Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 184(2): 80-5, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18259699

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Measurement of the radiation dose of different radiotherapy techniques with a phantom at the position of the uterus of a pregnant patient with and without a special radiation shielding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A special radiation shielding for the radiation therapy of a pregnant patient was constructed in the shape of a tunnel over the abdomen from 1 cm thick lead to reduce scatter radiation to the uterus and the fetus therein. The reduction of the scatter radiation to the lower abdomen was measured for three typical cases (cerebrum with lateral opposed fields, 6-MV photons; tangential fields for mamma irradiation, 6 MV; and anteroposterior-posteroanterior [AP-PA] opposed fields of 15 MV for treatment of the mediastinum) at an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom with thermoluminescence dosimeters in different depths and with an ionization chamber positioned in an RW3 solid water phantom. In the case of lateral opposed fields, a movable lead wall was additionally positioned next to the accelerator's head to reduce the scatter radiation from this source. RESULTS: Depending on the geometry of the radiation fields and on the photon energy, a reduction of the dose to the lower abdomen averaged over the depths of 6, 9, and 12 cm from 16% (15 MV, mediastinum case) to 51% (6 MV, cerebrum with additional lead wall) was achieved. The absolute scattered dose with shielding in place for a 2-Gy fraction dose results to 3.85 mGy and 0.27 mGy, respectively. CONCLUSION: National and international recommendations on the radiation dose to a fetus of a pregnant patient state limits of 200 mSv (DGMP report no. 7) and 100 mGy (ICRP 84), below which an abortion should not be considered and above which an indication for termination of the pregnancy could be given, respectively. The dose to the fetus can be kept below these limits with the shielding described in this work. Therefore, a radiation therapy of a pregnant patient is possible when these special precautions to reduce the scatter radiation to the fetus are met.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Fetales/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/instrumentación , Radiometría , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica/métodos
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 182(7): 369-75, 2006 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16826354

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is composed of modern CT and PET technology in one machine enabling examinations of patients in one session in the same position. Its value for modern radiation treatment planning is under investigation. METHODS: In 53 patients with head-and-neck (n = 11), non-small cell lung (n = 16), prostate (n = 14) and other cancers (n = 12), a PET/CT investigation was performed. During the diagnostic examination process an integrated scan under radiation treatment-planning conditions was included. Interpretation and delineation of macroscopic tumor were done in an interdisciplinary approach. Treatment changes occurred after critical interpretation of the PET/CT findings by the responsible radiotherapist. Analysis is descriptive with regard to changes in treatment intention, mode, radiation volumes and doses. RESULTS: Examinations were well tolerated. CT datasets in treatment position could be used for planning. Delineation of macroscopic tumor led to changes of the planning target volume after PET/CT 15 times, total dose was modified twelve times. PET/CT examinations led to changes of the general treatment mode in 19 cases. Using the separate CT and PET datasets, fusion in the planning software was easily performed in all patients due to the use of the same positioning and immobilization devices in PET/CT. CONCLUSION: Despite the low number of patients and an expected bias of selection, the first results are encouraging to perform more extended and detailed trials of this technology in radiotherapy planning. Whether PET/CT is superior to PET alone is part of ongoing investigations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/radioterapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Sesgo de Selección , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA