Does the addition of electrical stimulation or kinesiotherapy improve outcomes of amitriptyline treatment for women with vulvodynia? A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women diagnosed with provoked vulvodynia frequently report a great deal of frustration in achieving symptomatic relief. Physical therapy and drug treatment are among the interventions most indicated by guidelines; however, whether those modalities are effective when combined remains unclear. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of adding a physical therapy modality compared with amitriptyline alone for the treatment of vulvodynia. METHODS: Eighty-six women with vulvodynia were randomized to (G1) 25 mg amitriptyline, once a day (n=27), (G2) amitriptyline + electrical stimulation therapy (n=29) or (G3) amitriptyline + kinesiotherapy (n=30). All treatment modalities were administered for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the reduction in vestibular pain. Secondary measurements focused on sexual pain, frequency of vaginal intercourse, Friedrich score, and overall sexual function. Data were analyzed using intention-to-treat. RESULTS: All treatment modalities resulted in a significant decrease in vestibular pain (p<0.001), sexual pain (p<0.05), Friedrich score (p<0.001), and an increase in the frequency of sexual intercourse (p<0.05). G3 was more effective than G1 at reducing sexual pain (G1: 5.3±3.3 vs G3: 3.2±2.7; p=0.01) and at improving sexual function (G1: 18.8±9.8 vs G3: 23.9±7.8; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy additions to amitriptyline administration as well as amitriptyline alone, were effective at improving vestibular pain in women with vulvodynia. Women receiving physical therapy had the greatest improvement in sexual function and frequency of intercourse at post-treatment and follow-up.

Clitoral blood flow using color Doppler ultrasonography in women with and without provoked vestibulodynia.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To compare blood flow of the dorsal clitoral artery in women diagnosed with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) and in healthy controls using color Doppler ultrasonography. We hypothesized that women with PVD would have a restricted blood flow compared to controls. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the function of the dorsal clitoral artery through the spectral wave analysis of color Doppler ultrasonography (US) in 20 women diagnosed with PVD according to Friedrich's criteria and 21 healthy controls. Participants were evaluated during their follicular phase and were asked to abstain from sexual activities 24 ho prior the examination. Assessment was performed by an assessor blinded to participant diagnosis, in the morning after a 10-min rest period in a supine lying position in a room with temperature set at 22 °C. Measurements of the peak systolic velocity (PSV), time-averaged maximum velocity (TAMX), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsatility (PI) and resistance index (RI) were performed at rest considering the mean value of three consecutive waveforms. RESULTS: Women with PVD and healthy controls did not present any statistically different baseline characteristics. Participants with PVD presented higher values of Doppler-US PSV, TAMX, EDV and RI compared to controls (p ≤ 0.05), which are suggestive of a decrease in blood flow. However, non-significant difference was found regarding PI values between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed decreased peripheral tissue perfusion in women with PVD compared to healthy controls using color Doppler US, based on the alteration of four of the five assessed data of US parameters.