Increased Acid Exposure on Pretransplant Impedance-pH Testing Is Associated With Chronic Rejection After Lung Transplantation.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between pretransplant measures of reflux and longer-term outcomes of chronic allograft rejection in lung transplant recipients. BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a primary measure of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation, and a manifestation of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Acid reflux has been associated with early allograft injury through a proposed mechanism of aspiration and activation of the inflammatory cascade, but its association with chronic rejection is unclear. STUDY: This was a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients undergoing impedance-pH testing off proton pump inhibitor from 2007 to 2016. Patients with pretransplant antireflux surgery were excluded. Time-to-event analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model was applied to assess the relationship between pretransplant reflux measures and the development of BOS, defined histologically and clinically. A secondary analysis was completed using CLAD as the outcome variable. RESULTS: Fifty-one subjects (59% men, mean age: 56, mean follow-up: 2.2 y) met inclusion criteria for the study. The BOS endpoint was reached in 13 subjects (28%). In time-to-event analyses, BOS was associated with increased acid exposure, defined as >4.2% of time with pH<4 [hazard ratio (HR): 4.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-13.4; P=0.01], and elevated DeMeester score >14.7 (HR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.02-9.26; P=0.04), with confirmation from Kaplan-Meier analyses. The secondary analysis demonstrated a similar association between increased acid exposure and CLAD (HR: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.09-9.88; P=0.03), which persisted on multivariate models. CONCLUSION: Increased acid exposure on pretransplant reflux testing was associated with the development of BOS and CLAD, both measures of chronic allograft rejection, after lung transplantation, and may provide clinically relevant information to improve lung allograft survival through aggressive reflux management.

Clinical Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in the Presence of Donor-Specific Antibodies.

Rationale: There is significant variation in approach to pre-lung transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA), with some centers declining to cross any DSA. We implemented a protocol for transplantation for candidates with pretransplant DSA so long as a prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative, regardless of number, specificity, class, or mean fluorescence intensity.Objectives: To compare post-transplant outcomes including overall survival, chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival, antibody-mediated rejection, and acute cellular rejection in lung transplant recipients where pretransplant DSA was and was not present.Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. For recipients with pretransplant DSA, if the prospective complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch was negative, the donor offer was accepted and plasmapheresis was performed within 24 hours of transplantation and continued until retrospective crossmatch results returned. Immunosuppression and post-transplant management were not otherwise modified.Results: Of the 203 included recipients, 18 (8.9%) had pretransplant DSA. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity was 4,000 (interquartile range, 2,975-5,625; total range, 2,100-17,000). The median number of DSA present per patient was one (interquartile range, 1-2). The presence of pretransplant DSA was not associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-3.4) or decreased chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6-2.1). Recipients with pretransplant DSA were more likely to require prolonged mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio, 7.0; 95% CI, 2.3-21.6) and to have antibody-mediated rejection requiring treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 7.5; 95% CI, 1.0-55.8).Conclusions: A protocol of accepting donor offers for lung transplant candidates with preformed, complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch-negative DSA is associated with increased need for prolonged mechanical ventilation and antibody-mediated rejection without affecting short-term overall or chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival.

Comparison of extracorporeal photopheresis and alemtuzumab for the treatment of chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Survival after lung transplantation is limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Immunomodulatory therapies such as extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) and alemtuzumab (AL) have been described for refractory CLAD, but comparative outcomes are not well defined. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed spirometric values and clinical outcomes after therapy with ECP, AL, or no treatment (NT) in patients with CLAD who underwent transplant between January 2005 and December 2014. We used inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA) to adjust for potential confounders affecting treatment choice. RESULTS: Of 267 patients, 31 received immunomodulatory therapies for CLAD, and 78 received NT. The slope of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) decline significantly improved after treatment with AL and with ECP compared with pre-treatment FEV1 slope; however, there was no significant change in slope of forced vital capacity (FVC). Comparison with NT was limited because of clinical differences in treatment groups. After IPWRA, we found no significant difference in mean difference of FEV1 slope (ml/month) when comparing treatment with NT, suggesting stabilization of lung function in the treatment group. We found no difference between the 2 immunomodulatory therapies 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment (-49.9 [95% CI -581.8, +482.0], p = 0.85; +27.7 [95% CI -167.6, +223.0], p = 0.78; -9.6 [95% CI -167.5, +148.2], p = 0.91). We found no difference in mean FVC slope or differences between ECP and AL in infection rates or survival after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Immunomodulatory therapy for CLAD with ECP or AL was associated with a significant change in FEV1 slope post-treatment compared with pre-treatment slope, with minimal effect on FVC. There was no difference between the 2 therapies in their effect on pulmonary function.

