How to distinguish mpox from its mimickers: An observational retrospective cohort study.

During the current global outbreak of mpox (formerly monkeypox), atypical features were frequently described outside endemic areas, raising concerns around differential diagnosis. In this study, we included 372 adult patients who had clinical signs consistent with mpox and who were screened using non-variola orthopoxvirus specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) between 15 May and 15 November 2022 at the University Hospital Institute Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France. At least one clinical sample was positive for 143 (38.4%) of these patients and 229 (61.6%) were negative. Clinically, patients who had mpox presented more frequently with systemic signs (69.9% vs. 31.0%, p < 10-6 ) including fever (51.0% vs. 30.1%, p < 10-3 ), myalgia (33.5% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.002), and lymphadenopathy (38.5% vs. 13.1%, p < 10-6 ). Among the patients who were negative for the non-variola orthopoxvirus, an alternative diagnosis was identified in 58 of them (25.3%), including chickenpox (n = 30, 13.1%), syphilis (n = 9, 4%), bacterial skin infection (n = 8, 3.5%), gonococcus (n = 5, 2.2%), HSV infection (n = 5, 2.2%), and histoplasmosis (n = 1, 0.4%). Overall, in the current outbreak, we show that mpox has a poorly specific clinical presentation. This reinforces the importance of microbiological confirmation. In symptomatic patients who are negative for the monkeypox virus by PCR, a broad differential diagnosis should be maintained.

Schistosomiasis and Recurrent Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is an endemic parasitic infection found in many tropical countries and is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa. It can follow different and atypical clinical patterns. In these unusual cases, diagnosis may be difficult, as symptoms are unspecific. Arthropathy can appear in parasitic infections, but making a connection between arthritis and parasitic aetiology is difficult. This review aims to summarise all cases that have reported schistosomiasis associated with arthropathy, and the different ways authors have diagnosed this disease. METHOD: We present a systematic literature review of schistosomiasis associated with joint impairments, with a focus on the difficulty of differentiating between reactive arthritis and its parasitic presence in situ. RESULTS: Joint impairments mimicking polyarthropathy are not rare in parasitic infections. Diagnosis is difficult. On the one hand, some patients have arthritis with parasite eggs found in situ, particularly in synovial biopsy. These situations are less common and antiparasitic treatment is straightforward. On the other hand, arthritis can be associated with parasitic infections in the form of reactive arthritis due to an immunological reaction. In such cases, pathogenicity due to circulating immune complex should be suspected. Anti-inflammatory treatments such as corticosteroids or immunosuppressive therapies are ineffective in cases of schistosomal arthropathy. A joint fluid puncture appears to be necessary and parasitic examination as well as in situ immunological techniques appear to be important in order to confirm the diagnosis of schistosomal arthropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of articular schistosomiasis is probably underestimated and should be sought when patients have unexplained polyarthropathy, as it can be an alternative diagnosis when patients have concomitant parasitic infections. These situations are common, whereas the association between unexplained inflammatory arthritis and a concomitant parasitic infection is rarely made. Unspecific rheumatism can lead to probabilistic treatments with many side effects, and looking for a parasitic aetiology could lead to repeated antiparasitic treatments and may avoid other immunosuppressive or corticosteroid therapies. With increasing travel and global migration, physicians need to be more aware of nonspecific symptoms that may reveal an atypical presentation of a tropical disease that can be treated easily, thus avoiding inappropriate immunosuppressive treatments.

Schistosoma haematobium infection with pulmonary involvement in a traveller returning from Congo: A case report and systematic review of literature on nodular pulmonary schistosomiasis.

BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa and diagnosis is difficult for travel medicine practitioners, because it can affect different organs with atypical manifestations. S. haematobium is mostly associated with urinary involvement and rarely with pulmonary lesions. This review aims to summarise the pulmonary forms associated with schistosomiasis, especially with S. haematobium. METHOD: Based on a case report of both pulmonary and urogenital schistosomiasis, we performed a systematic literature review of schistosomiasis occurring in migrants and travellers, with a specific focus on pulmonary schistosomiasis. RESULTS: Pulmonary schistosomiasis can present two different clinical patterns. On the one hand, there is an acute pattern, which more frequently affects non-immune young travellers within three to eight weeks of their return and, on the other hand, there is a chronic pattern, which has been evolving in recent years and which mostly affects people living in endemic areas or migrating from these countries. Nodular pulmonary lesions are described in both patterns. Genus identification should not focus only on known patterns, and identification of S. haematobium should not be associated exclusively with urinary schistosomiasis. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary schistosomiasis, even when resulting from S. haematobium, is a rare but existing infection that appears to be spreading with increasing travel and global migration. Physicians need to be more aware of non-specific symptoms that may reveal an atypical presentation of a tropical disease, in order to avoid the chronic complications which can result from parasitic diseases.