Near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography at a very low dose of indocyanine green: quantification of fluorescence intensity using a colour analysis software based on the RGB color model.

BACKGROUND: Indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography (NIRF-C) is widely used to visualize the biliary tract during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). However, the ICG dose and its dosing time vary in the literature so there is not a standard ICG protocol. The objectives of this descriptive prospective study were to demonstrate that NIRF-C at a very low dose of ICG provides good visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree while avoiding hepatic hyperluminescence and to assess the surgeon-perceived benefit. Furthermore, another additional aim was quantifying the amount of ICG dye in the liver tissue and biliary tract through a green colour intensity (GCI) analysis according to red green blue (RGB) color model and correlating it to surgeon-perceived benefit. METHOD: Forty-four patients were scheduled for LC. We recorded demographics, surgical indication, intraoperative details, adverse reactions to ICG, hepatic hyperluminescence, visualization of the cystic duct (CD), the common bile duct (CBD) and the cystic duct-bile duct junction (CDBDJ) before and after dissection of Calot's triangle, operation time, surgical complications and subjective surgeon data. For all procedures, a unique dose of 0.25 mg of ICG was administered intravenously during the anaesthetic induction. ICG NIRF-C was performed using the overlay mode of the VISERA ELITE II Surgical Endoscope in all surgeries. Video recordings of all 44 LC were reviewed. Using a color analysis software, the GCI of CBD versus adjacent liver tissue was calculated using RGB color model. RESULTS: ICG NIRF-C was performed in all 44 cases. The mean operation time was 45 ± 15 min. There were no bile duct injuries (BDIs) or allergic reactions to ICG. The postoperative course was uneventful in all of cases. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 28 ± 4 h. ICG NIRF-C identified the CBD in 100% of the patients, the CD in 71% and the CDBDJ in 84%, with a surgeon satisfaction of 4/5 or 5/5 in almost 90% of surgeries based on a visual analogue scale (VAS). No statistically significant differences were found in the visualization of the biliary structures after the dissection of Calot's triangle in obese patients or with gallbladder inflammation. Furthermore, 25% of patients with a BMI ≥ 30, 27% of patients with a Nassar grade ≥ 3 and 21% of patients with gallbladder inflammation had a VAS score 5/5 compared to 6% of patients with a BMI < 30 (p = 0.215), 6% of patients with a Nassar grade < 3 (p = 0.083) and none of the patients without gallbladder inflammation (p = 0.037). Measured pixel GCI of CBD was higher than adjacent hepatic tissue for all cases regardless of the degree of gallbladder inflammation, the Nassar scale grades or the patient's BMI (p < 0.0001). In addition, a significant correlation was observed between surgeon-perceived benefit and the amount of ICG dye into the CBD according the RGB color model (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: ICG NIRF-C at a very low dose of ICG (0.25 mg of ICG 20 min before surgery) enables the real-time identification of biliary ducts, thereby avoiding the hepatic hyperluminescence even in cases of obese patients or those with gallbladder inflammation.

Duodenopancreatectomía por adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas en ancianos. ¿Podemos asumirla con seguridad? / Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Can we do it safely?

Introducción: La cirugía y la quimioterapia han aumentado la supervivencia de los pacientes con neoplasias pancreáticas. La disminución de la morbimortalidad postoperatoria y el aumento de la esperanza de vida han ampliado las indicaciones de la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC), aunque sigue siendo controvertida en la población geriátrica. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre una base de datos prospectiva, de pacientes con adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas sometidos a una DPC entre 2007-2018. El objetivo principal fue analizar la morbimortalidad y supervivencia asociada a la DPC en pacientes≥75 años (ancianos). Resultados: Se incluyeron 79 pacientes, 21 de ellos mayores de 75 años (27%); dentro de este grupo el 23,9% tenían más de 80 años. El ASA de ambos grupos fue similar. Los pacientes≥75años requirieron más transfusiones. No se observaron diferencias en el tiempo operatorio, aunque en los ancianos se realizaron más resecciones vasculares (26 vs. 8,7%; p=0,037).La morbilidad fue mayor en los ancianos (61,9 vs. 46,6%), aunque sin diferencias. Los≥75años presentaron más complicaciones no quirúrgicas (33,3%; p=0,050) siendo la neumonía la más frecuente. La mortalidad postoperatoria fue superior en los≥75años (9 vs. 0%; p=0,017), constituyendo la resección venosa un factor de riesgo (p=0,01). La supervivencia global y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad no mostraron diferencias significativas en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: Los pacientes ancianos presentaron una mayor mortalidad postoperatoria y más complicaciones no quirúrgicas. La supervivencia no mostró diferencias, por lo que, con una adecuada selección de pacientes, la edad no debe constituirse por sí misma como una contraindicación para la DPC(AU).

