Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Dis Child ; 104(3): 237-245, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30279157

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic conditions are the leading cause of mortality, morbidity and disability in children. However, children and caregivers are rarely involved in identifying research priorities, which may limit the value of research in supporting patient-centred practice and policy. OBJECTIVE: To identify priorities of patients, caregivers and health professionals for research in childhood chronic conditions and describe the reason for their choices. SETTING: An Australian paediatric hospital and health consumer organisations. METHODS: Recruited participants (n=73) included patients aged 8 to 14 years with a chronic condition (n=3), parents/caregivers of children aged 0 to 18 years with a chronic condition (n=19), representatives from consumer organisations (n=13) and health professionals including clinicians, researches (n=38) identified and discussed research priorities. Transcripts were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight research questions were identified. Five themes underpinned participants' priorities: maintaining a sense of normality (enabling participation in school, supporting social functioning, promoting understanding and acceptance), empowering self-management and partnership in care (overcoming communication barriers, gaining knowledge and skills, motivation for treatment adherence, making informed decisions, access and understanding of complementary and alternative therapies),strengthening ability to cope (learning to have a positive outlook, preparing for home care management, transitioning to adult services), broadening focus to family (supporting sibling well-being, parental resilience and financial loss, alleviating caregiver burden), and improving quality and scope of health and social care (readdressing variability and inequities, preventing disease complications and treatment side effects, identifying risk factors, improving long-term outcomes, harnessing technology, integrating multidisciplinary services). CONCLUSION: Research priorities identified by children, caregivers and health professionals emphasise a focus on life participation, psychosocial well-being, impact on family and quality of care. These priorities may be used by funding and policy organisations in establishing a paediatric research agenda.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Prioridades en Salud , Adolescente , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Niño , Preescolar , Consenso , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Nueva Gales del Sur , Participación del Paciente
2.
Intern Med J ; 47(3): 299-306, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27925382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Increasing the amount of clinical research that occurs in healthcare settings has been identified as an important mechanism to improve healthcare outcomes. While clinicians are key persons in achieving this aim, research participation amongst clinicians is generally limited. AIMS: To identify the factors (barriers and facilitators) influencing clinician research participation and determine how professional culture impacts on these factors. METHODS: Forty clinicians working at a tertiary children's hospital participated in six discipline-specific focus groups. Thematic analysis was performed using an inductive process based in grounded theory. RESULTS: Four major themes (cultural factors, personal factors, resources and solutions) and 16 subthemes were identified. Participants described how the current health system discourages clinician research. They reported that their research participation requires personal sacrifice of their own time; income or career progression. Research participation was seen to compete with other priorities in clinicians' workload and is disadvantaged because of the primacy of clinical work and the lack of immediate tangible benefit from research projects. Solutions suggested by our participants included better alignment of clinical and research goals, improved availability of research mentors and collaborative opportunities. Nurses and allied health professionals reported a changing professional culture that values research. Only doctors identified research participation to be important for career progression. CONCLUSIONS: For clinician research participation to flourish, significant changes in healthcare structure and priorities will be required that result in research becoming more embedded in healthcare delivery. Initiatives to improve collaboration between clinicians and universities may also support these aims.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Investigación Biomédica , Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Pediatría , Médicos , Adulto , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Australia , Conducta Cooperativa , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pediatría/educación , Pediatría/normas , Investigadores
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...