Training in neonatal neurocritical care: A case-based interdisciplinary approach.

Interdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology (FNN) training strengthens neonatal neurocritical care (NNCC) clinical decisions. Neonatal neurological phenotypes require immediate followed by sustained neuroprotective care path choices through discharge. Serial assessments during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) rounds are supplemented by family conferences and didactic interactions. These encounters collectively contribute to optimal interventions yielding more accurate outcome predictions. Maternal-placental-fetal (MPF) triad disease pathways influence postnatal medical complications which potentially reduce effective interventions and negatively impact outcome. The science of uncertainty regarding each neonate's clinical status must consider timing and etiologies that are responsible for fetal and neonatal brain disorders. Shared clinical decisions among all stakeholders' balance "fast" (heuristic) and "slow" (analytic) thinking as more information is assessed regarding etiopathogenetic effects that impair the developmental neuroplasticity process. Two case vignettes stress the importance of FNN perspectives during NNCC that integrates this dual cognitive approach. Clinical care paths evaluations are discussed for an encephalopathic extremely preterm and full-term newborn. Recognition of cognitive errors followed by debiasing strategies can improve clinical decisions during NICU care. Re-evaluations with serial assessments of examination, imaging, placental-cord, and metabolic-genetic information improve clinical decisions that maintain accuracy for interventions and outcome predictions. Discharge planning includes shared decisions among all stakeholders when coordinating primary care, pediatric subspecialty, and early intervention participation. Prioritizing social determinants of healthcare during FNN training strengthens equitable career long NNCC clinical practice, education, and research goals. These perspectives contribute to a life course brain health capital strategy that will benefit all persons across each and successive lifespans.

Biomarkers in retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: Retinopathy of prematurity is a significant global cause of childhood blindness. This study aims to identify serum biomarkers that are associated with the development of ROP. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched (Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science) from 2003 to March 2023. Only studies investigating serum biomarker levels in preterm infants (<37 weeks gestation) were included. Results: Meta-analysis suggests that low serum IGF-1 levels have a strong association with the development of ROP [SMD (95% CI) of -.46 [-.63, -.30], p < .001]. Meta-analysis suggests that higher serum glucose levels were associated with the development of ROP [SMD (95% CI) of 1.25 [.94, 1.55], p < .001]. Meta-analysis suggests that thrombocytopenia is associated with the development of ROP [SMD (95% CI) of -.62 [-.86, -.37], p < .001]. Conclusion: Low levels of serum IGF-1, high levels of serum glucose and thrombocytopenia all appear to have the strongest association with the development of ROP out of the 63 biomarkers investigated in this review. These associations highlight their potential use as diagnostic biomarkers in ROP, though further research is needed to establish the exact relationship between these biomarkers and disease pathogenesis.

Fluidity of Equipoise in a Multi-Centred Pilot RCT: Influences on Clinician Decision-Making in Offering Trial Entry.

OBJECTIVES: The embedded Qualitative Process Evaluation (QPE) within the CSTICH- Pilot RCT explored facilitators and barriers to recruitment within the Pilot. This study reports a secondary analysis of the overarching theme of Fluidity of Equipoise and the influences on individual and community clinical equipoise around the use of Emergency Cervical Cerclage (ECC). STUDY DESIGN: RCT recruitment assumes clinical equipoise and is defined as genuine uncertainty about an intervention. The ability of trial recruiters to convey this equipoise is also key to participant recruitment and fully informed consent. This exploratory qualitative process evaluation used semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in trial recruitment. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using codebook thematic analysis. RESULTS: 23 HCPs were interviewed. Clinical equipoise around the use of ECC was variable and influenced by a multitude of factors including: (1) obstetric history; (2) gestation; (3) standard site practice, and (4) HCPs previous experiences of ECC. We have interpreted this variability as 'fluidity of equipoise'. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical equipoise around complex pregnancy related conditions was fluid and influenced by the complexities of obstetric histories and gestation at presentation. Equipoise of HCPs involved in trial recruitment should be considered carefully as it can impact the nuances of recruitment, particularly in more challenging trials such as CSTICH-2. Study-specific documents and training can be used to increase staff and patient awareness of uncertainty in the evidence base for interventions under investigation. Further research is needed around the potential consequences of equipoise fluidity.

Severe neurological impairment and immune function: altered neutrophils, monocytes, T lymphocytes, and inflammasome activation.

BACKGROUND: Infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in children with Severe Neurological Impairment (SNI). Alterations in immune cell numbers and function in children with neurodisability have been reported. We aimed to characterise neutrophil, monocyte and lymphocyte proportions and activation, at baseline and in response to stimulation with lipopolysaccharide, in children with SNI compared to healthy controls. METHODS: Whole blood samples of children with SNI and controls were incubated in the presence or absence of lipopolysaccharide (10 ng/ml). Monocyte and neutrophil function (Cluster of Differentiation (CD)11b, (TLR)-4 and CD66b expression) and lymphocytes were assessed by flow cytometry. Expression of genes involved in the inflammasome (NLR Family Pyrin Domain Containing(NLRP)-3, Apoptosis-Associated Speck-like protein (ASC) and Interleukin(IL)1ß) were assessed by PCR. RESULTS: Monocytes and CD8+ T cells were lower in children with SNI (n = 14). CD66b, was hyporesponsive and monocyte TLR4 was hyperresponsive to lipopolysaccharide in children with SNI compared to controls (n = 14). NLRP3 expression was higher at baseline and IL1ß expression was not upregulated in response to lipopolysaccharide in children with SNI in contrast to controls. CONCLUSION: We have found significant differences in immune regulation in children with SNI compared to controls which may provide a useful therapeutic target in the future. IMPACT: Children with SNI have reduced monocyte and CD8+ T cells. Neutrophils and monocytes in children with SNI show altered markers of activation in response to lipopolysaccharide. Expression of NLRP3 at the RNA level was higher at baseline in children with SNI. This study adds to the existing literature that children with neurological impairment have altered inflammatory and immune cell responses. This may provide a useful therapeutic target to reduce infection-related morbidity and mortality, and tertiary neurological injury in the future.

Diuretics use in the management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: A systematic review.

AIM: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a respiratory complication associated with neonatal prematurity, presents opportunities for pharmacological intervention due to its contributing risk factors. Despite diuretics' controversial usage in BPD treatment and varying institutional practices, this review aims to consolidate evidence from clinical trials regarding diuretic use in BPD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and CINAHL databases (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022328292). Covidence facilitated screening and data extraction, followed by analysis and formatting in Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Among 430 screened records, 13 were included for analysis. Three studies assessed spironolactone and chlorothiazide combinations, two studied spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide, while eight examined furosemide. All studies evaluated drug effects on dynamic pulmonary compliance and pulmonary resistance, serving as comparative measures in our review. CONCLUSION: Diuretics' effectiveness in treating bronchopulmonary dysplasia remains uncertain. The limited number of identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) hampers high-level evidence-based conclusions when applying the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) approach. Conducting large prospective studies of good quality could provide more definitive insights, but the rarity of outcomes and eligible patients poses challenges. Further research, primarily focusing on RCTs assessing diuretics' safety and efficacy in this population, is warranted.

Neuroprotective therapies in the NICU in preterm infants: present and future (Neonatal Neurocritical Care Series).

The survival of preterm infants has steadily improved thanks to advances in perinatal and neonatal intensive clinical care. The focus is now on finding ways to improve morbidities, especially neurological outcomes. Although antenatal steroids and magnesium for preterm infants have become routine therapies, studies have mainly demonstrated short-term benefits for antenatal steroid therapy but limited evidence for impact on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. Further advances in neuroprotective and neurorestorative therapies, improved neuromonitoring modalities to optimize recruitment in trials, and improved biomarkers to assess the response to treatment are essential. Among the most promising agents, multipotential stem cells, immunomodulation, and anti-inflammatory therapies can improve neural outcomes in preclinical studies and are the subject of considerable ongoing research. In the meantime, bundles of care protecting and nurturing the brain in the neonatal intensive care unit and beyond should be widely implemented in an effort to limit injury and promote neuroplasticity. IMPACT: With improved survival of preterm infants due to improved antenatal and neonatal care, our focus must now be to improve long-term neurological and neurodevelopmental outcomes. This review details the multifactorial pathogenesis of preterm brain injury and neuroprotective strategies in use at present, including antenatal care, seizure management and non-pharmacological NICU care. We discuss treatment strategies that are being evaluated as potential interventions to improve the neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants born prematurely.

COHESION: a core outcome set for the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity in outcomes reported in trials of interventions for the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy (NE) makes evaluating the effectiveness of treatments difficult. Developing a core outcome set for NE treatment would enable researchers to measure and report the same outcomes in future trials. This would minimise waste, ensure relevant outcomes are measured and enable evidence synthesis. Therefore, we aimed to develop a core outcome set for treating NE. METHODS: Outcomes identified from a systematic review of the literature and interviews with parents were prioritised by stakeholders (n = 99 parents/caregivers, n = 101 healthcare providers, and n = 22 researchers/ academics) in online Delphi surveys. Agreement on the outcomes was achieved at online consensus meetings attended by n = 10 parents, n = 18 healthcare providers, and n = 13 researchers/ academics. RESULTS: Seven outcomes were included in the final core outcome set: survival; brain injury on imaging; neurological status at discharge; cerebral palsy; general cognitive ability; quality of life of the child, and adverse events related to treatment. CONCLUSION: We developed a core outcome set for the treatment of NE. This will allow future trials to measure and report the same outcomes and ensure results can be compared. Future work should identify how best to measure the COS. IMPACT: We have identified seven outcomes that should be measured and reported in all studies for the treatment of neonatal encephalopathy. Previously, a core outcome set for neonatal encephalopathy treatments did not exist. This will help to reduce heterogeneity in outcomes reported in clinical trials and other studies, and help researchers identify the best treatments for neonatal encephalopathy.

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for neonatal sepsis (NESCOS).

Neonatal sepsis is a serious public health problem; however, there is substantial heterogeneity in the outcomes measured and reported in research evaluating the effectiveness of the treatments. Therefore, we aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments for neonatal sepsis. Since a systematic review of key outcomes from randomised trials of therapeutic interventions in neonatal sepsis was published recently, we will complement this with a qualitative systematic review of the key outcomes of neonatal sepsis identified by parents, other family members, parent representatives, healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers. We will interpret the outcomes of both studies using a previously established framework. Stakeholders across three different groups i.e., (1) researchers, (2) healthcare providers, and (3) patients' parents/family members and parent representatives will rate the importance of the outcomes in an online Real-Time Delphi Survey. Afterwards, consensus meetings will be held to agree on the final COS through online discussions with key stakeholders. This COS is expected to minimize outcome heterogeneity in measurements and publications, improve comparability and synthesis, and decrease research waste.

Neonatal sepsis and cardiovascular dysfunction I: mechanisms and pathophysiology.

The highest incidence of sepsis across all age groups occurs in neonates leading to substantial mortality and morbidity. Cardiovascular dysfunction frequently complicates neonatal sepsis including biventricular systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction, vasoregulatory failure, and pulmonary arterial hypertension. The haemodynamic response in neonatal sepsis can be hyperdynamic or hypodynamic and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are heterogeneous. The diagnosis and definition of both neonatal sepsis and cardiovascular dysfunction complicating neonatal sepsis are challenging and not consensus-based. Future developments in neonatal sepsis management will be facilitated by common definitions and datasets especially in neonatal cardiovascular optimisation. IMPACT: Cardiovascular dysfunction is common in neonatal sepsis but there is no consensus-based definition, making calculating the incidence and designing clinical trials challenging. Neonatal cardiovascular dysfunction is related to the inflammatory response, which can directly target myocyte function and systemic haemodynamics.

Sex differences in neonatal brain injury and inflammation.

Neonatal brain injury and associated inflammation is more common in males. There is a well-recognised difference in incidence and outcome of neonatal encephalopathy according to sex with a pronounced male disadvantage. Neurodevelopmental differences manifest from an early age in infancy with females having a lower incidence of developmental delay and learning difficulties in comparison with males and male sex has consistently been identified as a risk factor for cerebral palsy in epidemiological studies. Important neurobiological differences exist between the sexes with respect to neuronal injury which are especially pronounced in preterm neonates. There are many potential reasons for these sex differences including genetic, immunological and hormonal differences but there are limited studies of neonatal immune response. Animal models with induced neonatal hypoxia have shown various sex differences including an upregulated immune response and increased microglial activation in males. Male sex is recognized to be a risk factor for neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) during the perinatal period and this review discusses in detail the sex differences in brain injury in preterm and term neonates and some of the potential new therapies with possible sex affects.

Innate immune dysregulation in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

MIS-C is a systemic inflammation disorder with poorly characterised immunopathological mechanisms. We compared changes in the systemic immune response in children with MIS-C (n = 12, 5-13 years) to healthy controls (n = 14, 5-15 years). Analysis was done in whole blood treated with LPS. Expression of CD11b and Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) in neutrophils and monocytes were analysed by flow cytometry. Serum cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-Ira, TNF-α, TNF-ß, IFN-Υ, VEGF, EPO and GM-CSF) and mRNA levels of inflammasome molecules (NLRP3, ASC and IL-1ß) were evaluated. Subpopulations of lymphocytes (CD3+, CD19+, CD56+, CD4+, CD8+, TCR Vδ1+, TCR Vδ2+) were assessed at basal levels. Absolute counts of neutrophils and NLR were high in children with MIS-C while absolute counts of lymphocytes were low. Children with MIS-C had increased levels of IL-6, IL-10, TNF-ß and VEGF serum cytokines at the basal level, and significantly increased TNF-ß post-LPS, compared to controls. IL-1RA and EPO decreased at baseline and post-LPS in MIS-C patients compared to controls. The percentage of CD3+ cells, NK cells and Vδ1 was lower while B cells were higher in children with MIS-C than in controls. Dysregulated immune response in children with MIS-C was evident and may be amenable to immunomodulation.

The CELTIC ranges project (comprehensive and effective laboratory test reference intervals for Irish children) methodology and results for renal profile tests in plasma on the Roche modularTM system.

BACKGROUND: The CELTIC ranges project aims to deliver a comprehensive range of reference intervals for commonly ordered laboratory investigations suitable for use in an Irish population as well as enabling comparison with relevant international studies. In this paper, we describe our methodology used throughout the entire project and present paediatric reference intervals for renal profile tests in plasma (sodium, potassium, urea and creatinine). METHODS: 1023 children aged up to 17 years were recruited from our hospital's general practitioner paediatric phlebotomy clinic. Clinical chemistry analyses were performed on the Roche modular system and statistical analysis was completed in line with CLSI guideline EP28-A3c. RESULTS: The plasma reference interval for sodium for ages 0.45-16.99 years was 137-143 mmol/L in 1000 subjects (combined genders). For plasma potassium, the corresponding ranges between 1 and 16.99 years (combined genders) were 3.6-4.8 mmol/L. Apart from neonates and in keeping with other studies, age partitioning for electrolytes was not required. Data for plasma creatinine (enzymatic methodology) and urea is also presented and, as anticipated, required partitioning for both age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Our renal profile findings are broadly consistent with those of international studies, for example, CALIPER, HAPPI, NORDIC, PRINCE and KiGGs. Moreover, the CELTIC ranges study is also based on over 1000 subjects whose samples were analysed on the widely used Roche modular analytics system. We also expect the findings will improve knowledge of children's metabolic health in Ireland.

Healthcare interventions for sex workers: protocol for a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Sex workers, who provide sexual or erotic acts in exchange for payment, often experience multiple disadvantages, including mental ill health and substance misuse. Mainstream healthcare services are generally not configured to facilitate engagement with sex workers and therefore, services are needed that are accessible to this population. The aim of this scoping review is to understand the evidence base for approaches, services and interventions that are aimed at addressing sex workers' health needs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nine databases, CINAHL, Embase, EThOS, Google Scholar, Health Management Information Consortium, MEDLINE, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, PsycINFO and Web of Science (Core Collection), will be searched, with results limited to English language publications and those published from 2003 onwards. De-duplication, study selection and data extraction will be conducted using Covidence software. Included studies will describe or evaluate approaches, services or interventions that address the health needs of sex workers who offer services that involve physical contact with a client. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical review is needed. The final report will be shared with Birmingham City Council as part of ongoing work and will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publication. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/N7WSX).

Multi-Round versus Real-Time Delphi survey approach for achieving consensus in the COHESION core outcome set: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Delphi surveys are commonly used to prioritise critical outcomes in core outcome set (COS) development. This trial aims to compare a three-round (Multi-Round) Delphi (MRD) with a Real-Time Delphi (RTD) in the prioritisation of outcomes for inclusion in a COS for neonatal encephalopathy treatments and explore whether 'feedback', 'iteration', and 'initial condition' effects may occur in the two survey methods. METHODS: We recruited 269 participants (parents/caregivers, healthcare providers and researchers/academics) of which 222 were randomised to either the MRD or the RTD. We investigated the outcomes prioritised in each survey and the 'feedback', 'iteration', and 'initial condition' effects to identify differences between the two survey methods. RESULTS: In the RTD, n = 92 participants (83%) fully completed the survey. In the MRD, n = 60 participants (54%) completed all three rounds. Of the 92 outcomes presented, 26 (28%) were prioritised differently between the RTD and MRD. Significantly fewer participants amended their scores when shown stakeholder responses in the RTD compared to the MRD ('feedback effect'). The 'iteration effect' analysis found most experts appeared satisfied with their initial ratings in the RTD and did not amend their scores following stakeholder response feedback. Where they did amend their scores, ratings were amended substantially, suggesting greater convergence. Variance in scores reduced with subsequent rounds of the MRD ('iteration effect'). Whilst most participants did not change their initial scores in the RTD, of those that did, later recruits tended to align their final score more closely to the group mean final score than earlier recruits (an 'initial condition' effect). CONCLUSION: The feedback effect differed between the two Delphi methods but the magnitude of this difference was small and likely due to the large number of observations rather than because of a meaningfully large difference. It did not appear to be advantageous to require participants to engage in three rounds of a survey due to the low change in scores. Larger drop-out through successive rounds in the MRD, together with a lesser convergence of scores and longer time to completion, indicate considerable benefits of the RTD approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04471103. Registered on 14 July 2020.