RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Stroke awareness by lay people in general is poor. It has been estimated that only as much as one third of patients with acute stroke reach emergency medical services within two hours of onset of their symptoms. We aimed to assess perception of and attitude towards a person with an acute stroke by professionals working in mobile unit of emergency medical service in the city of Campinas, Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted during VII Stroke Workshop of Campinas in November 2007. We used an anonymous self-report questionnaire with a clinical case of an acute stroke with duration of 50 minutes. We asked two open-ended questions to gauge perception and attitude. RESULTS: One-hundred forty-nine of 205 (73%) participants answered the questionnaire; 49% were women, average age of 37 years (range 21-59). Ninety (60%) were professionals allied to medicine (nurses, health auxiliary, dentists), six (4%) were physicians, and 53 (36%) were other professionals (secretary, driver). In regard to perception, 142 of 149 (95%) had a correct perception of stroke. In regard to attitude, in general, the basic support measures have been pointed out, but only one (0.5%) mentioned an issue of time less than 3 hours for thrombolysis, four (2%) mentioned the possibility of thrombolysis, and 12 (8%) requested computed tomographic examination. DISCUSSION: It appears that professionals allied to medicine can diagnosis stroke of anterior circulation; however, they do not have thrombolytic therapy in mind, and this should be considered the default treatment for all patients with stroke within the "therapeutic window."
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Adulto , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población Urbana , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate MRI findings in a large group of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsies. METHODS: Idiopathic generalized epilepsies were diagnosed according to clinical and EEG criteria following International League Against Epilepsy recommendations. MRI was performed in a 2.0 T scanner using a previously established epilepsy protocol. Images were reviewed, and any abnormality was reported. Patients were divided in those with and without MRI abnormalities. Comparisons were made between these groups concerning age, age at seizure onset, subsyndrome, EEG findings, and seizure control. RESULTS: Of the 134 MRIs evaluated, 33 (24%) showed abnormalities, most of which (88%) were nonspecific. There were eight main abnormalities: arachnoid cyst, diffuse cortical atrophy, basal ganglia abnormalities (signal alterations and prominent perivascular spaces), ventricular abnormalities (uni- or bilateral increased volume of the lateral ventricles), white matter abnormalities (increased T2 signal in the frontal lobes), reduced hippocampal volume, focal gyral abnormality, and area of gliosis in the frontal lobe. Comparisons between the groups showed a higher proportion of EEG focalities in patients with abnormal MRI, which were in most part concordant with the location of the MRI abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four percent of patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsies had MRI abnormalities. However, the majority of these abnormalities were nonspecific.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/patología , Epilepsia Generalizada/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adolescente , Adulto , Encéfalo/anomalías , Mapeo Encefálico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Epilepsia Generalizada/clasificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de ÓrganosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Clobazam (CLB) has an important antiepileptic effect and is less expensive than the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), but still has not been considered as first-line drug in the treatment of epilepsy. We evaluated the efficacy of CLB as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. METHODS: This was an open, retrospective study, conducted at the epilepsy clinic of our university hospital. All patients had chronic epilepsy and were being evaluated for epilepsy surgery. CLB was introduced as add-on therapy (starting with 10 mg/ day) in patients with previous failure of at least two AEDs. Information was obtained from clinical notes and follow-up visits. RESULTS: We evaluated 97 patients, 37 men and 60 women. Ages ranged from 15 to 70 years (mean, 35.8 years). Etiology of epilepsy was hippocampal atrophy in 67 (69%), cortical dysgenesis in nine (9.3%), and other etiologies in nine (9.3%). In 12 (12.3%) patients, the etiology of epilepsy was not identified despite clinical and neurologic investigation. Patients used CLB for a period ranging from 1 month to 7 years and 9 months (mean, 16.7 months) with doses ranging from 10 to 60 mg/day (mean, 29.7 mg/day). Seven (7.2%) patients were seizure free, 48 (49.4%) had > or =50% of improvement in seizure control, 39 (40.2%) had <50% of improvement in seizure control, and in three (3.1%), no data were available. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CLB may have efficacy equivalent to that of the new AEDs when used as add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. CLB should be considered an economic alternative in the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy.