RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Telemedicine has been an emerging trend over the past few years and has seen an exponential rise due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of the present study was to determine the accuracy of planned oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) procedures for patients seen initially by telemedicine in the department of OMS during the pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Record review of all patients who received telemedicine consultations during the pandemic time frame of March 1, 2020, to March 1, 2021, was performed. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the planned OMS procedure. Accuracy was defined as the ability to conduct the planned surgery with chosen anesthesia (local anesthesia, diazepam + local anesthesia, intravenous sedation, general anesthesia) at the immediate follow-up appointment without the need for further preoperative testing, evaluation, and consultation. The secondary outcomes were to determine the change in surgical plan, anesthesia plan, and medical plan. Predictor variables included age at the time of telemedicine consultation, gender, race, ethnicity, and the type of consult. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were executed. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 286 (64.56%) females and 157 (35.44%) males. The age range of the study population was 9 to 92 years, with a mean age of 33.88 years (standard deviation = 16.29 years). In the cohort of 443 patients who obtained telemedicine consultations, 98.19% were successfully treated at the following appointment. Four hundred thirty-one (97.3%) out of the 443 telemedicine consults pertained to dentoalveolar concerns. Logistic regression analysis showed that neither age nor gender had significant effects on the change of surgical and anesthesia plans. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine can be effectively utilized in performing consultations for routine OMS procedures, especially dentoalveolar surgeries. Telemedicine consultation can also be used to conduct a preoperative assessment to determine anesthesia and setting of care. However, given the lack of control group and the observational nature of this study, the results must be interpreted with caution.