Disparities in postoperative complications and perioperative events based on insurance status following elective spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Increasing evidence demonstrates disparities among patients with differing insurance statuses in the field of spine surgery. However, no pooled analyses have performed a robust review characterizing differences in postoperative outcomes among patients with varying insurance types. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of the PUBMED, MEDLINE(R), ERIC, and EMBASE was performed for studies comparing postoperative outcomes in patients with private insurance versus government insurance. Pooled incidence rates and odds ratios were calculated for each outcome and meta-analyses were conducted for 3 perioperative events and 2 types of complications. In addition to pooled analysis, sub-analyses were performed for each outcome in specific government payer statuses. Results: Thirty-eight studies (5,018,165 total patients) were included. Compared with patients with private insurance, patients with government insurance experienced greater risk of 90-day re-admission (OR 1.84, p<.0001), non-routine discharge (OR 4.40, p<.0001), extended LOS (OR 1.82, p<.0001), any postoperative complication (OR 1.61, p<.0001), and any medical complication (OR 1.93, p<.0001). These differences persisted across outcomes in sub-analyses comparing Medicare or Medicaid to private insurance. Similarly, across all examined outcomes, Medicare patients had a higher risk of experiencing an adverse event compared with non-Medicare patients. Compared with Medicaid patients, Medicare patients were only more likely to experience non-routine discharge (OR 2.68, p=.0007). Conclusions: Patients with government insurance experience greater likelihood of morbidity across several perioperative outcomes. Additionally, Medicare patients fare worse than non-Medicare patients across outcomes, potentially due to age-based discrimination. Based on these results, it is clear that directed measures should be taken to ensure that underinsured patients receive equal access to resources and quality care.

Increased 90-Day Mortality and Morbidity Among Patients Recovering From Elective Primary Arthroplasty During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City.

All elective procedures were stopped in March 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We report the 90-day mortality and complications of patients who underwent primary arthroplasty before the stopping of elective procedures at a single academic medical center. A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent elective primary arthroplasty between December 2019 and mid-March 2020. Their 90-day postoperative mortality and medical complications were statistically compared with those of a historical cohort from the same operative period in 2019. The 2020 and 2019 cohorts included 372 and 410 patients, respectively. Except for the prevalence of diabetes, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts regarding baseline characteristics or preoperative health. The 2020 cohort had statistically significant higher rates of pneumonia (2.7% vs 0.7%; P=.03), readmission (9.1% vs 5.4%; P=.04), pulmonary embolism (1.6% vs 0.2%; P=.04), and 90-day mortality (1.1% vs 0%; P=.04). The 2020 cohort also had a trend for increased rates of deep venous thrombosis (1.1% vs 0.7%; P=.7) and cardiac complications (1.9% vs 0.5%; P=.07) and no change in emergency department visits (14.0% vs 11.7%; P=.3). There were 7 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the 2020 cohort and 1 death. This study demonstrates that patients who underwent primary arthroplasty procedures at our institution close to the time of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced a statistically significant increase in mortality, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and readmission compared with a historical cohort. As elective procedures have resumed during the ongoing pandemic, providers and patients should be aware of these increased risks. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Pre-operative prone radiographs can reliably determine spinal curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between non-effort prone and bending radiographs in determining curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A retrospective review of AIS patients who underwent pre-operative full spine radiographic imaging from 2006 to 2019 was performed. The Cobb angle (CA) of proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT) and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves were measured and correlated on standing, prone and bending radiographs. Standing, bending, and prone measurements were correlated using Spearman's analysis, and intra-rater reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation analysis. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients (74% female) with a mean age of 15.1 ± 2.5 years were identified. A strong correlation existed between the prone and bending CA for the PT (rs = 0.797, p < 0.01) and MT (rs = 0.779, p < 0.01) curve and a moderate correlation existed between the prone and bending TL/L curve (rs = 0.641, p < 0.01). For a non-structural PT curve, a prone CA < 25° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 96.7% of the time (p < 0.005). For a non-structural MT curve, a prone CA < 35° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 90.2% of the time (p < 0.005). For a non-structural TL/L curve, a prone CA < 35° correctly identified a bending CA < 25° 95% of the time (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Prone radiographs demonstrated a moderate to strong correlation with bending radiographs and may be used as a proxy for determining spinal flexibility, especially when bending films are deemed unreliable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Comparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has been shown in several studies to be a viable alternative to general anesthesia (GA) in laminectomies, discectomies, and microdiscectomies. However, the use of SA in spinal fusion surgery has been very scarcely documented in the current literature. Here we present a comparison of SA to GA in lumbar fusion surgery in terms of perioperative outcomes and cost. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery by a single surgeon, at a single institution, from 2015 to 2018. Data collected included demographics, operative and recovery times, nausea/vomiting, postoperative pain, and opioid requirement. Costs were included in the analysis if they were: 1) non-fixed; 2) incurred in the operating room (OR); and 3) directly related to patient care. All cost data represents net costs and was obtained from the hospital revenue cycle team. Patients were grouped for statistical analysis based on anesthetic modality. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients received SA and 46 received GA. Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, BMI, number of levels operated upon, preoperative diagnosis, and medical comorbidities. The SA group spent less time in the OR (163.86 ± 9.02 vs. 195.63 ± 11.27 min, p < 0.05), PACU (82.00 ± 7.17 vs. 102.98 ± 8.46 min, p < 0.05), and under anesthesia (175.03 ± 9.31 vs. 204.98 ± 10.15 min, p < 0.05) than the GA group. Post-surgery OR time was significantly less with SA than with GA (6.00 ± 1.09 vs. 17.26 ± 3.05 min, p < 0.05); however, pre-surgery OR time was similar between groups (50.17 ± 3.08 vs. 56.17 ± 5.34 min, p = 0.061). The SA group also experienced less maximum postoperative pain (3.31 ± 1.41 out of 10 vs. 5.96 ± 0.84/10, p < 0.05) and required less opioid analgesics (2.38 ± 1.37 vs. 5.39 ± 0.84 doses, p < 0.05). Both groups experienced similar nausea or vomiting rates and adverse events postoperatively. Net operative cost was found to be $812.31 (5.6%) less with SA than with GA, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.225). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, SA is almost never used in lumbar fusion, and a cost-effectiveness comparison with GA has not been recorded. In this retrospective study, we demonstrate that the use of SA in lumbar fusion surgery leads to significantly shorter operative and recovery times, less postoperative pain and opioid usage, and slight cost savings over GA. Thus, we conclude that this anesthetic modality represents a safe and cost-effective alternative to GA in lumbar fusion.

Defining the Zygomaticosphenoidal Angle as a Guide to Anatomic Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture Reduction.

BACKGROUND: Alignment of the zygomaticosphenoid suture is fundamental to reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. To prevent a rotational deformity, the correct angle of the zygoma relative to the cranial base must be restored. Clinically, this can be a challenge, especially when there is comminution of the zygomaticosphenoid suture. Defining a zygomaticosphenoidal angle would provide a reference for use with stereotactic navigation to achieve anatomic reduction. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of 100 patients was designed to determine normative zygomaticosphenoidal angle values. An angle subtended by the midline and a best-fit line through the zygomaticosphenoid suture on axial computed tomography was measured bilaterally in patients with isolated mandibular or nasal fractures. The mean of this measurement for 3 vertically adjacent cuts was calculated with position of central cut determined by the equator of the globe and trigone of the sphenoid. Multivariate regression was completed to identify changes in zygomaticosphenoidal angle with age, sex, and race. RESULTS: The mean zygomaticosphenoidal angle was 47° (range 39°-55°). 97% of angles were within 2 standard deviations (8°) of mean. Regression analysis demonstrated no significant change in angle with age (P = 0.74) or sex (P = 0.89). For each angle, the variation across the 3 sample cuts was ≤4.5°. Patients demonstrated high fidelity in zygomaticosphenoidal angle bilaterally with mean difference of 3°. CONCLUSION: The zygomaticosphenoidal angle is a useful reference, in conjunction with stereotactic navigation, for reduction of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Contralaterally obtained patient-specific data may be used to guide unilateral repair. Normative values may serve as reference in bilateral injury.

Establishing a Protocol for Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures with Dynamic Elastic Therapy.

Treatment of mandibular condyle fractures is controversial. Open treatment achieves anatomic reduction with occlusal stability and faster functional recovery but risks facial nerve injury and jeopardizes joint capsule circulation which can lead to bone resorption. Traditional closed treatment avoids these issues but requires prolonged fixation and risks subsequent facial asymmetry, occlusal disturbance, and ankylosis. Rather than wires, closed treatment with elastics allows for customizable management of a healing fracture with ability to alter vector and degree of traction to restore vertical height and occlusion with less discomfort and decreased risk for ankylosis. In this protocol, unilateral condylar fractures were treated with class II elastics ipsilateral to injury and class I contralaterally. Class III elastics were used contralaterally if additional traction was required and Class II elastics were placed bilaterally for bilateral fractures. Patients were sequentially advanced from fixating to guiding to supportive elastics by titrating elastic vector to any dental midline incongruency or chin deviation. Six patients were treated with this protocol with six-month follow-up. Fracture patterns included displaced and dislocated fractures as well as intracapsular and extracapsular condylar fractures. All patients at completion of the protocol had objective centric occlusion with no subjective malocclusion, chin deviation, facial asymmetry, or temporomandibular joint pain. These early data demonstrate a safe and efficacious innovative protocol for closed treatment of mandibular condylar fractures with dynamic elastic therapy.