Development of the lichen planus quality of life questionnaire (LPQoL) informed by expert clinician input and patient feedback: a retrospective survey study.

Lichen planus (LP) can affect multiple body sites including skin, mucosae, scalp and nails, causing considerable impact on patients' quality of life. Currently, there are no LP patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that address all body sites potentially affected by LP. We developed a LP Quality of Life Questionnaire (LPQoL), informed by an expert consortium and patient survey study, to address this gap. The study was approved by our institution's Institutional Review Board. First, a 22-item LPQoL was designed with input from LP experts at our institution. The tool was then optimized by garnering input from patients recently diagnosed with LP, who were asked to complete the LPQoL, as well as the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and a feedback form about the LPQoL. Fifty-eight of 150 patients (39% response rate) returned the questionnaire. Mean DLQI score was 4.9 ± 5.6 SD (range 0-25) and mean LPQoL score was 13.6 ± 10.4 SD (range 0-54). LPQoL score was positively correlated with DLQI score (r = 0.79; p < 0.001). Forty-nine out of 56 (88%) and 6/56 (11%) rated the LPQoL as 'very easy' or 'fairly easy' to complete, respectively. Based on participants' feedback, we increased the recall period from one week to one month and added questions on esophageal involvement. With iterative input from LP experts and patients, we developed a LPQoL to address the gap in a multi-site PROM specific to LP. This is a pilot study and there is ongoing validation studies; therefore, this measure should not be used in clinical practice or research until validated.

Barriers and facilitators to the use of survivorship care plans by hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors and clinicians.

PURPOSE: Survivors of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) have complex care needs for the remainder of their lives, known as the survivorship period. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been proposed to improve care coordination and ultimately survivorship outcomes. We explored the barriers and facilitators of SCP use among HSCT survivors and their clinicians in order to develop more useful SCPs for the HSCT context. METHODS: Analogous surveys regarding perceived barriers to and facilitators of SCP use based on a sample SCP for a female allogenic HSCT survivor were administered to HSCT survivors and non-transplant oncology and primary care clinicians. RESULTS: Twenty-seven HSCT survivors and 18 clinicians completed the survey. The main barriers to SCP use were lack of awareness of SCP existence, uncertainty regarding where to find SCP, unclear roles and responsibilities among healthcare teams, length of SCP, and difficultly understanding SCPs. The facilitators of SCP use were increased understanding of survivorship care needs, clarified roles and responsibilities of survivors and clinicians, SCPs that are readily available and searchable in electronic health record, increased awareness of SCP existence and provision to all survivors, and if the SCP is survivor-specific and up-to-date. CONCLUSIONS: Much of the work regarding SCPs has looked at barriers to creation and provision; however, our study examines factors influencing use of SCPs. By determining the barriers and facilitators surrounding SCP use for HSCT survivors and their clinicians, we can create SCP templates and clinical workflows to optimize SCP use, ideally leading to better outcomes for HSCT survivors.

Onychodystrophy as the Presenting Sign of Steal Syndrome.

A man in his 70s presented to the dermatology nail clinic with a 1-month history of worsening onychodystrophy, leukonychia, and pain in his left fifth finger. Physical examination revealed a cool hand and absent radial pulse. Ischemia was suspected, and the patient was sent to the emergency department where the diagnosis of steal syndrome was made and his previously required arteriovenous fistula was ligated. This case highlights the clinical features of steal syndrome, that nail changes should be recognized as clinical features, and that urgent triage of these patients to vascular surgery is of critical importance.

Survivor and Clinician Assessment of Survivorship Care Plans for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: An Engineering, Primary Care, and Oncology Collaborative for Survivorship Health.

The long-term care of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors poses special challenges owing to a myriad of possible chronic and/or late complications. Survivorship care plans (SCPs) have been proposed as tools to communicate information on the late effects of treatment and recommended follow-up care to clinicians and survivors. The primary aims of this study were to determine SCP content and format, as well as to assess the preferred timing of SCP provision following HSCT. HSCT survivors and nontransplantation clinicians (oncologists and primary care physicians) were invited to participate in a survey evaluating the usefulness and utility of a sample HSCT-specific SCP with a treatment summary generated by autopopulation from an electronic health record (EHR). All participating HSCT survivors (n = 29) and clinicians (n = 18) indicated a desire to receive an SCP. More than 85% of the participants perceived information about treatments received, recommended follow-up and health maintenance including vaccinations, survivor and clinician resources, and graft-versus-host disease and other late/chronic side effects to be useful. The majority of survivors also believed that care team contact information was useful. In addition, >85% of survivors and clinicians agreed that the SCP increased their understanding of treatments and chronic/late side effects, improved health care provided, and were satisfied with the SCP and found it understandable and easy to use. The majority of survivors indicated that additional information should be added to the SCP, whereas some clinicians deemed the SCP too long. Survivors preferred to receive the SCP as a paper document at the end of a regular follow-up visit and review it with a cancer clinician, whereas clinicians preferred to receive the SCP through the EHR. These findings will help improve the design of future SCPs for use by HSCT survivors and clinicians. Future work will include leveraging the EHR to ease the burden of creating user-centered documents.

Factors Influencing Rural Physician Retention Following Completion of a Rural Training Track Family Medicine Residency Program.

INTRODUCTION: Rural training track residency programs were created to aid in addressing the shortage of rural physicians. While these programs have been shown to increase rural recruitment and retention, the reasons for improved retention are unclear. METHODS: We analyzed survey results of 16 graduates of the UW-Baraboo Rural Training Track Family Medicine Residency Program on which factors influenced rural retention. RESULTS: Participants cited the wishes of significant others, meaningful work, and integration into the local community as the most important factors in rural retention. Loan repayment and teaching opportunities were least important. DISCUSSION: The factors identified in this study as important to rural retention were supported by previous literature and have remained consistent over time for rural physicians, including rural training track graduates. CONCLUSION: Rural Training Track alumni physicians in our study found similar factors important to rural retention when compared to other rural physicians in the United States reported in the literature, regardless of residency background. These factors continue to be important to shape retention strategies employed by rural health care systems; future studies should evaluate rural retention strategies that utilize these factors.