Isolated Nodal TBC Reactivation in a Patient with Post-Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis Treated with Ruxolitinib: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Ruxolitinib side effects include the most frequent hematological toxicity along with a more recently evidenced immunosuppressive activity, interfering both with the innate and adaptive immunity, and several cases of reactivation of latent infections by opportunistic agents in patients in treatment with ruxolitinib have been published in the last years. Several pathophysiological mechanisms may explain an association between ruxolitinib and opportunistic infections. From what we know, the only case of an isolated lymph node TBC reactivation in a ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis (MF) patient was reported by Patil et al. in 2016 [Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6(3):1]. Other 10 cases describing TBC reactivations in MF patients assuming ruxolitinib and successfully treated with 4-drug anti-TBC therapy are available in the literature to date. The case we reported describes an isolated lymph nodal TBC reactivation in a patient with the diagnosis of post-essential thrombocythemia-MF during ruxolitinib treatment after a long course of interferon-a (IFN-α2b) assumed for the previous diagnosis of ET. The case we report teaches that lymphadenopathy with or without constitutional symptoms developing during ruxolitinib therapy should be considered as a possible manifestation of a TBC reactivation in patients with a previous positive TBC-exposure test. In these cases, Ziel-Nielsen testing on urine and sputum has to be performed to rule out infectiousness and eventually isolate the patient. Moreover, previous long-time exposition to IFN-α2b may be related with a higher risk for TBC reactivation in these subset of patients. We encourage reevaluation of the cohorts of patients treated with ruxolitinib in previous and current large prospective studies to study the possible correlation between previous exposition to IFN-α2b and TBC reactivation.

Could the Combined Administration of Bone Antiresorptive Drug, Taxanes, and Corticosteroids Worsen Medication Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Cancer Patients?

The study presents a report of 58 metastatic cancer patients who developed osteonecrosis of the jaws after being treated with zoledronic acid and taxanes, plus corticosteroids. A retrospective analysis of data registered in the archives of two Italian osteonecrosis of the jaws treatment centers, who are based at the University of Messina and at the University of Palermo, was performed in order to study, in these patients, demographic data and characteristics such as frequency of cancer location, lines of therapy, frequency of cancer drugs, presence/absence of oral trigger, number, location, and stage of jaw osteonecrosis. It was found that the majority of patients developed advanced stages of osteonecrosis, frequently complicated with infection. It was hypothesized that the concurrent administration of chemotherapeutic agents could be eventually considered as a factor able to allow a faster worsening of the clinical manifestation through the exacerbation of soft tissue defects, due to chemotherapy drugs.

Rivaroxaban-induced hepatotoxicity: review of the literature and report of new cases.

AIM/OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Direct-acting oral anticoagulant drugs are marketed worldwide for the primary and secondary prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, is one of the most used. Rivaroxaban-induced hepatotoxicity is unusual, although a number of adverse reports have recently been reported. Here, we report two new cases of rivaroxaban-induced hepatitis. METHODS: A systematic search of case reports on the MEDLINE database encompassing the years 2008-2016 was carried out.Additional references were obtained following a manual search of the retrieved papers. We report two new cases of adverse events occurred in patients treated with rivaroxaban (20 mg/die) to prevent systemic embolism, who presented with hepatocellular liver injury with onset at 8 weeks after initiation of the drug intake. RESULTS: Twenty-six cases were retrieved from MEDLINE (57.7% female, 42.3% male). Using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) scale, liver injury was classified as hepatocellular (42.3%), cholestatic (26.9%), or mixed (15.4%). Older age (≥65 years) was present as a risk factor in 57.7%. The time lapse between initiation of treatment and onset of hepatic injury ranged from 2 to 180 days (median: 15 days). Our two new patients were diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury (hepatocellular pattern) using the 'consensus criteria', for drug-induced liver injury. Their RUCAM scores were calculated and assessed as highly probable and probable, respectively. A clinical recovery after rivaroxaban withdrawal was observed. CONCLUSION: Direct-acting oral anticoagulants have been commonly prescribed, even if safety issues regarding the use of these drugs are still an ongoing concern, especially in patients experiencing chronic liver disease. Dedicated postauthorization safety studies should be undertaken to better define rivaroxaban-induced drug-induced liver injury.

