Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect ; : 106286, 2024 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39341401

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: PICOBOO is a randomised, adaptive trial evaluating the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of COVID-19 booster strategies. We report data for second boosters among individuals 50-<70 years old primed with AZD1222 (50-<70y-AZD1222) until Day 84. METHODS: Contributed equally as first authors.Immunocompetent adults who received any first booster >three months prior were eligible. Participants were randomly allocated to BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 or NVX-CoV2373 1:1:1. The concentrations of ancestral anti-spike immunoglobulin was summarised as the geometric mean concentrations (GMC). Reactogenicity and safety outcomes were captured. Additional analyses including neutralising antibodies were performed on a subset. ACTRN12622000238774. RESULTS: Between Mar 2022-Aug 2023, 743 participants were recruited and had D28 samples; 155 belonged to the 50-<70y-AZD1222 stratum. The mean adjusted GMCs (95% credible intervals) were 20,690 (17,555-23,883), 23,867 (20,144-27,604) and 8,654 (7,267-9,962) U/mL at D28 following boosting with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 and NVX-CoV2372, respectively, and 10,976 (8,826-13,196), 15,779 (12,512-19,070) and 6,559 (5 220-7 937) U/mL by D84. IgG against Omicron BA.5 was 2.7-2.9 times lower than the ancestral strain. Limited neutralisation against Omicron subvariants was found following all vaccines. Severe reactogenicity events were <4%. CONCLUSIONS: All vaccines were immunogenic with more rapid waning after mRNA vaccines. These data support boosting with vaccines with greater specificity for circulating Omicron subvariants.

2.
Pathology ; 53(6): 773-779, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34412859

RESUMEN

Serological assays for SARS-CoV-2 infection are now widely available for use in diagnostic laboratories. Limited data are available on the performance characteristics in different settings, and at time periods remote from the initial infection. Validation of the Abbott (Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG), DiaSorin (Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG) and Roche (Cobas Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2) assays was undertaken utilising 217 serum samples from 131 participants up to 7 months following COVID-19 infection. The Abbott and DiaSorin assays were implemented into routine laboratory workflow, with outcomes reported for 2764 clinical specimens. Sensitivity and specificity were concordant with the range reported by the manufacturers for all assays. Sensitivity across the convalescent period was highest for the Roche at 95.2-100% (95% CI 81.0-100%), then the DiaSorin at 88.1-100% (95% CI 76.0-100%), followed by the Abbott 68.2-100% (95% CI 53.4-100%). Sensitivity of the Abbott assay fell from approximately 5 months; on this assay paired serum samples for 45 participants showed a significant drop in the signal-to-cut-off ratio and 10 sero-reversion events. When used in clinical practice, all samples testing positive by both DiaSorin and Abbott assays were confirmed as true positive results. In this low prevalence setting, despite high laboratory specificity, the positive predictive value of a single positive assay was low. Comprehensive validation of serological assays is necessary to determine the optimal assay for each diagnostic setting. In this low prevalence setting we found implementation of two assays with different antibody targets maximised sensitivity and specificity, with confirmatory testing necessary for any sample which was positive in only one assay.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/análisis , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Humanos , Laboratorios , Estudios Longitudinales , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Epidemiol Infect ; 149: e44, 2021 02 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33563349

RESUMEN

Much of our current understanding about novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) comes from hospitalised patients. However, the spectrum of mild and subclinical disease has implications for population-level screening and control. Forty-nine participants were recruited from a group of 99 adults repatriated from a cruise ship with a high incidence of COVID-19. Respiratory and rectal swabs were tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sera were tested for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and microneutralisation assay. Symptoms, viral shedding and antibody response were examined. Forty-five participants (92%) were considered cases based on either positive PCR or positive ELISA for immunoglobulin G. Forty-two percent of cases were asymptomatic. Only 15% of symptomatic cases reported fever. Serial respiratory and rectal swabs were positive for 10% and 5% of participants respectively about 3 weeks after median symptom onset. Cycle threshold values were high (range 31-45). Attempts to isolate live virus were unsuccessful. The presence of symptoms was not associated with demographics, comorbidities or antibody response. In closed settings, incidence of COVID-19 could be almost double that suggested by symptom-based screening. Serology may be useful in diagnosis of mild disease and in aiding public health investigations.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Navíos , Evaluación de Síntomas , Esparcimiento de Virus , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Neutralización , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Turismo , Uruguay , Victoria/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA