RESUMEN
Introducción: Los implantes subperiósticos personalizados de titanio, diseñadosa partir de un software de planificación yfabricación, constituyen una alternativaen la rehabilitación de atrofias severasen los maxilares, evitando cirugías de reconstrucción óseas y el de partes blandasmás complejas y disminuyendo los tiempos de cicatrización. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar la rehabilitación enun caso clínico con una atrofia severa enmaxilar superior, utilizando una estructuracon implantes subperiósticos, medianteun protocolo digital.Descripción del caso: Se diseñó unaestructura subperióstica de titanio sinterizada con seis conexiones transepitelialesque fueron rehabilitadas con una prótesisfija inmediata implantosoportada fabricada en PMMA. Dos meses después, serealizó una estructura sinterizada en cromo-cobalto con bases mecanizadas recubierta con dientes de resina acrílica comorestauración final. En el seguimiento a unaño, el caso permanece estable.Conclusiones: Hoy en día, la rehabilitación con implantes subperiósticos constituye una herramienta alternativa en casosde cirugías complejas con grandes atrofias con la posibilidad, además, de realizar una carga inmediata. (AU)
Introduction: Customized subperiosteal titanium implants, designed from planning and fabrication software, constitute analternative in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy, avoiding more complex bone and soft reconstruction surgeries and reducing healing times. The aim of this article is to present the rehabilitation in a clinical case with severe atrophy in the upper jaw, using a structure with subperiosteal implants, by means of a digital protocol.Clinical Case: A subperiosteal sintered titanium structure was fabricated with six transepithelial connections that were rehabilitated with an immediate implant-supported fixed prosthesis made of PMMA. Two months later, a sintered Chromium-Cobalt framework with machined bases covered with acrylic resin teeth was fabricated as the final restoration. At one year follow-up, the case remains stable. Conclusions: Nowadays, rehabilitatin with subperiosteal implants is an alternative tool in cases of complex surgeries with large atrophies with the possibility of immediate loading. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Implantes Dentales , Implantación Dental/métodos , Rehabilitación Bucal/métodos , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Recesión Gingival/cirugía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Maxillectomies cause malocclusion, masticatory disorders, swallowing disorders and poor nasolabial projection, with consequent esthetic and functional sequelae. Reconstruction can be achieved with conventional approaches, such as closure of the maxillary defect by microvascular free flap surgery or prosthetic obturation. Four patients with segmental maxillary defects that had been reconstructed with customized subperiosteal titanium maxillary implants (CSTMI) through virtual surgical planning (VSP), STL models and CAD/CAM titanium mesh were included. The smallest maxillary defect was 4.1 cm and the largest defect was 9.6 cm, with an average of 7.1 cm. The reconstructed maxillary vertical dimension ranged from 9.3 mm to 17.4 mm, with a mean of 13.17 mm. The transverse dimension of the maxilla at the crestal level was attempted to be reconstructed based on the pre-excision CT scan, and these measurements ranged from 6.5 mm in the premaxilla area to 14.6 mm at the posterior level. All patients were rehabilitated with a fixed prosthesis on subperiosteal implants with good esthetic and functional results. In conclusion, we believe that customized subperiosteal titanium maxillary implants (CSTMI) are a safe alternative for maxillary defects reconstruction, allowing for simultaneous dental rehabilitation while restoring midface projection. Nonetheless, prospective and randomized trials are required with long-term follow-up, to assess its long-term performance and safety.
RESUMEN
Introduction: To describe a clinical case on cancer patient with ablative tumor surgery, from treatment planning, surgical resection and subsequent implantological rehabilitation. Case Report: A 61-year-old male, diagnosed with a squamous cell carcinoma in the maxilla, requires the removal of the lesion and corresponding oral rehabilitation. However, two surgeries were necessary to rehabilitate the upper jaw. A custom-made prosthesis was fabricated. It was made from sintered titanium using machined subperiosteal implants with a universal external connection. Finally, a milled cobalt- chrome structure was produced and a feldspar ceramic covering was subsequently applied. Conclusions: Rehabilitation using subperiosteal implants may be an alternative tool for complex surgery involving large atrophies or cancer patients who have undergone highly ablative surgery. Key words:Oral rehabilitation, oral cancer, subperiostal implants.
RESUMEN
A 52-year-old female patient with a diagnostic of osteosarcoma in the mandible, in which it was necessary a reconstruction with a microvascularized osteomyocutaneous fibula bone. Coadjuvant chemotherapy was scheduled. Two years later, 4 osseointegrated implants (OII) were placed in the fibula a 2 OII in the right mandible, using a splint guided surgery. The final prosthodontic consisted in a metal ceramic restoration using CAD/ CAM technology. Key words:Oral rehabilitation, oral cancer, head and neck radiotherapy, oral oncology.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To describe a clinical case of a cancer patient who underwent ablative tumor surgery, including treatment planning, surgical resection and subsequent implant rehabilitation. CASE REPORT: A 61-year-old patient with a diagnosis of multicystic follicular ameloblastoma in the maxilla, in which it was necessary a multidisciplinary approach and two surgical steps. In the first surgical intervention osseointegrated implants (OII) were placed in the fibula, until their osseointegration period of 8 weeks was complete. Afterwards, in the second surgery, the micro-vascularized free fibular flap bearing the implants was transplanted into the oral cavity, in order to perform simultaneous reconstruction and early rehabilitation. The final prosthetic rehabilitation consisted in a hybrid prosthesis fabricated using CAD CAM technology. RESULTS: The latest advances in medical research have improved our understanding of the oral cavity's regenerative capacity after oncological treatment. This, aided by the advances in digital 3D technologies, has allowed meticulous treatment planning prior surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The functional and esthetic reconstructions described in these two case reports were made possible by coordinating multidisciplinary approaches involving dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Advances in medicine have improved understanding of the regenerative capacity of the oral region following oncologic treatment, facilitating meticulous advance planning, while advances in digital 3D technologies for planning make it possible to reduce the number of surgical sessions and the time taken for the patient to recover both the esthetics and function of the stomatognathic system. Key words:Oral rehabilitation, oral cancer, oral surgery.
RESUMEN
Diversos refinamientos de la técnica quirúrgica de apicectomía han propiciado que su tasa de éxito haya aumentado de modo considerable. Se revisa la bibliografía científica para determinar cuáles de estos procedimientos son superiores. Se realiza un protocolo que aúna racionalmente esas técnicas, con lo que así se optimiza el resultado final de la intervención(AU)
Diverse refinements of the apicoectomy surgical technique have considerably increased the success rate of the procedure. The scientific literature was reviewed to identify the most relevant procedures for the final outcome of surgery. A protocol was prepared to facilitate the rational selection of technique, thus optimizing the surgical outcome(AU)
