Phase IV PROVE study: Perampanel in real-world clinical care of pediatric patients with epilepsy.

INTRODUCTION: The non-interventional Phase IV PROVE study (NCT03208660) assessed retention, efficacy, safety and tolerability, and perampanel dosing in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. This analysis evaluated final data from patients aged <4 years and 4-<12 years. METHODS: Data were obtained retrospectively from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the United States initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinician recommendations. Retention rate was the primary endpoint. Secondary assessments included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator impression of seizure effect, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 41 patients (<4 years; mean maximum dose, 3.5 mg/day) and 203 patients (4-<12 years; mean maximum dose, 5.3 mg/day); 24-month retention rates were 35.7% (n = 5/14) and 42.0% (n = 47/112), respectively. In the Full Analysis Set, during Months 1-3, median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 33.3% (n = 8 [<4 years]) and 26.0% (n = 32 [4-<12 years]), and seizure-freedom rates were 12.5% in both groups (n = 1/8 and n = 4/32); patient numbers were low at later time points. Most patients showed improvements in seizure control (45.9% [<4 years] versus 52.4% [4-<12 years]) or no change (45.9% versus 34.5%) (SAS). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 12 (<4 years: 29.3%; most common, irritability [7.3%]) and 64 patients (4-<12 years: 31.5%; most common, aggression [6.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: Perampanel was generally well tolerated with <21% of TEAEs leading to withdrawal at 24 months, had favorable retention rates (≥50% and >35% at 12 and 24 months, respectively), and sustained efficacy in pediatric patients during routine clinical care.

Perampanel in real-world clinical care of adolescent and adult patients with epilepsy: Results from the retrospective Phase IV PROVE Study.

PURPOSE: Report final data from adolescent (12-<18 years) and adult (≥18 years) patients from PROVE (NCT03208660), a multicenter, retrospective, non-interventional, Phase IV study to assess retention, efficacy, safety, and dosing of perampanel in patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from medical/pharmacy records of patients in the US initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, according to treating clinicians' recommendation. Retention rate was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rates, investigator's impression of seizure effect, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: The Safety Analysis Set (SAS) included 294 adolescents and 1157 adults (median maximum perampanel dose, 6.0 mg/day). In patients eligible for inclusion in the retention rate analysis, 24-month retention rates were 53.5% (n=91/170) in adolescents and 47.8% (n=354/741) in adults. In patients with available efficacy data during Months 10-12, median percent seizure frequency reductions were 79.3% (n=20) in adolescents and 70.8% (n=92) in adults. Most patients in the SAS with seizure-effect data experienced an improvement in seizures at the last follow-up time point (adolescents, 51.4% [n=128/249]; adults, 52.3% [n=506/967]). TEAEs occurred in 113 adolescents (38.4%; most common, aggression [6.5%]) and 512 adults (44.3%; most common, dizziness [9.2%]). CONCLUSION: Perampanel demonstrated favorable retention rates and sustained efficacy (up to 2 years) in adolescent and adult patients during routine clinical care; no new safety signals were observed. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03208660 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03208660).

PROVE-Phase IV Study of Perampanel in Real-World Clinical Care of Patients with Epilepsy: Interim Analysis in Pediatric Patients.

PROVE is a retrospective, phase IV study assessing retention, dosing, efficacy, and safety of perampanel when administered to patients during routine clinical care. We report an interim analysis of preadolescent (1 to <12 years) and adolescent (12 to <18 years) patients. Data were obtained from medical records of patients with epilepsy initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014; cut-off date for this analysis was October 10, 2018. Overall, 151 preadolescent and 183 adolescent patients were included. Retention rates following 24 months on perampanel were 42.5% (preadolescent subgroup; n = 31/73) and 55.7% (adolescent subgroup; n = 54/97). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 53 (35.1%) preadolescent (most common: aggression, irritability, and somnolence) and 78 (42.6%) adolescent patients (most common: somnolence, aggression, and dizziness). These data indicate that daily oral doses of perampanel are generally well tolerated during routine clinical care, with favorable retention rates for ≤2 years, in patients aged 1 to <18 years.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cannabidiol (CBD) in children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: Results from a state-based expanded access program.

INTRODUCTION: An intermediate-sized, multicenter, expanded-access study was opened in 2015 through the support of the State of Georgia. This study provided children with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE) access to plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD; Epidiolex® in the US; Epidyolex® in the EU; 100 mg/mL oral solution). These children had failed to achieve seizure freedom with available treatment options and were ineligible to participate in randomized controlled trials that only included patients with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes. METHODS: Cannabidiol safety, changes in seizure type, frequency, and seizure-free days were evaluated for children aged 1-18 years (at time of consent) as an adjunctive treatment for 36 months. The study consisted of a two-month baseline period, a titration period, treatment period, and optional titration period, which occurred after ≥26 weeks of treatment. Cannabidiol treatment was administered up to a targeted dose of 25 mg/kg/day, with an optional secondary treatment up to 50 mg/kg/day. Daily seizure type, seizure frequency, and seizure-free days were recorded in a Web-based diary, and changes in these outcomes were recorded and analyzed for the duration of the study. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was also recorded. RESULTS: The median percentage change in seizures for 45 patients in Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 showed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) reduction in major seizures (ranging from 54 to 72% at various time points) and all seizures (61-70%) compared with baseline. A mean increase in seizure-free days per 28 days was >5 in all treatment periods after Month 2, and an average increase of 7.52 (p < 0.001) seizure-free days per 28 days was observed at the end of follow-up compared with baseline. All patients experienced ≥1 AE. Children who transitioned to the optional secondary treatment (high-dose group) reported more AEs before increasing their dose to >25.0 mg/kg/day compared with the low-dose group. However, the average rate of AEs was significantly lower after moving to a high-dose regimen (p = 0.004). Twelve children reported 20 serious AEs, none of which were considered related to CBD. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports CBD as an adjunctive treatment for children with TRE. Treatment was well tolerated in doses up to 50 mg/kg/day. Patients who did not achieve desired results at a dose of ≤25.0 mg/kg/day reported more AEs when CBD dose increased to >25.0 mg/kg/day. Decreases in major seizure frequency and an increase in seizure-free days compared with baseline were reported during treatment. This supports the efficacy and tolerability of CBD for mixed seizure etiologies.