Prevalence of Transmitted Antiretroviral Resistance and Distribution of HIV-1Subtypes Among Patients with Recent Infection in Catalonia (Spain) between2003 and 2005

Los objetivos de este estudio fueron evaluar la prevalencia de las resistencias primarias transmitidas (RPT)y de subtipos de VIH-1 en pacientes recientemente infectados en Cataluña entre 2003 y 2005, y describirlas características de estos pacientes según la presencia o ausencia de RPT y el subtipo de VIH-1.Métodos: Después de la aplicación del algoritmo de pruebas serológicas para la seroconversión reciente al VIH (STARHS), alícuotas residuales de las muestras de suero de individuos recientemente infectados no tratados previamente con antirretrovirales fueron genotipados. Las secuencias FASTA se analizaron conel programa HIV db. Se utilizó el listado de mutaciones de la Organización Mundial de la Salud del 2009para estimar la prevalencia de resistencias transmitidas. Resultados: De 182 pacientes recientemente infectados, 14 (7,7%) presentaron RPT. Siete personas (3,8%)presentaban evidencias genotípica de RPT a los inhibidores de la transcriptasa inversa no análogos anucleósidos, 6 (3,3%) frente a inhibidores de la transcriptasa inversa análogos de nucleósidos, 3 (1,6%)frente a los inhibidores de la proteasa, y solo 2 personas (1,1%) presentaron RPT a más de una familia de medicamentos. Treinta y cinco (19,2%) pacientes estaban infectados con un subtipo no-B del VIH-1.Conclusión: Este es el primer estudio que estima la prevalencia de RPT en pacientes recientemente infectadosen Cataluña, y los resultados son similares a los de estudios realizados en otras regiones españolas. Para el adecuado seguimiento de estos parámetros es necesaria la vigilancia epidemiológica sistemática de las RPT (AU)

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistances(TDR) and HIV-1 subtypes in recently infected patients in Catalonia between 2003 and 2005 and to describe the characteristics of these patients according to the presence or absence of TDR and HIV-1subtype.Methods: After application of the Serological Testing Algorithm for Recent HIV Seroconversion (STARHS),residual aliquots of serum samples from recently infected antiretroviral-naïve individuals were genotyped. FASTA sequences were analyzed using the HIVDB Program. The World Health Organization 2009List of Mutations for Surveillance of Transmitted HIV-1 Drug Resistant HIV Strains was used to estimate the prevalence of TDR. Results: Of 182 recently infected patients, 14 (7.7%) presented TDR. Seven (3.8%) had genotypic evidence of TDR against non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 6 (3.3%) against nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 3 (1.6%) against protease inhibitors (PIs), and only 2 individuals (1.1%) presented TDR against more than one class of drugs. Thirty-five (19.2%) patients were infected with a non-B HIV-1subtype.Conclusion: This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of TDR in recently infected patients in Catalonia. The results are similar to those of studies performed in other Spanish regions. Correct monitoring of these parameters requires systematic epidemiologic surveillance of transmitted resistance (AU)

Prevalence of transmitted antiretroviral resistance and distribution of HIV-1 subtypes among patients with recent infection in Catalonia (Spain) between 2003 and 2005.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistances (TDR) and HIV-1 subtypes in recently infected patients in Catalonia between 2003 and 2005 and to describe the characteristics of these patients according to the presence or absence of TDR and HIV-1 subtype. METHODS: After application of the Serological Testing Algorithm for Recent HIV Seroconversion (STARHS), residual aliquots of serum samples from recently infected antiretroviral-naïve individuals were genotyped. FASTA sequences were analyzed using the HIVDB Program. The World Health Organization 2009 List of Mutations for Surveillance of Transmitted HIV-1 Drug Resistant HIV Strains was used to estimate the prevalence of TDR. RESULTS: Of 182 recently infected patients, 14 (7.7%) presented TDR. Seven (3.8%) had genotypic evidence of TDR against non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 6 (3.3%) against nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 3 (1.6%) against protease inhibitors (PIs), and only 2 individuals (1.1%) presented TDR against more than one class of drugs. Thirty-five (19.2%) patients were infected with a non-B HIV-1 subtype. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of TDR in recently infected patients in Catalonia. The results are similar to those of studies performed in other Spanish regions. Correct monitoring of these parameters requires systematic epidemiologic surveillance of transmitted resistance.

Poor response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy in HIV- and HCV-coinfected patients is not due to lower adherence to treatment.

The degree of adherence to anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is not known. A prospective cohort study was performed in two groups of patients: 79 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (group 1) and 78-HCV-monoinfected patients (group 2). Patients were treated with interferon alpha-2a (3 million international units [MIU], three times per week) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. Adherence to therapy was defined as having received +/-80% of both drug dosages for +/-80% of the expected duration of therapy. The degree of adherence to treatment was similar for patients with or without HIV coinfection (72.2 versus 80.8%). The overall sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with adherence to therapy was 41.7% as compared with only 8.1% (p = 0.0001) in patients without adherence. The difference in SVR rate according to adherence to treatment was also evident in patients of group 1 (29.8% versus 9.1%; p = 0.05) as well as in those of group 2 (52.4 versus 6.7%; p = 0.001). Adherence to anti-HCV therapy, which can be similar in mono- and coinfected patients, enhances the likelihood of achieving an increase in SVR rate. In addition to improved adherence, in coinfected patients more aggressive therapeutic strategies may be necessary to achieve SVR.

[Quick and early diagnostic outpatient unit: an effective and efficient assistential model. Five years experience]. / Unidad de diagnóstico rápido: un modelo asistencial eficaz y eficiente. Experiencia de 5 años.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To analyze the applicability of an out-patient Quick and Early Diagnostic Unit (QEDU) to evaluate patients with a potential life-threatening disorder on an out-patient basis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We analyzed prospectively all patients attended in the unit for five years (1997-2001). We compared patients with lung cancer and colorectal cancer admitted to hospital for conventional study versus patients studied at the unit. RESULTS: We attended 2,748 patients in total Main reasons for consultation were abdominal pain, asthenia-anorexia, neurologic symptoms, anemia and palpable tumors. The most frequent diagnostic category corresponded to gastroenterological diseases and neoplastic diseases. The mean interval (standard error) for the first visit was 4.9 (3.4) days and for diagnosis it was 5.7 (6.5) days. Some 95% patients displayed a high degree of satisfaction by the questionnaire. In patients with cancer of the colon studied at the QEDU, we observed a reduction in the average interval for diagnosis which was highly significant (p = 0.03). The overall costs of final diagnosis were also lower for the QEDU model. CONCLUSIONS: The QEDU unit represents an alternative to in hospital admission for diagnostic workouts, which is fully feasible in our setting. It can result in the same efficacy and a higher efficiency than hospital admission.