The Presence of Pretransplant HLA Antibodies Does Not Impact the Development of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction or CLAD-Related Death.

BACKGROUND: Development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after lung transplantation is associated with antibody mediated rejection, acute cellular rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; however, the significance of circulating antibodies before transplant remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including recipients of primary lung transplants between 2008 and 2012. We assessed the impact of circulating HLA and noncytotoxic DSA detected before transplant on development of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) or CLAD-related death. RESULTS: 30% of subjects had circulating class I antibodies alone, 4% Class II, and 14.4% class I and class II at mean fluorescent intensity greater than 1000. Nine percent of the subjects had DSA class I, 9% class II, and 2.4% both DSA classes 1 and 2. Neither the presence of circulating antibodies (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.54) nor the presence of DSA (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-3.18) before transplant at mean fluorescent intensity greater than 1000 was associated with the development of CLAD or CLAD-related death. CONCLUSIONS: Although in previous studies we have shown an increased incidence of antibody-mediated rejection in patients with pretransplant DSA, neither the presence of HLA antibodies nor DSA translated to an increased risk of allograft dysfunction or death if prospective crossmatch testing was negative. Prospective studies are needed to define the impact of pretransplant sensitization on lung transplant recipients.

Association of Donor and Recipient Telomere Length with Clinical Outcomes following Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with short telomere syndromes and pulmonary fibrosis have increased complications after lung transplant. However, the more general impact of donor and recipient telomere length in lung transplant has not been well characterized. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study of patients who received lung transplant at a single center between January 1st 2012 and January 31st 2015. Relative donor lymphocyte telomere length was measured and classified into long (third tertile) and short (other tertiles). Relative recipient lung telomere length was measured and classified into short (first tertile) and long (other tertiles). Outcome data included survival, need for modification of immunosuppression, liver or kidney injury, cytomegalovirus reactivation, and acute rejection. RESULTS: Recipient lung tissue telomere lengths were measured for 54 of the 79 patients (68.3%) who underwent transplant during the study period. Donor lymphocyte telomeres were measured for 45 (83.3%) of these recipients. Neither long donor telomere length (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-2.85, p = 0.50) nor short recipient telomere length (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.50-2.05, p = 0.96) were associated with adjusted survival following lung transplant. Recipients with short telomeres were less likely to have acute cellular rejection (23.5% vs. 58.8%, p = 0.02) but were not more likely to have other organ dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort, neither long donor lymphocyte telomeres nor short recipient lung tissue telomeres were associated with adjusted survival after lung transplantation. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Smoking and hepatocellular carcinoma mortality.

The association between cigarette smoking and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is ambiguous. We analyzed the association between smoking and mortality in HCC patients seen at our center. We collected data retrospectively on patients diagnosed with HCC between 2002 and 2009. We estimated the association of smoking history with demographic, clinical and treatment factors. We then modeled these factors as predictors of mortality. Among smokers, we analyzed the effects of pack-year history and cessation times on survival. Two hundred and twenty-three out of 444 patients with HCC had a history of smoking. Smokers were more likely to be younger at diagnosis, to have α fetoprotein (AFP) values less than the median, and to have had surgery (p=0.04) compared to non-smokers. In a Cox model, younger age, lower AFP and Child's Class were all independently predictive of survival, but smoking was not. Smokers with over 20 pack-years did not have worse survival than lighter smokers, and cessation times also did not affect survival after controlling for age. We found a significant interaction between smoking and drinking. In our data, smoking was not independently associated with HCC survival in a multivariable model. Smoking was associated with favorable prognostic features which likely outweighed any independent effect of smoking.