Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(7): 705-712, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32420626

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The standard approach to subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation often requires general anesthesia or anesthesiologist-delivered deep sedation. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) combined with parasternal block (PSB) has been proposed in order to provide anesthesia/analgesia and to reduce the need for sedation during S-ICD implantation. In this pilot study, we compared the double-block approach (SAPB + PSB) with the single-block approach (SAPB only) and with the standard approach involving local anesthesia and sedation. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 22 patients undergoing S-ICD implantation: in 10, the single-block approach was adopted; in 12, the double-block approach. As a control group, we retrospectively enrolled 14 consecutive patients who had undergone S-ICD implantation under standard local anesthesia and sedation in the previous 6 months. Intra- and postprocedural data, including patient-reported pain intensity, were collected and compared in the three study groups. RESULTS: The double-block approach was associated with a shorter procedure duration than the single-block and standard approaches (63.3 ± 7.9 vs 70.1 ± 6.8 vs 76.9 ± 7.8 min; P < .05) and with a lower dose of local an aesthetic for infiltration (18.9 ± 1.7 vs 27.5 ± 4.6 vs 44.6 ± 4.0 cc; P < .001). Both the double- and single-block approaches were associated with lower pain intensity at the device pocket and the lateral tunneling site (P < .05). The double-block approach proved superior to the other two approaches in controlling intraoperative pain at the parasternal tunneling site (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, SAPB combined with PSB was superior to SAPB alone and to the standard approach in controlling intraoperative pain during S-ICD implantation. In addition, this approach resulted in shorter procedure durations.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anestesia Local , Sedación Consciente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 20(1): 41-45, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30638214

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report our experience with subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation. METHODS: At our hospital, 7 procedures of S-ICD implantation were performed; 4 of these with ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and 3 with usual local anesthesia followed by sedation. RESULTS: Surgical operations were not burdened with peri- and postprocedural complications, with only one event of limited hematoma of the thoracic wall. Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block was associated with better pain control during the procedure and the postoperative period. The disconnection between latissimus dorsi and serratus obtained by serratus anterior plane block contributed to make the creation of the pocket easier. The technique used is with two incisions. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, S-ICD implantation with the technique of the serratus anterior plane block is safe and effective, and significantly facilitated pain control during the procedure and postoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA