Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(22)2023 Nov 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38002647

RESUMEN

The aims of this review are to provide a comprehensive overview of the definition and scope of pharmacoepidemiology, to summarize the study designs and methodologies used in the field, to discuss the future trends in the field and new methodologies to address bias and confounding, and finally to give some recommendations to clinicians interested in pharmacoepidemiologic research. Because drug efficacy and safety from randomized clinical trials do not reflect the real-world situation, pharmacoepidemiological studies on drug safety monitoring and drug effectiveness in large numbers of people are needed by healthcare professionals and regulatory institutions. We aim to highlight the importance of pharmacoepidemiologic research in informing evidence-based medicine and public health policy. The development of new designs and methodologies for the generation of valid evidence, as well as new initiatives to provide guidance and recommendations on how to incorporate real-world evidence into the drug development process, are reported on. In addition, we have touched on the implication of artificial intelligence in the management of real-world data. This overview aims to summarize all important aspects to consider when conducting or interpreting a pharmacoepidemiologic study.

2.
Med Sci Educ ; 33(5): 1183-1190, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37886280

RESUMEN

Introduction: The opinion of students is of utmost importance to identify areas of improvement in undergraduate studies. Medical schools would use this information to plan actions to ensure that the students achieve the necessary medical knowledge. The aim of this study was to analyse the opinion of medical students about their learning process and to analyse the influence of their experience according to their year of medical degree. Methods: A questionnaire including 21 items, divided into four sections (motivation, theory lectures, hospital internships, and research) and two overall questions, was distributed among eligible 246 students. Each item was scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The opinions of intermediate-year students of medical degree (3rd and 4th) were compared to late-year students (5th and 6th). Results: A total of 148 students answered the questionnaire (60.2% response rate). The mean scores for overall student motivation and teaching quality were 6.15 and 7.10, respectively. The student-teacher interaction and new learning technological tools were considered important for student motivation. The only differences found between the two groups of students were that late-year students wished to become part of a medical team and to learn writing scientific papers more than the intermediate-year students. Conclusions: This questionnaire revealed that the year of career had little influence on the medical students' opinion on their learning process during their undergraduate studies. Late-year students rated highest on being more interested in being part of a medical team and their knowledge on writing scientific articles. The use of new technologies and the student-teacher interaction is key to motivate students.

3.
J Clin Med ; 12(20)2023 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37892611

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe cases of lymphopenia have been reported during siponimod clinical trials, which may negatively impact its benefit/risk profile. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the incidence of lymphopenia following the initiation of siponimod treatment in clinical practice. The secondary objectives included the analysis of factors predisposing to and the clinical relevance of lymphopenia events. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, information collected from the medical records of 129 patients with MS from 15 tertiary hospitals in Spain who initiated treatment with Siponimod were followed-up for at least 3 months, including at least one lymphocyte count evaluation per patient. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients, 121 (93.6%) reported lymphopenia events, including 110 (85.3%) with grade ≤ 3 and 11 (8.5%) with grade 4 lymphopenia, higher than those reported in the pivotal clinical trial (73.3% and 3.3% for grade ≤ 3 and grade 4 lymphopenia, respectively). The study included an unexpectedly high proportion of male subjects (72.9%), which might have led to an underestimation of the actual magnitude of the risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the incidence and severity of lymphopenia after starting siponimod treatment were higher than those reported in previous clinical trials. Therefore, our results reinforce the need for the closer monitoring of novel MS drugs in clinical practice, as well as larger and longer follow-up studies to properly characterize this risk.

4.
Front Pharmacol ; 14: 1090707, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36794271

RESUMEN

Objectives: To describe the characteristics of safety alerts issued by the Spanish Medicines Agency (AEMPS) and the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System over a 7-year period and the regulatory actions they generated. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out of drug safety alerts published on the AEMPS website from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019. Alerts that were not drug-related or were addressed to patients rather than healthcare professionals were excluded. Results: During the study period, 126 safety alerts were issued, 12 of which were excluded because they were not related to drugs or were addressed to patients and 22 others were excluded as they were duplications of previous alerts. The remaining 92 alerts reported 147 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) involving 84 drugs. The most frequent source of information triggering a safety alert was spontaneous reporting (32.6%). Four alerts (4.3%) specifically addressed health issues related to children. ADRs were considered serious in 85.9% of the alerts. The most frequent ADRs were hepatitis (seven alerts) and congenital malformations (five alerts), and the most frequent drug classes were antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents (23%). Regarding the drugs involved, 22 (26.2%) were "under additional monitoring." Regulatory actions induced changes in the Summary of Product Characteristics in 44.6% of alerts, and in eight cases (8.7%), the alert led to withdrawal from the market of medicines with an unfavorable benefit/risk ratio. Conclusion: This study provides an overview of drug safety alerts issued by the Spanish Medicines Agency over a 7-year period and highlights the contribution of spontaneous reporting of ADRs and the need to assess safety throughout the lifecycle of medicines.

5.
J Clin Med ; 10(23)2021 Nov 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34884233

RESUMEN

The pediatric population is a vulnerable group for adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and data on spontaneous reporting of ADRs in the hospital setting are scarce. We conducted a retrospective analysis of ADRs in pediatric patients spontaneously reported by health care professionals to a Pharmacovigilance Program in a tertiary hospital between 2010 and 2020, and we compared characteristics of ADRs between pediatric age subgroups. From 1787 spontaneously reported ADRs in an 11-year period, 103 (5.85%) were pediatric ADRs. The median age of patients with ADRs was 8.4 years (range 1 day-17 years) and 57.3% were male. The most frequent ADRs reported were nervous system disorders (13.6%) and the most frequently involved drugs were antineoplastics and immunodulators (32.4%). A 59.2% of the ADRs were serious and 55.3% were classified as being type B reactions. Medication errors were involved in 7.8% of the ADRs and 11.9% of the suspected drugs were used off-label. Spontaneous reports of ADRs in newborns, infants, and toddlers were more serious and less often described in the product data sheet than in children and adolescents (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004 respectively). Medication errors were more frequent in patients under two years of age. These results should be interpreted with caution due to under-reporting and biases in spontaneous reporting of ADRs.

6.
J Clin Med ; 10(18)2021 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34575164

RESUMEN

Drug-related deaths (DRDs) are a common cause of hospital death. Pharmacovigilance, either as spontaneous reporting or active surveillance, plays a key role in the detection and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We conducted a retrospective analysis of all DRDs spontaneously reported to a pharmacovigilance program of a tertiary hospital, by health care professionals. We compared these results to those of a previous retrospective study conducted in the same hospital from the hospital's mortality registry. From 1460 spontaneous reported ADRs in a 10-year period, 73 (5%) were DRDs. The median age of DRD was 75 years (range 1 month-94) and 60.3% were men. The most frequent DRDs were hemorrhages (41.1%), followed by infections (17.8%). The most frequently involved drugs were anticoagulants and/or antithrombotic (30%), and antineoplastics (26.3%). When comparing both studies, spontaneous reporting detected more type B reactions (p < 0.001) and hospital-acquired DRD (p < 0.001); the number of concomitant drugs was higher (p = 0.0035); and the kind of ADR were different. The combination of several methods is mandatory to detect, assess, understand, and design strategies to prevent ADRs in a hospital setting, to ensure patient safety.

7.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(10): 3659-3671, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33629366

RESUMEN

AIMS: To perform a systematic review of observational studies on the epidemiology of drug-related death (DRD) in patients requiring hospitalisation or while hospitalised (hospital-acquired DRD). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies investigating the occurrence rate of DRD episodes among deceased inpatients. Two independent researchers assessed eligibility criteria, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. Both quality assessment and meta-analysis were performed. RESULTS: From 1351 identified potential studies, 6 retrospective studies were included. DRD occurrences rates were 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-12.5) among deceased inpatients and 0.13% (95% CI 0.04-0.40) among hospitalised patients. During hospitalisation, acquired-DRD represented 2.7% (95% CI 1.0-6.9) of inpatient deaths and occurred in 0.05% (95% CI 0.01-0.23) of hospitalised patients. However, these estimates have to be viewed with caution because there was significant heterogeneity (I2  > 97%). None of the studies were considered to be at high risk of bias according to the criteria of the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. The most common adverse drug reactions related to death were haemorrhages due to antithrombotic drugs (39%, 95% CI 26.5-53.2) and infections in drug-immunosuppressed patients (27.5%, 95% CI 16.7-41.7). CONCLUSION: We found that the DRD occurrence rate of deceased hospital inpatients has been infrequently studied in Europe. Our findings suggest that drugs are an important cause of death in hospitals. The limited number of studies in European countries stresses the need for more research in this area.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Humanos , Incidencia , Anamnesis , Prevalencia
8.
Med Clin (Engl Ed) ; 156(6): 277-280, 2021 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33589877

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize health care-related adverse events in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who died in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study, that included patients who died at HUGTiP hospital between 16 March and 10 April 2020. Data was extracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: The median age of the 164 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients who died in the center in the study period was 77.5 years and >90% of patients had ≥1 comorbidity. Forty point two percent of patients had at least ≥1 health care-related adverse event. Twenty three point eight of patients had an adverse drug reaction, the leading cause of adverse events in patients who died. Of patients who died in intensive care units, the frequency of problems related to mechanical ventilation was 8.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the case fatality rate associated with the adverse events detected was very low, close monitoring of potential health care-related adverse events, especially drug reactions, as the therapeutic management of the disease remains unclear.


OBJETIVO: Caracterizar los eventos adversos relacionados con la asistencia sanitaria en pacientes infectados por SARS-CoV-2 fallecidos en un hospital de tercer nivel. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron los pacientes fallecidos en el centro entre el 16 de marzo y el 10 de abril de 2020. La información fue extraída desde la historia clínica electrónica. RESULTADOS: La mediana de edad de los 164 pacientes analizados fue de 77,5 años. Más de 9 de cada 10 pacientes fallecidos presentaban al menos una comorbilidad. El 40,2% de los pacientes presentó al menos un evento adverso (EA) asociado a la atención sanitaria. Un 23,8% de los pacientes presentó alguna reacción adversa a medicamentos, constituyendo la primera causa de EA entre los pacientes fallecidos. Entre los pacientes que fallecieron en unidades de cuidados intensivos, los problemas relacionados con la ventilación mecánica han aparecido con una frecuencia del 8,8%. CONCLUSIONES: A pesar de que la letalidad asociada a los EA detectados fue muy reducida, es fundamental establecer una vigilancia estrecha de los posibles EA asociados a la asistencia sanitaria, especialmente los farmacológicos, dado que se trata de una enfermedad con un manejo terapéutico incierto.

9.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 156(6): 277-280, 2021 03 26.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358536

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize health care-related adverse events in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who died in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study, that included patients who died at HUGTiP hospital between 16 March and 10 April 2020. Data was extracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: The median age of the 164 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients who died in the center in the study period was 77.5 years and> 90% of patients had ≥ 1 comorbidity. Forty point two percent of patients had at least ≥ 1 health care-related adverse event. Twenty three point eight of patients had an adverse drug reaction, the leading cause of adverse events in patients who died. Of patients who died in intensive care units, the frequency of problems related to mechanical ventilation was 8.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the case fatality rate associated with the adverse events detected was very low, close monitoring of potential health care-related adverse events, especially drug reactions, as the therapeutic management of the disease remains unclear.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/efectos adversos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Terapia Combinada , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología
10.
Infect Dis Ther ; 10(1): 347-362, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33280066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the impact of tocilizumab use on severe COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 19) pneumonia mortality. METHODS: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study in 18 tertiary hospitals in Spain from March to April 2020. Consecutive patients admitted with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab were compared to patients not treated with tocilizumab, adjusting by inverse probability of the treatment weights (IPTW). Tocilizumab's effect in patients receiving steroids during the 48 h following inclusion was analysed. RESULTS: During the study period, 506 patients with severe COVID-19 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among them, 268 were treated with tocilizumab and 238 patients were not. Median time to tocilizumab treatment from onset of symptoms was 11 days [interquartile range (IQR) 8-14]. Global mortality was 23.7%. Mortality was lower in patients treated with tocilizumab than in controls: 16.8% versus 31.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.514 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.355-0.744], p < 0.001; weighted HR 0.741 (95% CI 0.619-0.887), p = 0.001. Tocilizumab treatment reduced mortality by 14.7% relative to no tocilizumab treatment [relative risk reduction (RRR) 46.7%]. We calculated a number necessary to treat of 7. Among patients treated with steroids, mortality was lower in those treated with tocilizumab than in those treated with steroids alone [10.9% versus 40.2%, HR 0.511 (95% CI 0.352-0.741), p = 0.036; weighted HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.449-0.804), p < 0.001] (interaction p = 0.094). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that survival of patients with severe COVID-19 is higher in those treated with tocilizumab than in those not treated and that tocilizumab's effect adds to that of steroids administered to non-intubated patients with COVID-19 during the first 48 h of presenting with respiratory failure despite oxygen therapy. Randomised controlled studies are needed to confirm these results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies (EU PAS Register) identifier, EUPAS34415.

11.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 76(12): 1653-1658, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32886177

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Feature films are increasingly being used in teaching health sciences. However, few publications address the effectiveness of this approach. We hypothesized that using feature films could help students learn. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of using a feature film to teach students about adverse drug reactions and pharmacovigilance. METHODS: The study population comprised third-, fifth-, and sixth-year undergraduate students of medicine, third-year undergraduate students of human biology, and graduate students in a master's degree program about the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Students watched clips from the film 150 Miligrams (La fille de Brest) and discussed them afterward. To measure learning, we administered a 10-question multiple-choice test about pharmacovigilance concepts. We assessed students' satisfaction with the activity through a questionnaire. An exploratory comparative analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 237 students participated. Postintervention assessment scores were significantly higher than preintervention scores for the entire population and for all subgroups. The mean number of correct answers was 4.41 on the preintervention assessment and 5.78 on the postintervention assessment (mean gain: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.10-1.65). Similar results were found when analyzing groups of students from each group. Student satisfaction with this teaching activity was high in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Cinemeducation is a useful tool for teaching about adverse drug reactions and pharmacovigilance processes. Most students were highly satisfied.


Asunto(s)
Instrucción por Computador/métodos , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Películas Cinematográficas , Farmacología Clínica/educación , Farmacovigilancia , Biología/educación , Biotecnología/educación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Evaluación Educacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Satisfacción Personal , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Farmacia/psicología , Estudiantes de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 154(5): 178-184, mar. 2020. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-186631

RESUMEN

Se define como reacción adversa a medicamentos (RAM) cualquier respuesta nociva y no intencionada a un medicamento. Las RAM constituyen una importante causa de morbimortalidad y de aumento de los costes sanitarios. Los sistemas de farmacovigilancia permiten la identificación y prevención de los riesgos asociados al uso de medicamentos, sobre todo de los fármacos de reciente comercialización; detectan señales a partir de datos del registro mundial de RAM y, además, dan soporte a las decisiones adoptadas por las agencias reguladoras de los diferentes países. Solo una minoría de los medicamentos comercializados se retiran del mercado: la hepatotoxicidad es la causa más frecuente. La notificación espontánea de RAM es el método más utilizado, barato y sencillo para reconocer nuevos problemas de seguridad, si bien su principal limitación es la infranotificación. El futuro de la farmacovigilancia y de las RAM pasará por una mayor implicación de los pacientes, médicos, autoridades sanitarias y empresas farmacéuticas y por el uso de las nuevas tecnologías


An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is defined as a response to a medicinal product which is noxious and unintended. ADRs are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and increase health costs. The pharmacovigilance systems allow the identification and prevention of the risks associated with use of a drug, especially of recently marketed drugs; they detect signals from data of the global ADR register and also support decisions taken by regulatory agencies in different countries. Only a few drugs are withdrawn from the market, mainly due to hepatotoxicity. Spontaneous notification of ADR is the cheapest, simplest and most used method to recognize new safety drug problems, under-reporting being its main limitation. The future of pharmacovigilance and ADRs will include a higher involvement of patients, doctors, health authorities and pharmaceutical companies, and the use of new technologies


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Farmacovigilancia , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Indicadores de Morbimortalidad , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/clasificación
13.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 154(5): 178-184, 2020 03 13.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31771857

RESUMEN

An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is defined as a response to a medicinal product which is noxious and unintended. ADRs are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and increase health costs. The pharmacovigilance systems allow the identification and prevention of the risks associated with use of a drug, especially of recently marketed drugs; they detect signals from data of the global ADR register and also support decisions taken by regulatory agencies in different countries. Only a few drugs are withdrawn from the market, mainly due to hepatotoxicity. Spontaneous notification of ADR is the cheapest, simplest and most used method to recognize new safety drug problems, under-reporting being its main limitation. The future of pharmacovigilance and ADRs will include a higher involvement of patients, doctors, health authorities and pharmaceutical companies, and the use of new technologies.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Farmacovigilancia , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/clasificación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Predicción , Humanos
14.
ASAIO J ; 64(2): 196-202, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28885379

RESUMEN

Patients bridged to transplant (BTT) with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have increased in the past decade. Decision support tools for these patients are limited. We developed a risk score to estimate prognosis and guide decision-making. We included heart transplant recipients bridged with CF-LVADs from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database and divided them into development (2,522 patients) and validation cohorts (1,681 patients). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed. Variables that independently predicted outcomes (age, African American race, recipient body mass index [BMI], intravenous [IV] antibiotic use, pretransplant dialysis, and total bilirubin) were assigned weight using linear transformation, and risk scores were derived. Patients were grouped by predicted posttransplant mortality: low risk (≤ 38 points), medium risk (38-41 points), and high risk (≥ 42 points). We performed Cox proportional hazards analysis on wait-listed CF-LVAD patients who were not transplanted. Score significantly discriminated survival among the groups in the development cohort (6.7, 12.9, 20.7; p = 0.001), validation cohort (6.4, 10.1, 13.6; p < 0.001), and ambulatory cohort (6.4, 11.5, 17.2; p < 0.001). We derived a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) BTT risk score that effectively identifies CF-LVAD patients who are at higher risk for worse outcomes after heart transplant. This score may help physicians weigh the risks of transplantation in patients with CF-LVAD.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Adulto , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 84(3): 542-552, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148077

RESUMEN

AIMS: To determine the incidence of drug-related deaths (DRD) in a university hospital in 2015, to describe their characteristics, and to discover risk factors of DRD. METHODS: An analytic and retrospective cohort study. Patients with a death diagnosed predefined from a list of medical conditions potentially caused by drugs were the selected cases for further review. Causality assessment was evaluated by a local drug safety committee. RESULTS: Out of 1135 inpatient deaths, 73 DRD were included (six were hospital-acquired). The incidence of DRD of all hospital admissions was 0.34%, and the incidence of all deaths cases was 7%. Drugs were the cause of death in 38 patients (52%) and a contributive role in 35 (48%). The median age of DRD patients was 72 years (range 19-94) and 72.6% were men. The median hospital stay, Charlson score and number of drugs were 5 days, 2 points and seven drugs respectively. The most frequent DRD were cerebral haemorrhages and infections in drug-immunosuppressed patients (32, 43.8%, each group). The most frequently involved drugs were antineoplastics and glucocorticosteroids (40% and 18%), and antithrombotics (33%); drug-drug interactions were present in 44% DRD. Sex, age and number of drugs were risk factors of DRD. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse drug reactions were a significant cause of death in hospitalized patients, mainly haemorrhages and infections precipitated by drug-drug interactions. Risk factors for DRD were sex, age and number of drugs. Preventable DRD and measures to avoid them should be accurately assessed in further studies.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Causas de Muerte , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Incidencia , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(45): e8505, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29137046