The use of proton pump inhibitors in an Italian hospital: focus on oncologic and critical non-ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most misused drugs both at the community and hospital level. Recently, possible risks have been underscored, suggesting the importance of limiting PPI use to proven indications. OBJECTIVE: To survey the appropriateness of PPI use in a University hospital in Italy. Setting Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico 'P. Giaccone', in Palermo, Italy. METHOD: A one day-observational study, reviewing patients' medical records to identify treatments with PPIs and the indications for their use. After discharge, a subgroup of the cohort was followed up to assess the continuation of therapy at home. Appropriateness was evaluated according to the indications stated in the official product information sheet and supported by the AIFA notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence and appropriateness of PPI use in the hospital and after discharge. RESULTS: In the index day 62.9 % of 343 evaluable patients received a PPI. In only 29.1 % of these, the treatment could be considered appropriate. The most frequent reasons for inappropriate treatment were stress ulcer prophylaxis in low risk patients and unwarranted gastro-protection in drug treated patients. 30.9 % of patients received PPIs for uncertain indications: of these, 25.7 % were "critical" patients admitted in non-ICU wards. Furthermore, as much as 88.2 % of anticancer drug treated patients received PPIs as gastroprotective agents. At discharge 48.6 % of patients received a prescription to continue PPI therapy at home and 75.9 % of the 83 followed up patients were found to be still taking these drugs after on average 3 months from discharge. CONCLUSION: This study confirms a high proportion of inappropriate PPI therapy into the hospital that translates in a prolonged unnecessary administration in the community setting. Further studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PPI therapy in subgroups of patients at moderate risk for gastric complications to optimize current guidelines.

Fluoroquinolone-induced liver injury: three new cases and a review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Fluoroquinolones are popular and widely used in primary care and hospital settings. Premarketing studies showed a favourable side-effect profile. However, significant morbidity and the need for liver transplantation for acute liver failure have been reported. We reviewed the available data on liver damage linked to fluoroquinolones. METHODS: A systematic search of case reports on the MEDLINE database encompassing the years 2000-2011 was carried out. Additional references were found by a manual search of the retrieved paper. We also describe three new cases of hepatotoxicity attributable to fluoroquinolones seen at our Unit. RESULTS: Thirty-five cases were retrieved from MEDLINE (51.4% male). According to the RUCAM scale, liver injury was classified as hepatocellular (51.4%), cholestatic (28.6%) or mixed (20.0%). Older age (≥ 65 years) was present in 42.8%. The time between initiation of treatment and hepatic injury ranged from 1 to 39 days (median 8 days). According to the RUCAM score, our cases were classified to be "highly probable" or "probable". Only one patient underwent liver biopsy, which showed the features of liver damage linked to drug exposure. Liver enzymes from all patients return to normal range within 4 weeks of withdrawal. Only one patient showed a renal failure, associated with liver injury, with a need for haemodialysis for 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolones are substantially safe antibiotics. Although fluoroquinolone-related hepatic injury occurs infrequently, its consequences can be severe. Patients should also be cautioned to avoid re-exposure to other members of the fluoroquinolone class.

Adverse reactions induced by NSAIDs and antibacterials: analysis of spontaneous reports from the Sicilian regional database.

OBJECTIVES: To (i) evaluate the suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to NSAIDs and antibacterials that were reported to Sicilian local health officers by healthcare professionals; and (ii) to detect new or serious potential signals of alarm related to these two widely used drug categories. METHODS: We selected all the spontaneous reports of ADRs sent between January 1998 and June 2004 and analysed those attributed to NSAIDs and systemic antibacterials, applying proportional reporting ratio (PRR) methodology. PRRs >2, chi(2) >4 and >3 ADRs were regarded as signals. RESULTS: During the period considered, 1585 reports of ADRs were received overall (42.6% serious), with an annual reporting rate of approximately 49.1 reports per million inhabitants on average; 351 referred to systemic antibacterials, and 179 to NSAIDs. There were 174 (49.6%) reports of serious ADRs associated with antimicrobials and 108 (60.3%) associated with NSAIDs. Disproportionality was observed, in particular for anaphylactic shock induced by ceftriaxone (all reports were associated with off-label use of the drug), photosensitivity reaction induced by lomefloxacin (administered in the summer), hepatitis induced by nimesulide (three cases leading to liver transplantation) and vasculitis induced by nimesulide. CONCLUSION: Our analysis highlighted several signals of alarm deserving further investigation or measures to influence prescribing. This study underlines the value of a regional centre in identifying local factors (such as prescribing patterns) that may increase the prevalence of serious ADRs.