Validity of the Mexican version of the combined Foot Care Confidence / Foot-Care Behavior scale for diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To 1) translate / transculturally adapt the original (English-language) combined Foot Care Confidence Scale / Foot-Care Behavior instrument (FCCS-FCB) to produce a Mexican-Spanish version and 2) determine its validity and reliability in a population with diabetes in Tijuana, Mexico. METHODS: The original FCCS-FCB was translated (and back-translated), the content validated (by a group of health professional experts), and the instrument applied to 304 patients 23-78 years old in diabetes support groups in Tijuana, Mexico. Internal consistency for the study constructs ("self-efficacy," and risk / preventive foot self-care behaviors) was measured using Cronbach's alpha. The constructs were validated using principal component factor analysis. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha values for internal consistency were 0.782 for self-efficacy and 0.505 for behaviors. Based on the analysis, two factors explained 49.1% of the total variance for self-efficacy, and six factors explained 57.7% of the total variance for behaviors. The results were consistent with those for the original (English) version of the FCCS-FCB. CONCLUSIONS: The Mexican version of the FCCS-FCB is a reliable and valid instrument recommended for use with Mexican-Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes.

Validity of the Mexican version of the combined Foot Care Confidence / Foot-Care Behavior scale for diabetes / Validez de la versión mexicana del instrumento combinado de las escalas Foot Care Confidence Scale y Foot Care Behavior para la diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To 1) translate / transculturally adapt the original (English-language) combined Foot Care Confidence Scale / Foot-Care Behavior instrument (FCCS-FCB) to produce a Mexican-Spanish version and 2) determine its validity and reliability in a population with diabetes in Tijuana, Mexico. METHODS: The original FCCS-FCB was translated (and back-translated), the content validated (by a group of health professional experts), and the instrument applied to 304 patients 23-78 years old in diabetes support groups in Tijuana, Mexico. Internal consistency for the study constructs ("self-efficacy," and risk / preventive foot self-care behaviors) was measured using Cronbach's alpha. The constructs were validated using principal component factor analysis. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha values for internal consistency were 0.782 for self-efficacy and 0.505 for behaviors. Based on the analysis, two factors explained 49.1% of the total variance for self-efficacy, and six factors explained 57.7% of the total variance for behaviors. The results were consistent with those for the original (English) version of the FCCS-FCB. CONCLUSIONS: The Mexican version of the FCCS-FCB is a reliable and valid instrument recommended for use with Mexican-Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes.

OBJETIVO: 1) traducir o adaptar transculturalmente el instrumento original combinado (en inglés) de las escalas Foot Care Confidence Scale (Escala de Competencia en el Cuidado del Pie) y Foot Care Behavior (Comportamientos del Cuidado del Pie) (FCCS-FCB) para crear una versión en español de México, y 2) determinar su validez y fiabilidad en una población de personas con diabetes de Tijuana, México. MÉTODOS: Se tradujo al español la escala original FCCS-FCB (y se volvió a traducir al inglés), su contenido fue validado (por un grupo de expertos), posteriormente se aplicó el instrumento a 304 pacientes de 23 a 78 años de edad, pertenecientes a grupos de apoyo al control de la diabetes de Tijuana, México. Mediante el alfa de Cronbach, se midió la coherencia interna de los constructos ("competencia personal" y "comportamientos de riesgo o preventivos de autocuidado del pie"). Los constructos fueron validados mediante análisis factorial de componentes principales. RESULTADOS: El valor de alfa de Cronbach correspondiente a competencia personal fue de 0,782 y de 0,505 para los comportamientos. En el análisis factorial, dos factores explicaron el 49,1% de la variancia total para la competencia personal, y seis factores explicaron el 57,7% de la variancia total para los comportamientos. Los resultados concordaron con los de la versión original (en inglés) del FCCS-FCB. CONCLUSIONES: La versión mexicana del FCCS-FCB es un instrumento fiable y válido recomendado para su empleo en pacientes mexicanos de habla hispana con diabetes.

Vulnerabilities faced by the children of sex workers in two Mexico-US border cities: a retrospective study on sexual violence, substance use and HIV risk.

Most studies of female sex workers (FSWs) conducted in the Mexico-US border region have focused on individual HIV risk, centered on sexual behaviors and substance abuse patterns. Little attention has been drawn to the reality that sex workers are often parents whose children potentially face vulnerabilities unique to their family situation. The objective of the present study was to identify the vulnerabilities faced by the children of FSWs in two Mexican-US border cities. From 2008 to 2010, 628 FSW-injection drug users underwent interviewer-administered surveys and HIV/STI testing. Approximately one in five participants (20%) reported having a parent involved in sex work and majority referred it was their mother (88%). Close to one-third of participants (31%) reported first injecting drugs <18 years of age, and 33% reported they began working regularly as a prostitute <18 years of age. First drinking alcohol <18 years old (AOR = 1.87, 95%CI: 1.13-3.08), lifetime cocaine use (AOR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.09-2.84), ever being forced or coerced into non-consensual sex as a minor (<18 years of age; AOR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.01-2.35), and injecting drugs with used syringes in the prior month (AOR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.07-2.49) were the factors associated with having had a parent involved in sex work. These findings begin to lay the groundwork for understanding the potential vulnerabilities faced by the children of sex workers. Understanding these potential needs is necessary for creating relevant, evidence-based interventions focused on supporting these women.

Deportation history among HIV-positive Latinos in two US-Mexico border communities.

Health-related vulnerabilities associated with deportation are understudied. We conducted a cross-sectional study to identify factors associated with history of deportation from the US to Mexico among HIV-positive Latinos. From 2009 to 2010, we recruited a convenience sample from HIV clinics in San Diego, US and Tijuana, Mexico. Of 283 participants, 25% reported a prior deportation. Factors independently associated with increased odds of deportation history were being male [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.77; 95% CI 1.18-6.48], having ≤high-school education (AOR 3.87; 95% CI 1.84-8.14), ever using cocaine (AOR 2.46; 95% CI 1.33-4.57), and reporting personalized HIV-stigma: "some have told me HIV is what I deserve for how I lived" (AOR 2.23; 95% CI 1.14-4.37). Lower self-reported antiretroviral medication adherence (AOR 0.35; 95% CI 0.12-0.96) and perceiving HIV-stigma: "most people believe a person who has HIV is dirty" (AOR 0.49; 95% CI 0.25-0.94) were associated with decreased odds of deportation history. Deportation is associated with specific socioeconomic indicators that are known to impact the health of individuals living with HIV.

Validity of the Mexican version of the combined Foot Care Confidence / Foot-Care Behavior scale for diabetes / Validez de la versión mexicana del instrumento combinado de las escalas Foot Care Confidence Scale y Foot Care Behavior para la diabetes

Objective. To 1) translate / transculturally adapt the original (English-language) combined Foot Care Confidence Scale / Foot-Care Behavior instrument (FCCS-FCB) to produce a Mexican-Spanish version and 2) determine its validity and reliability in a population with diabetes in Tijuana, Mexico. Methods. The original FCCS-FCB was translated (and back-translated), the content validat-ed (by a group of health professional experts), and the instrument applied to 304 patients 23–78 years old in diabetes support groups in Tijuana, Mexico. Internal consistency for the study constructs (“self-efficacy,” and risk / preventive foot self-care behaviors) was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. The constructs were validated using principal component factor analysis. Results. The Cronbach’s alpha values for internal consistency were 0.782 for self-efficacy and 0.505 for behaviors. Based on the analysis, two factors explained 49.1% of the total variance for self-efficacy, and six factors explained 57.7% of the total variance for behaviors. The results were consistent with those for the original (English) version of the FCCS-FCB. Conclusions. The Mexican version of the FCCS-FCB is a reliable and valid instrument recommended for use with Mexican-Spanish–speaking patients with diabetes.

Objetivo. 1) traducir o adaptar transculturalmente el instrumento original combi¬nado (en inglés) de las escalas Foot Care Confidence Scale (Escala de Competencia en el Cuidado del Pie) y Foot Care Behavior (Comportamientos del Cuidado del Pie) (FCCS-FCB) para crear una versión en español de México, y 2) determinar su validez y fiabilidad en una población de personas con diabetes de Tijuana, México. Métodos. Se tradujo al español la escala original FCCS-FCB (y se volvió a traducir al inglés), su contenido fue validado (por un grupo de expertos), posteriormente se aplicó el instrumento a 304 pacientes de 23 a 78 años de edad, pertenecientes a grupos de apoyo al control de la diabetes de Tijuana, México. Mediante el alfa de Cronbach, se midió la coherencia interna de los constructos (“competencia personal” y “comporta¬mientos de riesgo o preventivos de autocuidado del pie”). Los constructos fueron validados mediante análisis factorial de componentes principales. Resultados. El valor de alfa de Cronbach correspondiente a competencia personal fue de 0,782 y de 0,505 para los comportamientos. En el análisis factorial, dos factores explicaron el 49,1% de la variancia total para la competencia personal, y seis factores explicaron el 57,7% de la variancia total para los comportamientos. Los resultados concordaron con los de la versión original (en inglés) del FCCS-FCB. Conclusiones. La versión mexicana del FCCS-FCB es un instrumento fiable y válido recomendado para su empleo en pacientes mexicanos de habla hispana con diabetes.

Healthcare provider perspectives on barriers to HIV-care access and utilisation among Latinos living with HIV in the US-Mexico border.

Latinos living with HIV residing in the US-Mexico border region frequently seek care on both sides of the border. Given this fact, a border health perspective to understanding barriers to care is imperative to improve patient health outcomes. This qualitative study describes and compares experiences and perceptions of Mexican and US HIV care providers regarding barriers to HIV care access for Latino patients living in the US-Mexico border region. In 2010, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with HIV care providers in Tijuana (n = 10) and San Diego (n = 9). We identified important similarities and differences between Mexican and US healthcare provider perspectives on HIV care access and barriers to service utilisation. Similarities included the fact that HIV-positive Latino patients struggle with access to ART medication, mental health illness, substance abuse and HIV-related stigma. Differences included Mexican provider perceptions of medication shortages and US providers feeling that insurance gaps influenced medication access. Differences and similarities have important implications for cross-border efforts to coordinate health services for patients who seek care in both countries.

A binational comparison of HIV provider attitudes towards the use of complementary and alternative medicine among HIV-positive Latino patients receiving care in the US-Mexico border region.

Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common among Latinos living with HIV in the United States (US)-Mexico border region. Health providers may vary in their approach to communicating acceptance or non acceptance of CAM use, which can undermine patient confidence in disclosing CAM use. Patient-provider communication about CAM is important because certain types of CAM can affect antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. We undertook the present binational study to understand US and Mexican provider beliefs, and perceptions surrounding CAM use among Latino patients, and to learn if and how CAM communication occurs. Between July and December 2010, we conducted in-depth, qualitative interviews in Tijuana and San Diego. Analysis procedures drew upon principles of Grounded Theory. The sample was comprised of 19 HIV-health care providers, including 7 women and 12 men. Emerging CAM-related themes were: Provider's perceptions, attitudes and knowledge about CAM; CAM types and modalities; and patient-provider CAM communication. Many clinicians were uncomfortable supporting CAM use with their patients. San Diego providers reported more frequent instances of CAM use among Latino patients than Tijuana providers. Providers from both cities reported that patients infrequently disclose CAM use and almost half do not routinely ask patients about CAM practices. Most of the providers acknowledged that they lack information about CAM, and are concerned about the drug interaction as well as the effects of CAM on adherence. Our findings have important implications for understanding provider communication surrounding CAM use in a highly transnational population and context. Because CAM use may undermine ART adherence and is highly prevalent among Latinos, provider communication about CAM is critical to improved health outcomes among HIV-positive Latinos. Considering the significant growth of US Latinos, especially in the US-Mexico border region, assessment of Mexican and US provider training and communication needs surrounding Latino patient CAM use is warranted.

Choosing sides: HIV health care practices among shared populations of HIV-positive Latinos living near the US-Mexico border.

BACKGROUND: We compared HIV-positive patients receiving care in the border cities of San Diego, United States, with Tijuana, Mexico. METHODS: Participants were HIV-positive Latinos (n = 233) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) from San Diego-Tijuana clinics (2009-2010). Logistic regression identified correlates of receiving HIV care in San Diego versus Tijuana. RESULTS: Those with their most recent HIV visit in San Diego (59%) were more likely to be older, have at least a high school education, and were less likely to have been deported than those with last visits in Tijuana. Despite reporting better patient-provider relationships and less HIV-related stigma than those with visits in Tijuana, San Diego patients were twice as likely to make unsupervised changes in their ART regimen. CONCLUSIONS: We observed poorer relative adherence among HIV-positive Latinos receiving care in San Diego, despite reports of good clinical relationships. Further study is needed to ascertain underlying reasons to avoid ART-related resistance.

Condom access: Associations with consistent condom use among female sex workers in two northern border cities of Mexico.

To determine whether condom access is associated with consistent condom use among female sex workers (FSWs) in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, between 2004 and 2006 we administered a questionnaire to 924 FSWs who reported unprotected sex with a client in the past 2 months. Of these women, 43% reported consistent ("often" or "always") condom use, 74% said condoms were available, and 38% reported having access to free condoms. In a logistic regression, factors positively associated with consistent condom use were condom availability (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-3.03), condom affordability (AOR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.25-2.38) and self-efficacy (AOR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.54-3.04). Factors inversely associated with consistent condom use included poor financial status (AOR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.90), methamphetamine use (AOR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83), alcohol use (AOR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49-0.96), and recent injection drug use (AOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.97). While increased condom availability may improve condom use among FSWs in general, interventions to broaden condom use among lower income and drug-using FSWs are critically needed.