Arterial Stiffness and Aortic Aneurysmal Disease - A Narrative Review.

It has been documented that large-artery stiffness is independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk and may potentially lead to heart and kidney failure and cerebrovascular disease. A systematic review of studies investigating changes in arterial stiffness in patients undergoing endovascular repair of aortic disease was conducted. In addition, a review of the available literature was performed, analyzing findings from studies using the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as a marker of arterial stiffness. Overall, 26 studies were included in the present analysis. Our research revealed a high heterogeneity of included studies regarding the techniques used to assess the aortic stiffness. Aortic stiffness was assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV), elastic modulus (Ep), and augmentation index (AI). Currently a few studies exist investigating the role of CAVI in patients having an aortic aneurysm or undergoing endovascular aortic repair. The majority of studies showed that the treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) either with open repair (OR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) reduces aortic compliance significantly. Whether EVAR reconstruction might contribute a higher effect on arterial stiffness compared to OR needs further focused research. An increase of arterial stiffness was uniformly observed in studies investigating patients following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and the effect was more pronounced in young patients. The effects of increased arterial stiffness after EVAR and TEVAR on the heart and the central hemodynamic, and an eventual effect on cardiac systolic function, need to be further investigated and evaluated in large studies and special groups of patients.

A Greek Multicentre Study Assessing the Outcome of Late Rupture After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Late rupture after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an increasing complication associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to analyse the causes and outcomes in patients with AAA rupture after EVAR. METHODS: A multi-institutional Greek study of late ruptures after EVAR between 2008 - 2022 was performed. Primary outcomes were intra-operative and in hospital death. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients presented with late rupture after EVAR (proportion of ruptured EVARs among all EVARs, 0.6%; 69 males; mean age 77.2 ± 6.7 years). The mean time interval between EVAR and late rupture was 72.3 months (range 6 - 180 months). In all cases the cause of rupture was the presence of an endoleak (type I, 73%) with sac enlargement. Moreover, 34% of subjects with rupture after EVAR had been lost to follow up and 32% underwent a secondary intervention. Additionally, 57 patients (81%) were treated by conversion to open surgical repair (COSR) and the remainder by endovascular correction of endoleak (ECE). Eleven intra-operative deaths (16%) were recorded. The overall in hospital mortality rate was 41% (23% ECE vs. 46% COSR; p = .21). Of the patients who presented as initially haemodynamically stable, 23% died during hospitalisation, while the respective mortality rate for patients who presented as unstable was 78% (odds ratio [OR] 11.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6 - 39.1; p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that severity of haemodynamic shock was the most significant risk factor for intra-operative (OR 7.15, 95% CI 1.58 - 32.40; p = .010) and in hospital death (OR 9.53, 95% CI 2.79 - 32.58; p < .001). CONCLUSION: These data underline the devastating prognosis of late rupture after EVAR. Haemodynamic status at presentation was an important predictive factor for death both in the ECE and COSR groups. Rigorous follow up and prompt evaluation of an unstable patient in case of rupture after EVAR is recommended.

Novel Biomarkers and Imaging Indices for the "Vulnerable Patient" with Carotid Stenosis: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the relationship of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), and Gray-Scale Median (GSM) score with the severity and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerosis and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during follow-up of carotid artery revascularization. METHODS: We enrolled 262 patients undergoing carotid revascularization therapy (GRT), 109 asymptomatic patients with low-grade carotid stenosis (40-70%) receiving conservative treatment (GCT), and 92 age- and sex-matched control subjects without carotid atherosclerosis (GCO). All participants underwent carotid ultrasound and we assessed at baseline clinical parameters, metabolic profile, CAVI, GSM, and circulating levels of hsCRP, MMP-3,-7,-9, and TIMP-1. RESULTS: Both GRT and GCT presented with elevated CAVI, MMPs, and TIMP-1 levels compared to GCO (p < 0.001). The escalation highly correlated to the presence of symptoms or paralleled the degree of carotid stenosis (p < 0.001). During follow-up (mean duration: 55 months), 51 GRT patients experienced MACE unrelated to the revascularization procedure. Within GRT, diabetes (HR: 2.07; CI: 1.55-2.78, p < 0.001), smoking (HR: 1.67; CI: 1.35-1.95, p < 0.001), high CAVI (HR: 1.22; CI: 1.09-1.43, p = 0.023) and MMP-9 (HR: 1.44; CI: 1.29-2.15, p = 0.005), and low GSM (HR: 1.40; CI: 1.16-2.12, p = 0.002) independently predicted MACE occurrences, despite the optimum medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Novel imaging and biochemical biomarkers were positively associated with atherosclerosis severity, while CAVI, MMP-9, and low GSM showed a positive, independent relationship with MACE after carotid revascularization, describing "vulnerable patients".

Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We undertook a systematic review of the currently published literature on TEVAR for DTAAs and we combined the eligible studies into a meta-analysis with the intention of evaluating the efficacy and the long-term durability of this treatment option. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search of the literature from January 2015 up to December 2022 was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. For events during follow up we calculated the incidence rates (IRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) per 100 patient-years (p-ys) as the number of patients with outcome events occurring during the specific time period divided by the total number of p-ys. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 4127 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 12 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A Total of 1976 patients (62% male) were identified among the eligible studies. One-year survival was 90.1% (95% CI 86.3% to 93.0%), 3-year survival was estimated at 80.5% (95% CI 69.2% to 88.4%) and the 5-year survival was estimated at 73.2% (95%CI 64.3% to 80.5%) with significant heterogeneity among studies regarding these outcomes. Regarding freedom from reintervention analysis for 1 year and 5 years was 96.5% (95% CI 94.5% to 97.8%) and 85.4% (95% CI 56.7% to 96.3%) respectively. The pooled late complications IR per 100 p-ys was 55.0 (95% CI 39.1 to 70.9), whereas the pooled IR for late reinterventions per 100 p-ys was 21.2 (95% CI 26.0 to 87.5). Late type I endoleak was reported with a pooled IR of 26.7 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 19.8 to 33.6) and late type III endoleak with a pooled IR of 7.6 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 5.5 to 9.7). CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR presents a safe and feasible solution for the treatment of DTAA with sustained long-term effectivity. Current evidence supports a satisfactory 5-year survival with low rates of reinterventions.

Current Clinical Knowledge on GORE EXCLUDER Conformable Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Endoprosthesis: A Case Series and Literature Review.

The GORE EXCLUDER Conformable abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) Endoprosthesis (CEXC), is currently the newest stent-graft system for treating patients with AAA. CEXC is approved for patients with proximal aortic neck angles ≤90° with a ≥15 mm aortic neck length or proximal aortic neck angles ≤60° with ≥10 mm aortic neck length. The present study describes a clinical series of 5 males with AAA, one of whom had a ruptured infrarenal AAA and a 90° proximal aortic neck angle. All patients were treated with 100% technical success using the CEXC device. Dosimetric data were recorded regarding the total kerma-area product and total fluoroscopy time. During the 30-day follow-up, no device migration or failure was detected, whereas type Ib and II endoleaks were observed in two patients. The type Ib endoleak required re-intervention with limb extension placement, and the type II endoleak was treated with lumbar artery embolization. This clinical series showed that CEXC has no technical defects or AAA-related mortality. We also reviewed the current knowledge on CEXC's clinical outcomes, showing promising technical and clinical results in some studies, even outside the instructions for use. CEXC expands the vascular surgeons' armamentarium against hostile neck anatomy, as it is the only repositionable endovascular aneurysm repair device available. Multicenter, long-term outcome studies should confirm the promising preliminary results of our case series and the literature review.

BMI-Based organ doses in endovascular aneurysm repair interventions utilising Monte Carlo simulation.

In this study, the effect of body-mass-index (BMI) on organ doses (ODs) during infrarenal endovascular-aneurysm-repair (EVAR) procedures was evaluated. Patient- and intra-operative data from fifty-nine EVAR procedures were inserted into VirtualDose-IR software to calculate ODs. For overweight, obesity class-I and obesity class-II, ODs were up to 147%, 412% and 775% higher than those for normal weight-patients, respectively. A large variation was observed in ODs published in literature mainly due to the differences in the software and the technical parameters used for the calculations.

Re-Rupture 2 Years after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Rupture.

Re-rupture 2 years after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) rupture is an extremely rare event and limited data exist in the literature. We present an interesting case of a patient with an abdominal aortic rupture that had undergone 2 years before an endovascular repair for rupture after EVAR due to a type IA endoleak. The patient underwent a successful embolization of the type IA endoleak. Onyx was used to seal the gutter between the aortic wall and the endograft and the 1-month post-embolization CT showed complete sealing with no contrast in the sac. Two years after the rupture, he was presented again with clinical signs of hemodynamic shock and instability. An urgent CT Angiograph showed again rupture due to a type IA endoleak. The patient underwent an emergency open laparotomy. We analyze the re-rupture after EVAR while taking data from the literature into account.

FACTORS INFLUENCING FLUOROSCOPY TIME IN ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF ABDOMINAL ANEURYSMS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Patients who undergo endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) may require prolonged radiation exposure affected by several factors. The objectives of this study were to document fluoroscopy time (FT) during EVAR and identify possible factors that influence it. A retrospective analysis of a 180 patients' database with abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysms submitted to EVAR during a 7-y period was performed. The FT is evaluated regarding risk factors and comorbidities, graft type and patient-related, clinical and technical parameters. FT's median (interquartile range) was 1011 (698-1500) s. Excluder and C3 Excluder were associated with significantly lower FT values when compared with other grafts. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, age ≥ 70 y, maximum aneurysm diameter ≥ 6 cm and procedure duration ≥2 h resulted in higher FT values. A significantly lower FT was found for the operations performed in the 7th y of the study's period compared with the previous 6 y, mainly because of the use of Excluder or C3 Excluder grafts. However, these grafts did not show any significant difference in FT values during the 7 y. A significant correlation between FT with age and procedure duration was found. Nevertheless, procedure duration is a poor FT predictor in linear and logistic regressions, although is significantly correlated with FT. Dyslipidemia, procedure duration and graft type are independent predictors of FT larger than the median, whereas only the procedure duration is a predictor for FT larger than the 75th percentile value. The identified factors regarding radiation protection issues should be considered when contemplating abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, however, without compromising the procedure's efficacy. Further work is necessary to identify more potential anatomical, clinical and technical factors affecting procedures' complexity and FT and patient radiation dose during EVAR interventions.

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 10-Year Follow-Up after Endovascular and Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal AorticAneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has conferred an early survival advantage compared to an open surgical repair (OSR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). However, the long-term survival benefit after EVAR was not displayed among randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas many non-RCTs have provided conflicting results. We conducted a time-to-event individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis on long-term rAAA data. METHODS: All studies comparing mortality after EVAR versus OSR for rAAA were included. We used restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) as a measure of life expectancy for EVAR and OSR. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies, including 12,187 patients (4952 EVAR and 7235 OSR) were finally deemed eligible. A secondary IPD analysis included 725 (372 EVAR and 353 OSR) patients only from the 3 RCTs (Immediate Management of the Patient With Rupture : Open Versus Endovascular Repair, Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anévrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus and Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial trials). Among all studies, the median survival was 4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.70-4.58) years for EVAR and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.57-2.39) years for OSR. Although EVAR presented with increased hazard risk from 4 to 7 years, which peaked at 6 years after the operation, the RMST difference was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.73; P < 0.001) years gained with EVAR at the end of the 10-year follow-up. IPD meta-analysis of RCTs did not demonstrate significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: At 10-years follow-up, EVAR was associated with a 6.5 month increase in life expectancy when compared to OSR after analyzing all eligible studies. Evidence from our study suggests that a strict follow-up program would be desirable, especially for patients with long-life expectancy.

Endovascular Repair of an Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Combined with a Congenital Pelvic Kidney: Case Report and Literature Review.

The coexistence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm and a congenital pelvic kidney is extremely rare. We present a 66-year-old male with an inflammatory aneurysm and an aberrant origin of the superior mesenteric artery. The inflammatory infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with a congenital left pelvic kidney was successfully treated with endovascular repair. Coverage of one out of the two renal ectopic arteries was performed, without clinical evidence of renal function impairment.

Treatment options for dialysis access steal syndrome.

Vascular access-induced limb ischemia is a known complication of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. Many techniques have been adopted to prevent steal in high-risk patients and to treat steal in cases of moderate ischemia not controlled with conservative management. A major factor guiding treatment is access flow volume. Management is different when ischemia is combined with the excessive flow in contrast to the combination with normal flow. We describe the most popular techniques encountered in the English literature as a part of a stepwise approach to treating dialysis access steal syndrome. In absence of ischemia, when cardiac issues emerge due to extreme access flow volumes, some of these techniques are also used to decrease flow and protect the heart. Patient's history, focused clinical examination, color duplex ultrasound examination, pulse oximetry and an angiogram are essential tools to approach this entity.

Antegrade Endograft Deployment with Supra-Aortic Debranching to Treat Arch and Descending Thoracic Aortic Lesions. A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a widely used procedure that has drastically changed the management of thoracic aortic diseases. We assess the effectiveness of supra-aortic debranching during antegrade TEVAR procedures with a retrospective analysis of our clinical experience. METHODS: Between December 2005 and April 2017, 55 patients underwent 64 TEVAR procedures. Among them, there were 8 male patients, mean age 72, who underwent hybrid antegrade stent-graft deployment. Particularly, for degenerative aneurysms of the aortic arch, 3 patients for aneurysm of descending thoracic aorta 3, for post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm 1, and for penetrating aortic ulcer 1 which had resulted in an aortoesophageal fistula. Proximal landing zones were Z0:1, Z1:3 and Z2:4. Type I hybrid aortic arch repair was performed in 1 case, carotid-carotid bypass in 2, carotid-subclavian in 5 and aorto-carotid in 1. RESULTS: The 30-day postoperative mortality was 12.5%. One patient suffered a temporary right hemiplegia which resolved after left aorto-carotid bypass. No endoleaks were observed postoperatively and in follow-up period. In the long term and a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, there were no deaths related to the stent-graft implantation or to revascularization procedures. Regarding the aortic arch rerouting procedure, there were no pseudoaneurysm or other anastomotic events. CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade delivery of the endograft, combined with hybrid and revascularization procedures of the supra-aortic vessels is a safe treatment modality, in complex hostile anatomies. However, further improvements are recommended due to the presence of neurologic complications and reinterventions.

Treatment of Dialysis Access Steal Syndrome with Concomitant Vascular Access Aneurysms.

Limb ischemia is a known complication of vascular access that may appear early postoperatively or after years. Over the last few decades, various techniques based on different physiological mechanisms have been used for treatment. A standardized treatment does not exist, and must be individualized based on the flow volume, and the type and location of the access. True and false vascular access aneurysms are another common complication of arteriovenous fistulas, which develop because of venous hypertension or repeated needling. Evidence in the literature regarding treatment of patients with steal syndrome and concomitant true arteriovenous aneurysms is scarce. A female with a brachiocephalic fistula complicated by steal syndrome and vascular access aneurysms was treated successfully with tapered graft placement and aneurysm exclusion.

The Association of Arterial Stiffness With Significant Carotid Atherosclerosis and Carotid Plaque Vulnerability.

Arterial stiffness and its valid index, the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), have emerged as predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated the relationship of the CAVI with significant carotid stenosis (> 50%) and the related cerebrovascular symptoms or carotid plaque echogenicity, assessed by ultrasound gray-scale median (GSM) score, at baseline and after carotid artery stenting (CAS). We prospectively enrolled 113 patients with carotid stenosis (70-99% for asymptomatic and > 50% for symptomatic participants) eligible for CAS. Age- and sex-matched individuals (n = 38) served as controls (CON). Clinical data, CAVI, and biochemical profile were obtained at baseline. Clinical assessment and CAVI measurement were performed 6 months after CAS. Compared with the CON group, the CAS group had a higher incidence of co-morbidities (diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia), higher CAVI values (9.94 ± 2.14 vs 7.85 ± .97 m/sec, P < .001), but a better lipid profile due to increased prescription of statins. The symptomatic CAS subgroup showed higher CAVI (P < .001), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P = .048), and osteoprotegerin (P = .002) levels than the asymptomatic one. In multivariate analysis, CAVI at baseline was independently associated with the presence of significant carotid atherosclerosis (ß = .695, P < .001), cerebrovascular events (ß = .474, P < .001), and GSM score (ß = -.275, P = .042). Raised CAVI values were independently associated with significant carotid stenosis and plaque vulnerability.

Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Its Alterations After Treatment.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate a potential difference on the arterial stiffness among aneurysm patients and non-aneurysm controls, as well as to explore potential changes between patients treated either with endovascular or open repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 110 patients with an infrarenal AAA were prospectively enrolled in this study. Fifty-six patients received an EVAR, whereas 54 patients received an open surgical repair. Moreover, 103 gender and age-matched subjects without AAA served as controls. The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) was applied for measurement of the arterial stiffness. RESULTS: CAVI values were statistically higher in the AAA patients when compared with control subjects. Although at 48 hours postoperatively the CAVI values were increased in both groups when compared to baseline values, the difference in CAVI had a tendency to be higher in the open group compared to the endovascular group. At 6 months of follow up the CAVI values returned to the baseline for the patients of the open repair group. However, in the endovascular group CAVI values remained higher when compared with the baseline values. CONCLUSION: Patients with AAAs demonstrated a higher value of CAVI compared to healthy controls. A significant increase of arterial stiffness in both groups during the immediate postoperative period was documented. The increase in arterial stiffness remained significant at 6 months in EVAR patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate the impact of a decreased aortic compliance after stentgraft implantation on the cardiac function of patients with AAA.

Snare Entrapment During EVAR Limb Cannulation Resulting in Open Conversion. A Rare Complication.

We present an unreported complication that occurred during an accidental loss of the ipsilateral limb's wire during EVAR. During an endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR), unintentional loss of the ipsilateral limb's wire during deployment and withdrawal of the endogaft's main body occurred. The snare's loops were entrapped while attempting to catch the wire through the limb. Multiple maneuvers were performed to detach the snare, but all were unsuccessful. We then performed a conversion to open repair. In conclusion, commercially available endografts should include standard radiopaque markers in the ipsilateral limb to facilitate retrograde cannulation. Retrieval via the snare should not be performed proximal to the gate of the limb.

Aortic Rupture during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Report of Our Experience and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Aortic neck wall rupture during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) is an underreported potentially fatal complication. Only a few cases have been reported. The main cause of this complication is repeated attempts at balloon inflation or overdilation to treat an intraoperative Type 1a endoleak. We report three cases complicated by procedure-related aortic neck wall rupture during EVAR. We also review the literature regarding the causes and outcomes of this complication. METHODS: Medical records of all patients undergoing EVAR between January 2009 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, 824 EVAR procedures were performed, and rupture of the aortic neck wall was observed in three patients. In all cases, a Type 1a endoleak was observed and, in all cases, repeated ballooning attempts had been performed to resolve the endoleaks. In all cases, conversion to open repair was performed and all patients survived. CONCLUSION: In cases of Type 1a endoleak, a maximum of two ballooning attempts should be performed even if a Type 1a endoleak persists. In case of intraoperative aortic neck wall rupture, control of the hemorrhage should be achieved immediately by advancing the balloon above the site of rupture. Emergency surgical conversion in case of hemodynamic stability is the first choice. According to the literature, emergency surgical conversion, especially in cases of endograft with suprarenal fixation, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates, mainly due to hemorrhage and to the length of the procedure required to repair the aortic neck wall injury.