Elevated cardiovascular risk and acute events in hospitalized colon cancer survivors: A decade-apart study of two nationwide cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Over the years, strides in colon cancer detection and treatment have boosted survival rates; yet, post-colon cancer survival entails cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks. Research on CVD risks and acute cardiovascular events in colorectal cancer survivors has been limited. AIM: To compare the CVD risk and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in current colon cancer survivors compared to a decade ago. METHODS: We analyzed 2007 and 2017 hospitalization data from the National Inpatient Sample, studying two colon cancer survivor groups for CVD risk factors, mortality rates, and major adverse events like pulmonary embolism, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, and stroke, adjusting for confounders via multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Of total colon cancer survivors hospitalized in 2007 (n = 177542) and 2017 (n = 178325), the 2017 cohort often consisted of younger (76 vs 77 years), male, African-American, and Hispanic patients admitted non-electively vs the 2007 cohort. Furthermore, the 2017 cohort had higher rates of smoking, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, coagulopathy, liver disease, weight loss, and renal failure. Patients in the 2017 cohort also had higher rates of cardiovascular comorbidities, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, and at least one traditional CVD (P < 0.001) vs the 2007 cohort. On adjusted multivariable analysis, the 2017 cohort had a significantly higher risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR: 1.47, 95%CI: 1.37-1.48), arrhythmia (OR: 1.41, 95%CI: 1.38-1.43), atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.58-1.64), cardiac arrest including ventricular tachyarrhythmia (OR: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.46-1.82), and stroke (OR: 1.28, 95%CI: 1.22-1.34) with comparable all-cause mortality and fewer routine discharges (48.4% vs 55.0%) (P < 0.001) vs the 2007 cohort. CONCLUSION: Colon cancer survivors hospitalized 10 years apart in the United States showed an increased CVD risk with an increased risk of acute cardiovascular events (stroke 28%, PE 47%, arrhythmia 41%, and cardiac arrest 63%). It is vital to regularly screen colon cancer survivors with concomitant CVD risk factors to curtail long-term cardiovascular complications.

Examining the Role of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices in Preventing Postoperative Stroke in Patients with a History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been shown to lower the risk of stroke during the procedure. However, their long-term and clinical effects on neuro-cognition are unknown. Therefore, we hypothesized the benefit of CEPD in TAVR patients with a prior history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). National Inpatient Sample (2019) and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes were used to identify patients undergoing TAVR with prior stroke or TIA. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics and comorbidities. Primary outcome measures were postoperative stroke and all-cause mortality. Length of stay and hospital cost were secondary outcomes. Of 8450 unmatched TAVR patients with prior stroke or TIA in 2019, 1095 (13%) utilized CEPD. After propensity matching previous myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass grafting, and drug abuse were higher in the TAVR-only cohort. Postoperative stroke rate (1.4% vs 2.2%; P = 0.081) and odds [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-2.17; P = 0.341] were lower in the CEPD group. There was no difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups (0.9% vs 1.0%). Length of stay (3 vs 2 days, P <0.001) and hospital expenditure ($172,711 vs $162,284; P = 0.002) were higher for the TAVR-only cohort. CEPD in TAVR patients with prior stroke or TIA did not show statistically significant postoperative stroke benefits. However, further larger-scale prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term neurocognitive benefits of CEPD in these patients. As the use of TAVR continues to expand, optimizing peri-procedural strategies such as the use of CEPD remains a critical area of research to improve patient outcomes.

Key hypertension breakthroughs and emerging trends from the AHA's scientific sessions.

We aim to summarize selected late-breaking science on hypertension management strategies and disease presented at the 2023 American Heart Association (AHA) conference. The trials discussed below encompass stricter goals of blood pressure management and were expanded into different population groups from different countries with varied socioeconomic backgrounds and settings, collectively advancing our understanding of hypertension treatment and its impact on public health. We summarized the china rural health care project (CRHCP), a four-year study involving over 34,000 participants in rural China, emphasizing the potential of stricter blood pressure goals in lowering the incidence of all-cause dementia and cognitive impairment. Next, we explore the US-based CARDIA-SSBP study, which highlights the impact of dietary sodium on systolic blood pressure in middle-aged individuals. Through a randomized-order cross-over design, the study provides compelling evidence supporting the effectiveness of sodium reduction as a non-pharmacological approach to blood pressure control. The UK-based POP-HT trial offers critical insights into postpartum women with a history of hypertensive pregnancy. The trial emphasizes the benefits of self-monitoring and physician-optimized antihypertensive titration, showcasing significant blood pressure reductions in the intervention group. Furthermore, the KARDIA-1 study introduces us to Zilebesiran, an innovative RNA interference drug. This phase 2 study highlights its potential for achieving sustained blood pressure reductions and its favorable safety profile, marking a significant step forward in hypertension treatment. Lastly, we expand the practical application of the previously conducted landmark SPRINT trial, which showed cardiovascular benefit with intensive SBP control to less than 120 mm Hg in high-risk non-diabetic patients with hypertension compared with routine BP control to <140 mm Hg. The ESPRIT trial and the IMPACTS trial build upon the SPRINT trial, demonstrating the effects of intensive blood pressure lowering in Asian hypertensive patients and in 36 health care clinics in medically underserved states in the US: Louisiana and Mississippi. The IMPACTS trial and the "Hypertension Treatment in Nigeria Program" demonstrate the effectiveness of implementing comprehensive blood pressure control strategies in real-world settings. These studies highlight the feasibility and scalability of such interventions, especially in low-resource environments, and their potential to significantly improve public health outcomes.

Association of Cannabis Use Disorder with Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Older Non-Tobacco Users: A Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use disorder (TUD) adversely impacts older patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, CVD risk in chronic habitual cannabis users without the confounding impact of TUD hasn't been explored. We aimed to determine the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in older non-tobacco smokers with established CVD risk with vs. without cannabis use disorder (CUD). METHODS: We queried the 2019 National Inpatient Sample for hospitalized non-tobacco smokers with established traditional CVD risk factors aged ≥65 years. Relevant ICD-10 codes were used to identify patients with vs. without CUD. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the odds of MACCE in CUD cohorts compared to non-CUD cohorts. RESULTS: Prevalence of CUD in the sample was 0.3% (28,535/10,708,815, median age 69), predominantly male, black, and non-electively admitted from urban teaching hospitals. Of the older patients with CVD risk with CUD, 13.9% reported MACCE. The CUD cohort reported higher odds of MACCE (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.29, p < 0.001) compared to the non-CUD cohort. Comorbidities such as hypertension (OR 1.9) and hyperlipidemia (OR 1.3) predicted a higher risk of MACCE in the CUD cohort. The CUD cohort also had higher unadjusted rates of acute myocardial infarction (7.6% vs. 6%) and stroke (5.2% vs. 4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Among older non tobacco smokers with known CVD risk, chronic cannabis use had a 20% higher likelihood of MACCE compared to those who did not use cannabis.

Association of Prediabetes and Recurrent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Population-Based Analysis of Hospitalizations and Outcomes.

Prediabetes is a risk factor for ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, yet, its impact on recurrent stroke in AF patients remains understudied. Using the 2018 National Inpatient Sample, we investigated the link between Prediabetes and recurrent stroke in AF patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Among 18,905 non-diabetic AF patients, 480 (2.5%) had prediabetes. The prediabetic group, with a median age of 78, exhibited a two-fold higher risk of recurrent stroke compared to the non-prediabetic cohort (median age 82), as evidenced by both unadjusted (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.72-2.66) and adjusted (adjusted for socio-demographics/comorbidities, OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.65-2.64, p < 0.001). The prediabetes cohort, comprising more male and Black patients, demonstrated associations with higher Medicaid enrollment, admissions from certain regions, and higher rates of hyperlipidemia, smoking, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (all p < 0.05). Despite higher rates of home health care and increased hospital costs in the prediabetes group, the adjusted odds of all-cause mortality were not statistically significant (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-1.56, p = 0.260). The findings of this study suggest that clinicians should be vigilant in managing prediabetes in AF patients, and strategies to prevent recurrent stroke in this high-risk population should be considered.

Does Statin Use in Frail Patients Provide Survival Benefits? Insights From a Meta-Analysis.

