Falls in people with mobility limitations: a cross-sectional analysis of a US registry of assistive device users.

Purpose of the Article: To (1) summarise the personal and clinical characteristics of persons with disabilities (PwDs) in the US who were evaluated for mobility assistive equipment (MAE) in the functional mobility assessment and uniform dataset (FMA/UDS) and (2) stratify subpopulations of PwD who reported falling versus those who do not report a fall.Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective, descriptive cohort analysis of adults with disabilities using the FMA/UDS. Data are collected during a user's initial evaluation for a new mobility device. The sample is intentionally general to be inclusive of all mobility device users. The primary variable of interest was a patient-reported fall within the 3 months leading up to their evaluation for a new mobility device. Subpopulation characteristics were stratified by this binary fall variable.Results and Conclusions: This study provides descriptions of PwDs being evaluated for a new mobility device. There were 11,084 PwDs with 31 different primary diagnoses. During their new mobility device evaluation, 52.2% of PwDs reported at least one fall in the last 3 months. For those who reported a fall, 46.6% of PwDs were using a walking aid or no device at all before the new mobility device evaluation. Additionally, persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida). These findings will influence future studies comparing different types of devices and their influence on falls and user satisfaction.

52.2% of persons with disabilities (PwDs) seeking a new wheelchair evaluation reported at least one fall in the last 3 months.Persons with progressively acquired disabilities (i.e., Parkinson's disease, osteoarthritis and cardiopulmonary disease) reported higher rates of falls than those with congenital disabilities (i.e., cerebral palsy and spina bifida).Earlier interventions for fall prevention including professional wheelchair evaluations may be warranted, but further research is necessary to explore long-term effectiveness.

Telerehabilitation for New Wheelchair Evaluations: A Retrospective Study of Patient Characteristics.

The purpose of this paper was to describe the clinical and personal factors of persons with disabilities (PwD) seeking a new wheelchair evaluation via telerehabilitation compared to in-person appointments. This retrospective cohort analysis used the Functional Mobility Assessment and Uniform Dataset, which is a nationwide registry with ongoing enrollment at 31 clinical sites of PwD seeking a new wheelchair evaluation. PwD were stratified into either a Telerehabilitation Group or In-Person Group. There were 1,669 PwD in the Telerehabilitation Group and 10,284 in the In-Person Group. The Telerehabilitation Group had a higher mean age and higher percentage of Progressively Acquired Disabilities than the In-Person Group. This project lays the groundwork for future comparative effectiveness studies, which may influence telerehabilitation reimbursement policies for wheelchair services.

Differences in rehabilitation evaluation access for rural and socially disadvantaged stroke survivors.

BACKGROUND: Most stroke survivors have ongoing deficits and report unmet needs. Despite evidence that rehabilitation improves stroke survivors' function, access to occupational and physical therapy is limited. Describing access to care for disadvantaged communities for different levels of stroke severity will provide proportions used to create Markov economic models to demonstrate the value of rehabilitation. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to explore differences in the frequency of rehabilitation evaluations via outpatient therapy and home health for Medicare Part B ischemic stroke survivors in rural and socially disadvantaged locations. METHODS: We completed a retrospective, descriptive cohort analysis using the 2018 and 2019 5% Medicare Limited Data Sets (LDS) from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services using STROBE guidelines for observational studies. We extracted rehabilitation Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for those who received occupational or physical therapy to examine differences in therapy evaluations for rural and socially disadvantaged populations. RESULTS: Of the 9,076 stroke survivors in this cohort, 44.2% did not receive any home health or outpatient therapy. Of these, 64.7% had a moderate or severe stroke, indicating an unmet need for therapy. Only 2.0% of stroke survivors received outpatient occupational therapy within the first year Rural and socially disadvantaged communities accessed rehabilitation evaluations at lower rates than general stroke survivors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings describe the poor access to home health and outpatient rehabilitation for stroke survivors, particularly in traditionally underserved populations. These results will influence future economic evaluations of interventions aimed at improving access to care.

Understanding Occupational Therapists' Knowledge and Confidence When Assessing for Spatial Neglect: A Special Issue Review.

IMPORTANCE: Spatial neglect (SN)-failure to respond to stimuli on the side of the body contralateral to a poststroke lesion-is one of the most disabling impairments for stroke survivors, and 80% of stroke survivors may have undetected SN. Occupational therapists' evaluations should include determining the impact of poststroke SN. OBJECTIVE: To investigate occupational therapists' confidence, knowledge, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for SN in adult stroke survivors. DESIGN: A 30-item survey was created with guidance from stroke rehabilitation occupational therapists who reviewed the survey for face and content validity. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Occupational therapist survey responders (N = 76). OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Self-report assessments were used to measure occupational therapists' confidence in identifying SN, SN assessment practices, and barriers to and facilitators of SN assessment. Knowledge of SN signs and symptoms, neuroanatomy, and clinical presentation were measured with a three-question quiz. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of the respondents reported a high level of confidence in identifying SN, and 70% reported routinely assessing for SN, with 81% using clinical observation rather than standardized tools as the primary assessment method. Barriers to SN assessment included time and resources. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most respondents, despite reporting high levels of confidence with routine SN assessments, did not use standardized SN measures and demonstrated suboptimal knowledge of SN. These results emphasize the need to increase clinical education about SN and its assessments. Plain-Language Summary: This study gathered baseline information on an underinvestigated topic-occupational therapists' education, confidence, current practices, barriers, and facilitators when assessing for spatial neglect in adult stroke survivors. The study results also contribute to future research on occupational therapists' current confidence and knowledge when assessing for spatial neglect.

Development and evaluation of an efficient training program to facilitate the adoption of a novel neurorehabilitation device.

Many rehabilitation devices are not adopted by therapists in practice. One major barrier is therapists' limited time and resources to get training. The objective of this study was to develop/evaluate an efficient training program for a novel rehabilitation device. The program was developed based on structured interviews with seven therapists for training preference and composed of asynchronous and in-person trainings following efficient teaching methods. The training program was evaluated for six occupational therapy doctoral students and six licensed therapists in neurorehabilitation practice. Training effectiveness was evaluated in a simulated treatment session in which 3 trainees shifted their roles among therapist applying the device, client, and peer assessor. In results, 11 of the 12 trainees passed the assessment of using the device in simulated treatment sessions. One trainee did not pass because s/he did not plug in the device to charge at the end. The in-person training fit within 1-h lunch break. All trainees perceived that they could effectively use the device in their practice and both asynchronous and in-person training easily fit into their schedule. This project serves as an example for development of an efficient and effective training program for a novel rehabilitation device to facilitate clinical adoption.

Contribution of Continuous Virtual Monitoring to Hospital Safety, Quality, and Value of Care for COVID-19 Patients.

Introduction: The rapid onset of the COVID-19 pandemic increased hospital admissions and shortages for personal protective equipment (PPE) used to slow the spread of infections. In addition, nurses treating COVID-19 patients have time-consuming guidelines to properly don and doff PPE to prevent the spread. Methods: To address these issues, the Medical University of South Carolina repurposed continuous virtual monitoring (CVM) systems to reduce the need for staff to enter patient rooms. The objective of this study was to identify the economic implications associated with using the CVM program for COVID-19 patients. We employed a time-driven activity-based costing approach to determine time and costs saved by implementing CVM. Results: Over the first 52 days of the pandemic, the use of the CVM system helped providers attend to patients needs virtually while averting 19,086 unnecessary in-person interactions. The estimated cost savings for the CVM program for COVID-19 patients in 2020 were $419,319, not including potential savings from avoided COVID-19 transmissions to health care workers. A total of 19,086 PPE changes were avoided, with savings of $186,661. After accounting for cost of the CVM system, the net savings provided an outstanding return on investment of 20.6 for the CVM program for COVID-19 patient care. Conclusion: The successful and cost saving repurposing of CVM systems could be expanded to other infectious disease applications, and be applied to high-risk groups, such as bone marrow and organ transplant patients.

Determining the Marginal Cost Differences of a Telehealth Versus an In-person Occupational Therapy Evaluation Session for Stroke Survivors Using Time-driven Activity-based Costing.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the marginal cost differences and care delivery process of a telerehabilitation vs outpatient session. DESIGN: This study used a time-driven activity-based costing approach including (1) observation of rehabilitation sessions and creation of manual time stamps, (2) structured and recorded interviews with 2 occupational therapists familiar with outpatient therapy and 2 therapists familiar with telerehabilitation, (3) collection of standard wages for providers, and (4) the creation of an iterative flowchart of both an outpatient and telerehabilitation session care delivery process. SETTING: Telerehabilitation and outpatient therapy evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Three therapists familiar with care deliver for telerehabilitation or outpatient therapy (N=3). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Marginal cost difference between telerehabilitation and outpatient therapy evaluations. RESULTS: Overall, telerehabilitation ($225.41) was more costly than outpatient therapy ($168.29) per session for a cost difference of $57.12. Primary time drivers of this finding were initial phone calls (0 minutes for OP therapists vs 35 minutes for TR) and post documentation (5 minutes for OP vs 30 minutes for TR) demands for telerehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Telerehabilitation is an emerging platform with the potential to reduce costs, improve health care inequities, and facilitate better patient outcomes. Improvements in documentation practices, staffing, technology, and reimbursement structuring would allow for a more successful translation.

Measuring Value: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Occupational Therapy.

Stroke rehabilitation is expensive, and recent changes to Medicare reimbursement demand more efficient interventions. The use of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help occupational therapy practitioners, rehabilitation directors, and payers better understand the value of occupational therapy and decide whether or not to implement new treatments. The objective of this article is to illustrate the contribution of CEA to stroke rehabilitation using a hypothetical new intervention as an example. What This Article Adds: This article facilitates an understanding of the importance of CEA to occupational therapy. It also explains how CEA improves consistency with reporting standards for cost-effectiveness studies.

Determining Factors that Influence Adoption of New Post-Stroke Sensorimotor Rehabilitation Devices in the USA.

Rehabilitation device efficacy alone does not lead to clinical practice adoption. Previous literature identifies drivers for device adoption by therapists but does not identify the best settings to introduce devices, the roles of different stakeholders including rehabilitation directors, or specific criteria to be met during device development. The objective of this work was to provide insights into these areas to increase clinical adoption of post-stroke restorative rehabilitation devices. We interviewed 107 persons including physical/occupational therapists, rehabilitation directors, and stroke survivors and performed content analysis. Unique to this work, care settings in which therapy goals are best aligned for restorative devices were found to be outpatient rehabilitation, followed by inpatient rehabilitation. Therapists are the major influencers for adoption because they typically introduce new rehabilitation devices to patients for both clinic and home use. We also learned therapists' utilization rate of a rehabilitation device influences a rehabilitation director's decision to acquire the device for facility use. Main drivers for each stakeholder are identified, along with specific criteria to add details to findings from previous literature. In addition, drivers for home adoption of rehabilitation devices by patients are identified. Rehabilitation device development should consider the best settings to first introduce the device, roles of each stakeholder, and drivers that influence each stakeholder, to accelerate successful adoption of the developed device.