to describe the atrial mechanisms that lead to abnormal propagation patterns, premature or tachycardic beats, and reentrant arrhythmias. This review addresses the various ECGI methodologies, regularization methods, and post-processing techniques used in the atria, as well as the context in which they are used. The current advantages and limitations of ECGI in the fields of research and clinical diagnosis of atrial arrhythmias are outlined. In addition, areas where ECGI efforts should be concentrated to address the associated unsatisfied needs from the atrial perspective are discussed.

Effects of torso mesh density and electrode distribution on the accuracy of electrocardiographic imaging during atrial fibrillation.

Introduction: Electrocardiographic Imaging (ECGI) allows computing the electrical activity in the heart non-invasively using geometrical information of the patient and multiple body surface signals. In the present study we investigate the influence of the number of nodes of geometrical meshes and recording ECG electrodes distribution to compute ECGI during atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Torso meshes from 100 to 2000 nodes heterogeneously and homogeneously distributed were compared. Signals from nine AF realistic mathematical simulations were used for computing the ECGI. Results for each torso mesh were compared with the ECGI computed with a 4,000 nodes reference torso. In addition, real AF recordings from 25 AF patients were used to compute ECGI in torso meshes from 100 to 1,000 nodes. Results were compared with a reference torso of 2000 nodes. Torsos were remeshed either by reducing the number of nodes while maximizing the overall shape preservation and then assigning the location of the electrodes as the closest node in the new mesh or by forcing the remesher to place a node at each electrode location. Correlation coefficients, relative difference measurements and relative difference of dominant frequencies were computed to evaluate the impact on signal morphology of each torso mesh. Results: For remeshed torsos where electrodes match with a geometrical node in the mesh, all mesh densities presented similar results. On the other hand, in torsos with electrodes assigned to closest nodes in remeshed geometries performance metrics were dependent on mesh densities, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.53 ± 0.06 to 0.92 ± 0.04 in simulations or from 0.42 ± 0.38 to 0.89 ± 0.2 in patients. Dominant frequency relative errors showed the same trend with values from 1.14 ± 0.26 to 0.55 ± 0.21 Hz in simulations and from 0.91 ± 0.56 to 0.45 ± 0.41 Hz in patients. Conclusion: The effect of mesh density in ECGI is minimal when the location of the electrode is preserved as a node in the mesh. Torso meshes constructed without imposing electrodes to constitute nodes in the torso geometry should contain at least 400 nodes homogeneously distributed so that a distance between nodes is below 4 cm.

Higher reproducibility of phase derived metrics from electrocardiographic imaging during atrial fibrillation in patients remaining in sinus rhythm after pulmonary vein isolation.

BACKGROUND: Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) allows evaluating the complexity of the reentrant activity of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. In this study, we evaluated the ability of ECGI metrics to predict the success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to treat AF. METHODS: ECGI of 24 AF patients (6 males, 13 paroxysmal, 61.8 ± 14 years) was recorded prior to PVI. Patients were distributed into two groups based on their PVI outcome 6 months after ablation (sinus vs. arrhythmia recurrence). Metrics derived from phase analysis of ECGI signals were computed for two different temporal segments before ablation. Correlation analysis and variability over time were studied between the two recorded segments and were compared between patient groups. RESULTS: Temporal variability of both rotor duration and spatial entropy of the rotor histogram presented statistical differences between groups with different PVI outcome (p < 0.05). The reproducibility of reentrant metrics was higher (R2 > 0.8) in patients with good outcome rather than arrhythmia recurrence patients (R2 < 0.62). Prediction of PVI success based on ECGI temporal variability metrics allows for an increased specificity over the classification into paroxysmal or persistent (0.85 vs. 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with favorable PVI outcome present ECGI metrics more reproducible over time than patients with AF recurrence. These results suggest that ECGI derived metrics may allow selecting which patients would benefit from ablation therapies.

Electrocardiographic Imaging for Atrial Fibrillation: A Perspective From Computer Models and Animal Experiments to Clinical Value.

Electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is a technique to reconstruct non-invasively the electrical activity on the heart surface from body-surface potential recordings and geometric information of the torso and the heart. ECGI has shown scientific and clinical value when used to characterize and treat both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Regarding atrial fibrillation (AF), the characterization of the electrical propagation and the underlying substrate favoring AF is inherently more challenging than for ventricular arrhythmias, due to the progressive and heterogeneous nature of the disease and its manifestation, the small volume and wall thickness of the atria, and the relatively large role of microstructural abnormalities in AF. At the same time, ECGI has the advantage over other mapping technologies of allowing a global characterization of atrial electrical activity at every atrial beat and non-invasively. However, since ECGI is time-consuming and costly and the use of electrical mapping to guide AF ablation is still not fully established, the clinical value of ECGI for AF is still under assessment. Nonetheless, AF is known to be the manifestation of a complex interaction between electrical and structural abnormalities and therefore, true electro-anatomical-structural imaging may elucidate important key factors of AF development, progression, and treatment. Therefore, it is paramount to identify which clinical questions could be successfully addressed by ECGI when it comes to AF characterization and treatment, and which questions may be beyond its technical limitations. In this manuscript we review the questions that researchers have tried to address on the use of ECGI for AF characterization and treatment guidance (for example, localization of AF triggers and sustaining mechanisms), and we discuss the technological requirements and validation. We address experimental and clinical results, limitations, and future challenges for fruitful application of ECGI for AF understanding and management. We pay attention to existing techniques and clinical application, to computer models and (animal or human) experiments, to challenges of methodological and clinical validation. The overall objective of the study is to provide a consensus on valuable directions that ECGI research may take to provide future improvements in AF characterization and treatment guidance.