Treatment of completely obstructed anastomosis after low rectal resection A trans-anal plus endoscopic trans-colostomy rendez-vous approach and a review of the literature.

AIM: Completely obstructed anastomosis (COA) after low rectal resection (LRR) represents a rare entity difficult to manage. We herein summarize the available evidence from literature on the treatment of this condition and we report our particular experience in the management of a completely obstructed colon-anal anastomosis (CAA) with a trans-anal plus endoscopic trans-colostomy rendez-vous approach. METHODS: The Pub-Med database was inquired from inception to October 2019 about the treatment of COA after LRR reported in English literature. Article selection was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Moreover, clinical, radiological and surgical data of our case presentation were retrieved. RESULTS: Ten articles involving twelve patients and concerning the management of COA were identified. All of them reported the treatment of completely obstructed colon-rectal anastomosis. As we didn't find any article reporting the treatment of completely obstructed CAA, we also described a case of its treatment. The patient was successfully treated at our institution using a rendez-vous approach with a simultaneous trans-colostomy endoscopy, associated to a trans-anal dilatation. This combined approach, thanks to trans-illumination and to the miniature passage of CO2 coming from above, permitted to identify the correct way to surgically establish a trans-anal lumen. The post-procedural course was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of COA after LRR can be very demanding, particularly after CAA. Few data are reported in literature to define the best approach to treat these conditions. Our described rendez-vous technique can represent a valid choice, especially after CAA. KEY WORDS: Colorectal anastomosis, Endoscopic treatment, Low-rectal resection.

Pancreatic resections in elderly patients with high American Society of Anesthesiologists' risk score: a view from a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: More than 60% of patients affected by pancreatic cancer are ≥ 65 years of age. Surgery represents the only potentially curative treatment for malignant pancreatic neoplasia and a useful treatment for benign diseases. AIM: To evaluate outcomes in elderly patients with ASA risk score 4 who underwent pancreatic resection compared to younger patients and elderly patients with lower anesthesiological risk. METHODS: A consecutive series of 345 patients underwent pancreatic resection between 2010 and 2017 was reviewed. We compared three groups based on age at the time of surgery: < 65 years (group A), 65-74 years (group B), and ≥ 75 years (group C). Patients in group C were split into two subgroups, ASA 1-3 versus ASA 4, and compared. RESULTS: Group A consisted of 117 (34%) patients, group B 128 (37%) patients, and group C 100 (29%) patients. Group C had a significantly higher incidence of comorbidity and ASA 4 status (p < 0.05), and of overall post-operative complications (p < 0.01), because of the higher incidence of post-operative medical complications. No differences in terms of overall surgical complications and post-operative mortality were reported. The mean overall survival was significantly lower for group C (p < 0.01), with no difference in mortality for cancer. Within group C, no differences were reported regarding surgical complications (p = 0.59), mortality (p = 0.34), and mean overall survival (p = 0.53) between ASA 1-3 and ASA 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age should not preclude elderly patients with pancreatic diseases from being treated surgically, and ASA 4 in subjects aged ≥ 75 years should not be an absolute contraindication.

Robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal liver metastasis: A single-centre experience.

Background: Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of the liver is increasingly widespread, its role in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) remains uncertain. In this setting, the role of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has not been significantly evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to report our experience with RAS for treatment of CRLM. Material and Methods: Prospectively collected surgical and oncologic data on all of the robotic-assisted liver resections for CRLM performed at our centre were retrieved from the institutional database and retrospectively analysed. Intra-operative ultrasound (US) was obtained with a dedicated robotic probe using the TilePro™ function. Results: Twenty patients underwent robotic-assisted resection of CRLM between May 2012 and April 2018. Six patients (30%) had multiple synchronous CRLM resections (median = 2; range 2-4). The tumour size averaged 3.0 ± 1.8 cm. All of the lesions were removed using a parenchymal-sparing approach, with R0 resection margins. Mean hospital stay was 4.7 ± 1.8 days. The mean follow-up was 22.5 ± 19.5 months. During the study period, there were no local recurrences, while 9 patients (45%) developed new systemic metastasis. All patients are still alive as of September 2018 with 1- and 3-year disease-free survival of 89.5% and 35.8%, respectively. Conclusions: In our experience, RAS for CRLM surgical treatment was feasible and played a positive role even in patients with multiple metastases and previous or synchronous surgery. RAS seemed to be oncologically effective in this setting, as no patients experienced local relapse in the treated area.

Robotic-assisted versus open left pancreatectomy for cystic tumours: A single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Cystic pancreatic lesions (CPLs) are being identified increasingly, and some benefit from surgical treatment. With the increasing use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) for neoplasms of the pancreas, the aim of the present comparative study is to establish whether the RAS offered any advantages over conventional open surgery (OS) in the management of CPLs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven out of 37 robot-assisted left-sided pancreatectomy (LSP) performed between January 2010 and April 2017 were carried out for CPLs. The surgical outcome and histopathology were compared retrospectively with a control group of 27 patients who had undergone open LSP for CPLs, selected using a one-to-one case-matched methodology (OS-Group) from the prospectively collected institutional database. RESULTS: The spleen was preserved in a significantly higher percentage of patients in the RAS-group (63% vs. 33.3%,P < 0.05). There was no difference in the post-operative course (pancreatic fistula and morbidity) between the two groups. The median post-operative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RAS-group: 8 days (range 3-25) versus 12 days (range 7-26) in the OS-group (P < 0.01). No conversion to open approach was reported in the RAS-group. CONCLUSIONS: Robotically assisted LSP is a safe and effective procedure. It is accompanied by a significantly higher spleen preservation rate compared to the open approach. In addition, because of the reduced trauma, RAS incurred a shorter post-operative hospital stay and faster return to full recovery, particularly important in patients undergoing surgery for relative indications. However, these benefits of RAS for LSP require confirmation by prospective randomised controlled studies.

Pancreatic resections for metastases: A twenty-year experience from a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND: Literature data about pancreatic resections for metastases are limited to small series, so that the role of surgery in this setting remains unclear. We herein report our experience from a tertiary care center, analyzing the outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatic resections for metastases and discussing the role of surgical resection in their management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to January 2019, 26 patients underwent pancreatic resections for metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC-group) or other primitive tumors (non-RCC-group). Details regarding pre-, intra-, post-operative course, and follow-up, prospectively collected in a database of pancreatic resection, were retrospectively analyzed and compared. RESULTS: RCC-group was composed of 21 patients, non-RCC-group of 5 patients. RCC-group presented a longer disease-free interval: 96.4 vs. 5.4 months (p < 0.001). In 9/21 patients (42.9%) of RCC-group the surgical resection of other organs or vascular structures was performed, while in non-RCC-group pancreatic resection alone was performed in all cases, p = 0.070. No local recurrence was reported in all cases. The systemic recurrence rate was 42.9% (9/21 patients) in RCC-group and 80% (4/5 patients) in non-RCC-group, p = 0.135. RCC-group presented a longer DFS and OS: 107.5 vs. 25.2 months (p = 0.002), and 109.1 vs. 36.2 months (p = 0.016), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Radical pancreatic resection may confer a survival benefit for RCC metastases, while for other primitive tumors it should be applied more selectively. For RCC pancreatic metastases, an aggressive surgical approach, even in patient with locally advanced tumors, or associated extra-pancreatic localizations, or recurrent metastases should be taken in consideration.

Al professor Mosca la "Honorary Fellowship" dell'American College of Surgeons.

È la massima onorificenza conferita dalla più grande organizzazione mondiale di chirurghi La più grande organizzazione mondiale di chirurghia ha conferito la sua massima onorificenza al professor Franco Mosca, Emerito di Chirurgia generale dell'Università di Pisa. La "Honorary Fellowship" dell'American College of Surgeons (ACS) è stata assegnata al professor Mosca in occasione del Congresso 2018 che si è svolto a Boston. L'ACS, fondata nel 1913, è la più grande organizzazione di chirurgia generale e specialistica e riunisce più di 82.000 chirurghi di tutto il mondo, con lo scopo di migliorare la qualità della pratica chirurgica. Dalla sua istituzione a oggi sono divenuti membri onorari 470 chirurghi internazionali e tra di loro primo italiano fra tutti Raffaele Bastianelli nel lontano 1918 ed a seguire Roberto Alessandri nel 1926, Mario Dogliotti nel 1951 e Pietro Valdoni nel 1955. Il professor Franco Mosca, Fellow dell'ACS da 25 anni, aggiunge questo massimo riconoscimento ad honorem ad altri ambiti e molto esclusivi, quali il Royal College of Surgeons (2006), l'American Surgical Association (2008) e il Polish Association of Surgeons (2011). Nella Motivazione del riconoscimento si ricorda che "il professor Franco Mosca è divenuto cattedratico nel 1986. Da allora ha creato una Unità Operativa di eccellenza in chirurgia oncologica, vascolare e trapiantologica. Fin dall'inizio della sua carriera si è dedicato a migliorare l'organizzazione ospedaliera introducendo la terapia intensiva post chirurgica, l'endoscopia chirurgica, l'ecografia diagnostica ed operativa nella convinzione che i chirurghi non possono delegare queste attività ad altri se vogliono ottenere i migliori risultati. Queste basi hanno consolidato lo sviluppo di una costellazione di nuovi programmi per il trattamento dell'ipertensione portale, la chirurgia vascolare, i trapianti di organi (rene, pancreas, fegato). Inoltre il professor Mosca ha sviluppato la chirurgia oncologica e in particolare quella pancreatica ed epatobiliare; infine ha, tra i primi in Italia, sviluppato la chirurgia laparoscopica. L'interesse per le nuove tecnologie ha portato il professor Mosca a stabilire legami stretti con i Dipartimenti di Ingegneria delle Università Pisane, mettendo a punto nuovi dispositivi per la chirurgia laparoscopica e l'endoscopica fino alla creazione di un Centro di Eccellenza (Endocas) per ricerca e training in chirurgia assistita dal computer. Questo centro è riconosciuto, primo e unico in Italia, dall'American College of Surgeons quale 'Accredited Education Institute'. Il professor Mosca è un eccezionale leader chirurgico e uno dei più rispettati e influenti chirurghi europei". "Desidero condividere questo riconoscimento - ha dichiarato il professor Franco Mosca - con quanti hanno collaborato con me in tanti anni di impegno e sacrificio rendendo possibile il raggiungimento di risultati importanti a favore dei nostri pazienti e della Sanità Pubblica. Sono molto gratificato per essere stato presentato all'ACS da un illustre allievo della Scuola Medica Pisana: il professor Fabrizio Michelassi chirurgo di fama mondiale".

Role of abdominal ultrasound for the surveillance follow-up of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a cost-effective safe alternative to the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN), without surgical indication at the time of diagnosis according to current guidelines, require lifetime image-based surveillance follow-up. In these patients, the current European evidenced-based guidelines advise magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning every 6 mo in the first year, then annually for the next five years, without reference to any role for trans-abdominal ultrasound (US). In this study, we report on our clinical experience of a follow-up strategy of image-based surveillance with US, and restricted use of MRI every two years and for urgent evaluation whenever suspicious changes are detected by US. AIM: To report the results and cost-efficacy of a US-based surveillance follow-up for known PCNs, with restricted use of MRI. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the records of all the patients treated in our institution with non-surgical PCN who received follow-up abdominal US and restricted MRI from the time of diagnosis, between January 2012 and January 2017. After US diagnosis and MRI confirmation, all patients underwent US surveillance every 6 mo for the first year, and then annually. A MRI scan was routinely performed every 2 years, or at any stage for all suspicious US findings. In this communication, we reported the clinical results of this alternative follow-up, and the results of a comparative cost-analysis between our surveillance protocol (abdominal US and restricted MRI) and the same patient cohort that has been followed-up in strict accordance with the European guidelines recommended for an exclusive MRI-based surveillance protocol. RESULTS: In the 5-year period, 200 patients entered the prescribed US-restricted MRI surveillance follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 25.1 ± 18.2 mo. Surgery was required in two patients (1%) because of the appearance of suspicious features at imaging (with complete concordance between the US scan and the on-demand MRI). During the follow-up, US revealed changes in PCN appearance in 28 patients (14%). These comprised main pancreatic duct dilatation (n = 1), increased size of the main cyst (n = 14) and increased number of PNC (n = 13). In all of these patients, MRI confirmed US findings, without adding more information. The bi-annual MRI identified evolution of the lesions not identified by US in only 11 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (5.5%), largely consisting of an increased number of very small PCN (P = 0.14). The overall mean cost of surveillance, based on a theoretical use of the European evidenced-based exclusive MRI surveillance in the same group of patients, would have been 1158.9 ± 798.6 € per patient, in contrast with a significantly lower cost of 366.4 ± 348.7 € (P < 0.0001) incurred by the US-restricted MRI surveillance used at our institution. CONCLUSION: In patients with non-surgical PCN at the time of diagnosis, US surveillance could be a safe complementary approach to MRI, delaying and reducing the numbers of second level examinations and therefore reducing the costs.

Gray-scale, Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pancreatic allograft surveillance: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Gray scale ultrasound (US), Doppler and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) represent important surveillance tools in the early post-operative period after pancreas transplantation (PTx), when complications are more common. This review summarizes the available evidence on their clinical application in this setting. METHODS: We searched the Pub-Med database from inception to October 2018 for English literature on the clinical use of US, Doppler and CEUS in the post-PTx surveillance. Article selection was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria (PRISMA). RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles concerning the clinical applications of US, Doppler and CEUS were identified, 13 of which, involving 264 patients, were focused on the sonographic findings in immunologic rejection, whereas 11 studies reporting on 887 patients were focused on post-PTx vascular complications. The remaining five articles, involving a total of 196 patients, described US or CEUS applied in the study of pancreatic morphology and texture to diagnose peri-graft fluids collections or to obtain experimental data on allograft endocrine function. CONCLUSIONS: US, Doppler and CEUS have proven to be valuable assets in post-PTx follow up, thanks to the combination of their non-invasiveness with a high accuracy in the detection of early abnormalities, in particular regarding vascular complications. Preliminary experiences are directing towards functional research; however, future prospective trials are necessary to precisely correlate organ perfusion, early abnormalities and allograft function.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours of stomach: Robot-assisted excision with the da Vinci Surgical System regardless of size and location site.

Aims: The role of minimally invasive surgery of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of the stomach remains uncertain especially for large and/or difficult located tumours. We are hereby presenting a single-centre series of robot-assisted resections using the da Vinci Surgical System (Si or Xi). Subjects and Methods: Data of patients undergoing robot-assisted treatment of gastric GIST were retrieved from the prospectively collected institutional database and a retrospective analysis was performed. Patients were stratified according to size and location of the tumour. Difficult cases (DCs) were considered for size if tumour was >50 mm and/or for location if the tumour was Type II, III or IV sec. Privette/Al-Thani classification. Results: Between May 2010 and February 2017, 12 consecutive patients underwent robot-assisted treatment of GIST at our institution. DCs were 10/12 cases (83.3%), of which 6/10 (50%) for location, 2/10 (25%) for size and 2/10 (25%) for both. The da Vinci Si was used in 8 patients, of which 6 (75%) were DC, and the da Vinci Xi in 4, all of which (100%) were DC. In all patients, excision was by wedge resection. All lesions had microscopically negative resection margins. There was no conversion to open surgery, no tumour ruptures or spillage and no intraoperative complications. Conclusion: Our experience suggests a positive role of the robot da Vinci in getting gastric GIST removal with a conservative approach, regardless of size and location site. Comparative studies with a greater number of patients are necessary for a more robust assessment.

Structured cost analysis of robotic TME resection for rectal cancer: a comparison between the da Vinci Si and Xi in a single surgeon's experience.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted surgery by the da Vinci Si appears to benefit rectal cancer surgery in selected patients, but still has some limitations, one of which is its high costs. Preliminary studies have indicated that the use of the new da Vinci Xi provides some added advantages, but their impact on cost is unknown. The aim of the present study is to compare surgical outcomes and costs of rectal cancer resection by the two platforms, in a single surgeon's experience. METHODS: From April 2010 to April 2017, 90 robotic rectal resections were performed, with either the da Vinci Si (Si-RobTME) or the da Vinci Xi (Xi-RobTME). Based on CUSUM analysis, two comparable groups of 40 consecutive Si-RobTME and 40 consecutive Xi-RobTME were obtained from the prospectively collected database and used for the present retrospective comparative study. Data costs were analysed based on the level of experience on the proficiency-gain curve (p-g curve) by the surgeon with each platform. RESULTS: In both groups, two homogeneous phases of the p-g curve were identified: Si1 and Xi1: cases 1-19, Si2 and Xi2: cases 20-40. A significantly higher number of full RAS operations were achieved in the Xi-RobTME group (p < 0.001). A statistically significant reduction in operating time (OT) during Si2 and Xi2 phase was observed (p < 0.001), accompanied by reduced overall variable costs (OVC), personnel costs (PC) and consumable costs (CC) (p < 0.001). All costs were lower in the Xi2 phase compared to Si2 phase: OT 265 versus 290 min (p = 0.052); OVC 7983 versus 10231.9 (p = 0.009); PC 1151.6 versus 1260.2 (p = 0.052), CC 3464.4 versus 3869.7 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms a significant reduction of costs with increasing surgeon's experience with both platforms. However, the economic gain was higher with the Xi with shorter OT, reduced PC and CC, in addition to a significantly larger number of cases performed by the fully robotic approach.

Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study.

Proficiency-based training has become essential in the training of surgeons such that on completion they can execute complex operations with novel surgical approaches including direct manual laparoscopic surgery (DMLS) and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). To this effect, several virtual reality (VR) simulators have been developed. The objective of the present study was to assess and establish proficiency gain curves for medical students on VR simulators for DMLS and RALS. Five medical students participated in training course consisting of didactic teaching and practical hands-on training with VR simulators for DMLS and RALS. Evaluation of didactic component was by questionnaire completed by participating students, who also were required to undertake selected exercises to reach proficiency at each VR simulator: (1) 12 tasks on LapSim VR (Surgical Science, Gothenburg, Sweden) for DMLS, and (2) six selected exercises on the dV-Trainer Mimic (Seattle, WA, United States). The five medical students reached the 60% threshold on the questionnaire-based didactic component. During selected hands-on simulation on VR simulators, students with previous experience with simulators (n = 3) outperformed those without (n = 2) in ten out of twelve LapSim tasks and all six at dV-Trainer, by requiring fewer attempts to reach proficiency although the difference was not significant (p < 0.05). In this work, we developed a proficiency-based training program for medical undergraduates based on surgical simulation for DMLS and RALS.z. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the benefit of this program in stimulating interest for surgical career amongst medical students after the qualify.

Control Comparison of the New EndoWrist and Traditional Laparoscopic Staplers for Anterior Rectal Resection with the Da Vinci Xi: A Case Study.

Background: A new robotic stapler for the da Vinci Xi® is directly controlled by the surgeon at the console and equipped with EndoWrist® technology. We evaluated operative and short-term results of the first patients who underwent anterior rectal resection for cancer with the da Vinci Xi and new staplers, and compared the results with those of a comparable group treated with traditional laparoscopic staplers. Methods: From December 2015 to December 2017, 25 patients underwent anterior rectal resection for cancer with robotic EndoWrist staplers (EndoWrist group). Using a case-control method, we compared the results with those of a similar group of patients treated with the same system and a traditional laparoscopic endostapler, controlled by a bedside assistant (Control group). Results: No conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy were observed, in either group. The mean number of charges was 2.1 ± 0.2 in the EndoWrist group versus 2.7 ± 0.7 in the Control group (P = .0004). The other perioperative results were comparable. During follow-up, the incidence of anastomotic fistula in a contrast enema study was higher in the Control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (two leaks versus two leaks in EndoWrist group; P = .8). The interval between rectal resection and stoma closure was shorter in the EndoWrist group (3.4 ± 2.5 versus 4.2 ± 2.9 months in the Control group; P = .2), although the difference was not significant. Conclusions: Our experience suggests that the new robotic staplers simplify transection, which could reduce the average number of stapler firings used during rectal resection and could decrease the incidence of anastomotic leakage. These findings require confirmation in larger studies.

Distribution of innate psychomotor skills recognized as important for surgical specialization in unconditioned medical undergraduates.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing interest for a test assessing objectively the innate aptitude for surgery as a craft specialty to complement the current selection process of surgical residents. The aim of this study was to quantify the size of individuals with high, average, and low level of innate psychomotor skills among medical students. METHODS: A volunteer sample of 155 medical students, without prior experience with surgical simulator, executed five tasks at a virtual simulator for robot-assisted surgery. They had to reach proficiency twice consecutively in each before moving to the next one. A weighting based on time and number of attempts needed to reach proficiency was assigned to each task. RESULTS: Nine students (5.8%) out of 155 significantly outperformed all the others on median (i.q.r.) weighted time [44.7 (42.2-47.3) min vs. 98.5 (70.8-131.8) min, p < 0.001], and number of attempts to reach proficiency [14 (12-15) vs. 23 (19-32.75), p < 0.001). Seventeen students (11.0%) scored significantly much worse than the rest on median weighted time [202.2 (182.5-221.0) min vs. 84.3 (65.7-114.4) min, p < 0.001], and number of attempts [42 (40-48) vs. 22 (17.25-28), p < 0.001]. Low correlation between simulator scores and extracurricular activities, like videogames and musical instruments, was found. CONCLUSIONS: The test successfully identified two groups straddling the large cohort with average innate aptitude for psychomotor skills: (i) innately gifted and (ii) with scarce level. Hence, exercises on a virtual simulator are a valid test of innate manual dexterity and can be considered to complement the selection process for a surgical training program, primarily to identify individuals with low innate aptitude for surgery and advise them to consider specialization in other (non-craft) medical specialties.

Robotic Colorectal Resection With and Without the Use of the New Da Vinci Table Motion: A Case-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci Table Motion (dVTM) is a new device that enables patients to be repositioned with instruments in place within the abdomen, and without undocking the robot. The present study was designed to compare operative and short-term outcomes of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery with the da Vinci Xi system, with or without use of the dVTM. METHODS: Ten patients underwent robotic colorectal resection for cancer with the use of dVTM (Xi-dVTM group) between May 2015 and October 2015 at our center. The intraoperative and short-term clinical outcome were compared, using a case-control methodology (propensity scores approach to create 1:2 matched pairs), with a similar group of patients who underwent robotic colorectal surgery for cancer without the use of the dVTM device (Xi-only group). RESULTS: Overall robotic operative time was shorter in the Xi-dVTM group ( P = .04). Operations were executed fully robotic in all Xi-dVTM cases, while 2 cases of the Xi-only group required conversion to open surgery because of bulky tumors and difficult exposure. Postoperative medical complications were higher in the Xi-only group ( P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary experience, the use of the new dVTM with the da Vinci Xi in colorectal surgery, by overcoming the limitations of the fixed positions of the patient, enhanced the workflow and resulted in improved exposure of the operative field. Further studies with a greater number of patients are needed to confirm these benefits of the dVTM-da Vinci Xi robotically assisted colorectal surgery.

Multiple small bowel perforations due to invasive aspergillosis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia: case report and a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Involvement of the gastrointestinal tract by Aspergillus is mostly reported as part of a disseminated infection from a primary pulmonary site and only rarely as an isolated organ infection. METHODS: We report a case of small bowel perforation due to IA in a patient with acute leukemia under chemotherapy and pulmonary aspergillosis. We performed a systematic review of the literature as well. RESULTS: A 43-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia under chemotherapy developed severe neutropenia and pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus flavus. He developed melena and hemodynamic failure and a contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan suggested active intestinal bleeding. During emergency laparotomy we found multiple intestinal abscesses, several perforations of intestinal loop and Aspergillus flavus was isolated from the abscesses. Resection of the jejunum was performed. The patient received voriconazole and finally recovered. The patient is now alive and in complete disease remission. From literature review we found 35 intestinal IA previously published in single case reports or small case series as well. CONCLUSION: Clinical manifestations of gastrointestinal aspergillosis are nonspecific, such as abdominal pain, and only occasionally it presents as an acute abdomen. Antemortem detection of bowel involvement is rarely achieved and, only in cases of complicated gastrointestinal aspergillosis, the diagnosis is achieved thanks to the findings during surgery. Gastrointestinal aspergillosis should be suspected in patients with severe and prolonged neutropenia with or without pulmonary involvement in order to consider the right therapy and prompt surgery.

Performances on simulator and da Vinci robot on subjects with and without surgical background.

Objective: To assess whether previous training in surgery influences performance on da Vinci Skills Simulator and da Vinci robot. Material and methods: In this prospective study, thirty-seven participants (11 medical students, 17 residents, and 9 attending surgeons) without previous experience in laparoscopy and robotic surgery performed 26 exercises at da Vinci Skills Simulator. Thirty-five then executed a suture using a da Vinci robot. Results: The overall scores on the exercises at the da Vinci Skills Simulator show a similar performance among the groups with no statistically significant pair-wise differences (p < .05). The quality of the suturing based on the unedited videos of the test run was similar for the intermediate (7 (4, 10)) and expert group (6.5 (4.5, 10)), and poor for the untrained groups (5 (3.5, 9)), without statistically significant difference (p < .05). Conclusion: This study showed, for subjects new to laparoscopy and robotic surgery, insignificant differences in the scores at the da Vinci Skills Simulator and at the da Vinci robot on inanimate models.

Pancreatoduodenectomy without Vascular Resection in Patients with Primary Resectable Adenocarcinoma and Unilateral Venous Contact: A Matched Case Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the oncological outcome and survival of patients following a conservative approach on the portal-mesenteric axis, in an intraoperative ultrasound-selected group of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), performed on patients with primary resectable with vascular contact (prVC) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: A consecutive series of patients who underwent PD for PDAC at our tertiary care center, between 2008 and 2017, were reviewed. A total of 156 PDs and 88 total pancreatectomies were performed during the study period, including 35 vascular resections. We identified a group of 40 (25.6%) patients with prVC-PDAC in whom after checking the feasibility with intraoperative ultrasound, we were able to perform PD by separation of the tumor from the portomesenteric axis avoiding vascular resection, without residual macroscopic disease (no vascular resection, nvrPD), and compared this group, using case-matched methodology, with the standard PD (sPD) group of primary resectable without vascular contact- (prwVC-) PDAC. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 28.5 ± 23.2 months in the sPD group and 23.8 ± 20.8 months in the nvrPD group (p = 0.35). Isolated local recurrence rate was 2/40 (5%) in both groups. Additionally, there were no statistical differences in the systemic progression of the disease (42.5% sPD vs. 45% nvrPD, p = 0.82) or local plus synchronous systemic disease rates (2.5% sPD vs. 7.5% nvrPD, p = 0.30). The median survival was 22 months for the sPD group and 23 months for the nvrPD group, p = 0.86. The overall survival was similar in the two groups (1 y: 76.3% sPD vs. 70.0% nvrPD; 3 y: 35.6% vs. 31.6%; and 5 y: 28.5% vs. 25.3%; p = 0.80). Conclusions. PD without vascular resection can be considered safe and oncologically acceptable in selected patients with preoperative diagnosis of prVC-PDAC. The poor prognosis of PDAC is related to the aggressive biology and systemic spread of the tumor, rather than the local control of the disease.

Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si.

BACKGROUND: Robotic rectal resection with da Vinci Si has some technical limitations, which could be overcome by the new da Vinci Xi. We compare short-term surgical and functional outcomes following robotic rectal resection with total mesorectal excision for cancer, with the da Vinci Xi (Xi-RobTME group) and the da Vinci Si (Si-RobTME group). METHODS: The first consecutive 30 Xi-RobTME were compared with a Si-RobTME control group of 30 patients, selected using a one-to-one case-matched methodology from our prospectively collected Institutional database, comprising all cases performed between April 2010 and September 2016 by a single surgeon. Perioperative outcomes were compared. The impact of minimally invasive TME on autonomic function and quality of life was analyzed with specific questionnaires. RESULTS: The docking and overall operative time were shorter in the Xi-RobTME group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 respectively). The mean differences of overall operative time and docking time were -33.8 min (95% CI -5.1 to -64.5) and -6 min (95% CI -4.1 to -7.9), respectively. A fully-robotic approach with complete splenic flexure mobilization was used in 30/30 (100%) of the Xi-RobTME cases and in 7/30 (23%) of the Si-RobTME group (p < 0.001). The hybrid approach in males and patients with BMI > 25 kg/m2 was necessary in ten patients (45 vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and in six patients (37 vs. 0%, p < 0.05), in the Si-RobTME and Xi-RobTME groups, respectively. There were no differences in conversion rate, mean hospital stay, pathological data, and in functional outcomes between the two groups before and at 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION: The technical advantages offered by the da Vinci Xi seem to be mainly associated with a shorter docking and operative time and with superior ability to perform a fully-robotic approach. Clinical and functional outcomes seem not to be improved, with the introduction of the new Xi platform.

Technical Details and Results of a Modified End-to-Side Technique of Pancreatojejunostomy: a Personal Series of 100 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of pancreatic stump is a critical step of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) because leaks from this anastomosis incur major morbidity and mortality. We describe the technical details of a modified end-to-side pancreatojejunostomy (mPJ), and report on the outcome of the first 100 patients. METHODS: From October 2008 to June 2017, 424 pancreatic resections were performed, of which 203 were PD. The mPJ was introduced in November 2010 and used in 100 consecutive patients, by a single surgeon. Data were retrieved from a prospectively collected Institutional database, and used for the present retrospective evaluation. Post-operative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) were stratified with the Fistula Risk Score (FRS), based on the 2005-International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification (ISGPFc) and on the subsequent 2016-revised version (ISGPSc). RESULTS: ISGPFc POPF occurred in 17/100 (17%): grade A in 10/100 (10%), grade B in 6/100 (6%) and grade C in 1/100 (1%). On the ISGPSc, POPF rate averaged 7%: grade B in 6/100 (6%) and grade C in 1/100 (1%). POPF rate associated with high FRS was 18.8%/6.3% (ISGPFc/ISGPSc). With low and intermediate FRS, POPFs were 5.3%/0% (ISGPFc/ISGPSc) and 21.3%/9.8% (ISGPFc/ISGPSc) respectively. Re-operation rate was 3%. In-hospital mortality rate was 2% and specific mortality rate for POPF was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: The mPJ technique is associated with a POPF rate which was less than expected, especially for "difficult" pancreas with high FRS (soft gland texture and small duct). A larger prospective series is needed in addition to comparative studies with other techniques for robust assessment.