New standardized cystatin C and creatinine GFR equations in children validated with inulin clearance.

BACKGROUND: This study compares glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations in children based on standardized cystatin C (CYSC) and creatinine (CREA) and their combinations with renal clearance of inulin (C-inulin). METHODS: A total of 220 children with different renal disorders were referred for C-inulin (median 84 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Bias, precision (interquartile range, IQR), and accuracy (percentage of estimates ±30 % of C-inulin; P30) were evaluated for two cystatin C equations, CAPACYSC and BergCYSC, for creatinine equations, SchwartzCREA and GaoCREA, the arithmetic mean of CAPACYSC and SchwartzCREA (MEANCAPA+Schwartz), BergCYSC and SchwartzCREA (MEANBERG+SCHWARTZ) and the composite equation ChehadeCYSC+CREA. RESULTS: Overall results of CAPACYSC, BergCYSC, SchwartzCREA, GaoCREA, MEANCAPA+Schwartz, MEANBERG+SCHWARTZ and ChehadeCYSC+CREA were: median bias -7.6/-4.9/-3.7/-2.3/-4.6/-4.0/-10.1 %, IQR 20.0/19.9/21.7/22.4/21.0/20.9/23.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and P30 86/86/80/83/89/91/83 %. The cystatin C equations, MEANCAPA+Schwartz and MEANBERG+SCHWARTZ had a more stable performance across subgroups compared with SchwartzCREA, GaoCREA and ChehadeCYSC+CREA. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C was the preferred filtration marker for GFR estimation in children, while the benefit of combining cystatin C and creatinine deserves further investigations.

Comparison of plasma clearance of iohexol and urinary clearance of inulin for measurement of GFR in children.

BACKGROUND: Very few studies have been published that compare plasma clearance of iohexol (Cio) with renal clearance of inulin (Cin). STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 60 children aged 11.6 ± 4.5 years with different kidney disorders were investigated. INDEX TEST: Plasma Cio calculated from the slope and a single point. REFERENCE TEST: Renal Cin with continuous infusion during water diuresis. Results were compared with the correlation coefficients, bias and precision, accuracy percentage, root mean square error, and intraclass correlation. OTHER MEASUREMENTS: Measured creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on serum creatinine level and height. RESULTS: Mean Cin was 70.7 ± 41.3 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m². Mean differences between Cio and Cin were 2.65 and 2.00 mL/min/1.73 m² for the slope and single-point methods, respectively. Precision was ±16 mL/min/1.73 m² and intraclass correlation was 0.92 in both methods. Proportions of Cio within 30% of Cin were 83.3% and 86.7% for the slope and single-point methods, respectively. LIMITATIONS: A limited number of patients; no adults were studied. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma Cio shows good agreement with renal Cin.