Vaginal screening for group B streptococcus using PCR in pregnant women with unknown colonization status: Impact on newborn monitoring for early-onset sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Early-onset neonatal sepsis represents a diagnostic challenge, as it is a cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Guidelines for the prevention of group B streptococcus (GBS) infection recommend that all pregnant women must be screened for GBS carriage at the end of pregnancy, with intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis being provided for GBS carriers. If vaginal culture is not available, GBS polymerase chain reaction (GBS-PCR) is an alternative option for this type of screening. In our unit, GBS-PCR is performed when pregnant women present to the delivery room with ongoing labor and with no results of culture GBS screening available. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the results of GBS-PCR on monitoring modifications in newborns of mothers with unknown GBS status. The secondary objectives were to confirm the feasibility of a GBS-PCR-based screening method in everyday practice and to evaluate the impact of GBS-PCR results on the modification of intrapartum antibiotic therapy in pregnant women. METHOD: A retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted for 1 year. For dyads with GBS-PCR performed, changes concerning intrapartum antibiotic therapy and the newborn's monitoring were recorded. The feasibility of the method was evaluated by the delay between the GBS-PCR realization and the availability of the result; in addition, the number of GBS-PCR tests that could not be realized were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 60 GBS-PCR samples were tested for 60 pregnant women. Results were obtained for all samples, and the median duration to obtaining the GBS-PCR results was 70 min (60.8-87.2). These results were positive for 11 (18.3 %) women and led to monitoring modifications for two infants. In total, 27 pregnant women (45 %) had modifications in their antibiotic therapy due to the GBS-PCR results. CONCLUSION: GBS-PCR was quickly available and the results led to changes in maternal antibiotic prophylaxis and in the monitoring level of the newborns.

Distribution of proteinuria- and albuminuria-to-creatinine ratios in preterm newborns.

BACKGROUND: Urine protein assessment is important when glomerular disease or injury is suspected. Normal values of proteinuria already published for preterm newborns suffer from limitation, with small cohorts of patients. This prospective study was conducted to update the urine total protein- and albumin-to-creatinine ratio values. METHODS: Urine samples were collected from 231 preterm newborns within the first 48 h (D0-1) and/or between 72-120 h of life (D3-4). Total protein, albumin, and creatinine were measured, their distribution and upper-limit values determined. RESULTS: At D0-1 and D3-4, respectively, the median for the total protein-to-creatinine ratio were 80 and 107 mg/mmol (upper-limit values 223 and 289 mg/mmol) in the whole studied population, 149 and 214 mg/mmol in children born before 29 weeks of gestational age, 108 and 130 mg/mmol in those born between 29 and 33 weeks, and 61 and 93 mg/mmol in those born after 33 weeks. For the albumin-to-creatinine ratio, the median were 12 and 17 mg/mmol (upper-limit values 65 and 62 mg/mmol) in the whole studied population, 22 and 50 mg/mmol in children born before 29 weeks, 21 mg/mmol in those born between 29 and 33 weeks, and 8 and 12 mg/mmol in those born after 33 weeks. The use of nephrotoxic drugs and mechanical ventilation seems to influence proteinuria and albuminuria values. CONCLUSIONS: We report distribution of proteinuria- and albuminuria-to-creatinine in preterm newborns, including the upper-limit values. These values should be taken into account in the detection and diagnosis of glomerular disease and/or injury in daily clinical practice. Graphical abstract.

French neonatal society position paper stresses the importance of an early family-centred approach to discharging preterm infants from hospital.

AIM: The families of hospitalised preterm infants risk depression and post-traumatic stress and the preterm infants risk re-hospitalisation. The French neonatal society's aim was to review the literature on how the transition from hospital to home could limit these risks and to produce a position paper. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed covering 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2018, and multidisciplinary experts examined the scientific evidence. RESULTS: We identified 939 English and French papers and 169 are quoted in the position paper. Most studies stressed the importance of early, personalised and progressive involvement of the family. Healthcare staff and families should assess discharge preparations jointly. This evaluation should assess the capacities of the newborn infant, with regard to its physiological maturity. It should also assess the family's ability to supply the medical, psychological and social assistance required before and after discharge. There should be a structured follow-up process that includes effective communication, various tools, interventions, networks, health and social professionals. CONCLUSION: Discharge preparations may improve the transition from hospital to home and the outcomes for the parents and newborn preterm infant. This early family-centred approach should be structured, coordinated and based on individual needs and circumstances.

Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.

IMPORTANCE: Up-to-date estimates of the health outcomes of preterm children are needed for assessing perinatal care, informing parents, making decisions about care, and providing evidence for clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To determine survival and neonatal morbidity of infants born from 22 through 34 completed weeks' gestation in France in 2011 and compare these outcomes with a comparable cohort in 1997. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The EPIPAGE-2 study is a national, prospective, population-based cohort study conducted in all maternity and neonatal units in France in 2011. A total of 2205 births (stillbirths and live births) and terminations of pregnancy at 22 through 26 weeks' gestation, 3257 at 27 through 31 weeks, and 1234 at 32 through 34 weeks were studied. Cohort data were collected from January 1 through December 31, 1997, and from March 28 through December 31, 2011. Analyses for 1997 were run for the entire year and then separately for April to December; the rates for survival and morbidities did not differ. Data are therefore presented for the whole year in 1997 and the 8-month and 6-month periods in 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survival to discharge and survival without any of the following adverse outcomes: grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity (stage 3 or higher), or necrotizing enterocolitis (stages 2-3). RESULTS: A total of 0.7% of infants born before 24 weeks' gestation survived to discharge: 31.2% of those born at 24 weeks, 59.1% at 25 weeks, and 75.3% at 26 weeks. Survival rates were 93.6% at 27 through 31 weeks and 98.9% at 32 through 34 weeks. Infants discharged home without severe neonatal morbidity represented 0% at 23 weeks, 11.6% at 24 weeks, 30.0% at 25 weeks, 47.5% at 26 weeks, 81.3% at 27 through 31 weeks, and 96.8% at 32 through 34 weeks. Compared with 1997, the proportion of infants surviving without severe morbidity in 2011 increased by 14.4% (P < .001) at 25 through 29 weeks and 6% (P < .001) at 30 through 31 weeks but did not change appreciably for those born at less than 25 weeks. The rates of antenatal corticosteroid use, induced preterm deliveries, cesarean deliveries, and surfactant use increased significantly in all gestational-age groups, except at 22 through 23 weeks. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The substantial improvement in survival in France for newborns born at 25 through 31 weeks' gestation was accompanied by an important reduction in severe morbidity, but survival remained rare before 25 weeks. Although improvement in survival at extremely low gestational age may be possible, its effect on long-term outcomes requires further studies. The long-term results of the EPIPAGE-2 study will be informative in this regard.