Optimizing the Endoscopic Transorbital Approach: MacCarty Keyhole for Enhanced Surgical Exposure in the Opticocarotid Region.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the endoscopic transorbital (TO) approach has gained increasing interest for the treatment of middle cranial fossa lesions. We propose a technical refinement to the conventional superior eyelid TO approach, which improves the surgical exposure and augments the working angles when targeting the opticocarotid region. METHODS: Four embalmed adult cadaveric specimens (8 sides) were dissected at the Laboratory of Surgical Neuroanatomy of our institution. A TO approach was performed, with removal of the anterior clinoid process and the lateral orbital rim. Subsequently, the MacCarty keyhole was drilled in the superolateral orbital wall. Given that the lesser sphenoid wing was already drilled in the conventional TO craniectomy, the opening of the keyhole was essentially a lateral extension of the craniectomy. RESULTS: The procedure was successfully conducted in all 4 orbits. Clinoidectomy was performed either before or after extending the craniectomy to the MacCarty point. Extending the craniectomy made anterior clinoidectomy easier, by increasing the surgical exposure, and allowing a more lateral entrance for the endoscope. The extension also facilitated frontal lobe retraction, and it facilitated the optic nerve and carotid artery manipulation. Postoperative computed tomography scans showed a minimal 10-mm craniectomy extension, which remained covered by the temporal muscle after reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The modified endoscopic TO approach with the extension of the craniectomy to MacCarty point improves surgical access and visualization of the opticocarotid region. This facilitates anterior clinoidectomy and optic nerve decompression. Although it implies judicious instrument manipulation and a larger incision size, further studies can define its potential benefits.

Clinicopathological and Neuroimaging Features of Primary Gliosarcoma: A Case Series and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Gliosarcoma (GS) is a rare primary high-grade brain neoplasm with a poor prognosis and challenging surgical resection. Although it is now considered a morphologic variant of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (World Health Organization Classification of Tumours 2021), GS may display peculiarities that hamper both surgical and oncological management. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we searched our registry for histologically confirmed GS patients between 2006 and 2020. Cases were reviewed for clinical information, pathologic characteristics, imaging findings, management, and outcome. RESULTS: 21 patients with histologically confirmed GS were identified with a median age of 62 years. Twelve were men and 9 women. The temporal lobe was the most common location (9 patients, 42.9%). Nineteen patients underwent surgical resection, and only 4 (19%) demonstrated gross total resection on postsurgical MRI, with an overall median survival of 7 months (range, 0.5-37). Diagnostic MRI demonstrated heterogenous lesions with necrotic-cystic areas and a ring-enhancement pattern. Only 1 case of extracranial extension was seen in our sample, and no patient showed distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The rarity of primary GS and the absence of specific therapeutic guidelines represent a significant clinical challenge. Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of clinical and neuroimaging characteristics in a real-world patient cohort and compares our findings with the available literature.

Validation of Presurgical Simulation of White Matter Damage Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

BACKGROUND: The understanding of white matter (WM) was revolutionized by the emergence of tractography based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Currently, DTI simulations are implemented in preoperative planning to optimize surgical approaches. The reliability of these simulations has been questioned and investigated seeking for correlation between neurological performance and anomalies in DTI parameters. However, the ability of preoperative WM simulations to predict a surgical injury has not been thoroughly evaluated. Our objective was to assess the reliability of preoperatively simulated WM injuries for conventional neurosurgical procedures. METHODS: WM surgical damage was preoperatively simulated by creating a 3-dimensional volume representing the endoscope or the surgical trajectory. This volume was used as an additional region of interest in the fascicle reconstruction to be subtracted from the original fascicle. Simulated, injured fascicles were compared in terms of the number of fibers and volume to those created from postoperative DTI studies. Reliability was assimilated into the correlation between the simulation and the postoperative reconstruction; evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient or Lin's Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and represented on Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative DTI studies of 30 patients undergoing various neurosurgical approaches were processed. The correlation between simulated injuries and postoperative studies was high in terms of fibers (Concordance correlation coefficient = Rho.C = 0.989 [95% confidence interval = 0.979-0.995]) and volume (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95 [95% CI = 0.89-0.97]). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated that the great majority of cases fell within the mean ± 2 Standard deviations. CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical simulation of WM fascicles based on DTI is consistent with postoperative DTI studies. These findings require further validation by neurophysiological and clinical correlation.

Women's role in neurosurgical research: is the gender gap improving?

OBJECTIVE: The percentage of women publishing high-impact neurosurgical research might be perceived as a representation of our specialty and may influence the perpetuation of the existing gender gap. This study investigated whether the trend in women taking lead roles in neurosurgical research has mirrored the increase in female neurosurgeons during the past decade and whether our most prestigious publications portray enough female role models to stimulate gender diversity among the new generation of neurosurgeons. METHODS: Two of the most prominent neurosurgical journals-Journal of Neurosurgery and Neurosurgery-were selected for this study, and every original article that was published in 2009 and 2019 in each of those journals was investigated according to the gender of the first and senior authors, their academic titles, their affiliations, and their institutions' region. RESULTS: A total of 1328 articles were analyzed. The percentage of female authors was significantly higher in Europe and Russia compared with the US and Canada (first authors: 60/302 [19.9%] vs 109/829 [13.1%], p = 0.005; and senior authors: 32/302 [10.6%] vs 57/829 [6.9%], p = 0.040). Significantly increased female authorship was observed from 2009 to 2019, and overall numbers of both first and senior female authors almost doubled. However, when analyzing by regions, female authorship increased significantly only in the US and Canada. Female authors of neurosurgical research articles were significantly less likely to hold an MD degree compared with men. Female neurosurgeons serving as senior authors were represented in only 3.6% (48/1328) of articles. Women serving as senior authors were more likely to have a female colleague listed as the first author of their research (29/97 [29.9%] vs 155/1231 [12.6%]; χ2 = 22.561, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although this work showed an encouraging increase in the number of women publishing high-impact neurosurgical research, the stagnant trend in Europe may suggest that a glass ceiling has been reached and further advances in equity would require more aggressive measures. The differences in the researchers' profiles (academic title and affiliation) suggest an even wider gender gap. Cultural unconscious bias may explain why female senior authors have more than double the number of women serving as their junior authors compared with men. While changes in the workforce happen, strategies such as publishing specific issues on women, encouraging female editorials, and working toward more gender-balanced editorial boards may help our journals to portray a more equitable specialty that would not discourage bright female candidates.