Atypical Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Nephritis: A Case Series From the French Nephropathology Group.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Atypical anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) nephritis is characterized by a bright linear immunoglobulin staining along the GBM by immunofluorescence without a diffuse crescentic glomerulonephritis nor serum anti-GBM antibodies by conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We characterized a series of patients with atypical anti-GBM disease. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients identified by the French Nephropathology Group as having atypical anti-GBM nephritis between 2003 and 2022. FINDINGS: Among 38 potential cases, 25 were included, of whom 14 (56%) were female and 23 (92%) had hematuria. The median serum creatinine at diagnosis was 150 (IQR, 102-203) µmol/L and median urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR) was 2.4 (IQR, 1.3-5.2) g/g. Nine patients (36%) had endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis (GN), 4 (16%) had mesangial proliferative GN, 4 (16%) had membranoproliferative GN, 2 (8%) had pure and focal crescentic GN, 1 (4%) had focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and 5 had glomeruli that were unremarkable on histopathology. Nine patients (36%) had crescents, involving a median of 9% of glomeruli. Bright linear staining for IgG was seen in 22 cases (88%) and for IgA in 3 cases (12%). The 9 patients (38%) who had a monotypic staining pattern tended to be older with less proteinuria and rarely had crescents. Kidney survival rate at 1 year was 83% and did not appear to be associated with the light chain restriction. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective case series with a limited number of biopsies including electron microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with typical anti-GBM disease, atypical anti-GBM nephritis frequently presents with an endocapillary or mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis pattern and appears to have a slower disease progression. Further studies are needed to fully characterize its pathophysiology and associated clinical outcomes. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Atypical anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) nephritis is characterized histologically by bright linear immunoglobulin staining along the GBM without diffuse crescentic glomerulonephritis or circulating anti-GBM antibodies. We report a case series of 25 atypical cases of anti-GBM nephritis in collaboration with the French Nephropathology Group. Compared with typical anti-GBM disease, we observed a slower disease progression. Patients frequently presented with heavy proteinuria and commonly had evidence of endocapillary or mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. About half of the patients displayed a monotypic immune staining pattern; they tended to be older, with less proteinuria, and commonly without glomerular crescents in biopsy specimens. No concomitant circulating monoclonal gammopathy was detected. Further studies are needed to fully characterize its pathophysiology and associated clinical outcomes.

Development and validation of a new equation based on plasma creatinine and muscle mass assessed by CT scan to estimate glomerular filtration rate: a cross-sectional study.

Background: Inter-individual variations of non-glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determinants of serum creatinine, such as muscle mass, account for the imperfect performance of estimated GFR (eGFR) equations. We aimed to develop an equation based on creatinine and total lumbar muscle cross-sectional area measured by unenhanced computed tomography scan at the third lumbar vertebra. Methods: The muscle mass-based eGFR (MMB-eGFR) equation was developed in 118 kidney donor candidates (iohexol clearance) using linear regression. Validation cohorts included 114 healthy subjects from another center (51Cr-EDTA clearance, validation population 1), 55 patients with chronic diseases (iohexol, validation population 2), and 60 patients with highly discordant creatinine and cystatin C-based eGFR, thus presumed to have atypical non-GFR determinants of creatinine (51Cr-EDTA, validation population 3). Mean bias was the mean difference between eGFR and measured GFR, precision the standard deviation (SD) of the bias, and accuracy the percentage of eGFR values falling within 20% and 30% of measured GFR. Results: In validation population 1, performance of MMB-eGFR was not different from those of CKD-EPICr2009 and CKD-EPICr2021. In validation population 2, MMB-eGFR was unbiased and displayed better precision than CKD-EPICr2009, CKD-EPICr2021 and EKFC (SD of the biases: 13.1 vs 16.5, 16.8 and 15.9 mL/min/1.73 m2). In validation population 3, MMB-eGFR had better precision and accuracy {accuracy within 30%: 75.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64.0-86.0] vs 51.5% (95% CI 39.0-64.3) for CKD-EPICr2009, 43.3% (95% CI 31.0-55.9) for CKD-EPICr2021, and 53.3% (95% CI 40.7-66.0) for EKFC}. Difference in bias between Black and white subjects was -2.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI -7.2 to 3.0), vs -8.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI -13.2 to -3.6) for CKD-EPICr2021. Conclusion: MMB-eGFR displayed better performances than equations based on demographics, and could be applied to subjects of various ethnic backgrounds.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept.

Introduction: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in kidney transplant recipients has been reported in 3% to 9% of anti-HBc antibody (HBcAb)-positive HBs antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients. It has not been studied in patients receiving belatacept, a selective costimulation blocker. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all transplant recipients receiving belatacept in 2 kidney transplantation centers in France. Among HBcAb-positive patients, we analyzed HBV reactivation rate, outcomes, and risk factors. Results: A total of 135 patients treated with belatacept were included: 32 were HBcAb-positive and 2 were HBsAg-positive. Seven patients reactivated HBV (21.9% of HBcAb-positive patients), including 5 HBsAg-negative patients (16.7% of HBcAb-positive HBsAg-negative patients). Reactivation occurred 54.8 (± 70.9) months after transplantation. One patient presented with severe hepatitis and 1 patient developed cirrhosis. There was no significant difference in survival between patients that reactivated HBV and patients that did not: 5-year patient survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 83.4% (67.6; 100), respectively (P = 0.363); and 5-year graft survival of 100% (28.6; 100) and 79.8% (61.7; 100), respectively (P = 0.335). No factor, including HBsAb positivity and antiviral prophylaxis, was statistically associated with the risk of HBV reactivation. Conclusion: HBV reactivation rate was high in patients treated with belatacept when compared with previous transplantation studies. HBV reactivation did not impact survival. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. A systematic antiviral prophylaxis for these patients should be considered and evaluated.

Belatacept rescue conversion in kidney transplant recipients with vascular lesions (Banff cv score >2): a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with decreased graft function and histological vascular changes can be particularly challenging. The impact of a late rescue conversion to belatacept on kidney graft survival in this context has never been studied. METHODS: We report a bicentric retrospective cohort study comparing a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept switch versus CNI continuation in 139 kidney transplant recipients with histological kidney vascular damage (cv ≥2, g + cpt ≤1, i + t ≤1) and low estimated glomerular filtration rate (≤40 mL/min/1.73 m²). Primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. RESULTS: During the study follow-up, 10 graft losses (14.5%) occurred in the belatacept group (n = 69) versus 26 (37.1%) in the matched CNI group (n = 70) (P = .005). Death-censored graft survival was significantly higher in the belatacept group (P = .001). At 3 years, graft survival was 84.0% in the belatacept group compared with 65.1% in the control group. Continuing CNI was an independent risk factor for graft loss [hazard ratio (HR) 3.46; P < .005]. The incidence of cellular rejection after the conversion was low (4.3% in both groups) and not significantly different between groups (P = .84). Patients switched to belatacept developed significantly less donor-specific antibodies de novo. Belatacept was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of opportunistic infections (HR 4.84; P < .005). CONCLUSION: The replacement of CNI with belatacept in patients with decreased allograft function and vascular lesions is associated with an improvement in graft survival and represents a valuable option in a context of organ shortage. Caution should be exercised regarding the increased risk of opportunistic infection.

CMV-related anterior and intermediate uveitis in a kidney transplant recipient treated with belatacept.

INTRODUCTION: Belatacept is associated with a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and atypical presentations. Ocular manifestations are rare, representing up to 5% of disease manifestations and previous cases consisted in isolated retinitis. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein, we report the case of an 81-year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed an anterior and intermediate uveitis under belatacept therapy. The diagnosis was established using quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction assays in the aqueous humor. Belatacept was interrupted and oral and topical valganciclovir treatments were instituted. Lesions however extended, leading to intensify the treatment by intra-venous and intra-vitreal ganciclovir injections. Visual acuity stabilized and ocular inflammation was finally controlled after 3 months. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of CMV infection as a cause of anterior uveitis under belatacept-based regimen, even in the absence of symptoms suggestive of systemic CMV replication.

Overly broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment of wild-type Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in relation to the EUCAST new definition of susceptibility testing categories, a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

Objectives: EUCAST changed the definition of the 'intermediate' (I) category in 2019, now defined as 'susceptible, increased exposure'. This new definition could lead to an increased prescription of antibiotics still reported as 'S', compared with those now reported as 'I'. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of this definition on the use of overly broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by WT Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: A retrospective observational multicentre study was conducted, involving five hospitals. Two 15 month study periods were defined, before and after the implementation of the new definition. All patients with an infection caused by WT P. aeruginosa treated by ß-lactams were included. The main endpoint was the proportion of patients treated by an overly broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment by meropenem or ceftolozane/tazobactam. Results: Two hundred and ninety-one patients were included. No difference between groups was found, in terms of infection, microbiology or demographic characteristics. Two overly broad-spectrum antibiotic treatments by meropenem or ceftolozane/tazobactam were observed in Period 1 (1.2%), versus 13 in Period 2 (10.8%; P < 0.001). No overly broad-spectrum treatment was observed when the antimicrobial stewardship team had given advice. Conclusions: This new definition can cause a negative impact on the use of overly broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment due to misunderstanding by clinicians. Its successful implementation requires adaptation of software for reporting antibiotic susceptibility, a sustained strong information campaign by microbiologists and support by an antimicrobial stewardship team.

Activity vs exploration: Locomotion in a known and unknown environment differs in Atlantic cod juveniles (Gadus morhua).

Individuals within a population often behave differently and these differences can be consistent over time and/or context, also termed "animal personality". Animal personality has been commonly classified into five axes with studies aiming to validate these axes. One subject that has surprisingly not received full attention yet is the difference between the two personality axes "activity" and "exploration-avoidance", i.e. behaviour in a known vs an unknown environment. Despite this clear difference in definition, many studies measure activity in an unknown environment and term it activity, while underlying motivations between the two environments are different. This study aimed to detect the two personality traits "activity" and "exploration" in Atlantic cod juveniles, and to investigate whether they support the distinctive definitions proposed by previous authors. This study showed significant consistency in locomotion variation in both environments, i.e. personality. In addition, the two environments clearly elicited different behaviours; Atlantic cod juvenile behaviour was more repeatable and they moved more in the known vs the unknown environment, and no correlation of the proportional locomotion between the two was found. This demonstrates that locomotion in both environments, i.e. the personality axes "activity" and "exploration", should not be confused nor treated as if they reflect the same personality trait.

Three-Year Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Switched From Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Regimens to Belatacept as a Rescue Therapy.

Background: The long-term benefits of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to belatacept in kidney transplant recipients (KTr) are poorly documented.Methods: A single-center retrospective work to study first-time CNI to belatacept conversion as a rescue therapy [eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, chronic histological lesions, or CNI-induced thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)]. Patient and kidney allograft survivals, eGFR, severe adverse events, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and histological data were recorded over 36 months after conversion. Results: We included N = 115 KTr. The leading cause for switching was chronic histological lesions with non-optimal eGFR (56.5%). Three years after conversion, patient, and death-censored kidney allograft survivals were 88% and 92%, respectively, eGFR increased significantly from 31.5 ± 17.5 to 36.7 ± 15.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.01), the rejection rate was 10.4%, OI incidence was 5.2 (2.9-7.6) per 100 person-years. Older age was associated with death, eGFR was not associated with death nor allograft loss. No patient developed dnDSA at M36 after conversion. CNI-induced TMA disappeared in all cases without eculizumab use. Microvascular inflammation and chronic lesions remained stable. Conclusion: Post-KT conversion from CNIs to belatacept, as rescue therapy, is safe and beneficial irrespective of the switch timing and could represent a good compromise facing organ shortage. Age and eGFR at conversion should be considered in the decision whether to switch.

Severe relapse of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a kidney transplant recipient with negative nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR after rituximab.

Immunocompromised patients may experience prolonged viral shedding after their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, symptomatic relapses after remission currently remain rare. We herein describe a severe COVID-19 relapse case of a kidney transplant recipient (KTR) following rituximab therapy, 3 months after a moderate COVID-19 infection, despite viral clearance after recovery of the first episode. During the clinical relapse, the diagnosis was established on a broncho-alveolar lavage specimen (BAL) by RT-PCR. The infectivity of the BAL sample was confirmed on a cell culture assay. Whole genome sequencing confirmed the presence of an identical stain (Clade 20A). However, it had an acquired G142D mutation and a larger deletion of 3-amino-acids at position 143-145. These mutations located within the N-terminal domain are suggested to play a role in viral entry. The diagnosis of a COVID-19 relapse should be considered in the setting of unexplained persistent fever and/or respiratory symptoms in KTRs (especially for those after rituximab therapy), even in patients with previous negative naso-pharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR.

Myosteatosis as an independent risk factor for mortality after kidney allograft transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease may display both a loss of skeletal muscle mass and an increase in muscle fat deposits. We aimed to analyse the impact of low skeletal muscle mass index (SMI, surrogate marker of sarcopenia) and low muscle density (MD, surrogate marker of myosteatosis) on patient survival after kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 200 kidney transplant recipients (KTr), we measured on an unenhanced cross-sectional computed tomography scan taken at the level of the third lumbar vertebra within the previous year or at the time of KT, both SMI (muscle cross-sectional area normalized for height2 , reported in cm2 /m2 ) and MD (mean attenuation of muscle cross-sectional area, expressed in Hounsfield units). We determined age-specific and sex-specific normality thresholds on 130 healthy subjects. The baseline factors associated with low MD were assessed by logistic regression analysis. Cox proportional hazard univariable and multivariable models were constructed to identify predictive factors of patient survival. RESULTS: Among the 200 patients of the cohort, 123 were male (62%), and mean age was 54.8 ± 13.8 years. A total of 181 KTr required renal replacement therapy before KT (91%), and 36 KTr (18%) received repeat kidney transplant after previous failed KT. Mean MD was 30.6 ± 9 HU in men and 29.7 ± 8.3 HU in women, whereas SMI was 49.7 ± 8.6 cm2 /m2 in men and 42.3 ± 7.3 cm2 /m2 in women. MD was below the 2.5th percentile for the healthy population in 49 KTr (25%), defining the myosteatosis group, while SMI was below the 2.5th percentile for the reference population in 10 KTr (5%). Independent risk factors for myosteatosis were two or more KT [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 5.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.22-12.4, P = 0.0001], a history of stroke (aOR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.30-10.7, P = 0.015), and body mass index > 25 kg/m2 (aOR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.4-6.18, P = 0.004). Myosteatosis was independently associated with mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.12, 95% CI: 1.06-4.24, P = 0.033], as were cardiovascular disease (HR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.02-4.15, P = 0.043) and age (aHR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.09, P = 0.0003). Low SMI was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Myosteatosis, which was more prevalent than low skeletal muscle mass, might be an important prognostic marker in patients undergoing KT.

