Association of intrauterine synechiae with pituitary gonadotrophin pulse patterns: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine synechiae (IS) is an acquired uterine condition that occurs when scar tissues (adhesions) form within the uterus and/or cervix, causing menstrual disturbance. However, approximately 50% of patients with IS are refractory to treatment. Therefore, other endocrine disturbances, such as gonadotropin disturbance, may affect treatment success. STUDY AIM: To analyze gonadotropin levels in women with and without IS. METHODS: Ten women with refractory IS experiencing amenorrhea since at least 6 months and nine with normal menstrual cycles (control group) were included in this study. Blood sample were collected every 10 minutes during a 4-h period. The serial ultrasound was performed in both groups for evaluating the cycle phase. Blood was collected when the follicles size was between 5-10 mm. Serum LH, FSH, progesterone and estradiol concentrations were measured. To detect LH and FSH pulses, the technique proposed by Santen and Bardin was adopted; therefore, one pulse was defined as a 20% increase in the concentrations as to the preceding point, followed by an important decrease. RESULTS: No differences were observed between the study groups at baseline. Estradiol levels were lower in the IS group than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. During the first hour of monitoring, cumulative FSH pulsatile frequency of IS group was lower than one of control. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the estradiol levels of IS participants are lower than those of women with normal menstrual cycle. The role of this finding in the physiology of uterine synechiae requires further investigation.

Delphi consensus on add-ons and social midia in Assisted Reproductive Technology.

This article reports the annals of a national consensus meeting on add-ons and social networks in Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ART). The panel of experts has developed a set of consensus points and this document is intended to be referenced as a national consensus to allow social networks and add-ons to be used in ART, following the standards of the Code of Medical Ethics and the Federal Council of Medicine, in a safe ethical and responsible way.

Vitamin D and in vitro fertilization: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Vitamin D (VD) action on calcium is well known, but its other properties, particularly in the human reproductive system, are not completely understood. This review aims at assessing the relationship between serum VD levels and IVF results. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out using MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Google scholar, the CAPES journal portal, and the Cochrane Library, as well as the descriptors "vitamin D" and "fertilization in vitro." The review was conducted by two authors following the PRISMA recommendations between September 2021 and February 2022. RESULTS: Eighteen articles were selected. Five of them showed a positive correlation between serum VD levels and IVF results, 12 lacked any association, and 1 exhibited a negative correlation. The 3 studies that assessed VD in the follicular fluid found a positive correlation between the serum and follicular levels. Non-Hispanic White patients seemed to suffer the consequence of vitamin D deficiency more than Asian patients. In one study alone in the VD-deficient group, there was a larger number of natural killer (NK) cells, B cells, a greater proportion of helper T cells/cytotoxic T cells (Th/Tc), and an association with a smaller number of mature oocytes. CONCLUSION: The association between serum VD levels and the post-IVF pregnancy rate is uncertain. However, VD levels might be more relevant in the White than in the Asian ethnicity and in the number of aspiration follicles, and they could act in the immune system having an impact both on embryo implantation and on pregnancy.

One Plus One is Better than Two: An Approach Towards a Single Blastocyst Transfer Policy for All IVF Patients / Um mais um é melhor que dois: Uma abordagem pela prática da transferência de embrião único para todos os pacientes de FIV

Abstract Objective It is known that the single embryo transfer (SET) is the best choice to reduce multiples and associated risks. The practice of cryopreserving all embryos for posterior transfer has been increasingly performed for in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients at the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. However, its widespread practice is still controverse. The aim of this study was to evaluate how effective is the transfer of two sequential SET procedures compared with a double embryo transfer (DET) in freeze-only cycles. Methods This retrospective study reviewed 5,156 IVF cycles performed between 2011 and 2019, and 506 cycles using own oocytes and freeze-only policy with subsequent elective frozen-thawed embryo transfers (eFET) were selected for this study. Cycles having elective SET (eSET, n = 209) comprised our study group and as control group we included cycles performed with elective DET (eDET, n = 291). In the eSET group, 57 couples who had failed in the 1st eSET had a 2nd eFET, and the estimated cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was calculated and compared with eDET. Results After the 1st eFET, the ongoing pregnancy rates were similar between groups (eSET: 35.4% versus eDET: 38.5%; p =0.497), but the estimated cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after a 2nd eFET in the eSET group (eSET + SET) was significantly higher (48.8%) than in the eDET group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the eSET +SET group had a 2.7% rate of multiple gestations, which is significantly lower than the eDET group, with a 30.4% rate (p < 0.001). Conclusion Our study showed the association of freeze-only strategy with until up to two consecutive frozen-thawed eSETs resulted in higher success rates than a frozenthawed DET, while drastically reducing the rate of multiple pregnancies.