Frailty is a complex syndrome that increases with age and predisposes older adults to adverse outcomes, including mortality. Statins are proven to lower the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but there is limited data on their survival benefit in frail older people. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether statins can lower mortality in frail persons. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS was conducted until September 2022 to identify studies reporting mortality outcomes with statin therapy in adults aged 75 with a validated frailty assessment. The pooled odds ratio for all-cause mortality was calculated using a random effects model. Leave-one-out method was used for sensitivity analysis. Of 5 studies (2013-2022) included (Total = 14,324, 3 prospective and 2 retrospectives, Males: 49%, Mean follow-up duration: 4.7 years), 41.6% (5971/14,324) were frail. 52.7% of patients were on a moderate-dose/no-statin, while 47.2% took a high-dose statin. Nonstatin users were older (83.35 vs 81.5) than users. Frail patients often had diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, a history of Stroke/MI, and dementia. High-dose atorvastatin was the most used statin. Pooled analysis revealed that statins lower all-cause mortality in elderly adults, however, the association was not significant (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.18; P = 0.17). The meta-analysis demonstrated that using statins to reduce mortality in frail patients does not appear justifiable. Further prospective studies are needed to guide statin use among frail older adults for survival benefits.

Concurrent Cardio-Cerebral Infarctions in COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Published Case Reports/Series.

Twelve CCI patients were studied with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection. The majority of these patients were males (83.3%) with a median age of 55 years from three geographical locations, constituting the Middle East (7), Spain (3), and the USA (1). In 6 patients, IgG/IgM was positive for COVID-19, 4 with high pretest probability and 2 with positive RT-PCR. Type 2 DM, hyperlipidemia, and smoking were the primary risk factors. Right-sided neurological impairments and verbal impairment were the most common symptoms. Our analysis found 8 (66%) synchronous occurrences. In 58.3% of cases, neuroimaging showed left Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) infarct and 33.3% right. Carotid artery thrombosis (16.6%), tandem occlusion (8.3%), and carotid stenosis (1%) were also reported in imaging. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and anticoagulants were conservative therapies (10). Two AMI patients had aspiration thrombectomy, while three AIS patients had intravenous thrombolysis/tissue plasminogen activator (IVT-tPA), 2 had mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and 1 had decompressive craniotomy. Five had COVID-19-positive chest X-rays, whereas 4 were normal. four of 8 STEMI and 3 NSTEMI/UA patients complained chest pain. LV, ICA, and pulmonary embolism were further complications (2). Upon discharge, 7 patients (70%) had residual deficits while 1 patient unfortunately died.

Takotsubo Syndrome in Orthotopic Liver Transplant: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Published Studies and Case Reports.

BACKGROUND: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) has been reported in solid-organ transplant recipients. However, the pooled data regarding TTS after liver transplant remain limited. METHODS: A systematic review was performed through February 2022 using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to review case reports/series and original studies on liver transplant-associated TTS. Descriptive analysis was performed for case reports and pooled analysis for the prevalence using random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 56 case reports were included from 30 articles (51.8 % male; mean age, 53 years; India 56%, US 27%, and Europe 8.93%) and 10 original studies (US 88.65%, India 10.92%) revealing liver transplant-associated TTS. The pooled prevalence of TTS was 1.1% (95% Cl, 0.6%-1.7%) of all liver transplants with comparable rates in studies from India and the US (P = .92). Indications for liver transplant included end-stage liver disease due to alcohol-related cirrhosis (25%), hepatitis C virus infection (17.9%), hepatocellular carcinoma (10.7%), and non-alcohol-related steatohepatitis (8.9%); the average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 24.75. TTS commonly presented as hypotension (30%), dyspnea (14%), and oliguria, occurring mostly post-transplant (82%), whereas 14% were intraoperative. Common electrocardiogram findings were ST changes, ventricular tachycardia, and atrial fibrillation. Common echocardiogram findings showed left ventricular apical ballooning in 46.5% of cases and reduced ejection fraction < 20% in 41.9% of cases. Common complications were cardiogenic shock (32.1 %), acute kidney injury (12.5%), arrhythmia, stroke, cardiac arrest, and hepatic artery thrombosis. Mechanical circulatory support was required in 30.3%. Recurrence was reported in 15, and mortality in 30.4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Takotsubo syndrome prevalence after liver transplant is significantly higher than TTS prevalence in general US hospitalizations with potentially worse outcomes. Prospective registries reporting TTS in liver transplant recipients are warranted.