Belatacept-based immunosuppressive regimen in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Kidney allograft survival in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients is lower than that in the general population. Belatacept increases long-term patient and allograft survival rates when compared with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Its use in HIV-positive recipients remains poorly documented. METHODS: We retrospectively report a French cohort of HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients who were switched from CNI to belatacept, between June 2012 and December 2018. Patient and allograft survival rates, HIV immunovirological and clinical outcomes, acute rejection, opportunistic infections (OIs) and HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) were analysed at 3 and 12 months, and at the end of follow-up (last clinical visit attended after transplantation). Results were compared with HIV-positive recipients group treated with CNI. RESULTS: Twelve patients were switched to belatacept 10 (2-25) months after transplantation. One year after belatacept therapy, patient and allograft survival rates scored 92% for both, two (17%) HIV virological rebounds occurred due to antiretroviral therapy non-compliance, and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts remained stable over time. Serious adverse events included two (17%) acute steroid-resistant T-cell-mediated rejections and three (25%) OIs. Kidney allograft function significantly increased over the 12 post-switch months (P = 0.009), and DSAs remained stable at 12 months after treatment. The control group showed similar results in terms of patient and kidney allograft survival rates, DSA characteristics and proteinuria. CONCLUSIONS: Switch from CNI to belatacept can be considered safe and may increase long-term kidney allograft survival in HIV-positive kidney allograft recipients. These results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort.

Weak antibody response to three doses of mRNA vaccine in kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept.

Poor responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine have been reported after 2 vaccine injections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) treated with belatacept. We analyzed the humoral response in belatacept-treated KTRs without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection who received three injections of BNT162b2-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. We also investigated vaccine immunogenicity in belatacept-treated KTRs with prior COVID-19 and characterized symptomatic COVID-19 infections after the vaccine in belatacept-treated KTRs. Among the 62 belatacept-treated KTRs (36 [58%] males), the median age (63.5 years IQR [51-72]), without COVID-19 history, only four patients (6.4%) developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG with low antibody titers (median 209, IQR [20-409] AU/ml). 71% were treated with mycophenolic acid and 100% with steroids in association with belatacept. In contrast, in all the 5 KTRs with prior COVID-19 history, mRNA vaccine induced a strong antibody response with high antibody titers (median 10 769 AU/ml, IQR [6410-20 069]) after two injections. Seroprevalence after three-vaccine doses in 35 non-belatacept-treated KTRs was 37.1%. Twelve KTRs developed symptomatic COVID-19 after vaccination, including severe forms (50% of mortality). Breakthrough COVID-19 occurred in 5% of fully vaccinated patients. Administration of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not improve immunogenicity in KTRs treated with belatacept without prior COVID-19. Other strategies aiming to improve patient protection are needed.

Renal Diseases Associated with Hematologic Malignancies and Thymoma in the Absence of Renal Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposits.

In addition to kidney diseases characterized by the precipitation and deposition of overproduced monoclonal immunoglobulin and kidney damage due to chemotherapy agents, a broad spectrum of renal lesions may be found in patients with hematologic malignancies. Glomerular diseases, in the form of paraneoplastic glomerulopathies and acute kidney injury with various degrees of proteinuria due to specific lymphomatous interstitial and/or glomerular infiltration, are two major renal complications observed in the lymphoid disorder setting. However, other hematologic neoplasms, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia, thymoma, myeloproliferative disorders, Castleman disease and hemophagocytic syndrome, have also been associated with the development of kidney lesions. These renal disorders require prompt recognition by the clinician, due to the need to implement specific treatment, depending on the chemotherapy regimen, to decrease the risk of subsequent chronic kidney disease. In the context of renal disease related to hematologic malignancies, renal biopsy remains crucial for accurate pathological diagnosis, with the aim of optimizing medical care for these patients. In this review, we provide an update on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathophysiological processes and diagnostic strategy for kidney diseases associated with hematologic malignancies outside the spectrum of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.