Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adult Patients Diagnosed with Epilepsy Being Treated with Perampanel.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a complex disorder that can affect patients' medical, psychological, and social well-being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), satisfaction, and adherence in adult patients diagnosed with epilepsy treated with perampanel in the United States (US). METHODS: A US-based, multicenter, observational cross-sectional survey was completed by 61 patients taking perampanel with or without other antiseizure medications (ASMs). Respondents were ≥18 years old, had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy, used perampanel for ≥4 months, and provided informed consent. Patients responded to questions concerning their demographic characteristics, treatment history, experiences before perampanel, experiences while taking perampanel, HRQoL, treatment satisfaction, and medication adherence. RESULTS: Patients (N=61) were 42.8 years old on average; majority were female (63.9%) and white (75.4%). Mean time on perampanel was 2.5 years, with sodium channel blockers often (55.7%) used concomitantly with perampanel. Patients reported, on average, 5.5 (standard deviation [SD]=13.2) seizures/month after initiating perampanel, whereas these same patients reported experiencing 20.4 (SD=60.0) seizures/month prior to perampanel. When comparing their experience on perampanel with their experience with previous ASMs, more patients "strongly agreed" that perampanel allowed them to live a more normal life (36.1% vs 27.5%) and worked as intended if they missed taking a dose (16.4% vs 7.8%). Average satisfaction scores were high, with ratings of 71.8 for effectiveness, 84.0 for convenience, and 71.9 for global satisfaction (0-100 scores). Perampanel use was associated with improvements in HRQoL and fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety. The majority of patients were adherent (62.3%) to perampanel. DISCUSSION: Perampanel use was associated with reductions in number of seizures, better HRQoL, and high adherence rates. These results provide initial evidence that perampanel can be an effective, tolerable, and valid option for patients with epilepsy in the real world.

Long-term efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in adults with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (secondary generalized) seizures: Post hoc pooled analysis.

This post hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life during long-term adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) treatment in adult patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). Patients (≥ 16 years) were included in this post hoc analysis if they were randomized to BRV or placebo in double-blind, placebo-controlled (N01252 [NCT00490035], N01253 [NCT00464269], N01358 [NCT01261325]; core) trials, and received adjunctive BRV in the corresponding long-term follow-up (N01125 [NCT00175916], N01199 [NCT00150800], N01379 [NCT01339559]) trials, and reported FBTCS during the 8-week prospective baseline (core trial). Efficacy (concomitant levetiracetam excluded) and tolerability (concomitant levetiracetam included) were assessed from the first day of BRV in patients who initiated BRV at 50-200 mg/day. Two hundred and eighty-four patients reported FBTCS during baseline (core trials) and were included in the Efficacy Set. Patients (mean age of 37.0 years; 51.8% male; mean epilepsy duration of 22.4 years; median baseline frequency of 2.8 FBTCS per 28 days) received BRV for a median treatment duration of 2.5 years (range< 0.1-11.3) at a median modal dose of 150 mg/day. BRV was discontinued by 175 (61.6%) patients, most commonly (≥ 10% of patients) due to adverse event (18.3%), lack of efficacy (18.3%), and consent withdrawn (11.6%); the median time to discontinuation of BRV due to any reason was 358.5 days. The Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated retention on BRV at 1, 3, and 5 years, were 69.3%, 48.2%, and 37.3%, respectively. The KM-estimated proportion of patients not discontinuing BRV due to lack of efficacy or adverse event were 80.0%, 63.9%, and 57.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Overall, the median percentage reduction in FBTCS frequency from baseline was 76.2%, and the 50% and 75% responder rates for FBTCS were 68.7% and 50.7%, respectively, which were sustained over time across completer cohorts. Sustained 50%, 75%, and 100% response in FBTCS from day 1 of adjunctive BRV treatment during the entire first year was estimated for 32.5%, 21.1%, and 15.0% of patients, respectively (KM analysis), and showed maintenance or improvement in the response to BRV over time. For patients with ≥ 1 year of BRV exposure, 51.3% were free from FBTCS for ≥ 1 year during any time of the treatment period, and 22.8% of patients did not report FBTCS during the first year from the first day of treatment. Clinically meaningful improvements in total Patient Weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-Form 31 (QOLIE-31-P) score were reported by 43.6% and 46.4% of patients after 1 and 2 years of treatment, respectively. The largest improvements in the QOLIE-31-P score, with > 50% of patients reporting a clinically meaningful improvement, were observed in the seizure worry and daily activities/social functioning subscales after 1 and 2 years of BRV treatment. Overall, 278/313 (88.8%; Safety Set) patients reported at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), 170 (54.3%) had a drug-related TEAE, 88 (28.1%) had a serious TEAE, and 55 (17.6%) discontinued BRV due to a TEAE. Overall, long-term adjunctive BRV was generally well tolerated and reduced the frequency of FBTCS in adults, with 22.8% of patients (who completed ≥ 1 year of treatment) not reporting any FBTCS during the first year from the first day of BRV treatment.

Behavioral adverse events with brivaracetam, levetiracetam, perampanel, and topiramate: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: To understand the currently available post-marketing real-world evidence of the incidences of and discontinuations due to the BAEs of irritability, anger, and aggression in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated with the anti-seizure medications (ASMs) brivaracetam (BRV), levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), as well as behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in PWE switching from LEV to BRV. METHODS: A systematic review of published literature using the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase was performed to identify retrospective and prospective observational studies reporting the incidence of irritability, anger, or aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, or TPM in PWE. The incidences of these BAEs and the rates of discontinuation due to each were categorized by ASM, and where possible, weighted means were calculated but not statistically assessed. Behavioral and psychiatric adverse events in PWE switching from LEV to BRV were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 1500 records were identified in the searches. Of these, 44 published articles reporting 42 studies met the study criteria and were included in the data synthesis, 7 studies were identified in the clinical trial database, and 5 studies included PWE switching from LEV to BRV. Studies included a variety of methods, study populations, and definitions of BAEs. While a wide range of results was reported across studies, weighted mean incidences were 5.6% for BRV, 9.9% for LEV, 12.3% for PER, and 3.1% for TPM for irritability; 3.3%* for BRV, 2.5% for LEV, 2.0% for PER, and 0.2%* for TPM for anger; and 2.5% for BRV, 2.6% for LEV, 4.4% for PER, and 0.5%* for TPM for aggression. Weighted mean discontinuation rates were 0.8%* for BRV, 3.4% for LEV, 3.0% for PER, and 2.2% for TPM for irritability and 0.8%* for BRV, 2.4% for LEV, 9.2% for PER, and 1.2%* for TPM for aggression. There were no discontinuations for anger. Switching from LEV to BRV led to improvement in BAEs in 33.3% to 83.0% of patients (weighted mean, 66.6%). *Denotes only 1 study. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review characterizes the incidences of irritability, anger, and aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, and TPM, and it provides robust real-world evidence demonstrating that switching from LEV to BRV may improve BAEs. While additional data remain valuable due to differences in methodology (which make comparisons difficult), these results improve understanding of the real-world incidences of discontinuations due to these BAEs in clinical practice and can aid in discussions and treatment decision-making with PWE.

A review of the drug-drug interactions of the antiepileptic drug brivaracetam.

Brivaracetam is an antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for the treatment of focal seizures, with improved safety and tolerability vs first-generation AEDs. Brivaracetam binds with high affinity to synaptic vesicle protein 2A in the brain, which confers its antiseizure activity. Brivaracetam is rapidly absorbed and extensively biotransformed, and exhibits linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics at therapeutic doses. Brivaracetam does not interact with most metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, and therefore does not interfere with drugs that use these metabolic routes. The favorable pharmacokinetic profile of brivaracetam and lack of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with commonly prescribed AEDs or oral contraceptives allows administration without dose adjustment, and avoids potential untoward events from decreased efficacy of an AED or oral contraceptive due to a drug-drug interaction. Few agents have been reported to affect the pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam. The strong enzyme-inducing AEDs carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital/primidone have been shown to moderately lower brivaracetam plasma concentrations, with no adjustment of brivaracetam dose needed. Dose adjustment should be considered when brivaracetam is coadministered with the more potent CYP inducer, rifampin. Additionally, caution should be used when adding or ending treatment with the strong enzyme inducer, St. John's wort. In summary, brivaracetam (50-200 mg/day) has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and is associated with few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

