Movement Is Life-Optimizing Patient Access to Total Joint Arthroplasty: Cardiovascular Health Disparities.

Cardiovascular disease includes a collection of conditions with 6.7% of American adults having coronary artery disease and 45% having hypertension. Proper management of these conditions is low (<25%). Hypertension is highest among African Americans and is associated with lower socioeconomic status and education level. Heart disease is associated with postoperative complications, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, pulmonary and coagulopathy complications, and mortality. Underserved communities can be optimized beginning with a thorough preoperative assessment, which includes evaluating for food security, instituting dietary modifications and exercise regimens, and improving cardiovascular health with pharmacologic modalities and specialty care. Nurse navigators can be invaluable for guiding patients through a cardiovascular preoperative optimization pathway.

Movement is Life-Optimizing Patient Access to Total Joint Arthroplasty: HIV and Hepatitis C Disparities.

This article is one of a series focusing on how the preoperative optimization process, if designed for underserved communities, can improve access to care and reduce disparities. In this article, we specifically focus on methods to improve optimization for patients with HIV and hepatitis C to facilitate their access to total joint arthroplasty. 1.2 million Americans are currently living with HIV (people living with HIV). African Americans and Hispanics account for the largest proportion of new HIV diagnoses and make up the highest proportion of people living with HIV. HIV-positive patients, many of them with complex comorbidities, are at a high risk for postoperative complications. Optimization of this vulnerable cohort involves a multidisciplinary strategy focusing on optimizing treatment modalities to reduce viral loads, leading to lower complication rates and a safer environment for the surgical team. The rates of hepatitis C have been increasing in the United States, and more than half of individuals living with hepatitis C are unaware that they are infected. Hepatitis C infections are highest in African Americans, and the rates of chronic hepatitis C are highest in those born outside the United States. Patients with hepatitis C have an increased risk for surgical complications after total joint arthroplasty, and studies have demonstrated that these risks normalize when patients are preoperatively screened and treated. Optimization in these vulnerable groups includes working closely with psychosocial resources, the primary care team, and infectious disease specialists to ensure treatment access and compliance.

On Answering the Call to Action for COVID-19: Continuing a Bold Legacy of Health Advocacy.

The indelible impacts on our nation from the Coronavirus pandemic along with high fatality rates that disproportionately burden racial and ethnic minorities necessitate long-term coordinated federal, state and local action to improve critical determinants of population health, specifically important health and public health infrastructures as well as emergency and disaster preparedness systems. While our purview as the new pandemic epicenter should be a sufficient driver, coordinated health professionals bringing thoughtful attention to our historical context may be warranted. Prompting our advocacy should be the reality that our collective ability to rebound from such crises may ultimately hinge on protecting and equipping our most vulnerable racial-ethnic minority groups and any susceptible individuals within those populations. Recent historic firsts on behalf of racial and ethnic minorities taken by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through the Health Resources and Services Administration, the Office of Minority Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in response to COVID-19, if proven effective, should be considered for permanency within policy, practice and funding. In addition, given the complex history of Black Americans in this country and persistent and substantial Black-white disparities on health and economic measures across the board, the ultimate solution for improving the health and status Black Americans may look slightly different. Influenced by the 400th year anniversary of the first documented arrival of unfree Africans in North America in 1619, as well as the introduction of bills S.1080 and H.R.40 into Congress (The Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act), some kind of reparations for Black Americans might serve as the logical starting point for further advocacy. Nevertheless, we remain supportive allies of all organizations concerned with communities who suffer the weight of this pandemic and any future world health disasters. What is additionally needed is a thoughtful unification of efforts and a commitment to sustained progress with measurable results for as long as the need exists and certainly for the foreseeable future. Let us as humane clinicians and public health professionals capture this moment of challenge and follow through on this urgent call to action.

On Answering the Call to Action For COVID-19: Continuing a Bold Legacy of Health Advocacy.

The disproportionately high burden of death and disability observed for racial and ethnic minorities under the Coronavirus pandemic necessitates sustained advocacy by the medical and public health communities around critical determinants of population health. Prompting our advocacy should be the understanding that our collective ability to rebound from such crises may ultimately hinge on protecting and equipping our most vulnerable racial-ethnic minority groups and any susceptible individuals within those populations. If proven effective, recent historic firsts by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the Office of Minority Health (OMH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in response to COVID-19 should be championed for permanency within policy, practice and funding. In addition, given the complex history of Black Americans in this country and persistent and substantial Black-white disparities on health and economic measures across the board, some kind of reparations for this group may serve as a logical starting point for further advocacy. Nevertheless, we remain supportive allies of all organizations concerned with communities who suffer the weight of this pandemic and any future world health disasters. Let us as human clinicians and public health professionals capture this moment of challenge and engage in thoughtful unification of effort and commit to measurable progress for as long as the need exists and certainly for the foreseeable future.

The Report of the W. Montague Cobb /NMA Health Institute Consensus Panel on the Plight of Underrepresented Minorities in Medical Education.

Many programs have been designed to increase the number of minorities participating in medical education. Despite these programs, the number of underrepresented minorities (URMs) has never reached the level of representation as is noted in the general census reporting of 12-13%.Using a focused literature review methodology, the Cobb Institute W. Montague Cobb Institute/NMA Health Institute (The Cobb Institute)1 reviewed articles from medical and social science publications to elucidate the causes for the dearth of URMs. Multiple articles have been written to examine this phenomenon and they have identified many challenges. Factors identified include stigmata and stereotyping, growing up in under resourced communities, sub-standard public education opportunities, lack of role models and mentors, lower standardized test scores, and admissions committee practices; all negatively impact URMs on the path to graduate medical education. The W. Montague Cobb Institute/NMA Health Institute (The Cobb Institute) has identified many common impediments along the path to matriculation and offer recommendations and strategies to address the URM matriculation issue. The Cobb Institute concluded there is a substantial need to invest more in 'working' programs with proven outcomes aimed at increasing admittance into medical schools for black males in particular and URMs in general. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to discuss and identify effective programs and strategies used to increase admissions of underrepresented minorities (URM) in general, and black males in particular, into medical school. We will examine best practices and make recommendations regarding successful actions which can lead to increasing black males in the admissions process.

A Fresh Perspective on a Familiar Problem: Examining Disparities in Knee Osteoarthritis Using a Markov Model.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in the presentation of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and in the utilization of treatment across sex, racial, and ethnic groups in the United States are well documented. OBJECTIVES: We used a Markov model to calculate lifetime costs of knee OA treatment. We then used the model results to compute costs of disparities in treatment by race, ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used the literature to construct a Markov Model of knee OA and publicly available data to create the model parameters and patient populations of interest. An expert panel of physicians, who treated a large number of patients with knee OA, constructed treatment pathways. Direct costs were based on the literature and indirect costs were derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: We found that failing to obtain effective treatment increased costs and limited benefits for all groups. Delaying treatment imposed a greater cost across all groups and decreased benefits. Lost income because of lower labor market productivity comprised a substantial proportion of the lifetime costs of knee OA. Population simulations demonstrated that as the diversity of the US population increases, the societal costs of racial and ethnic disparities in treatment utilization for knee OA will increase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that disparities in treatment of knee OA are costly. All stakeholders involved in treatment decisions for knee OA patients should consider costs associated with delaying and forgoing treatment, especially for disadvantaged populations. Such decisions may lead to higher costs and worse health outcomes.

Breakout session: Ethnic and racial disparities in joint arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Many authors report racial and ethnic disparities in total joint arthroplasty. The extent and implications, however, are not fully understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our purposes in this breakout session were to (1) define "Where are we now?"; (2) outline "Where do we need to go?"; and (3) generate a plan for "How do we get there?" in addressing issues of racial disparity and total joint arthroplasty. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Blacks and some other ethnic minorities have a greater incidence of arthritis and chronic disability than the population in general. Blacks have a lower use of total joint arthroplasty for a variety of reasons, including patient trust, perceived limited satisfaction with results by peers, varying knowledge about total joint arthroplasty, and concerns about pain associated with these procedures. Current data, however, are insufficient to clearly define the magnitude and nature of musculoskeletal disparities. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: We need to better define the magnitude and nature of racial disparities to best design and implement research questions and studies and target areas for improvement. We should define geographic and provider variation that lead to the differences in use that has been observed in total joint arthroplasty. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: A profession-wide emphasis and focus on disparities needs to be developed with other medical specialties and national organizations to advocate for changes to better define and address racial disparities. Partnerships with organizations and/or investigators that can gain access to relevant databases should be encouraged. Special attention to disparities and manuscript reviewing and editing is essential.

Cobb Institute strategies for the elimination of health disparities.

The mission of the W. Montague Cobb/NMA Health Institute, which was founded in December 2004, is to study and provide solutions for the elimination of health disparities affecting African Americans as well as other underserved populations. The vision of the Cobb Institute is to become the repository of information regarding the health of African Americans, with holdings in statistics, solutions to health disparities, and best practices to prove the efficacy of these solutions. The major diseases on which the Cobb Institute is particularly focused include heart disease, diabetes, obesity, asthma, HIV/AIDS, and cancer (prostate, breast, colorectal). The scientific sections of the National Medical Association form the basis of the research capabilities of the Cobb Institute. Clinical trials performed by these research physicians and their institutions will provide cutting-edge data for the Cobb Institute to review, validate, and publicize in scientific journals and other communication vehicles.