Reprogramming human B cells with custom heavy-chain antibodies.

The immunoglobulin locus of B cells can be reprogrammed by genome editing to produce custom or non-natural antibodies that are not induced by immunization. However, current strategies for antibody reprogramming require complex expression cassettes and do not allow for customization of the constant region of the antibody. Here we show that human B cells can be edited at the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus to express heavy-chain-only antibodies that support alterations to both the fragment crystallizable domain and the antigen-binding domain, which can be based on both antibody and non-antibody components. Using the envelope protein (Env) from the human immunodeficiency virus as a model antigen, we show that B cells edited to express heavy-chain antibodies to Env support the regulated expression of B cell receptors and antibodies through alternative splicing and that the cells respond to the Env antigen in a tonsil organoid model of immunization. This strategy allows for the reprogramming of human B cells to retain the potential for in vivo amplification while producing molecules with flexibility of composition beyond that of standard antibodies.

Reprogramming human B cells with custom heavy chain antibodies.

We describe a genome editing strategy to reprogram the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus of human B cells to express custom molecules that respond to immunization. These heavy chain antibodies (HCAbs) comprise a custom antigen-recognition domain linked to an Fc domain derived from the IgH locus and can be differentially spliced to express either B cell receptor (BCR) or secreted antibody isoforms. The HCAb editing platform is highly flexible, supporting antigen-binding domains based on both antibody and non-antibody components, and also allowing alterations in the Fc domain. Using HIV Env protein as a model antigen, we show that B cells edited to express anti-Env HCAbs support the regulated expression of both BCRs and antibodies, and respond to Env antigen in a tonsil organoid model of immunization. In this way, human B cells can be reprogrammed to produce customized therapeutic molecules with the potential for in vivo amplification.

Reprogramming human B cells with custom heavy chain antibodies.

We describe a genome editing strategy to reprogram the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus of human B cells to express custom molecules that respond to immunization. These heavy chain antibodies (HCAbs) comprise a custom antigen-recognition domain linked to an Fc domain derived from the IgH locus and can be differentially spliced to express either B cell receptor (BCR) or secreted antibody isoforms. The HCAb editing platform is highly flexible, supporting antigen-binding domains based on both antibody and non-antibody components, and also allowing alterations in the Fc domain. Using HIV Env protein as a model antigen, we show that B cells edited to express anti-Env HCAbs support the regulated expression of both BCRs and antibodies, and respond to Env antigen in a tonsil organoid model of immunization. In this way, human B cells can be reprogrammed to produce customized therapeutic molecules with the potential for in vivo amplification.

Salvage Therapy with Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir in DAA-experienced Patients: Results from a Prospective Canadian Registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite the current highly effective therapies with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), some patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection still do not achieve sustained virological response (SVR) and require retreatment. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SVV) is recommended as the first-line retreatment option for most patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of SVV as salvage therapy after at least one course of DAA. METHODS: Data were collected on all HCV-infected patients who failed DAAs and were prescribed SVV from a prospective Canadian registry (CANUHC) including 17 sites across Canada. Factors associated with failure to achieve SVR with SVV therapy and the utility of RAS testing and ribavirin use were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients received SVV after non-SVR with DAA treatment: 80% male, median age 57.5 (31-86), 44% cirrhotic, and 17 patients post liver transplant. First line regimens included: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (27.3%), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (26.5%), grazoprevir/elbasvir (12.5%), other (33.5%). Ribavirin was added to SVV in 26 patients due to past sofosbuvir/velpatasvir use (n = 8), complex resistance associated substitution profiles (n = 16) and/or cirrhosis (n = 9). Overall SVR rate was 96% (123/128). Of 35 patients who previously failed sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, 31 (88.5%) achieved SVR compared to 92 of 93 (99%) among those receiving any other regimen (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Similar to reports from phase 3 clinical trials, SVV proved highly effective as salvage therapy for patients who failed a previous DAA therapy. Those who failed SVV had at least 2 of the following factors: genotype 3, presence of cirrhosis, past liver transplantation, past exposure to sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and/or complex resistance profiles.

Limited potential of AAV-mediated gene therapy in transducing human mesenchymal stem cells for bone repair applications.

Adeno-associated viral vectors (AAV) are unique in their ability to transduce a variety of both dividing and nondividing cells, with significantly lower risk of random genomic integration and with no known pathogenicity in humans, but their role in ex vivo regional gene therapy for bone repair has not been definitively established. The goal of this study was to test the ability of AAV vectors carrying the cDNA for BMP-2 to transduce human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), produce BMP-2, and induce osteogenesis in vitro as compared with lentiviral gene therapy with a two-step transcriptional amplification system lentiviral vector (LV-TSTA). To this end, we created two AAV vectors (serotypes 2 and 6) expressing the target transgene; eGFP or BMP-2. Transduction of human MSCs isolated from bone marrow (BMSCs) or adipose tissue (ASCs) with AAV2-eGFP and AAV6-eGFP led to low transduction efficiency (BMSCs: 3.57% and 8.82%, respectively, ASCs: 6.17 and 20.2%, respectively) and mean fluorescence intensity as seen with FACS analysis 7 days following transduction, even at MOIs as high as 106. In contrast, strong eGFP expression was detectable in all of the cell types post transduction with LV-TSTA-eGFP. Transduction with BMP-2 producing vectors led to minimal BMP-2 production in AAV-transduced cells 2 and 7 days following transduction. In addition, transduction of ASCs and BMSCs with AAV2-BMP-2 and AAV6-BMP-2 did not enhance their osteogenic potential as seen with an alizarin red assay. In contrast, the LV-TSTA-BMP-2-transduced cells were characterized by an abundant BMP-2 production and induction of the osteogenic phenotype in vitro (p < 0.001 vs. AAV2 and 6). Our results demonstrate that the AAV2 and AAV6 vectors cannot induce a significant transgene expression in human BMSCs and ASCs, even at MOIs as high as 106. The LV-TSTA vector is significantly superior in transducing human MSCs; thus this vector would be preferable when developing an ex vivo regional gene therapy strategy for clinical use in orthopedic surgery applications.

Homologous Recombination-Based Genome Editing by Clade F AAVs Is Inefficient in the Absence of a Targeted DNA Break.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are frequently used as donor templates for genome editing by homologous recombination. Although modification rates are typically under 1%, they are greatly enhanced by targeted double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs). A recent report described clade F AAVs mediating high-efficiency homologous recombination-based editing in the absence of DSBs. The clade F vectors included AAV9 and a series isolated from human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). We evaluated these vectors by packaging homology donors into AAV9 and an AAVHSC capsid and examining their ability to insert GFP at the CCR5 and AAVS1 loci in human HSPCs and cell lines. As a control, we used AAV6, which effectively edits HSPCs but only when combined with a targeted DSB. Each AAV vector promoted GFP insertion in the presence of matched CCR5 or AAVS1 zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), but none supported detectable editing in the absence of the nucleases. Rates of editing with ZFNs correlated with transduction efficiencies for each vector, implying no differences in the ability of donor sequences delivered by the different vectors to direct genome editing. Our results, therefore, do not support that clade F AAVs can perform high-efficiency genome editing in the absence of a DSB.