Resumo Objetivo Sabe-se que a transferência de embrião único (SET) é a melhor escolha para reduzir as gestações múltiplas e riscos associados. A prática da criopreservação de todos os embriões para transferência posterior tem sido cada vez mais utilizada para fertilização in vitro (FIV), em especial quando há risco de síndrome de hiperestimulação ovariana ou realização de teste genético pré-implantacional. Entretanto, sua utilização disseminada ainda é controversa. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia de duas SET sequenciais em comparação com uma transferência de embrião dupla (DET) em ciclos de FIV onde todos os embriões foram criopreservados. Métodos Neste estudo retrospectivo foram revisados 5.156 ciclos de FIV realizados entre 2011 e 2019, e 506 ciclos usando oócitos próprios e criopreservação de todos os embriões com transferências eletivas subsequentes de embriões descongelados, foram selecionados para este estudo. Ciclos com transferência eletiva de embrião único (eSET, n = 209) compuseram nosso grupo de estudo e como grupo de controle incluímos os ciclos com transferência eletiva de dois embriões (eDET, n = 291). No grupo eSET, 57 casais que falharam na 1ª tentativa de eSET tiveram uma 2ª eFET e a taxa de gravidez em curso cumulativa foi estimada para o grupo eSET e comparada com o grupo eDET. Resultados Após a 1ª eFET, as taxas de gravidez em curso foram semelhantes entre os grupos (eSET: 35,4% versus eDET: 38,5%; p = 0,497), mas a taxa de gravidez em curso cumulativa estimada após a 2ª eFET no grupo eSET (eSET + SET) foi significativamente maior (48,8%) do que no grupo eDET (p <0,001). Além disso, as taxas de gestação múltipla foram expressivamente inferiores no grupo eSET + SET (2,7%) quando comparado ao grupo eDET (30,4%; p < 0,001). Conclusão Nosso estudo mostrou que a associação das estratégias de congelamento de todos os embriões com até duas eSETs sequenciais resultou em maiores taxas de sucesso do que uma DET com embriões descongelados, além de reduzir drasticamente a ocorrência de gestações múltiplas.

One Plus One is Better than Two: An Approach Towards a Single Blastocyst Transfer Policy for All IVF Patients.

OBJECTIVE: It is known that the single embryo transfer (SET) is the best choice to reduce multiples and associated risks. The practice of cryopreserving all embryos for posterior transfer has been increasingly performed for in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients at the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. However, its widespread practice is still controverse. The aim of this study was to evaluate how effective is the transfer of two sequential SET procedures compared with a double embryo transfer (DET) in freeze-only cycles. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed 5,156 IVF cycles performed between 2011 and 2019, and 506 cycles using own oocytes and freeze-only policy with subsequent elective frozen-thawed embryo transfers (eFET) were selected for this study. Cycles having elective SET (eSET, n = 209) comprised our study group and as control group we included cycles performed with elective DET (eDET, n = 291). In the eSET group, 57 couples who had failed in the 1st eSET had a 2nd eFET, and the estimated cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was calculated and compared with eDET. RESULTS: After the 1st eFET, the ongoing pregnancy rates were similar between groups (eSET: 35.4% versus eDET: 38.5%; p = 0.497), but the estimated cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after a 2nd eFET in the eSET group (eSET + SET) was significantly higher (48.8%) than in the eDET group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the eSET + SET group had a 2.7% rate of multiple gestations, which is significantly lower than the eDET group, with a 30.4% rate (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study showed the association of freeze-only strategy with until up to two consecutive frozen-thawed eSETs resulted in higher success rates than a frozen-thawed DET, while drastically reducing the rate of multiple pregnancies.

OBJETIVO: Sabe-se que a transferência de embrião único (SET) é a melhor escolha para reduzir as gestações múltiplas e riscos associados. A prática da criopreservação de todos os embriões para transferência posterior tem sido cada vez mais utilizada para fertilização in vitro (FIV), em especial quando há risco de síndrome de hiperestimulação ovariana ou realização de teste genético pré-implantacional. Entretanto, sua utilização disseminada ainda é controversa. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia de duas SET sequenciais em comparação com uma transferência de embrião dupla (DET) em ciclos de FIV onde todos os embriões foram criopreservados. MéTODOS: Neste estudo retrospectivo foram revisados 5.156 ciclos de FIV realizados entre 2011 e 2019, e 506 ciclos usando oócitos próprios e criopreservação de todos os embriões com transferências eletivas subsequentes de embriões descongelados, foram selecionados para este estudo. Ciclos com transferência eletiva de embrião único (eSET, n = 209) compuseram nosso grupo de estudo e como grupo de controle incluímos os ciclos com transferência eletiva de dois embriões (eDET, n = 291). No grupo eSET, 57 casais que falharam na 1ª tentativa de eSET tiveram uma 2ª eFET e a taxa de gravidez em curso cumulativa foi estimada para o grupo eSET e comparada com o grupo eDET. RESULTADOS: Após a 1ª eFET, as taxas de gravidez em curso foram semelhantes entre os grupos (eSET: 35,4% versus eDET: 38,5%; p = 0,497), mas a taxa de gravidez em curso cumulativa estimada após a 2ª eFET no grupo eSET (eSET + SET) foi significativamente maior (48,8%) do que no grupo eDET (p < 0,001). Além disso, as taxas de gestação múltipla foram expressivamente inferiores no grupo eSET + SET (2,7%) quando comparado ao grupo eDET (30,4%; p < 0,001). CONCLUSãO: Nosso estudo mostrou que a associação das estratégias de congelamento de todos os embriões com até duas eSETs sequenciais resultou em maiores taxas de sucesso do que uma DET com embriões descongelados, além de reduzir drasticamente a ocorrência de gestações múltiplas.

Effectivity of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) when male factor is absent: a perspective point of view.

An objective and individualized approach of in vitro fertilization techniques tends to decrease costs and improve the experience of infertile couples during treatment. The use of available technologies to diagnose and treat infertility based on scientific evidence seems to be the best practice, which is the guideline that motivates this review on the available techniques for laboratory oocyte insemination. Conventional IVF, the pioneering technique, was initially used in the treatment of tubal obstruction infertility, successfully expanding the treatment of infertile couples presenting with several other factors. However, it was less effective in cases of severe male factor infertility. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, which was developed in 1992, proved to be the method of choice for treating couples with severe male factor infertility. Since then, it has been increasingly used regardless of the infertility factor. This review discusses the effectiveness of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) when the male factor is absent in all aspects, as technical and clinical outcomes, associated risks, adjustments for using with other technologies and costs. Finally we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each one, with all aspects reviewed.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Human Reproduction: A Changing Perspective.

Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the coronavirus disease 2019 has had a wide range of effects on human health. This paper summarizes the data related to the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on human reproduction. Both the male and female reproductive tract express high levels of receptors and proteins needed for viral cell entry. There is presently no evidence that gametes are affected by the infection. Male fertility may be temporarily reduced due to inflammatory responses following infection. The endometrium is highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 cell entry; however, it remains unclear whether this could alter receptivity and embryo implantation. Menstrual cycle changes were reported in women who experienced severe infection; however, they tended to be reversible. For couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment, the pandemic led to a significant psychological burden, with changes in lifestyle that could directly affect the success of the treatment. Human reproduction societies recommend screening all patients prior to cycle initiation and avoiding treatment of women with severe comorbidities until the pandemic is under control. Finally, for pregnant women, it is expected that the infection is more severe in women in the third trimester and in those with comorbidities. Those who are symptomatic for SARS-CoV-2 are more likely to have increased rates of prematurity and intrapartum fetal distress than those who are asymptomatic. Vertical transmission cannot be completely ruled out, but neonatal infection rates are low. Vaccination appears to be safe and is indicated for use in pregnant and lactating women because the benefits outweigh the risks.

Delivering embryos following 10 years of cryopreservation, using unpaired freeze/thaw techniques: A case report.

Although frozen embryo transfer is a widely established route for assisted reproduction, successful frozen embryo transfer using embryos that have undergone long term cryopreservation remains relatively unexplored, and its efficacy remains a matter of some debate. This case report describes two successful frozen embryo transfer conceptions in the same patient, one after 3 months of cryopreservation and the second 10 years after cryopreservation. These embryos were cryopreserved using the slow freezing technique and were thawed using an unpaired technique (ultra-rapid warming) after 10 years of storage.

Coronavirus disease 2019 and human reproduction: a changing perspective

Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the coronavirus disease 2019 has had a wide range of effects on human health. This paper summarizes the data related to the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on human reproduction. Both the male and female reproductive tract express high levels of receptors and proteins needed for viral cell entry. There is presently no evidence that gametes are affected by the infection. Male fertility may be temporarily reduced due to inflammatory responses following infection. The endometrium is highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 cell entry; however, it remains unclear whether this could alter receptivity and embryo implantation. Menstrual cycle changes were reported in women who experienced severe infection; however, they tended to be reversible. For couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment, the pandemic led to a significant psychological burden, with changes in lifestyle that could directly affect the success of the treatment. Human reproduction societies recommend screening all patients prior to cycle initiation and avoiding treatment of women with severe comorbidities until the pandemic is under control. Finally, for pregnant women, it is expected that the infection is more severe in women in the third trimester and in those with comorbidities. Those who are symptomatic for SARS-CoV-2 are more likely to have increased rates of prematurity and intrapartum fetal distress than those who are asymptomatic. Vertical transmission cannot be completely ruled out, but neonatal infection rates are low. Vaccination appears to be safe and is indicated for use in pregnant and lactating women because the benefits outweigh the risks.

Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Brazil: characterization of centers and profiles from patients treated.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the application of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Brazil from the active clinics and the population served considering the changes in the last resolutions of the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM), which enabled the use of the techniques for anyone, regardless of their health insurance system, gender or marital status. METHODS: This paper was based on the analysis from the "Reproductive Technologies and (in) fertility study: regulation, market and rights". We used quantitative and qualitative methodologies. In this paper, we used the empirical data produced in the quantitative study. The quantitative online survey was carried out in 2016-2018, answered by 81 fertility clinics in Brazil about their performance in 2015-2016. We opted to use the REDCap Program, a web-based application for the construction and management of online surveys and databases. The questionnaire addressed the characteristics of services, practices performed, population served and existing forms of funding. RESULTS: The questionnaires returned corresponded to 63.1% of the clinics in the southeast region. ART is mainly offered by 90.1% private clinics. We report that 63.8% of establishments have up to 20 employees; 44.5% have been in operation between 11 and 20 years. 85.1% of the clinics reported having treated non-Brazilian residents. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a significant increase in the provision of ART in Brazil. Access remains thoroughly dependent on its own financial resources. The new CFM resolutions have shifted from the prevailing concept of "health care" to "assisting with new family configurations".

A review of initial data on pregnancy during the COVID-19 outbreak: implications for assisted reproductive treatments.

The current outbreak of the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) started in China in December 2019 and has since spread to several other countries. On March 25, 2020, a total of 375,498 cases had been confirmed globally with 2,201 cases in Brazil, showing the urgency of reacting to this international public health emergency. While in most cases, mild symptoms are observed, in some cases the infection leads to serious pulmonary disease. As a result, the possible consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak for pregnant women and its potential effects on the management of assisted reproductive treatments, demand attention. In this review, we summarize the latest research progress related to COVID-19 epidemiology and the reported data of pregnant women, and discuss the current evidence of COVID-19 infections during pregnancy and its potential consequences for assisted reproductive treatments. Reported data suggest that symptoms in pregnant women are similar to those in other people, and that there is no evidence for higher maternal or fetal risks. However, considering the initial data and lack of comprehensive knowledge on the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy, human reproduction societies have recommended postponing the embryo transfers and do not initiate new treatment cycles. New evidence must be considered carefully in order to adjust these recommendations accordingly at any time and to guide assisted reproductive treatments.

A review of initial data on pregnancy during the COVID-19 outbreak: implications for assisted reproductive treatments

The current outbreak of the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) started in China in December 2019 and has since spread to several other countries. On March 25, 2020, a total of 375,498 cases had been confirmed globally with 2,201 cases in Brazil, showing the urgency of reacting to this international public health emergency. While in most cases, mild symptoms are observed, in some cases the infection leads to serious pulmonary disease. As a result, the possible consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak for pregnant women and its potential effects on the management of assisted reproductive treatments, demand attention. In this review, we summarize the latest research progress related to COVID-19 epidemiology and the reported data of pregnant women, and discuss the current evidence of COVID-19 infections during pregnancy and its potential consequences for assisted reproductive treatments. Reported data suggest that symptoms in pregnant women are similar to those in other people, and that there is no evidence for higher maternal or fetal risks. However, considering the initial data and lack of comprehensive knowledge on the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy, human reproduction societies have recommended postponing the embryo transfers and do not initiate new treatment cycles. New evidence must be considered carefully in order to adjust these recommendations accordingly at any time and to guide assisted reproductive treatments.(AU)

