Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
HRB Open Res ; 5: 72, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37636245

RESUMEN

Background: There is a growing number of service users looking to discontinue use of psychiatric medicines. Tapering is the recommended approach for reducing and/or discontinuing the use of psychiatric medicines. This involves gradually reducing the dose over time to minimise the potential for withdrawal symptoms. However, many uncertainties exist regarding the process of reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines. This study will use a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to determine the Top 10 unanswered questions and uncertainties about reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines. Methods : The Priority Setting Partnership will be conducted using the James Lind Alliance methodology. It will involve seven stages: (i) creating an international Steering Group of representatives from key stakeholder groups that will include people with lived experience of taking and/or stopping psychiatric medicines, family members, carers/supporters and healthcare professionals, and identifying potential partners to support key activities (e.g. dissemination); (ii) gathering uncertainties about reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines from key stakeholders using an online survey; (iii) data processing and summarising the survey responses; (iv) checking the summary questions against existing evidence and verifying uncertainties; (v) shortlisting the questions using a second online survey; (vi) determining the Top 10 research questions through an online prioritisation workshop; (vii) disseminating results. Conclusions : This study will use a Priority Setting Partnership to generate a Top 10 list of research questions and uncertainties about reducing and stopping psychiatric medicines. This list will help to guide future research and deliver responsive and strategic allocation of research resources, with a view to ultimately improving the future health and well-being of individuals who are taking psychiatric medicines.

4.
Br J Gen Pract ; 67(664): 503-504, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29074683
5.
Br J Gen Pract ; 67(662): e609-e613, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28716996

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current British National Formulary (BNF) guidelines state that benzodiazepines and zolpidem, zopiclone, and zaleplon, commonly known as Z-drugs (BZD), be prescribed for no more than 4 weeks, although anecdotal data suggest that many patients are prescribed BZDs for much longer. As there are no recent, evidence-based estimates of long-term (>12 months) BZD use in the UK, the scale of this potential problem is unknown. AIM: To produce the first reliable, evidence-based estimate of long-term BZD use in the UK. DESIGN AND SETTING: Estimates of UK long-term BZD use were projected from data obtained from a survey conducted in 2014-2015 by the Bridge Project, a prescribed-drug withdrawal support charity in the North of England (Bradford). METHOD: Percentages of long-term users of BZD were derived from the survey, by sampling primary care GP surgeries with around 100 000 registered patients, and these were applied to UK-wide NHS patient numbers. The data were filtered to exclude the very young and old, and those with other health issues. RESULTS: The mean percentage of registered patients prescribed BZDs for more than a year in the survey sample is 0.69% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.84). Applying this value to national patient numbers yields a mean projection of 296 929 (95% CI = 232 553 to 361 305) long-term users of BZD in the UK. The data also suggest that as many as 119 165 of these patients may be willing to accept prescribed drug dependency withdrawal services. CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of a million people in the UK are likely to be taking highly dependency-forming hypnotic medication far beyond the recommended time scales. As there is evidence that long-term use of BZDs causes adverse physiological and neurological effects, and protracted withdrawal (with associated complications), this represents a serious public health problem.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Hipnóticos y Sedantes , Prescripción Inadecuada , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/prevención & control , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/métodos , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/normas , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/clasificación , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Salud Pública/normas , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/epidemiología , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/etiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...