On the use of radiobiological-based optimization functions in radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate and head and neck cases on Monaco and Eclipse TPS / Sobre el uso de funciones de costo basadas en radiobiología en la planeación de tratamientos de radioterapia para casos de próstata y cabeza y cuello en los TPS Monaco y Eclipse

INTRODUCTION Radiobiological-based optimization functions for radiotherapy treatment planning involve dose-volume effects that could allow greater versatility when shaping dose distributions and DVHs than traditional dose volume (DV) criteria. Two of the most commercially available TPS (Monaco and Eclipse) already offer biological-based optimization functions, but they are not routinely used by most planners in clinical practice. Insight into the benefits of using EUD, TCP/NTCP-based cost functions in Monaco and Eclipse TPS was gained by comparing biological-based optimizations and physical-based optimizations for prostate and head and neck cases. METHODS Three prostate and three H&N cases were retrospectively optimized in Monaco and Eclipse TPS, using radiobiological-based cost functions vs DV-based cost functions. Plan comparison involved ICRU Report 83 parameters D95%, D50%, D2% and TCP for the PTV, and NTCP and RTOG tolerance doses for OARs. RESULTS Although there were differences between Monaco and Eclipse plans due to their dissimilar optimization and dose calculation algorithms as well as optimization functions, both TPS showed that radiobiological-based criteria allow versatile tailoring of the DVH with variation of only one parameter and at most two cost functions, in contrast to the use of three to four DV-based criteria to reach a similar result. CONCLUSION Despite the use of a small sample, optimization of three prostate and three head and neck cases allowed the exploration of optimization possibilities offered by two of the most commercially available TPS on two anatomically dissimilar regions. Radiobiological-based optimization efficiently drives dose distributions and DVH shaping for OARs without sacrifice of PTV coverage. Use of EUD-based cost functions should be encouraged in addition to DV cost functions to obtain the best possible plan in daily clinical practice

INTRODUCCION Las funciones de optimización basadas en radiobiología para la planificación del tratamiento de radioterapia implican efectos dosis volumen que podrían permitir una mayor versatilidad a la hora de dar forma a las distribuciones de dosis y DVH que los tradicionales criterios dosis-volumen (DV). Dos de los TPS más disponibles comercialmente (Mónaco y Eclipse) ya ofrecen productos de funciones de optimización de base biológica, pero la mayoría de los planificadores no las utilizan de forma rutinaria en la práctica clínica. El conocimiento de los beneficios del uso de las funciones de costos basadas en EUD, TCP/NTCP en Mónaco y Eclipse TPS se obtuvo comparando optimizaciones de base biológica y optimizaciones físicas para casos de próstata y cabeza y cuello. MÉTODOS Tres próstatas y tres casos de H&N en Mónaco y Eclipse TPS fueron optimizadas retrospectivamente usando funciones de costos basadas en radiobiología vs funciones de costos basadas en DV. La comparación de planes involucró los parámetros del Informe ICRU 83 D95%, D50%, D2% y TCP para el PTV, y dosis de tolerancia NTCP y RTOG para OAR. Resultados. Aunque hubo diferencias entre los planes Mónaco y Eclipse, debido a sus diferentes algoritmos de optimización y cálculo de dosis, así como funciones de optimización, ambos TPS demostraron que el criterio basado en radiobiología permiten una adaptación versátil del DVH con variación de un solo parámetro y como máximo dos funciones de costos, en contraste con el uso de tres o cuatro criterios basados en DV para alcanzar un resultado similar. CONCLUSIÓN A pesar del uso de una muestra pequeña, la optimización de tres casos de próstata y tres de cabeza y cuello permitió la exploración de las posibilidades de optimización que ofrecen dos de los TPS más disponibles comercialmente en dos regiones anatómicamente diferentes. La optimización basada en radiobiología impulsa de manera eficiente las distribuciones de dosis y la configuración de DVH para OAR sin sacrificar Cobertura de PTV. Se debe fomentar el uso de funciones de costos basadas en EUD además de las funciones de costos DV para obtener el mejor posible plan en la práctica clínica diaria

Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging.