Modelo de impacto orçamentário da aplicação do single embryo transfer consecutivo comparado com o double embryo transfer em tratamentos de fertilização in vitro no Sistema de Saúde Suplementar / Budget impact model of the use of consecutive single embryo transfers compared to double embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization procedures in the Brazilian Private Healthcare System

Objetivo: Estimar o impacto orçamentário em cinco anos da incorporação da técnica de SET (single embryo transfer) sequencial no Sistema de Saúde Suplementar brasileiro (SSSB). Métodos: Foram consideradas taxas de nascidos vivos de 41% e de gemelaridade de 2% e 30% para SET e DET (double transfer embryo), respectivamente. Os custos dos procedimentos foram, em sua maioria, obtidos das tabelas SIMPRO, CBHPM e CMED. Para a estimativa da população elegível, foram consideradas mulheres de 20 a 35 anos registradas no Datasus e taxas de infertilidade e de uso de fertilização in vitro (FIV) da literatura. Estimou-se em 20% e 80% o uso de SET sequencial e DET, respectivamente, com incorporação da primeira em 45%, 50%, 55%, 65% e 75% dos casos nos cinco anos subsequentes. Resultados: Considerando cenários com reembolso de um a dois ciclos de SET sequencial e inclusão ou não do valor dos medicamentos, o impacto orçamentário em cinco anos seria entre R$ 10.231.387 e R$ 16.123.874 em operadoras de grande porte, R$ 1.054.174 e R$ 1.661.297 em operadoras de médio porte e R$ 173.700 e R$ 273.738 em operadoras de pequeno porte. Em cenário com aumento progressivo do uso de SET sequencial sem alteração no modelo de reembolso atual, foi estimada economia de R$ 59.319.276 para o SSSB em cinco anos. Conclusões: O uso de SET sequencial (vs. DET) em procedimentos de FIV é potencialmente menos oneroso para o SSSB referente a custos de pré-natal, parto e complicações. Em cenário de incorporação progressiva, o custo incremental foi estimado em R$ 8-13 mil/paciente.

Objective: To estimate the five-year budget impact of incorporating the sequential single embryo transfer (SET) technique into the Brazilian Supplementary Healthcare System (BSHS). Methods: Live birth rates of 41% and multiple pregnancy rates of 2% and 30% were considered for SET and DET (double transfer embryo), respectively. The costs of the procedures were mostly obtained from e SIMPRO, CBHPM and CMED tables. To estimate the eligible population, we considered women aged 20-35 years registered in DATASUS, and infertility and in vitro fertilization (IVF) rates from the literature. The use of sequential SET and DET was estimated as 20% and 80%, respectively, with incorporation of the first in 45%, 50%, 55%, 65% and 75% of cases in the subsequent five years. Results: Considering scenarios with reimbursement of 1 to 2 cycles of sequential SET and inclusion or not of the drugs in the reimbursement, the budget impact in five years would be between BRL 10,231,387-16,123,874 in large operators, BRL 1,054,174-1,661,297 in midsize operators and BRL 173,700-273,738 in small operators. In a scenario of progressive increase of the use of sequential SET with no change in the current reimbursement model, we estimated a saving of BRL 59,319,276 for the BSHS in five years. Conclusions: The use of sequential SET (vs. DET) in IVF procedures is potentially less costly for BSHS for prenatal, child-birth and complication costs. In the scenario of progressive incorporation and full reimbursement of the procedure, the incremental cost was estimated at BRL 8-13 thousands/patient.

Prognostic factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prognostic factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted among couples who underwent IUI at Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, between January 31, 2008, and April 30, 2016. The main outcome was a positive ß human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) test result after IUI. Univariate analyses were used to determine predictors of pregnancy. Selected numerical variables were categorized to maximize the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Logistic regression was performed using the backward method. The quality of the model was evaluated using the R2 (Nagelkerke) and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. RESULTS: Of 355 insemination cycles, 56 (15.8%) resulted in a positive ß-hCG test result. The predictors and cutoff values that maximized the area under the ROC curve were as follows: follicle-stimulating hormone (<7.7 mIU/mL; P<0.001); duration of infertility (<62 menses; P<0.001); number of follicles greater than or equal to 14 mm (>1 follicle; P<0.001); baseline spermatozoa concentration (>52.0 million/mL; P=0.007); total ejaculate (>123.7 million; P=0.003); and grade B motility (>35%; P=0.013). These factors were able to predict 50.4% of the positive test results (R2 ). CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors for pregnancy identified approximately half of all successful outcomes after IUI.