Outcomes for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ and a positive sentinel node: a multi-institutional audit.

BACKGROUND: A positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) has been reported in 6% to 13% of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Although it is well established that nodal status for invasive disease is prognostically important, the clinical relevance of a positive SLN in patients with DCIS remains undetermined. METHODS: SLN biopsy was performed on 470 high-risk patients with DCIS (22% of all patients with DCIS) at 3 institutions. Of these, 43 (9%) had SLN metastases. Pathology findings of positive cases were reviewed, and follow-up was obtained. At 2 of the 3 institutions, data were also collected on DCIS patients who had negative findings on SLN biopsy. For these 414 patients, univariate analyses of tumor characteristics were performed to identify factors associated with node positivity. RESULTS: Extensive disease requiring mastectomy (p = 0.02) and the presence of necrosis (p = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of nodal positivity. Three (7%) of the 43 SLN-positive patients had macrometastases (pN1), 4 (9%) had micrometastases (pN1mi), and 36 (84%) had single tumor cells or small clusters (pN0(i+)). Of the 25 women that underwent completion axillary dissection, one was found to have a macrometastasis. On pathological review of the primary lesion, 2 (5%) of 43 patints were found to have microinvasion, and 2 (5%) lymphovascular invasion. Nine of 43 (21%) high-risk DCIS patients with a positive SLN and 9/470 (2%) of all high-risk DCIS patients were upstaged to AJCC stage I or II as a result of the SLN biopsy. At a median (range) follow-up of 27 (3-88) months, 1 patient had developed hepatic metastases. This patient had immunohistochemistry detected isolated tumor cells in her SLN (N0(i+)), and upon pathologic review, was found to have high-grade DCIS with microinvasion. CONCLUSION: SLN biopsy for high-risk DCIS patients is a mean of detecting those who may have unrecognized invasive disease and therefore are at risk for distant disease.

Immunohistochemically detected tumor cells in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with breast carcinoma: biologic metastasis or procedural artifact?

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a new standard of care for patients with breast carcinoma, and allows enhanced pathologic analysis with serial sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratins to be performed on a routine basis. However, the significance of SLN micrometastases detected only by IHC is uncertain. Are these tumor cells truly markers of metastatic potential, or simply evidence of passive displacement by preoperative instrumentation of the tumor site? Here we evaluate whether the pattern of SLN metastasis in breast carcinoma is related to the degree of manipulation at biopsy before surgery, independently of other known predictors. METHODS: Among 4016 consecutive eligible patients with breast carcinoma registered in a prospective SLN database at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, we noted patient/tumor characteristics, pathologic status of the SLN (negative, positive by hematoxylin and eosin [H&E], or positive only on IHC), and method of previous biopsy (none, fine-needle aspiration biopsy [FNAB], core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy). RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that the likelihood of an H&E-positive SLN was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion, tumor size, tumor type, and tumor location, but not with the method of biopsy. In contrast, the likelihood of finding an SLN positive only on IHC was unassociated with any of the four variables above, but was significantly associated with the method of biopsy. After no previous biopsy, FNAB, core needle biopsy, or surgical biopsy, IHC-positive SLN were present in 1.2%, 3.0%, 3.8%, and 4.6% of patients, respectively (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the frequency of IHC-positive SLN in patients with breast carcinoma 1) is unrelated to conventional predictors of lymph node positivity, 2) is increased after instrumentation of the tumor site, and 3) is increased approximately proportionate to the degree of manipulation. A proportion of IHC-positive SLN were present before biopsy and therefore less likely to be artifactual.

How are we treating patients with hepatic colorectal metastases in Sydney?

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer is common. At presentation 25% of patients have established hepatic metastases and overall at least half will develop hepatic metastases. Many different therapeutic options have been proposed. This study evaluates the current resources available and patterns of care for patients with hepatic colorectal metastases in the Sydney metropolitan area. METHODS: Prospective data were collated describing all patients presenting to any one of nine hospitals within the Sydney metropolitan area in a 12-month period, diagnosed with hepatic metastases. The data included patient demographics and background, treatment of the primary tumour, diagnosis and treatment of the hepatic metastases and histopathology both of the primary and of the hepatic metastases. RESULTS: There were 194 patients in the study. Most when diagnosed with hepatic colorectal metastases were independent, active, retired and usually had existing social supports. The majority had had their primary colorectal cancer resected and were later treated with systemic chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for a comprehensive multicentre, prospective data collection of patients with hepatic metastatic disease. This would clarify the effectiveness or otherwise of the health system caring for such patients and provide additional information for the development and implementation of guidelines.