Randomized open-label trial of intravenous brivaracetam versus lorazepam for acute treatment of increased seizure activity.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present trial was to assess efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) brivaracetam (BRV) vs. lorazepam (LZP) in patients with epilepsy undergoing evaluation in an epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) who experienced seizures requiring acute treatment. METHODS: This was a phase 2, open-label, randomized, active-control, proof-of-concept trial (EP0087; NCT03021018). Patients (18-70 years) admitted to EMU were randomized 1:1:1 to single-dose bolus IV LZP (dose per investigator's practice), IV BRV 100 mg, or IV BRV 200 mg. Trial medication had to be administered within 30 min of qualifying seizure. Primary efficacy outcome was time to next seizure (clinical observation with electroencephalogram [EEG] confirmation) or to rescue medication use within 12 h of trial medication administration. Secondary outcomes included seizure freedom and rescue medication use within 12 h of trial medication administration. Safety and tolerability outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Overall, 46 patients were randomized, and 45 received trial medication for a qualifying seizure. Patients in the LZP arm had doses from 1 to 4 mg (median: 1 mg). Eleven of 45 patients had a seizure within 12 h of trial medication administration (LZP 5/15 [median time to next seizure: 5.55 h], BRV 100 mg 3/15 [5.97 h], BRV 200 mg 3/15 [3.60 h]). No patients received additional rescue medication to control their qualifying seizure. Most patients were seizure-free over 12 h (LZP 9/15 [60.0%], BRV 100 mg 12/15 [80.0%], BRV 200 mg 12/15 [80.0%]). Rescue medication use within 12 h was numerically higher for LZP (6/15 [40.0%]) vs. BRV 100 mg (1/15 [6.7%]) and vs. BRV 200 mg (2/15 [13.3%]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 5/16 (31.3%), 6/15 (40.0%), and 3/15 (20.0%) of LZP, BRV 100 mg, and BRV 200 mg patients; one LZP patient had a serious TEAE (seizure cluster). Most common TEAEs (≥10% of patients) were sedation and somnolence with LZP, and dizziness, headache, and nausea with BRV. SIGNIFICANCE: Intravenous LZP, IV BRV 100 mg, and IV BRV 200 mg showed similar efficacy in controlling acute seizure activity in the EMU. Treatment-emergent adverse events were as expected for each medication. Although this trial should be interpreted with caution because of small patient numbers, it suggests a possible role of BRV in the acute treatment of increased seizure activity.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of brivaracetam on other antiepileptic drugs in adults with focal seizures: Pooled analysis of data from randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of brivaracetam (BRV) on steady-state plasma concentrations of commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). METHODS: Data were pooled from five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy studies (NCT00175929, NCT00175825, NCT00490035, NCT00464269, and NCT01261325) in which adults with refractory epilepsy, and receiving stable doses of 1-2 AEDs, initiated adjunctive treatment with BRV (or placebo) for up to 12 weeks, following a 4-8 week baseline period. Concentrations of carbamazepine, carbamazepine epoxide, clobazam, clonazepam, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine (MHD), phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, topiramate, valproic acid and zonisamide, were measured during baseline and during BRV or placebo evaluation periods. Log-transformed data for patients receiving BRV dosages of 50-200 mg/day (or placebo) were evaluated using repeated measures analysis of covariance. Geometric least-squares means ratios of respective AED concentrations (treatment vs baseline) and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Relevant interaction of BRV on the respective AED was inferred if CIs were entirely outside of 0.80-1.25 limits. RESULTS: Within the population for analysis (n = 1402), relevant interaction was observed for carbamazepine epoxide alone which increased up to 2-fold from baseline due to inhibition of epoxide hydrolase by BRV, and the effect size was not influenced by concomitant valproic acid. Relevant interaction was not observed for other AEDs. CONCLUSION: In adults with focal seizures, adjunctive BRV treatment does not affect plasma concentrations of the evaluated AEDs but increases carbamazepine epoxide metabolite. Carbamazepine dose reduction should be considered if tolerability issues arise.

SUDEP in the North American SUDEP Registry: The full spectrum of epilepsies.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain medical records, family interviews, and death-related reports of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) cases to better understand SUDEP. METHODS: All cases referred to the North American SUDEP Registry (NASR) between October 2011 and June 2018 were reviewed; cause of death was determined by consensus review. Available medical records, death scene investigation reports, autopsy reports, and next-of-kin interviews were reviewed for all cases of SUDEP. Seizure type, EEG, MRI, and SUDEP classification were adjudicated by 2 epileptologists. RESULTS: There were 237 definite and probable cases of SUDEP among 530 NASR participants. SUDEP decedents had a median age of 26 (range 1-70) years at death, and 38% were female. In 143 with sufficient information, 40% had generalized and 60% had focal epilepsy. SUDEP affected the full spectrum of epilepsies, from benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (n = 3, 1%) to intractable epileptic encephalopathies (n = 27, 11%). Most (93%) SUDEPs were unwitnessed; 70% occurred during apparent sleep; and 69% of patients were prone. Only 37% of cases of SUDEP took their last dose of antiseizure medications (ASMs). Reported lifetime generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were <10 in 33% and 0 in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: NASR participants commonly have clinical features that have been previously been associated with SUDEP risk such as young adult age, ASM nonadherence, and frequent GTCS. However, a sizeable minority of SUDEP occurred in patients thought to be treatment responsive or to have benign epilepsies. These results emphasize the importance of SUDEP education across the spectrum of epilepsy severities. We aim to make NASR data and biospecimens available for researchers to advance SUDEP understanding and prevention.

Continuous Electroencephalography After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: After traumatic brain injury, continuous electroencephalography is widely used to detect electrographic seizures. With the development of standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology, we aimed to describe the prevalence and burden of ictal-interictal patterns, including electrographic seizures after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury and to correlate continuous electroencephalography features with functional outcome. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the prospective, randomized controlled phase 2 multicenter INTREPID study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00805818). Continuous electroencephalography was initiated upon admission to the ICU. The primary outcome was the 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Consensus electroencephalography reviews were performed by raters certified in standardized continuous electroencephalography terminology blinded to clinical data. Rhythmic, periodic, or ictal patterns were referred to as "ictal-interictal continuum"; severe ictal-interictal continuum was defined as greater than or equal to 1.5 Hz lateralized rhythmic delta activity or generalized periodic discharges and any lateralized periodic discharges or electrographic seizures. SETTING: Twenty U.S. level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury and postresuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale score of 4-12 were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 152 patients with continuous electroencephalography (age 34 ± 14 yr; 88% male), 22 (14%) had severe ictal-interictal continuum including electrographic seizures in four (2.6%). Severe ictal-interictal continuum burden correlated with initial prognostic scores, including the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (r = 0.51; p = 0.01) and Injury Severity Score (r = 0.49; p = 0.01), but not with functional outcome. After controlling clinical covariates, unfavorable outcome was independently associated with absence of posterior dominant rhythm (common odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.30-9.09), absence of N2 sleep transients (3.69; 1.69-8.20), predominant delta activity (2.82; 1.32-6.10), and discontinuous background (5.33; 2.28-12.96) within the first 72 hours of monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Severe ictal-interictal continuum patterns, including electrographic seizures, were associated with clinical markers of injury severity but not functional outcome in this prospective cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Importantly, continuous electroencephalography background features were independently associated with functional outcome and improved the area under the curve of existing, validated predictive models.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: Risk factors, biomarkers, and prevention.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is one of the most important direct epilepsy-related causes of death, with an incidence in adults of 1.2 per 1000 person-years. Generalized tonic-clonic seizures have consistently emerged as the leading risk factor for SUDEP, particularly when such seizures are uncontrolled. High seizure burden, lack of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment, polytherapy, intellectual disability, and prone position at the time of death are other key risk factors. Unfortunately, despite advances in treatment, overall mortality rates in epilepsy are rising. It is imperative that we learn more about SUDEP so that effective prevention strategies can be implemented. To help identify persons at greater risk of SUDEP and in need of closer monitoring, biomarkers are needed. Candidate biomarkers include electrocardiographic, electroencephalographic, and imaging abnormalities observed more frequently in those who have died suddenly and unexpectedly. As our knowledge of the pathophysiologic mechanisms behind SUDEP has increased, various preventative measures have been proposed. These include lattice pillows, postictal oxygen therapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and inhibitors of opiate and adenosine receptors. Unfortunately, no randomized clinical trials are available to definitively conclude these measures are effective. Rather, gaining the best control of seizures possible (with AEDs, devices, and resective surgery) still remains the intervention with the best evidence to reduce the risk of SUDEP. In this evidence-based review, we explore the incidence of SUDEP and review the risk factors, biomarkers, and latest prevention strategies.

Automated Detection of Postictal Generalized EEG Suppression.

Although there is no strict consensus, some studies have reported that Postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES) is a potential electroencephalographic (EEG) biomarker for risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). PGES is an epoch of EEG inactivity after a seizure, and the detection of PGES in clinical data is extremely difficult due to artifacts from breathing, movement and muscle activity that can adversely affect the quality of the recorded EEG data. Even clinical experts visually interpreting the EEG will have diverse opinions on the start and end of PGES for a given patient. The development of an automated EEG suppression detection tool can assist clinical personnel in the review and annotation of seizure files, and can also provide a standard for quantifying PGES in large patient cohorts, possibly leading to further clarification of the role of PGES as a biomarker of SUDEP risk. In this paper, we develop an automated system that can detect the start and end of PGES using frequency domain features in combination with boosting classification algorithms. The average power for different frequency ranges of EEG signals are extracted from the prefiltered recorded signal using the fast fourier transform and are used as the feature set for the classification algorithm. The underlying classifiers for the boosting algorithm are linear classifiers using a logistic regression model. The tool is developed using 12 seizures annotated by an expert then tested and evaluated on another 20 seizures that were annotated by 11 experts.

Ranking the Leading Risk Factors for Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is rare in well-controlled epilepsy. However, SUDEP is a common cause of death in drug-resistant epilepsy. Over the last 30 years, multiple cohort and population studies have identified clinical risk factors associated with an increased risk for SUDEP. OBJECTIVE: To identify and rank the leading SUDEP risk factors from major cohort and population-based studies. The incidence of SUDEP is also evaluated in special clinical situations, including antiepileptic drug treatment, epilepsy surgery, devices, and assignment to placebo in clinical trials. METHODS: A PubMed search for English language human cohort studies for the terms Sudden, Death, and Epilepsy was performed for the years 1987-2017. Risk factors for SUDEP were identified and ranked by the weighted log adjusted odds ratio (OR)/relative risk ratio (RR). FINDINGS: The top 10 leading risk factors ranked from highest to lowest log adjusted OR/RR are the following: ≥3 GTC seizures per year; ≥13 seizures in the last year; No Antiepileptic Drug (AED) treatment; ≥3 AEDs; ≥3 GTCs in the past year; 11-20 GTC seizures in the last 3 months; age of onset 0-15 years old; IQ < 70; 3-5 AED changes in the last year; ≥3 AEDs. Two risk factors from separate sources (≥3 GTC seizures and ≥3 AEDs) occur twice in the top 10 risk factors. CONCLUSION: The top 10 risk factors for SUDEP are identified and ranked. A ranking of the top risk factors could help clinicians identify patients at highest risk for SUDEP.

The STOP-BANG questionnaire improves the detection of epilepsy patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea.

Patients with epilepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at risk for worsened seizure control and quality of life. We performed a quality improvement project, evaluating for improvements in the screening of OSA in epilepsy patients using the STOP-BANG questionnaire. The electronic medical records of patients seen in our epilepsy clinic were screened for 4 months prior to the intervention. We subsequently implemented the STOP-BANG questionnaire for 3 months. Only 22/664 patients (3.3%) had their sleeping habits explored during the pre-intervention period; 11 (1.7%) were referred to sleep medicine. Following implementation of the STOP-BANG questionnaire, the percentage of patients screened for OSA increased to 41.6% (269/647, Chi-square Fisher's Exact test 2-sided p<0.001). Of the 269 patients screened, 84 (31.2%) met criteria for elevated OSA risk. Forty-one patients were referred to sleep medicine during the subsequent 3 month period, including 33 who met STOP-BANG criteria for OSA. This represented 6.3% and 5.1% (respectively) of all 647 patients, a significant improvement over the percentage referred prior to the intervention (Chi-square Fisher's Exact test 2-sided p<0.001). Twelve of the 33 patients referred based on the STOP-BANG questionnaire saw sleep medicine; 11 (91.7%) were referred for polysomnography (PSG). Of the 10 patients who underwent PSG, 9 (90%) were diagnosed with OSA and offered treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Reasons for prolonged length of stay in the epilepsy monitoring unit.

Epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) admissions are essential for the classification/localization of epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). However, the duration of admissions is highly variable. Accordingly, we evaluated the duration of 596 EMU admissions and reasons for prolonged (>7 days) lengths of stay (LOS). The average LOS was longer for patients diagnosed with ES (8.0 days, SD 4.1 days) than all others (6.0 days, SD 3.9 days, p<0.001). Of the 596 admissions, 231 (38.8%) had prolonged LOS. The most commonly reported reason for prolonged stay was need to record additional seizures (33%). Other contributors included complications such as seizure clusters (6.9%), status epilepticus (1.6%), test complications (3.7%), psychiatric concerns (4.3%), and medication side effects (1.6%). Our results suggest multiple factors produce prolonged LOS with no factor accounting for the majority. Recording an insufficient number of all habitual seizures was the leading cause, which was over twice the percentage of reported complications (17.6%). However, being able to prolong admissions when necessary resulted in only 14.9% of admissions being inconclusive, potentially justifying the extra expense. Efforts to shorten LOS may be best directed at faster recording of seizures, but this may increase LOS due to complications. Our results may be helpful when assessing whether efforts to shorten LOS are useful in improving the quality and cost of care.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam for secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Pooled results from three Phase III studies.

PURPOSE: Secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCS) are among the most devastating types of seizures, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. Brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A), has been shown to be useful for the adjunctive treatment of focal seizures. We sought to determine its specific efficacy in treating SGTCS. METHODS: Data were pooled from three Phase III studies (NCT00490035; NCT00464269; NCT01261325) of adults with focal seizures taking 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) who received placebo or BRV 50-200mg/day without titration over a 12-week treatment period. We report efficacy and safety/tolerability data for the BRV therapeutic dose range (50-200 mg/day) in patients with focal seizures including baseline SGTCS. RESULTS: Patients (efficacy population, N=409) had been diagnosed with epilepsy for a mean±standard deviation duration of 22.2±13.1years. Baseline median SGTCS frequency was 3.0 per 28days. The majority (293, 71.6%) had failed ≥2 AEDs prior to study enrollment. The median percent reduction from baseline in SGTCS frequency/28days was: placebo, 33.3%; BRV 50mg/day, 66.6% (p<0.001); BRV 100mg/day, 61.2% (p=0.002); and BRV 200mg/day, 82.1% (p<0.001). The ≥50% responder rate for SGTCS was: placebo, 33.0%; BRV 50mg/day, 61.3% (p=0.003); BRV 100mg/day, 55.0% (p<0.001); and BRV 200mg/day, 64.0% (p<0.001). Freedom from SGTCS was achieved by: placebo, 14.8%; BRV 50mg/day, 22.6%; BRV 100mg/day, 31.0%; and BRV 200mg/day, 36.0% of patients. Time to first SGTCS during the treatment period was longer in patients receiving BRV than placebo (26days vs 8days, hazard ratio 0.55, p<0.001). In the SGTCS safety population (N=487), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 60.6% of patients receiving placebo vs 65.0% of patients receiving BRV ≥50mg/day. Serious TEAEs were reported by 3.1% placebo vs 3.9% BRV ≥50mg/day. Discontinuations due to TEAEs were 3.9% placebo vs 6.3% BRV ≥50mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with drug-resistant focal seizures, adjunctive BRV is effective in reducing the frequency of SGTCS. Almost one-third (30.4%) of patients were rendered completely free of SGTCS during the 12-week treatment period when taking BRV ≥50mg/day. BRV was well tolerated, with a TEAE profile consistent with that of the overall study population.

Which patients with epilepsy are at risk for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES)? A multicenter case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the clinical and electrographic differences between patients with combined epileptic (ES) and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and age- and gender-matched patients with ES-only and PNES-only. METHODS: Data from 138 patients (105 women [77%]), including 46 with PNES/ES (39±12years), 46 with PNES-only (39±11years), and 46 with ES-only (39±11years), were compared using logistic regression analysis after adjusting for clustering effect. RESULTS: In the cohort with PNES/ES, ES antedated PNES in 28 patients (70%) and occurred simultaneously in 11 (27.5%), while PNES were the initial presentation in only 1 case (2.5%); disease duration was undetermined in 6. Compared with those with ES-only, patients with PNES/ES had higher depression and anxiety scores, shorter-duration electrographic seizures, less ES absence/staring semiology (all p≤0.01), and more ES arising in the right hemisphere, both in isolation and in combination with contralateral brain regions (61% vs. 41%; p=0.024, adjusted for anxiety and depression) and tended to have less ES arising in the left temporal lobe (13% vs. 28%; p=0.054). Compared with those with PNES-only, patients with PNES/ES tended to show fewer right-hemibody PNES events (7% vs. 23%; p=0.054) and more myoclonic semiology (10% vs. 2%; p=0.073). CONCLUSIONS: Right-hemispheric electrographic seizures may be more common among patients with ES who develop comorbid PNES, in agreement with prior neurobiological studies on functional neurological disorders.