First-Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Three-Armed Real-World Comparison.

Background and Aim: There are several existing systemic 1st- line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atez/Bev), sorafenib and lenvatinib. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of these three 1st-line systemic treatments in a real-world setting for HCC, focusing on specific patient subgroups analysis. Methods: A total of 177 patients with advanced HCC treated with Atez/Bev (n = 38), lenvatinib (n = 21) or sorafenib (n = 118) as 1st line systemic therapy were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Primary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and 15-month overall survival (15-mo OS). Subgroups regarding liver function, etiology, previous therapy and toxicity were analyzed. Results: Atez/Bev demonstrated significantly longer median 15-month OS with 15.03 months compared to sorafenib with 9.43 months (p = 0.04) and lenvatinib with 8.93 months (p = 0.05). Similarly, it had highest ORR of 31.6% and longest median PFS with 7.97 months, independent of etiology. However, significantly superiority was observed only compared to sorafenib (ORR: 4.2% (p < 0.001); PFS: 4.57 months (p = 0.03)), but not comparing to lenvatinib (ORR: 28.6% (p = 0.87); PFS: 3.77 months (p = 0.10)). Atez/Bev also resulted in the longest PFS in patients with Child-Pugh A and ALBI 1 score and interestingly in those previously treated with SIRT. Contrary, sorafenib was non inferior in patients with impaired liver function. Conclusion: Atez/Bev achieved longest median PFS and 15-mo OS independent of etiology and particularly in patients with stable liver function or prior SIRT treatment. Regarding therapy response lenvatinib was non-inferior to Atez/Bev. Finally, sorafenib seemed to perform best for patients with deteriorated liver function.

A fatal course of COVID-19 during the Omicron surge: can you estimate your patients' SARS-CoV-2 immune status?

We present a case of an ultimately fatal course of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease-19) in an 81-year-old female patient during the Omicron surge. The patient did not represent the typical patient at risk for severe COVID-19 with significant causes of immunodeficiency. However, she had been skeptical about the vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and had refused it. Moreover, there had been no previous COVID-19 episodes. Our case report illustrates that with regard to SARS-CoV-2, immunologically naive patients are still at risk for severe and/or even fatal courses of COVID-19. We call to implement both, recommendations for SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations as well as for antiviral treatment.

Impaired immunogenicity after vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: does tumor entity matter?

Background: SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity in patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GI cancer) following second and third vaccination was analyzed. Methods: A total of 125 patients under active anticancer therapy or in follow-up care were included in this prospective study. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike and surrogate neutralization antibodies (NABs) was measured. Results: Four weeks after second vaccination, adequate titers of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) [≥282.0 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL] were found in 62.2% of patients under treatment versus 96.3% of patients in follow-up care (P<0.01). Sufficient titers of SARS-CoV-2 surrogate NAB (≥85.0%) were found in 32.7% of patients under treatment versus 70.6% in follow-up care (P<0.01). Titers of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG were especially low in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). For SARS-CoV-2 surrogate NAB, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and with pancreaticobiliary cancer showed the lowest titers (P<0.01). SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG and SARS-CoV-2 surrogate NAB were associated with a correlation coefficient of 0.93. Reaching a titer of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG ≥482.0 BAU/mL, protective levels of SARS-CoV-2 surrogate NAB (≥85.0%) could be assumed. Following booster vaccination, all patients reached effective antibody titers. Conclusions: Patients with active GI cancer showed impaired immunogenicity after second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination which was overcome by booster vaccination. Our findings were tumor-related and pronounced in patients with CRC and HCC. Waning immunity over time and antibody escape phenomena by variant of concern Omicron must be considered in these especially vulnerable patients.

Enabling CAR T-cell therapies for HIV-positive lymphoma patients - A call for action.

People living with HIV have a higher risk of developing lymphoma. Outcomes for people living with HIV with relapsed or refractory (r/r) lymphoma remain poor. For this group of patients, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy represents a new successful treatment strategy. However, people living with HIV were not included in pivotal trials, so data are limited to case reports. We searched the PubMed and Ovid technologies databases for literature until 1 November 2022 using the terms 'HIV and CAR-T', 'HIV and lymphoma' and 'HIV and CAR-T and lymphoma'. Six cases with sufficient information were included in the review. The mean CD4+ T-cell count before CAR T-cell therapy was 221 cells/µL (range 52-629). The viral load was below the limit of detection in four patients. All patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and were treated with gamma-retroviral-based axicabtagene ciloleucel. Four patients developed cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) grade 2 or less or immune effector-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANs) grade 3-4. Four of six patients responded to CAR T-cell therapy (three complete remissions, one partial remission). In summary, there are no clinical reasons to restrict the use of CAR T-cell therapy in people living with HIV with r/r DLBCL. According to the current data, CAR T-cell therapy was safe and effective. In people who meet the standard criteria for CAR T-cell therapy, this treatment approach could significantly improve the unmet need for more effective treatment options for people living with HIV with r/r lymphoma.

Clinical characteristics of monkeypox virus infections among men with and without HIV: A large outbreak cohort in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Since May 2022, increasing numbers of monkeypox virus (MPXV) infections have been reported from across Europe and North America. Studies, mainly from Africa, have suggested a higher risk for severe MPXV cases in people living with HIV. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all confirmed MPXV infections observed in the participating centres since 19 May 2022. We conducted a chart review to evaluate clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and coinfections, including HIV, viral hepatitis, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). RESULTS: By 30 June 2022, a total of 546 MPXV infections were reported from 42 German centres. All patients were men who have sex with men (MSM), of whom 256 (46.9%) were living with HIV, mostly with a preserved immune system and with viral suppression. In total, 232 (42.5%) MSM were also taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and 58 (10.6%) MSM had no known HIV infection or PrEP use. The median age was 39 years (range 20-67), and comorbidities were rare. However, 52.4% and 29.4% of all patients had been diagnosed with at least one STI within the last 6 months or within the last 4 weeks, respectively. The most frequent localizations of MPXV infection were genital (49.9%) and anal (47.9%), whereas fever (53.2%) and lymphadenopathy (42.6%) were the most frequent general symptoms. The hospitalization rate was low (4.0%), and no fatal course was observed. The clinical picture showed no apparent differences between MSM with or without HIV. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary cohort analysis from a current large outbreak among MSM in Germany, the clinical picture of MPXV infection did not differ between MSM with and without HIV infection. Severe courses were rare and hospitalization rates were low. However, most patients were relatively healthy, and only a few people living with HIV were viremic or severely immunosuppressed.