Characterization of Ebola Virus Risk to Bedside Providers in an Intensive Care Environment.

BACKGROUND: The 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa recapitulated that nosocomial spread of Ebola virus could occur and that health care workers were at particular risk including notable cases in Europe and North America. These instances highlighted the need for centers to better prepare for potential Ebola virus cases; including understanding how the virus spreads and which interventions pose the greatest risk. METHODS: We created a fully equipped intensive care unit (ICU), within a Biosafety Level 4 (BSL4) laboratory, and infected multiple sedated non-human primates (NHPs) with Ebola virus. While providing bedside care, we sampled blood, urine, and gastric residuals; as well as buccal, ocular, nasal, rectal, and skin swabs, to assess the risks associated with routine care. We also assessed the physical environment at end-point. RESULTS: Although viral RNA was detectable in blood as early as three days post-infection, it was not detectable in the urine, gastric fluid, or swabs until late-stage disease. While droplet spread and fomite contamination were present on a few of the surfaces that were routinely touched while providing care in the ICU for the infected animal, these may have been abrogated through good routine hygiene practices. CONCLUSIONS: Overall this study has helped further our understanding of which procedures may pose the highest risk to healthcare providers and provides temporal evidence of this over the clinical course of disease.

Correction to: Impact of intensive care unit supportive care on the physiology of Ebola virus disease in a universally lethal non-human primate model.

Please note that four authors (Logan Banadyga, Alixandra Albietz, Brad Pickering, and Gary Wong) have been erroneously omitted from the author list in the published original article [1].

Impact of intensive care unit supportive care on the physiology of Ebola virus disease in a universally lethal non-human primate model.

BACKGROUND: There are currently limited data for the use of specific antiviral therapies for the treatment of Ebola virus disease (EVD). While there is anecdotal evidence that supportive care may be effective, there is a paucity of direct experimental data to demonstrate a role for supportive care in EVD. We studied the impact of ICU-level supportive care interventions including fluid resuscitation, vasoactive medications, blood transfusion, hydrocortisone, and ventilator support on the pathophysiology of EVD in rhesus macaques infected with a universally lethal dose of Ebola virus strain Makona C07. METHODS: Four NHPs were infected with a universally lethal dose Ebola virus strain Makona, in accordance with the gold standard lethal Ebola NHP challenge model. Following infection, the following therapeutic interventions were employed: continuous bedside supportive care, ventilator support, judicious fluid resuscitation, vasoactive medications, blood transfusion, and hydrocortisone as needed to treat cardiovascular compromise. A range of physiological parameters were continuously monitored to gage any response to the interventions. RESULTS: All four NHPs developed EVD and demonstrated a similar clinical course. All animals reached a terminal endpoint, which occurred at an average time of 166.5 ± 14.8 h post-infection. Fluid administration may have temporarily blunted a rise in lactate, but the effect was short lived. Vasoactive medications resulted in short-lived improvements in mean arterial pressure. Blood transfusion and hydrocortisone did not appear to have a significant positive impact on the course of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The model employed for this study is reflective of an intramuscular infection in humans (e.g., needle stick) and is highly lethal to NHPs. Using this model, we found that the animals developed progressive severe organ dysfunction and profound shock preceding death. While the overall impact of supportive care on the observed pathophysiology was limited, we did observe some time-dependent positive responses. Since this model is highly lethal, it does not reflect the full spectrum of human EVD. Our findings support the need for continued development of animal models that replicate the spectrum of human disease as well as ongoing development of anti-Ebola therapies to complement supportive care.

Delivering Prolonged Intensive Care to a Non-human Primate: A High Fidelity Animal Model of Critical Illness.

Critical care needs have been rising in recent decades as populations age and comorbidities increase. Sepsis-related admissions to critical care contribute up to 50% of volume and septic shock carries a 35-54% fatality rate. Improvements in sepsis-related care and mortality would have a significant impact of a resource-intensive area of health care delivery. Unfortunately, research has been hampered by the lack of an animal model that replicates the complex care provided to humans in an intensive care unit (ICU). We developed a protocol to provide full ICU type supportive care to Rhesus macaques. This included mechanical ventilation, continuous sedation, fluid and electrolyte management and vasopressor support in response to Ebolavirus-induced septic shock. The animals accurately recapitulated human responses to a full range of ICU interventions (e.g. fluid resuscitation). This model can overcome current animal model limitations by accurately emulating the complexity of ICU care and thereby provide a platform for testing new interventions in critical care and sepsis without placing patients at risk.

Apneic Oxygenation during Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Ill Children.

This prospective case series documented hypoxemia and potential complications associated with apneic oxygenation in critically ill pediatric patients during rapid sequence intubation. Forty-four patients received apneic oxygenation via nasal cannula at rates of 5, 10, and 15 L/min for ages <4, 4 to 12, and 12 to 18 years, respectively. Pre- and postintubation attempt mean Spo 2 were 98.9 ± 2.95 and 90.7 ± 1.95%, respectively. Postintubation Spo 2 < 80% were significantly less with one intubation attempt, compared with multiple attempts (p < 0.001). No serious complications were noted. Apneic oxygenation was well tolerated in critically ill children.