Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(13)2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38998858

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between clinical severity and functionality, occupational performance, and health-related quality of life in patients hospitalized with pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary embolism patients were grouped by clinical severity using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. Those scoring ≥160 were in the high-severity group (HSG); those scoring < 160 in the low-moderate group (LMSG). The main variables were functionality assessed by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), self-perception of occupational performance assessed by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), pain and fatigue assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and health-related quality of life assessed by the EuroQol-5Dimensions (EQ-5D). Patients were evaluated at hospital admission and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. At admission, there were significant differences between groups in the WHODAS and health-related quality of life in favor of the LMSG. At 1-month and at 3-month follow-up, there were significant differences between the LMSG and HSG in WHODAS, COMP, NRS pain, fatigue and EQ-5D scores in favor of the LMSG. An association exists between clinical severity and mid-term functionality, self-perception of occupational performance, pain, fatigue, and health-related quality of life in PE patients.

7.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 49(4): 26-31, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34224215

RESUMEN

AIM: Compare a pre-co-seasonal with a perennial schedule using an undiluted mixture of a depigmented-polymerized grass/Olea europaea immunotherapy (2,000 DPP/mL) in pediatric patients with rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis with or without controlled asthma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Primary objective was to determine the non-superiority of a perennial compared to a pre-co-seasonal schedule by means of Paediatric/Adolescent Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ/AdolRQLQ). Secondary objectives were Paediatric Asthma/Caregiver´s Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ/PACQLQ) Asthma Control Test (ACT), Visual Analogue Scale global assessment of allergic disease (VAS), use of resources and immunological response. All variables were compared during the pollen season (April-June) without (2015) and with (2016) immunotherapy. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study of which 29 patients were assigned to the perennial and 11 to the pre-co-seasonal schedule. During 2016 pollen season a significant improvement in the PRQLQ/AdolRQLQ, PAQLQ/AdolAQLQ, ACT and VAS score were observed both in perennial and pre-co-seasonal schedule group. No significant differences were seen between treatment schedules for PRQLQ/AdolRQLQ, PAQLQ/AdolAQLQ and ACT scores comparing both pollen seasons. A significant increase in sIgG4 and reduction in the number of rescue medications used and number of patients who needed visit to any specialist was observed in both treatment schedules during 2016 pollen season. No relevant differences were found in the safety profile of any treatment schedule. DISCUSSION: Treatment with undiluted mixture of a depigmented-polymerized Grass/Olea europaea allergen immunotherapy has proven to be effective both using a perennial and a pre-co-seasonal schedule and therefore suitable for polyallergic patients.


Asunto(s)
Estaciones del Año , Adolescente , Alérgenos , Asma/terapia , Niño , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Humanos , Olea/inmunología , Poaceae , Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 49(4): 26-31, jul. 2021. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-214287

RESUMEN

Aim: Compare a pre-co-seasonal with a perennial schedule using an undiluted mixture of a depigmented-polymerized grass/Olea europaea immunotherapy (2,000 DPP/mL) in pediatric patients with rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis with or without controlled asthma. Material and Methods: Primary objective was to determine the non-superiority of a perennial compared to a pre-co-seasonal schedule by means of Paediatric/Adolescent Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ/AdolRQLQ). Secondary objectives were Paediatric Asthma/Caregiver´s Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ/PACQLQ) Asthma Control Test (ACT), Visual Analogue Scale global assessment of allergic disease (VAS), use of resources and immunological response. All variables were compared during the pollen season (April-June) without (2015) and with (2016) immunotherapy. Results: Forty patients were included in the study of which 29 patients were assigned to the perennial and 11 to the pre-co-seasonal schedule. During 2016 pollen season a significant improvement in the PRQLQ/AdolRQLQ, PAQLQ/AdolAQLQ, ACT and VAS score were observed both in perennial and pre-co-seasonal schedule group. No significant differences were seen between treatment schedules for PRQLQ/AdolRQLQ, PAQLQ/AdolAQLQ and ACT scores comparing both pollen seasons. A significant increase in sIgG4 and reduction in the number of rescue medications used and number of patients who needed visit to any specialist was observed in both treatment schedules during 2016 pollen season. No relevant differences were found in the safety profile of any treatment schedule. Discussion: Treatment with undiluted mixture of a depigmented-polymerized Grass/Olea europaea allergen immunotherapy has proven to be effective both using a perennial and a pre-co-seasonal schedule and therefore suitable for polyallergic patients (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Asma/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Olea/inmunología , Poaceae/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estaciones del Año , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 155(9): 375-381, nov. 2020. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-192588

RESUMEN

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: En los últimos meses se han realizado grandes esfuerzos para evaluar las terapias más eficaces en el manejo de pacientes con COVID-19. Actualmente ninguna combinación ha demostrado de manera consistente una relación clara con la mortalidad. Nuestro objetivo fue valorar el patrón de asociaciones observado entre los distintos tratamientos intrahospitalarios administrados a 238 pacientes ingresados por COVID-19 y la mortalidad. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron las historias clínicas electrónicas de aquellos pacientes dados de alta o que fallecieron por COVID-19 entre el 16 de marzo y el 10 de abril de 2020 en el Hospital Universitario San Cecilio (Granada, España). Se obtuvo información sobre sexo, edad, comorbilidades al ingreso, parámetros clínicos, analíticos, pruebas de imagen y tratamientos empíricos empleados. La variable de desenlace fue la mortalidad intrahospitalaria. Para estimar las asociaciones entre los diferentes tratamientos y el riesgo de mortalidad se estimaron, mediante modelos de regresión de Cox, hazard ratio ajustadas por edad, sexo, patologías previas y gravedad al ingreso. RESULTADOS: La combinación de fármacos más frecuentemente empleada fue la formada por heparina de bajo peso molecular (HBPM), hidroxicloroquina y ritonavir/lopinavir. Ninguno de los tratamientos utilizados mostró una asociación independiente con la mortalidad. Los fármacos que mostraron una asociación inversa de mayor magnitud fueron el tocilizumab y los corticoides. CONCLUSIONES: El patrón se asociaciones obtenido es consistente con lo reportado en la bibliografía. Parece oportuno diseñar ensayos aleatorizados que valoren el posible efecto protector de los corticoides y el tocilizumab sobre el riesgo de muerte en algunos subgrupos de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19


BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last months great efforts have been developed to evaluate the more efficient therapeutic agents in the management of patients with COVID-19. Currently, no specific drug combination has consistently demonstrated an association with mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of associations observed between the different in-hospital treatments administered to a series of 238 patients admitted for COVID-19 and their relationship with mortality. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients that discharged or died from COVID-19 in the Hospital Universitario San Cecilio (Granada, Spain) between March 16 and April 10, 2020 were analysed. From these records, information was obtained on sex, age, comorbidities at admission, clinical information, analytical parameters, imaging tests and empirical treatments used. The outcome variable was the in-hospital mortality. To estimate the associations between the different therapeutic alternatives and the risk of mortality, hazard ratios adjusted for age, sex, previous pathologies and severity at discharge were estimated using Cox regression models. RESULTS: The most frequently used combination of drugs was low molecular weight heparins, hydroxychloroquine, and ritonavir/lopinavir. None of the analysed treatments showed independent association with mortality. The drugs that showed a greater inverse association with mortality were tocilizumab and corticoids. CONCLUSIONS: The observed association patterns are consistent with previous literature. It seems necessary to design randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluate the possible protector effect of tocilizumab and corticoids in the risk of mortality for some subgroups of COVID-19 hospitalized patients


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Antivirales/farmacología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Betacoronavirus , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias
11.
Med Clin (Engl Ed) ; 155(9): 375-381, 2020 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33072869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last months great efforts have been developed to evaluate the more efficient therapeutic agents in the management of patients with COVID-19. Currently, no specific drug combination has consistently demonstrated an association with mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of associations observed between the different in-hospital treatments administered to a series of 238 patients admitted for COVID-19 and their relationship with mortality. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients that discharged or died from COVID-19 in the Hospital Universitario San Cecilio (Granada, Spain) between March 16 and April 10, 2020 were analysed. From these records, information was obtained on sex, age, comorbidities at admission, clinical information, analytical parameters, imaging tests and empirical treatments used. The outcome variable was the in-hospital mortality. To estimate the associations between the different therapeutic alternatives and the risk of mortality, Hazard Ratios adjusted for age, sex, previous pathologies and severity at discharge were estimated using Cox Regression models. RESULTS: The most frequently used combination of drugs was low molecular weight heparins, hydroxychloroquine, and ritonavir/lopinavir. None of the analysed treatments showed independent association with mortality. The drugs that showed a greater inverse association with mortality were tocilizumab and corticoids. CONCLUSIONS: The observed association patterns are consistent with previous literature. It seems necessary to design randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluate the possible protector effect of tocilizumab and corticoids in the risk of mortality for some subgroups of COVID-19 hospitalized patients.


ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: En los últimos meses se han realizado grandes esfuerzos para evaluar las terapias más eficaces en el manejo de pacientes con COVID-19. Actualmente ninguna combinación ha demostrado de manera consistente una relación clara con la mortalidad. Nuestro objetivo fue valorar el patrón de asociaciones observado entre los distintos tratamientos intrahospitalarios administrados a 238 pacientes ingresados por COVID-19 y la mortalidad. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se analizaron las historias clínicas electrónicas de aquellos pacientes dados de alta o que fallecieron por COVID-19 entre el 16 de marzo y el 10 de abril de 2020 en el Hospital Universitario San Cecilio (Granada, España). Se obtuvo información sobre sexo, edad, comorbilidades al ingreso, parámetros clínicos, analíticos, pruebas de imagen y tratamientos empíricos empleados. La variable de desenlace fue la mortalidad intrahospitalaria. Para estimar las asociaciones entre los diferentes tratamientos y el riesgo de mortalidad se estimaron, mediante modelos de regresión de Cox, hazard ratio ajustadas por edad, sexo, patologías previas y gravedad al ingreso. RESULTADOS: La combinación de fármacos más frecuentemente empleada fue la formada por heparinade bajo peso molecular (HBPM), hidroxicloroquina y ritonavir/lopinavir. Ninguno de los tratamientos utilizados mostró una asociación independiente con la mortalidad. Los fármacos que mostraron una asociación inversa de mayor magnitud fueron el tocilizumab y los corticoides. CONCLUSIONES: El patrón se asociaciones obtenido es consistente con lo reportado en la bibliografía. Parece oportuno diseñar ensayos aleatorizados que valoren el posible efecto protector de los corticoides y el tocilizumab sobre el riesgo de muerte en algunos subgrupos de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19.

12.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 155(9): 375-381, 2020 11 13.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the last months great efforts have been developed to evaluate the more efficient therapeutic agents in the management of patients with COVID-19. Currently, no specific drug combination has consistently demonstrated an association with mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of associations observed between the different in-hospital treatments administered to a series of 238 patients admitted for COVID-19 and their relationship with mortality. METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients that discharged or died from COVID-19 in the Hospital Universitario San Cecilio (Granada, Spain) between March 16 and April 10, 2020 were analysed. From these records, information was obtained on sex, age, comorbidities at admission, clinical information, analytical parameters, imaging tests and empirical treatments used. The outcome variable was the in-hospital mortality. To estimate the associations between the different therapeutic alternatives and the risk of mortality, hazard ratios adjusted for age, sex, previous pathologies and severity at discharge were estimated using Cox regression models. RESULTS: The most frequently used combination of drugs was low molecular weight heparins, hydroxychloroquine, and ritonavir/lopinavir. None of the analysed treatments showed independent association with mortality. The drugs that showed a greater inverse association with mortality were tocilizumab and corticoids. CONCLUSIONS: The observed association patterns are consistent with previous literature. It seems necessary to design randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluate the possible protector effect of tocilizumab and corticoids in the risk of mortality for some subgroups of COVID-19 hospitalized patients.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores del Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , España , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
13.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0235107, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584868

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To identify and quantify associations between baseline characteristics on hospital admission and mortality in patients with COVID-19 at a tertiary hospital in Spain. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This retrospective case series included 238 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio (Granada, Spain) who were discharged or who died. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain information on sex, age, personal antecedents, clinical features, findings on physical examination, and laboratory results for each patient. Associations between mortality and baseline characteristics were estimated as hazard ratios (HR) calculated with Cox regression models. Series mortality was 25.6%. Among patients with dependence for basic activities of daily living, 78.7% died, and among patients residing in retirement homes, 80.8% died. The variables most clearly associated with a greater hazard of death were age (3% HR increase per 1-year increase in age; 95%CI 1-6), diabetes mellitus (HR 2.42, 95%CI 1.43-4.09), SatO2/FiO2 ratio (43% HR reduction per 1-point increase; 95%CI 23-57), SOFA score (19% HR increase per 1-point increase, 95%CI 5-34) and CURB-65 score (76% HR increase per 1-point increase, 95%CI 23-143). CONCLUSIONS: The patients residing in retirement homes showed great vulnerability. The main baseline factors that were independently associated with mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 were older age, diabetes mellitus, low SatO2/FiO2 ratio, and high SOFA and CURB-65 scores.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Edad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno , Pandemias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología
14.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 26(5): 192-196, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31022055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis that often results in frequent hospitalizations. We investigated the characteristics and predictors of 30-day hospital readmissions in GPA. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis using the 2014 National Readmission Database. We included nonelective admissions with a primary or secondary diagnosis of GPA. We compared characteristics between readmissions and nonreadmissions. Independent predictors for readmissions were studied using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 9749 hospital admissions with GPA, among which there were 2173 readmissions (22.3%) within 30 days of discharge. The top 5 primary reasons for readmissions were GPA, sepsis, pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, and acute kidney injury. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis readmissions were associated with higher length of stay (8.0 vs 7.2 days; p = 0.019) and less discharge home (50% vs 63%, p < 0.001). Independent predictors for readmissions were younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; p = 0.013), no private insurance (OR, 0.50; p < 0.001), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 1.12; p = 0.039), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.71; p = 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR, 1.39; p = 0.005), and discharge to home health care (OR, 1.29; p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant burden of 30-day readmissions among GPA populations. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding patients with high risk of readmissions, including those with younger age, public insurance, higher comorbidity burden, cardiac and renal complications, and unfavorable discharge dispositions.


Asunto(s)
Granulomatosis con Poliangitis , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/diagnóstico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/epidemiología , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/terapia , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 22(6): 1023-1028, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30834657

RESUMEN

AIM: We investigated the association between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and perioperative cardiovascular risk for inpatient non-cardiac surgical procedures. METHODS: We used data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the year 2014 to identify patients undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery. SSc and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined by International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision diagnosis codes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. We adjusted for demographic information, socioeconomic status, cardiac comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors and procedural category. Two models were used with different categorization strategies for surgical procedures. RESULTS: A total of 8 156 379 hospitalizations for non-cardiac surgeries were included, 4385 of which had a diagnosis of SSc. Patients with SSc were older, more likely to be female and Caucasian and with higher cardiac and systemic comorbidity burden. In univariate analysis, SSc was associated with higher risk of perioperative MACE (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9; P < 0.001) and all-cause death (P = 3.07; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis yielded conflicting results regarding the association between SSc and perioperative MACE (Model 1: OR = 1.42; P = 0.146; Model 2: OR = 1.59; P = 0.048). Subsequent analysis showed that only perioperative myocardial infarction (Model 1 OR = 1.85; P = 0.048; Model 2 OR = 1.94; P = 0.031) was independently associated with SSc. CONCLUSION: We did not find consistent association between SSc and perioperative MACE in non-cardiac surgical procedures. SSc may be associated with perioperative myocardial infarction.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Case Rep Med ; 2018: 5979386, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30356389

RESUMEN

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a rare manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with potentially life-threatening consequences. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reported in literature for a constellation of MAS, glomerulonephritis, pericarditis, and retinal vasculitis as initial presentation of SLE. Despite extensive multisystem involvement of his disease, the patient responded well to initial steroid treatment, with mycophenolate mofetil successfully added as a steroid-sparing agent. Our case highlights the importance of multispecialty collaboration in the diagnosis and management of SLE with multisystem involvement.

17.
Clin Rheumatol ; 37(7): 1971-1976, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29671191

RESUMEN

The relationship between RA and asthma has been yielding conflicting results, with most recent studies showing a possible positive association. The study aims at the outcomes of adult patients hospitalized for asthma exacerbation in those with and without RA. We used data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the period of 2012-2014. ICD 9 code was used to identify the diagnosis. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Our secondary outcome was total asthma exacerbation hospitalizations, length of stay, and total hospital charges. Compared to those without RA, RA was associated with increased hospitalizations for asthma exacerbation (unadjusted OR 1.29, p < 0.001; adjusted OR 1.06, p = 0.002), more respiratory and systemic comorbidities, increased in-hospital mortality (unadjusted OR 1.89, p = 0.001; adjusted OR 1.60, p = 0.020), length of stay (4.5 vs 3.8; unadjusted p < 0.001, adjusted p < 0.001), and total hospital charges (30,149 vs 26,247; unadjusted p < 0.001, adjusted p = 0.048). Our study was the first to demonstrate that RA is associated with increased in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost using a national inpatient database. We hypothesize that in asthmatic patients with concurrent RA, their asthma may represent a distinctive subgroup that is more severe and carries a poorer prognosis, which deserves more attention and future investigation.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Asma/mortalidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Asma/complicaciones , Femenino , Precios de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA