Pediatric Thromboprophylaxis of Large Coronary Artery Aneurysm Using Rivaroxaban.

Giant or large coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) are rare in children, most often secondary to Kawasaki disease, and anticoagulation is recommended to prevent thromboembolism. There are no published pediatric reports on the use of a direct oral anticoagulant for this indication. We describe the anticoagulation management of an 8-year-old boy with a dilated right CAA secondary to Kawasaki disease that has remained stable on rivaroxaban and aspirin, following bleeding complications on enoxaparin and challenges on warfarin. The use of rivaroxaban appears to be safe and effective in the prevention of thrombosis in a pediatric patient with CAA.

Once-daily Compared With Twice-daily Enoxaparin Maintenance Therapy Appears Safe and Efficacious in Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Once-daily enoxaparin (ODE), considered standard of care for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in adults, has been infrequently assessed in children. To contribute available data to a limited field, we reviewed our center's experience with ODE in treating pediatric VTE compared with twice-daily enoxaparin (TDE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of children and adolescents 18 years of age or below diagnosed with VTE and treated at our institution with ODE or TDE maintenance therapy between April 2015 and December 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical and laboratory data pertaining to VTE diagnosis, and management were gathered from electronic medical records and compared between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: Seventy-one children met the eligibility criteria. All patients were initially treated with TDE for 2 weeks before transitioning to ODE maintenance therapy (n=39; 55%) or continuing with TDE dosing (n=32; 45%).Extremity VTE was more common in ODE ( P =0.051) versus pulmonary/intracardiac sites in TDE ( P =0.002) when compared with other sites. Median enoxaparin dosing was 1.5 and 1.1 mg/kg/dose in ODE and TDE cohorts, respectively. Bleeding episodes were rare without any difference between the cohorts. Two patients (6%) were lost to follow up in TDE cohort. All evaluable patients in both cohorts had either complete/partial response (ODE n=35 [90%]; TDE n=24 [75%] or stable thrombus ODE n=4 [10%]; TDE n=6 [19%]). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that ODE, used after the initial TDE treatment period, is as safe and efficacious as TDE maintenance for the treatment of pediatric VTE. The difference in VTE sites may have contributed to the equal efficacy of both the cohorts. Future prospective studies in pediatric VTE are needed to validate these results.