Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 133(1): 238-46, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23297898

RESUMEN

In applied research, noise annoyance is often used as indicator of subjective reaction to aircraft noise in residential areas. The present study aims to show that the meaning which respondents attach to the concept of aircraft noise annoyance is partly a function of survey context. To this purpose a survey is conducted among residents living near Schiphol Airport, the largest airport in the Netherlands. In line with the formulated hypotheses it is shown that different sets of preceding questionnaire items influence the response distribution of aircraft noise annoyance as well as the correlational patterns between aircraft noise annoyance and other relevant scales.


Asunto(s)
Aeronaves , Percepción Auditiva , Genio Irritable , Ruido del Transporte/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Humanos , Percepción Sonora , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Características de la Residencia
2.
Noise Health ; 12(46): 17-25, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20160387

RESUMEN

In this paper, an attempt is made to establish the direction of causality between a range of psychological factors and aircraft noise annoyance. For this purpose, a panel model was estimated within a structural equation modeling approach. Data were gathered from two surveys conducted in April 2006 and April 2008, respectively, among the same residents living within the 45 Level day-evening-night contour of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the largest airport in the Netherlands (n=250). A surprising result is that none of the paths from the psychological factors to aircraft noise annoyance were found to be significant. Yet 2 effects were significant the other way around: (1) from 'aircraft noise annoyance' to 'concern about the negative health effects of noise' and (2) from 'aircraft noise annoyance' to 'belief that noise can be prevented.' Hence aircraft noise annoyance measured at time 1 contained information that can effectively explain changes in these 2 variables at time 2, while controlling for their previous values. Secondary results show that (1) aircraft noise annoyance is very stable through time and (2) that changes in aircraft noise annoyance and the identified psychological factors are correlated.


Asunto(s)
Aeronaves , Percepción Auditiva , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Ruido del Transporte/efectos adversos , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Adaptación Psicológica , Causalidad , Recolección de Datos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Países Bajos , Estadística como Asunto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 123(6): 4250-60, 2008 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18537376

RESUMEN

Previous research has stressed the relevance of nonacoustical factors in the perception of aircraft noise. However, it is largely empirically driven and lacks a sound theoretical basis. In this paper, a theoretical model which explains noise annoyance based on the psychological stress theory is empirically tested. The model is estimated by applying structural equation modeling based on data from residents living in the vicinity of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol in The Netherlands. The model provides a good model fit and indicates that concern about the negative health effects of noise and pollution, perceived disturbance, and perceived control and coping capacity are the most important variables that explain noise annoyance. Furthermore, the model provides evidence for the existence of two reciprocal relationships between (1) perceived disturbance and noise annoyance and (2) perceived control and coping capacity and noise annoyance. Lastly, the model yielded two unexpected results. Firstly, the variables noise sensitivity and fear related to the noise source were unable to explain additional variance in the endogenous variables of the model and were therefore excluded from the model. And secondly, the size of the total effect of noise exposure on noise annoyance was relatively small. The paper concludes with some recommended directions for further research.


Asunto(s)
Aeronaves , Ruido del Transporte/efectos adversos , Acústica , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Política de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Países Bajos , Percepción
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA