Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAC Antimicrob Resist ; 6(3): dlae077, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799180

RESUMEN

Objectives: To investigate the activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from hospitalized patients in Mexico in 2017-2021. Methods: MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI M100 breakpoints. ß-Lactamase genes were identified in ceftolozane/tazobactam-, imipenem/relebactam-, and/or imipenem-non-susceptible isolates. Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam inhibited 89% and 99% of E. coli isolates (n = 2337), and 87% and 94% of K. pneumoniae isolates (n = 1127). Sixty-four percent of E. coli and 47% of K. pneumoniae had an ESBL non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (ESBL non-CRE) phenotype. Eighty-six percent and 91% of ESBL non-CRE E. coli and K. pneumoniae were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible, and 99.9% and 99.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active agent studied against P. aeruginosa (n = 1068; 83% susceptible), 9-28 percentage points higher than carbapenems and comparator ß-lactams excluding imipenem/relebactam (78% susceptible). Ceftolozane/tazobactam remained active against 35%-58%, and imipenem/relebactam against 32%-42%, of P. aeruginosa in meropenem-, piperacillin/tazobactam-, and cefepime-non-susceptible subsets. The majority of isolates of ceftolozane/tazobactam-non-susceptible E. coli carried an ESBL, whereas among ceftolozane/tazobactam-non-susceptible K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, the majority carried carbapenemases. The most prevalent carbapenemase observed among E. coli (estimated at 0.7% of all isolates), K. pneumoniae (4.8%) and P. aeruginosa (10.0%) was an MBL. Almost all imipenem/relebactam-non-susceptible E. coli and K. pneumoniae carried MBL or OXA-48-like carbapenemases, whereas among imipenem/relebactam-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa, 56% carried MBL or GES carbapenemases. Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam may provide treatment options for patients infected with ß-lactam-non-susceptible Gram-negative bacilli, excluding isolates carrying an MBL- or OXA-48-like carbapenemase.

2.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 27(3): 102775, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37169345

RESUMEN

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are being isolated from patient specimens with increasing frequency in Latin America and worldwide. The current study provides an initial description of the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and P. aeruginosa infecting hospitalized patients in Latin America. From 2018 to 2020, 37 clinical laboratories in nine Latin American countries participated in the SMART global surveillance program and contributed 15,466 NME and 3408 P aeruginosa isolates. MICs for IMR and seven comparators were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by CLSI M100 (2022) breakpoints. ß-lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets. IMR (96.9% susceptible), amikacin (95.9%), meropenem (90.7%), and imipenem (88.7%) were the most active agents against NME. Among piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible NME (n = 4124), 90.4% of isolates were IMR-susceptible (range by country, 97.2 [Chile] to 67.0% [Guatemala]) and among meropenem-nonsusceptible NME isolates (n = 1433), 74.0% were IMR-susceptible (94.1% [Puerto Rico] to 5.1% [Guatemala]). Overall, 6.3% of all collected NME isolates carried a KPC (metallo-ß-lactamase [MBL]-negative), 1.8% an MBL, 0.4% an OXA-48-like carbapenemase (MBL-negative), and 0.1% a GES carbapenemase (MBL-negative). Amikacin (85.2% susceptible) and IMR (80.1%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; only 56.5% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 22.0% (from 23.9% to 45.9%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1031) and by 35.5% (from 5.5% to 41.0%) in meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 1128). Overall, 7.6% of all collected P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL-positive and 0.7% carried a GES carbapenemase. In conclusion, in 2018‒2020, almost all NME (97%) and most P. aeruginosa (80%) isolates from Latin America were IMR-susceptible. Continued surveillance of the in vitro activities of IMR and comparator agents against Gram-negative pathogens, and monitoring for ß-lactamase changes (in particular for increases in MBLs), is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Amicacina , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , América Latina , Amicacina/farmacología , Meropenem/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Imipenem/farmacología , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Piperacilina , Tazobactam , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
3.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; Braz. j. infect. dis;27(3): 102775, 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1447667

RESUMEN

Abstract Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are being isolated from patient specimens with increasing frequency in Latin America and worldwide. The current study provides an initial description of the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) against non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) and P. aeruginosa infecting hospitalized patients in Latin America. From 2018 to 2020, 37 clinical laboratories in nine Latin American countries participated in the SMART global surveillance program and contributed 15,466 NME and 3408 P aeruginosa isolates. MICs for IMR and seven comparators were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by CLSI M100 (2022) breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in selected isolate subsets. IMR (96.9% susceptible), amikacin (95.9%), meropenem (90.7%), and imipenem (88.7%) were the most active agents against NME. Among piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible NME (n= 4124), 90.4% of isolates were IMR-susceptible (range by country, 97.2 [Chile] to 67.0% [Guatemala]) and among meropenem-nonsusceptible NME isolates (n= 1433), 74.0% were IMR-susceptible (94.1% [Puerto Rico] to 5.1% [Guatemala]). Overall, 6.3% of all collected NME isolates carried a KPC (metallo-β-lactamase [MBL]-negative), 1.8% an MBL, 0.4% an OXA-48-like carbapenemase (MBL-negative), and 0.1% a GES carbapenemase (MBL-negative). Amikacin (85.2% susceptible) and IMR (80.1%) were the most active agents against P. aeruginosa; only 56.5% of isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Relebactam increased susceptibility to imipenem by 22.0% (from 23.9% to 45.9%) in piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates (n= 1031) and by 35.5% (from 5.5% to 41.0%) in meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n= 1128). Overall, 7.6% of all collected P. aeruginosa isolates were MBL-positive and 0.7% carried a GES carbapenemase. In conclusion, in 2018‒2020, almost all NME (97%) and most P. aeruginosa(80%) isolates from Latin America were IMR-susceptible. Continued surveillance of the in vitro activities of IMR and comparator agents against Gram-negative pathogens, and monitoring for β-lactamase changes (in particular for increases in MBLs), is warranted.

4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30917985

RESUMEN

We developed a rapid high-throughput PCR test and evaluated highly antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli (n = 2,919), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 1,974), Proteus mirabilis (n = 1,150), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,484) for several antibiotic resistance genes for comparison with phenotypic resistance across penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides. The isolates originated from hospitals in North America (34%), Europe (23%), Asia (13%), South America (12%), Africa (7%), or Oceania (1%) or were of unknown origin (9%). We developed statistical methods to predict phenotypic resistance from resistance genes for 49 antibiotic-organism combinations, including gentamicin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ertapenem, imipenem, cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ampicillin, and aztreonam. Average positive predictive values for genotypic prediction of phenotypic resistance were 91% for E. coli, 93% for K. pneumoniae, 87% for P. mirabilis, and 92% for P. aeruginosa across the various antibiotics for this highly resistant cohort of bacterial isolates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana/genética , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/genética , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , África , Asia , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Europa (Continente) , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , América del Norte , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , América del Sur
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28167555

RESUMEN

International data on the molecular epidemiology of Enterobacteriaceae with IMP carbapenemases are lacking. We performed short-read (Illumina) whole-genome sequencing on a global collection of 38 IMP-producing clinical Enterobacteriaceae (2008 to 2014). IMP-producing Enterobacteriaceae (7 varieties within 11 class 1 integrons) were mainly present in the South Pacific and Asia. Specific blaIMP-containing integrons (In809 with blaIMP-4, In722 with blaIMP-6, and In687 with blaIMP-14) were circulating among different bacteria in countries such as Australia, Japan, and Thailand. In1312 with blaIMP-1 was present in Klebsiella pneumoniae from Japan and Citrobacter freundii from Brazil. Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 22) was the most common species; clonal complex 14 (CC14) from Philippines and Japan was the most common clone and contained In1310 with blaIMP-26 and In1321 with blaIMP-6 The Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 9) consisted of Enterobacter hormaechei and E. cloacae cluster III. CC78 (from Taiwan) containing In73 with blaIMP-8 was the most common clone among the E. cloacae complex. This study highlights the importance of surveillance programs using the latest molecular techniques for providing insight into the characteristics and global distribution of Enterobacteriaceae with blaIMP genes.


Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Inosina Monofosfato/metabolismo , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Brasil , Citrobacter freundii/enzimología , Citrobacter freundii/genética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Epidemiología Molecular , beta-Lactamasas/genética
6.
J Nat Prod ; 72(3): 345-52, 2009 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19115838

RESUMEN

Bacterial resistance to existing antibiotics continues to grow, necessitating the discovery of new compounds of this type. Antisense-based whole-cell target-based screening is a new and highly sensitive antibiotic discovery approach that has led to a number of new natural product antibiotics. Screening with a rpsD-sensitized strain led to the discovery of a number of natural product polyketides from Streptomyces lucensis. Complete workup of the fermentation extract of this strain allowed for the isolation of seven new compounds, lucensimycins A-G (1-3, 4a, 5-7), with varying degrees of antibacterial activities. Lucensimycin E (5) exhibited the best activity and showed MIC values of 32 microg/mL against Staphylococcus aureus and 8 microg/mL against Streptococcus pneumoniae. The isolation, structure elucidation, and antibacterial activities of four new members, lucensimycins D-G, are described. Lucensimycins D (4a) and E (5) are N-acetyl-l-cysteine adducts of lucensimycin A (1). Semisynthesis of lucensimycins D and E from lucensimycin A has also been described. Lucensimycins F and G are myo-inositolyl-alpha-2-amino-2-deoxy-l-idosyl amide derivatives of lucensimycins D and E, respectively. The relative configuration of these compounds was determined, in part, by molecular dynamics simulations.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Compuestos de Espiro , Streptomyces/química , Streptomyces/genética , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , ADN sin Sentido/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estructura Molecular , Compuestos de Espiro/química , Compuestos de Espiro/aislamiento & purificación , Compuestos de Espiro/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Indias Occidentales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA