Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Glaucoma ; 2024 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38752785

RESUMEN

PRCIS: Based on a large administrative database of German claims data, our study provides current estimates of the prevalence and incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in Germany and describes selected outcomes for prevalent POAG patients. PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of POAG in Germany, to describe the patient population in terms of comorbidity burden, routine care, and overall healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs, and to describe treatment patterns over time in patients undergoing relevant laser procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on anonymized German claims data, we carried out a retrospective, non-interventional study covering calendar years 2016 to 2021. RESULTS: For the adult German population (≥18 y), we estimated a POAG one-year prevalence of 1.70% and a one-year incidence of 0.17% in 2018; both increased with age, peaking in 80-89 year-olds. Prevalence and incidence were lower in 2020 (1.65% and 0.16%, respectively), the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Most patients solely received topical treatment. Most surgically-treated patients underwent laser trabeculoplasty, followed by laser iridotomy, trabeculectomy, and filtration operations with implant. In patients undergoing laser trabeculoplasty, the treatment regimen was nearly unchanged in the second year after, compared to two years before the procedure. Multimorbidity was commonly observed; 75.5% of patients had arterial hypertension and 50.0% had disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias, compared to 60.1% and 39.2%, respectively, in an age- and sex-matched control sample. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insights into epidemiology and routine care of POAG in Germany and HCRU in prevalent patients. There was little change in treatment regimens in patients who underwent laser trabeculoplasty, two years after the procedure. Most patients were multimorbid highlighting the need for comprehensive care.

2.
J Med Econ ; 26(1): 667-678, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37126606

RESUMEN

AIMS: Despite migraine being one of the most common neurological diseases, affected patients are often not effectively treated. This analysis describes the burden of migraine in Germany and assesses real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of preventive-treated migraine patients from the perspective of Statutory Health Insurance. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using InGef Research Database claims data from 2018-2019. Migraine patients were stratified into cohorts by acute and preventive treatment status. Patients on preventive treatment were further stratified according to the type of prophylaxis received. Disease burden in preventively treated migraine patients was reported via treatment patterns, pathways, and comorbidities. HCRU was assessed through outpatient provider visits, hospitalizations, and sick leave. RESULTS: 160,164 adult migraine patients were identified, of which 55,378 (34.6%) were prescribed preventive treatment with conventional (n = 25,984, 46.9%), calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP mAb) (n = 613, 1.1%), or off-label therapies (n = 28,781, 52.0%). 936 (1.7%) patients received Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNTA). CGRP mAb-treated patients had a high rate of triptan prescriptions (2018: 95.5%; 2019: 88.9%), migraine-related hospitalizations (2018: 33.0%; 2019: 21.0%), and sick leave (2018: 26.8%; 2019: 22.5%). A high proportion of CGRP mAb- and BoNTA-treated patients was diagnosed with abdominal and pelvic pain (34.3% and 36.2%) and low back pain (34.1% and 35.3%). These patients also showed a high prevalence of depressive episodes (49.1% and 50.1%) and chronic pain disorders (37.5% and 32.9%). LIMITATIONS: This study focused on descriptive analyses which do not allow for assessment of causality when comparing treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Disease burden was high in patients receiving CGRP mAbs suggesting that patients treated preventively with CGRP mAbs shortly after product launch in Germany were severely affected, chronic migraine patients. The same may be true for patients receiving BoNTA who also showed an increased disease burden.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Humanos , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...