Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer.

Background: Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. A better understanding of where treatment fails could aid the development of new treatment strategies. Objective: To describe the disease course after pelvic lymph node (LN) treatment for PeCa. Design setting and participants: We retrospectively analysed 228 patients who underwent pelvic LN treatment with curative intent from 1969 to 2016. The main treatment modalities were neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and pelvic LN dissection. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: In the case of multiple recurrence locations, the most distant location was taken and recorded as follows: local (penis), regional (inguinal and pelvic LN), and distant (any other location). A competing risk analysis was used to calculate the time to recurrence per location, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS). Results and limitations: The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 79 mo. The reason for pelvic treatment was pelvic involvement on imaging (29%), two or more tumour-positive inguinal LNs (61%), or inguinal extranodal extension (52%). More than half of the patients (61%) developed a recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival was 11 mo. The distribution was local in 9%, regional in 27%, and distant in 64% of patients. The infield control rate of nonsystemically treated patients was 61% (113/184). From the start of pelvic treatment, the median OS was 17 mo (95% confidence interval 12-22). After regional or distant recurrence, all but one patient died of PeCa with median OS after a recurrence of 4.4 (regional) and 3.1 (distant) mo. This study is limited by its retrospective nature. Conclusions: The prognosis of PeCa patients treated on their pelvis who recur despite locoregional treatment is poor. The tendency for systemic spread emphasises the need for more effective systemic treatment strategies. Patient summary: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of penile cancer patients in an expert centre undergoing various treatments on their pelvis. We found that survival is poor after recurrence despite locoregional treatment. Therefore, better systemic treatments are necessary.

What Is the Most Effective Management of the Primary Tumor in Men with Invasive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Available Treatment Options and Their Outcomes.

Context: The primary lesion in penile cancer is managed by surgery or radiation. Surgical options include penile-sparing surgery, amputative surgery, laser excision, and Moh's micrographic surgery. Radiation is applied as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. The treatment aims to completely remove the primary lesion and preserve a sufficient functional penile stump. Objective: To assess whether the 5-yr recurrence-free rate and other outcomes, such as sexual function, quality of life, urination, and penile preserving length, vary between various treatment options. Evidence acquisition: The EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane HTA, DARE, HEED), Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for publications from 1990 through May 2021. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. Evidence synthesis: The systematic review included 88 studies, involving 9578 men from 16 NRCSs and 72 CSs. The cumulative mean 5-yr recurrence-free rates were 82.0% for penile-sparing surgery, 83.9% for amputative surgery, 78.6% for brachytherapy, 55.2% for EBRT, 69.4% for lasers, and 88.2% for Moh's micrographic surgery, as reported from CSs, and 76.7% for penile-sparing surgery and 93.3% for amputative surgery, as reported from NRCSs. Penile surgery affects sexual function, but amputative surgery causes more appearance concerns. After brachytherapy, 25% of patients reported sexual dysfunction. Both penile-sparing surgery and amputative surgery affect all aspects of psychosocial well-being. Conclusions: Despite the poor quality of evidence, data suggest that penile-sparing surgery is not inferior to amputative surgery in terms of recurrence rates in selected patients. Based on the available information, however, broadly applicable recommendations cannot be made; appropriate patient selection accounts for the relative success of all the available methods. Patient summary: We reviewed the evidence of various techniques to treat penile tumor and assessed their effectiveness in oncologic control and their functional outcomes. Penile-sparing as well as amputative surgery is an effective treatment option, but amputative surgery has a negative impact on sexual function. Penile-sparing surgery and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of local recurrence, but preserve sexual function and quality of life better. Laser and Moh's micrographic surgery could be used for smaller lesions.

PSMA-11-PET/CT versus choline-PET/CT to guide stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for androgen deprivation therapy deferral in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with oligometastatic recurrent prostate cancer, standard treatment is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, ADT has many potential side effects that may result in impaired quality of life. Early identification to select patients suitable for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is of utmost importance to prevent or delay start of ADT and its side effects. Because Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-11-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-11-PET) has a higher sensitivity than choline-PET, we hypothesise that PSMA-11-PET based SABR results in longer response duration and subsequent longer delay in starting ADT than choline-PET. METHODS: Patients with oligometastatic (≤4 metastases) recurrent prostate cancer (with no local recurrence) based on PSMA-11-PET or choline-PET treated with SABR from January 2012 until December 2017 were included. Primary endpoint was ADT-free survival. Secondary endpoints were Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) response after SABR and time to PSA rise after SABR. RESULTS: Fifty patients (n = 40 PSMA-11-PET and n = 10 choline-PET) with in total 72 lesions were included. Median follow-up was 24.3 months. PSMA-11-PET enabled eligibility of patients with lower PSA levels than choline-PET (median 1.8 versus 4.2 ng/mL, p = 0.03). The PSMA-11-PET group had a significant longer PSA response duration (median 34.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 16.0-52.0) versus 14.7 months (95% CI 4.7-24.7), p = 0.004) with a subsequent longer ADT-free survival (median 32.7 months (95% CI, 20.8-44.5) versus 14.9 months (95% CI, 5.7-24.1), p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: With PSMA-11-PET we are able to select patients with oligometastatic recurrent prostate cancer suitable for SABR in an earlier disease stage at lower PSA levels. PSMA-11-PET guided SABR resulted in a significant longer response duration and ADT-free survival compared with choline-PET and can therefore prevent or delay ADT related side effects.

Displacement patterns of stranded I-125 seeds after permanent brachytherapy of the prostate: Dosimetry in the operating room put into perspective.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The reliability of post-implant dosimetry in the OR depends on the geometrical variability of implant and anatomy after the procedure. The purpose was to gain detailed information on seed displacement patterns in different sectors of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 33 patients with stranded seed implants the seed geometry and the dose distribution were compared between the situation in the OR just after the procedure, based on ultrasound images, and the situation after 1month, based on registered CT and MR images. RESULTS: There was a substantial displacement of ventral seeds of 3.8±2.5mm in caudal direction (p<0.001). Of these ventral seeds cranially located seeds moved more than caudally located seeds, 4.5±2.7mm and 2.9±2.6mm, respectively (p<0.001). The D90 in the dorsal-caudal and ventral-caudal sectors increased with respectively 44±20Gy and 29±28Gy (p<0.001) and decreased with 17±31Gy in the ventral-cranial sector (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: There were substantial changes in dose distribution 1month after the procedure, mainly due to implant and prostate shrinkage and displacement of ventral seed strands in caudal direction. When performing dynamic dosimetry or dosimetry at the end of the procedure the effect of these phenomena has to be taken into account when using stranded seeds.

Is there a relation between the radiation dose to the different sub-segments of the lower urinary tract and urinary morbidity after brachytherapy of the prostate with I-125 seeds?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate possible relationships between the dose to the sub-segments of the lower urinary tract and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after brachytherapy of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved 225 patients treated for prostate cancer with I-125 seeds. Post-implant dose-volume histograms of the prostate, urethra, bladder wall, bladder neck and external sphincter were determined. Endpoints were the mean and the maximum International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) during the first 3months after the treatment. For binary analysis the patients were stratified in a group with enhanced LUTS and a group with non-enhanced LUTS. RESULTS: The dose to 0.5cm(3) of the bladder neck 'D0.5cc-blne' (p=0.002 and p=0.005), the prostate volume prior to treatment 'Vpr-0' (p=0.005 and p=0.024) and the pre-treatment IPSS (both p<0.001) were independently correlated with mean and maximum IPSS, respectively. Of the patients with a D0.5cc-blne⩾175Gy and a Vpr-0⩾42cm(3), 68% suffered from enhanced LUTS, against just 30% of the other patients (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment IPSS, prostate volume and dose to the bladder neck are correlated with post-implant IPSS. A combination of a large prostate and a high dose to the bladder neck is highly predictive for enhanced early LUTS.

Inguinal recurrence following therapeutic lymphadenectomy for node positive penile carcinoma: outcome and implications for management.

PURPOSE: We investigated the treatment results and outcomes of patients with pathological node positive penile carcinoma who experienced an inguinal recurrence after therapeutic lymphadenectomy, and determined the clinicopathological features predictive of such recurrences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 161 patients with pN+ penile carcinoma were analyzed. Ipsilateral postoperative radiotherapy was given if histopathology revealed 2 or more metastases and/or extranodal extension. Medium observed followup was 60 months. The 5-year incidence of inguinal recurrence was estimated using a competing risk analysis considering death a competing risk. RESULTS: An inguinal recurrence developed in 26 patients following lymphadenectomy after a median of 5.3 months. The overall estimated 5-year inguinal recurrence rate was 16%. Of the 26 patients with inguinal recurrence ipsilateral adjuvant radiotherapy was indicated in 22 but given in 11. The other 11 patients had recurrence in the groin before the start of adjuvant radiotherapy. Median survival after inguinal recurrence was 4.5 months. Only 2 of 26 patients (8%) underwent successful salvage after inguinal recurrence. Pronounced differences in estimated recurrence rates were found among several clinicopathological variables indicating extensive penile cancer. Patients with 3 or more unilateral metastatic inguinal nodes and/or extranodal extension and/or pelvic nodal involvement defined a subgroup with high risk pN+ penile cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Most inguinal recurrence following therapeutic lymphadenectomy in pN+ penile carcinoma occurs within a short time. Patients experiencing such a recurrence have a poor outcome with limited salvage options. Patients with 3 or more unilateral metastatic inguinal nodes and/or extranodal extension and/or pelvic nodal involvement represent a high risk group that may benefit from multimodality treatment.

Minimizing the number of implantation needles for prostate (125)I brachytherapy: an investigation of possibilities and implications.

PURPOSE: Reduction of the number of implantation needles for prostate brachytherapy will shorten the duration of implantation procedures and possibly reduce trauma-related morbidity. The purpose of this study was to investigate possibilities for the minimization of the number of needles and to investigate the consequences for the dose distribution. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A planning study for six different prostate volumes was performed. The number of needles was minimized by changing fixed 1cm interseed spacing to free interseed spacing within the needles and by increasing the seed activity. Dose-volume parameters of prostate and organs at risk (OAR) bladder, rectum, and urethra were determined. For plans with different needle and seed configurations, the sensitivity for random seed placement inaccuracies was tested. Dose distributions of realized implants based on fixed (n=21) and free interseed spacing (n=21) were compared. RESULTS: The average number of needles (±1 standard deviation) could be reduced from 18.8±3.6 to 12.7±2.9 (-33%) when changing from fixed interseed spacing to free interseed spacing and subsequently to 7.3±1.0 (-42%) by increasing the seed strength from 0.57U to 1.14U. These needle reductions resulted in increased dose inhomogeneity within the prostate and increased sensitivity of dose-volume parameters of the OAR for random geometrical inaccuracies. Introduction of free interseed spacing in our clinic resulted in very satisfactory dose coverage of the prostate (D(90)=172±17Gy), while the average number of needles was reduced by 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial reduction of the number of implantation needles is possible without compromising adequate dose coverage of the prostate. However, the chance of an unpredicted high dose to the OAR increases as fewer needles are used.

Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in patients with pathological node positive penile carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We assessed the prognostic significance of extranodal extension, defined as tumor extension through the lymph node capsule into the perinodal fibrous-adipose tissue, as well as several other risk factors in node positive penile cancer cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data on a consecutive series of 156 chemotherapy naïve patients with proven lymph node involvement who underwent therapeutic regional lymphadenectomy. Postoperative external radiotherapy was indicated when histopathological analysis revealed more tumor than 1 intranodal metastasis. We estimated cancer specific survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was done according to the Cox proportional hazards model of factors statistically significant on univariate analysis. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiotherapy was done in 70 patients (45%). Median followup was 57.8 months. Overall 5-year cancer specific survival was 61%. Men with extranodal extension had significantly decreased 5-year cancer specific survival compared with men without it (42% vs 80%). Other prognostic variables on univariate analysis were bilateral metastatic involvement vs unilateral, 3 or greater unilateral metastatic inguinal nodes vs 2 or fewer, inguinal lymphadenectomy positive margin status vs negative status and pelvic lymph node involvement. Pathological T stage or differentiation grade were not significant predictors of outcome. On multivariate analysis extranodal extension and pelvic lymph node involvement remained associated with decreased cancer specific survival (HR 2.37 and 2.20, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic inguinal lymph node extranodal extension and pelvic lymph node involvement are independent predictive parameters of cancer specific survival in patients with pathologically node positive penile carcinoma despite surgery with postoperative radiotherapy.

An analysis of the relation between physical characteristics of prostate I-125 seed implants and lower urinary tract symptoms: bladder hotspot dose and prostate size are significant predictors.

PURPOSE: Lower urinary tract symptoms are frequently observed after I-125 seed implantation of the prostate. More knowledge about causes and predictors is necessary to be able to develop less toxic implantation techniques. The aim of this study was to identify implantation related factors that contribute to post-implant urinary morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysed was a group of 72 patients that filled in a symptom score questionnaire before, 3 months and 6 months after implantation as well as a group of 15 patients that suffered from acute urinary retention. Several dose-volume parameters of prostate, urethra and bladder wall were determined based on a post-implant TRUS-CT scan. RESULTS: The dose to a 1cm(3) hotspot in the bladder wall (D1cc-bl) as well as the prostate volume were independently correlated with urinary morbidity symptom scores at 3 months (p=0.006 and p=0.005, respectively) and at 6 months (p=0.001 and p=0.015, respectively) after implantation. The number of implanted seeds and the D1cc-bl were significant discriminators (p<0.001 and p=0.015, respectively) for either mild or severe early urinary morbidity. CONCLUSION: Bladder hotspot dose appears to be an important dosimetric predictor for urinary morbidity both at 3 months and at 6 months after implantation. Other predictors are prostate volume, or equivalently, the number of implanted seeds.

The influence of geometrical changes on the dose distribution after I-125 seed implantation of the prostate.

PURPOSE: After prostate implantation, dose calculation is usually based on a single imaging session, assuming no geometrical changes occur during the months of dose accumulation. In this study, the effect of changes in anatomy and implant geometry on the dose distribution was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One day, 1 month and 312 months after seed implantation, a combined TRUS-CT scan was made of 13 patients. Based on these scans changes in dose rate distribution were determined in prostate, urethra and bladder and a 'geometry corrected' dose distribution was estimated. RESULTS: When based on the day-1 scan, parameters representing high dose volumes in prostate and urethra were largely underestimated: V150 of the prostate 18+/-10% and V120 of the urethra 47+/-32%. The dose to a 2cm(3) hotspot in the bladder wall (D2cc), however, was overestimated by 31+/-35%. Parameters based on scans 1 month post-implant or later were all within +/-5% of geometry corrected values. CONCLUSION: Values meant to indicate the adequacy of dose coverage of the prostate, V100 and D90, were not influenced by geometrical changes and were independent of the post-implant scan date. Other parameters representing high dose volumes changed strongly within the first month after implantation.

Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival.

PURPOSE: We identified pathological parameters of inguinal lymph node involvement with the aim of predicting pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 308 patients with penile carcinoma and adequate followup were included in this study. The outcome of 102 patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for lymph node metastases was analyzed further. Histopathological characteristics of the regional lymph nodes were reviewed including unilateral or bilateral involvement, the number of involved nodes, pathological tumor grade of the involved nodes, and the presence of extracapsular growth. RESULTS: Tumor grade of the involved inguinal lymph nodes (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.2-30.3) and the number of involved nodes (2 or less vs more than 2) (OR 12.1, 95% CI 3.0-48.1) were independent prognostic factors for pelvic lymph node involvement. Extracapsular growth (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8), bilateral inguinal involvement OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2-9.4) and pelvic lymph node involvement (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.6) were independent prognostic factors for disease specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with only 1 or 2 inguinal lymph nodes involved without extracapsular growth and no poorly differentiated tumor within these nodes are at low risk of pelvic lymph node involvement and have a good prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 90%. Pelvic lymph node dissection seems to be unnecessary in these cases.

Salvage cystectomy after failure of interstitial radiotherapy and external beam radiotherapy for bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of salvage cystectomy after interstitial radiotherapy (IRT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for transitional cell carcinoma, and to assess the morbidity and functional results of the different urinary diversions used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 27 patients treated with salvage cystectomy in one institution between 1988 and 2003 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Salvage cystectomy was used after failure of IRT in 14 or EBRT in 13 patients, with a 3- and 5-year survival probability of 46% (95% confidence interval 26-65) and 33 (11-54)%. The 5-year overall survival after cystectomy was 54% after IRT and 14% after EBRT (P = 0.12). Tumour category, response to radiation, American Society of Anesthesiology score, and complete tumour resection had a significant influence on survival. Five of seven patients with incomplete resection died because of local disease, with a median survival of 5 months. There was clinical understaging after radiotherapy in 41% of patients. Nine patients had an orthotopic neobladder, with complete day- and night-time continence in eight and four, respectively. All patients but one had good voiding function. There were early complications in two and late complications in six patients (for Bricker, seven of 14 and none; for Indiana, none of four and two of four). The duration of hospitalization was not influenced by the type of diversion. Erectile function was maintained in four of six patients after a sexuality-preserving cystectomy and neobladder. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage cystectomy can be performed with acceptable morbidity using any type of urinary diversion. Understaging after radiotherapy is common, but preoperative selection needs improving. A very significant factor for an adverse outcome and death from local tumour recurrence was incomplete resection, suggesting that salvage cystectomy should only be attempted if complete resection is probable.