Introduction: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. Methods: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018.The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients≥75 years (elderly). Results: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23.9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P=.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9 vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P=.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P=.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. Conclusions: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC(AU).

Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Can we do it safely?

INTRODUCTION: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. METHODS: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018. The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients ≥75 years (elderly). RESULTS: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23'9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients ≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P = .037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9% vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged ≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P = .050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the ≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P = .017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC.

Revisión del diagnóstico y manejo del quiste hidatídico hepático / Review of diagnosis and management of hydatid cyst of the liver

La hidatidosis es una zoonosis causada por el estado larvario de Echinococcus. Los seres humanos son huéspedes intermediarios accidentales, donde produce lesiones quísticas, principalmente en hígado y pulmón. Suele ser asintomática, por lo que se suele detectar de forma incidental. Los síntomas se deben a la expansión del quiste y/o a la reacción inflamatoria. El signo más frecuente es la hepatomegalia. No produce alteraciones analíticas específicas pero existeninmunodiagnósticos que pueden complementar su estudio, siendo la detección de anticuerpos el método de elección. Aunque la ecografía es la principal técnica para su diagnóstico, la tomografía brinda información más precisa respecto a sus características y relaciones anatómicas. Actualmente hay varias opciones terapéuticas. El tratamiento con albendazol, combinado o no con prazicuantel, es útil en los quistes pequeños (< 5 cm) sin complicaciones. Solo el 30 % de los quistes desaparecen con tratamiento médico exclusivo. La cirugía está indicada en los quistes hepáticos grandes (> 10 cm), con riesgo de ruptura y/o complicados; el abordaje laparoscópico está poco generalizado. La técnica radical (quistoperiquistectomía total) es preferible dado el menor riesgo postoperatorio de infecciones abdominales, fístulas biliares y morbilidad global. Las técnicas conservadoras son adecuadas en las áreas endémicas donde la cirugía la realizan cirujanos no especializados. La PAIR (punción-aspiración-inoculación-reaspiración) es una técnica innovadora que representa una alternativa a la cirugía. Está indicada en los pacientes inoperables y/o que rechazan la cirugía, en caso de recidiva tras la cirugía y cuando hay ausencia de respuesta al tratamiento médico. En los casos en que se demuestran quistes quiescentes o inactivos no complicados, se puede realizar una vigilancia activa sin tratamiento. (AU)

A review of the diagnosis and management of liver hydatid cyst.

Hydatidosis is a zoonosis caused by Echinococcus in the larval stage. Humans are accidental intermediary hosts where cystic lesions develop, primarily in the liver and the lungs. It is usually asymptomatic, hence it often represents an incidental finding. Symptoms result from cyst expansion and/or host inflammatory reaction. Hepatomegaly is the most common sign. Hydatidosis induces no specific changes in lab tests but immunodiagnostics are available that may complement its study, with antibody detection being the modality of choice. While ultrasound is the main diagnostic technique, tomography offers more accurate information regarding both characteristics and anatomical relations. A number of therapy options are presently available. Treatment with albendazole, whether combined or not with praziquantel, is useful for smaller, uncomplicated cysts (< 5 cm). Only 30 % of cysts disappear with medical treatment alone. Surgery is indicated for bigger liver cysts (> 10 cm), and cysts at risk of rupture and/or complicated cysts. The laparoscopic approach is scarcely widespread. The radical technique (total cystopericystectomy) is preferable because of its lower risk for postoperative abdominal infection, biliary fistula, and overall morbidity. Conservative techniques are appropriate in endemic areas where surgery is performed by nonspecialist surgeons. PAIR (puncture-aspiration-injection-reaspiration) is an innovative technique representing an alternative to surgery. It is indicated for inoperable cases and/or patients who reject surgery, for recurrence after surgery, and for lack of response to medical treatment. Active surveillance without treatment may be indicated for quiescent or inactive, uncomplicated liver cysts.

Cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the elderly. Can we do it safely? / Duodenopancreatectomía por adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas en ancianos. ¿Podemos asumirla con seguridad?

INTRODUCTION: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. METHODS: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018.The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients≥75 years (elderly). RESULTS: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23.9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P=.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9 vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P=.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P=.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC.

Oclusión e isquemia por vólvulo de ciego en corea de Huntington / Obstruction and ischaemia due to caecal volvulus in Huntington's chorea

No disponible

Aportaciones de la fluorescencia a la cirugía endocrina / Contributions of fluorescence to endocrine surgery

El uso de la fluorescencia en cirugía se ha ampliado y difundido en los últimos años, lo que ha constituido un auténtico fenómeno tecnológico ligado a la aparición de dispositivos adaptados a su utilización en los abordajes laparoscópicos y robóticos. La cirugía guiada por fluorescencia en el campo de la cirugía endocrina está igualmente en auge. Cada vez son más los artículos que describen su uso en la cirugía de las glándulas tiroides, paratiroides y suprarrenal, aunque con series aun modestas y con protocolos diversos no estandarizados. Existen actualmente diversas áreas de desarrollo de la aplicación de la fluorescencia en cirugía endocrina. Cabe destacar el uso de la fluorescencia con verde de indocianina en cirugía suprarrenal, la identificación y predicción de la perfusión paratiroidea con verde de indocianina, y la autofluorescencia de las glándulas paratiroides. El objetivo de este artículo es revisar las actuales aplicaciones de la fluorescencia en cirugía endocrina

The use of fluorescence in surgery has expanded and become widespread in recent years, which has led to a real technological phenomenon with the emergence of devices adapted for use in laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Fluorescence-guided surgery in the field of endocrine surgery is also on the rise. More and more articles describe its use in surgery of the thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal glands, although the series are still modest in size and protocols have not been standardized. There are currently several developing areas for the application of fluorescence in endocrine surgery, including the use of fluorescence with indocyanine green in adrenal gland surgery, the identification and prediction of parathyroid perfusion with indocyanine green, and autofluorescence of the parathyroid glands. The objective of this article is to review the current applications of fluorescence in endocrine surgery

Contributions of fluorescence to endocrine surgery. / Aportaciones de la fluorescencia a la cirugía endocrina.

The use of fluorescence in surgery has expanded and become widespread in recent years, which has led to a real technological phenomenon with the emergence of devices adapted for use in laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Fluorescence-guided surgery in the field of endocrine surgery is also on the rise. More and more articles describe its use in surgery of the thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal glands, although the series are still modest in size and protocols have not been standardized. There are currently several developing areas for the application of fluorescence in endocrine surgery, including the use of fluorescence with indocyanine green in adrenal gland surgery, the identification and prediction of parathyroid perfusion with indocyanine green, and autofluorescence of the parathyroid glands. The objective of this article is to review the current applications of fluorescence in endocrine surgery.

Seudoquiste pancreático intrahepático bilateral / Bilateral intrahepatic pancreatic pseudocyst

No disponible

Laparoscopic transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after biliopancreatic diversion.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography may be difficult in patients that have undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Due to the fact that prevalence of morbid obesity is increasing, and laparoscopic procedures for its treatment have increased, the incidence of biliary tract problems in patients of altered anatomy is also growing. We describe a laparoscopic technique to access the biliary tree by endoscope, through the excluded stomach.