Yttrium-90 is known to have a low positron emission decay of 32 ppm that may allow for personalized dosimetry of liver cancer therapy with (90)Y labeled microspheres. The aim of this work was to image and quantify (90)Y so that accurate predictions of the absorbed dose can be made. The measurements were performed within the QUEST study (University of Sydney, and Sirtex Medical, Australia). A NEMA IEC body phantom containing 6 fillable spheres (10-37 mm ∅) was used to measure the 90Y distribution with a Biograph mCT PET/CT (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with time-of-flight (TOF) acquisition. A sphere to background ratio of 8:1, with a total (90)Y activity of 3 GBq was used. Measurements were performed for one week (0, 3, 5 and 7 d). he acquisition protocol consisted of 30 min-2 bed positions and 120 min-single bed position. Images were reconstructed with 3D ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and point spread function (PSF) for iteration numbers of 1-12 with 21 (TOF) and 24 (non-TOF) subsets and CT based attenuation and scatter correction. Convergence of algorithms and activity recovery was assessed based on regions-of-interest (ROI) analysis of the background (100 voxels), spheres (4 voxels) and the central low density insert (25 voxels). For the largest sphere, the recovery coefficient (RC) values for the 30 min -2-bed position, 30 min-single bed and 120 min-single bed were 1.12 ± 0.20, 1.14 ± 0.13, 0.97 ± 0.07 respectively. For the smaller diameter spheres, the PSF algorithm with TOF and single bed acquisition provided a comparatively better activity recovery. Quantification of Y-90 using Biograph mCT PET/CT is possible with a reasonable accuracy, the limitations being the size of the lesion and the activity concentration present. At this stage, based on our study, it seems advantageous to use different protocols depending on the size of the lesion.

Arc therapy for total body irradiation--a robust novel treatment technique for standard treatment rooms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We developed a simple and robust total body irradiation (TBI) method for standard treatment rooms that obviates the need for patient translation devices. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two generic arcs with rectangular segments for a patient thickness of 16 and 20 cm (arc16/arc20) were generated. An analytical fit was performed to determine the weights of the arc segments depending on patient thickness and gantry angle. Stability and absolute dose for both arcs were measured using EBT3 films in a range of solid water slab phantom thicknesses. Additionally ionization chamber measurements were performed every 10 cm at a source surface distance (SSD) of ∼ 200 cm. RESULTS: The measured standard deviation for arc16 is ± 3% with a flatness ⩽ 9.0%. Arc20 had a standard deviation of ± 3% with a flatness ⩽ 7.3% for all measured thicknesses. The theoretical curves proved to be accurate for the prediction of the segment weightings for the two arcs. In vivo measurements for the first 22 clinical patients showed a dose deviation of less than 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Arc therapy is a convenient and stable method for TBI. This cost-effective approach has been introduced clinically, obviating the need for field patches and to physically move the patient.

Dependence of image quality on acquisition time for the PET/CT Biograph mCT.

The impact of acquisition time on reconstructed PET image quality is analyzed for different acquisition times (1, 2, 3 and 4min). Image quality was tested according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 2-2007, the evaluation for the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and the reconstructed activity ratio (RAR) for three algorithms, i.e. OSEM, TrueX and TOF applying different effective iteration numbers. The present work shows that the image quality of 3 and 4min acquisition time for spherical lesions of 10mm diameter are not significantly different between TrueX, TOF and OSEM. The 2min acquisition time should be used carefully for the TrueX and OSEM algorithms in small lesions, because the levels of background noise are high compared to 3 or 4min measurements. Also, the reconstructed activity ratio is underestimated to be approximately half of the expected value. For large lesions the three algorithms perform similarly for all acquisition durations, however, OSEM has the advantage of a more accurately reconstructed activity ratio compared to TrueX and TOF, which are more strongly influenced by noise.