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Defects in drug metabolic pathways could explain why some patients have a history of multiple adverse drug reactions (ADR); therefore we aimed to analyze genetic polymorphisms in a patient with multiple ADR related to drugs with a common hepatic metabolic pathway through CYP2D6. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a patient with psychosis and hypertension related to amitriptyline, tramadol, and duloxetine within a 2-year period. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: A pharmacogenetic test was performed to assess the causative role of the CYP2D6 enzyme, but did not demonstrate a metabolic deficiency. LESSONS: Although negative results in the reported case; typing for cytochrome P450 isoenzyme polymorphisms could be a useful diagnostic tool in some patients with a history of multiple ADR.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/genética , Mielitis Transversa/tratamiento farmacológico , Aminas/efectos adversos , Amitriptilina/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Ciclohexanocarboxílicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Gabapentina , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo Genético , Síndrome , Vértebras Torácicas , Tramadol/efectos adversos , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/efectos adversos
17.
PLoS One ; 12(2): e0171294, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nyaditum resae® (NR) is a galenic preparation of heat-killed Mycobacterium manresensis, a new species of the fortuitum complex, that is found in drinkable water, and that has demonstrated to protect against the development of active TB in a murine experimental model that develop human-like lesions. METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Clinical Trial (51 volunteers included). Two different doses of NR and a placebo were tested, the randomization was stratified by Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI)-positive (n = 21) and LTBI-negative subjects (n = 30). Each subject received 14 drinkable daily doses for 2 weeks. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. The 46.3% of the overall reported adverse events (AE) were considered related to the investigational treatment. None of them were severe (94% were mild and 6% moderate). No statistical differences were found when comparing the median number of AE between the placebo group and both treatment groups. The most common AE reported were gastrointestinal events, most frequently mild abdominal pain and increase in stool frequency. Regarding the immunogenic response, both LTBI-negative and LTBI-positive volunteers treated with NR experienced a global increase on the Treg response, showed both in the population of CD25+CD39-, mainly effector Treg cells, or CD25+CD39+ memory PPD-specific Treg cells. CONCLUSION: This clinical trial demonstrates an excellent tolerability profile of NR linked to a significant increase in the population of specific effector and memory Tregs in the groups treated with NR in both LTBI-positive and negative subjects. NR shows a promising profile to be used to reduce the risk of active TB.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Tuberculosis Latente/dietoterapia , Mycobacterium , Probióticos , Adulto , Suplementos Dietéticos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Tuberculosis Latente/inmunología , Masculino , Viabilidad Microbiana , Mycobacterium/inmunología , Proyectos Piloto , Placebos , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Probióticos/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
18.
J Hepatol ; 65(3): 532-42, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27184533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic outcome following acute idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is not yet defined. This prospective, long-term follow-up study aimed to analyze time to liver enzyme resolutions to establish the best definition and risk factors of DILI chronicity. METHODS: 298 out of 850 patients in the Spanish DILI registry with no pre-existing disease affecting the liver and follow-up to resolution or ⩾1year were analyzed. Chronicity was defined as abnormal liver biochemistry, imaging test or histology one year after DILI recognition. RESULTS: Out of 298 patients enrolled 273 (92%) resolved ⩽1year from DILI recognition and 25 patients (8%) were chronic. Independent risk factors for chronicity were older age [OR: 1.06, p=0.011], dyslipidemia [OR: 4.26, p=0.04] and severe DILI [OR: 14.22, p=0.005]. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and total bilirubin (TB) median values were higher in the chronic group during follow-up. Values of ALP and TB >1.1 x upper limit of normal (xULN) and 2.8 xULN respectively, in the second month from DILI onset, were found to predict chronic DILI (p<0.001). Main drug classes involved in chronicity were statins (24%) and anti-infectives (24%). Histological examination in chronic patients demonstrated two cases with ductal lesion and seven with cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: One year is the best cut-off point to define chronic DILI or prolonged recovery, with risk factors being older age, dyslipidemia and severity of the acute episode. Statins are distinctly related to chronicity. ALP and TB values in the second month could help predict chronicity or very prolonged recovery. LAY SUMMARY: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) patients who do not resolve their liver damage during the first year should be considered chronic DILI patients. Risk factors for DILI chronicity are older age, dyslipidemia and severity of the acute episode. Chronic DILI is not a very common condition; normally featuring mild liver profile abnormalities and not being an important clinical problem, with the exception of a small number of cases of early onset cirrhosis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas , Alanina Transaminasa , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
19.
J Vasc Surg ; 63(4): 1091-8, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27016858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide recommendations to assist health professionals and patients in the process of making decisions for specific clinical conditions to improve the quality of the patient care. However, there are concerns about the quality of some CPGs. The aim of this study was to review the quality of CPGs in pharmacologic management of peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: A systematic review of CPGs for the pharmacologic treatment of PAD was performed. CPGs published between 2003 and January 2015 in English, Spanish, or French were retrieved using PubMed, Cochrane, and TRIP databases; guideline developer organization Web sites, and European and American scientific societies related to PAD Web sites. One reviewer performed the search and guideline selection, which was validated by a second reviewer. Three appraisers independently assessed the quality of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines, REsearch and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS: A total of seven CPGs, published between 2006 and 2012, were included. All except one were written in English. Average AGREE II guidelines scores varied from 45% to 72%. There was considerable variation in the quality of the CPGs across the AGREE II domain scores (ranging from 4% to 85%). The highest scored domains were 'clarity of presentation' and 'editorial independence' and the lowest scored domain was 'applicability.' The reviewers consider that six CPGs could be recommended with modifications for use and one without modification. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in the quality of the CPGs on pharmacologic treatment in PAD. All of the assessed guidelines could be recommended; however, there is considerable scope to improve their quality by highlighting aspects of applicability, the involvement of the stakeholder, as well as the rigor of development.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...