Benefits of dapagliflozin in the whole spectrum of heart failure in clinical practice: the RICA registry.

Aims: To determine the projected benefits of dapagliflozin after an acute heart failure (HF) event in Spain. Methods: A multicenter and prospective study that included subjects aged 50 years or older consecutively admitted with HF to internal medicine departments in Spain. The projected clinical benefits of dapagliflozin were calculated via pooled analysis of the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials. Results: A total of 5644 subjects were analyzed, of whom 79.2% were eligible for dapagliflozin, according to criteria of the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials. Full implementation of dapagliflozin would imply a 1-year absolute risk reduction of 2.3% for death (number needed to treat = 43) and 5.7% (number needed to treat = 17) for HF rehospitalization. Conclusion: Treatment with dapagliflozin could significantly reduce HF burden in clinical practice.

Heart failure is a severe condition that is associated with a high risk of complications. This means that it is important to start using new therapies that have demonstrated a clinical benefit. Clinical trials have shown that dapagliflozin reduces the risk of developing these complications in patients with heart failure. However, it is important to find out whether the results of clinical trials are also seen in real-life populations. We estimated the potential benefits of dapagliflozin in people admitted to hospital more than once with heart failure. The study took place in Spain. Our data suggest that treatment with dapagliflozin could reduce the complications associated with heart failure in real-life patients.

Effect of intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone 250 mg versus dexamethasone 6 mg in hospitalised adults with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: An open-label randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of high versus medium doses of glucocorticoids for the treatment of patients with COVID-19 has shown mixed outcomes in controlled trials and observational studies. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of methylprednisolone 250 mg bolus versus dexamethasone 6 mg in patients with severe COVID-19. METHODS: A randomised, open-label, controlled trial was conducted between February and August 2021 at four hospitals in Spain. The trial was suspended after the first interim analysis since the investigators considered that continuing the trial would be futile. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive dexamethasone 6 mg once daily for up to 10 days or methylprednisolone 250 mg once daily for 3 days. RESULTS: Of the 128 randomised patients, 125 were analysed (mean age 60 ± 17 years; 82 males [66%]). Mortality at 28 days was 4.8% in the 250 mg methylprednisolone group versus 4.8% in the 6 mg dexamethasone group (absolute risk difference, 0.1% [95% CI, -8.8 to 9.1%]; p = 0.98). None of the secondary outcomes (admission to the intensive care unit, non-invasive respiratory or high-flow oxygen support, additional immunosuppressive drugs, or length of stay), or prespecified sensitivity analyses were statistically significant. Hyperglycaemia was more frequent in the methylprednisolone group at 27.0 versus 8.1% (absolute risk difference, -18.9% [95% CI, -31.8 to - 5.6%]; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Among severe but not critical patients with COVID-19, 250 mg/d for 3 days of methylprednisolone compared with 6 mg/d for 10 days of dexamethasone did not result in a decrease in mortality or intubation.

Standardized incidence ratios and risk factors for cancer in patients with systemic sclerosis: Data from the Spanish Scleroderma Registry (RESCLE).

AIM: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are at increased risk of cancer, a growing cause of non-SSc-related death among these patients. We analyzed the increased cancer risk among Spanish patients with SSc using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and identified independent cancer risk factors in this population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Spanish Scleroderma Registry data were analyzed to determine the demographic characteristics of patients with SSc, and logistic regression was used to identify cancer risk factors. SIRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) relative to the general Spanish population were calculated. RESULTS: Of 1930 patients with SSc, 206 had cancer, most commonly breast, lung, hematological, and colorectal cancers. Patients with SSc had increased risks of overall cancer (SIR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36-1.60; P < 0.001), and of lung (SIR 2.22, 95% CI 1.77-2.73; P < 0.001), breast (SIR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.54; P = 0.003), and hematological (SIR 2.03, 95% CI 1.52-2.62; P < 0.001) cancers. Cancer was associated with older age at SSc onset (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; P < 0.001), the presence of primary biliary cholangitis (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.18-4.68; P = 0.015) and forced vital capacity <70% (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.24-2.70; P = 0.002). The presence of anticentromere antibodies lowered the risk of cancer (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Spanish patients with SSc had an increased cancer risk compared with the general population. Some characteristics, including specific autoantibodies, may be related to this increased risk.

High serum osmolarity at admission determines a worse outcome in patients with heart failure: Is a new target emerging?

AIMS: The osmolarity of human serum is restricted to a tightly regulated range, and any deviation has clinical implications. Our aim in this study was to establish whether differences in serum osmolarity in heart failure (HF) patients are related with a worse outcome. METHODS: We evaluated the prognostic value of serum osmolarity in patients with HF from the Spanish National Registry on Heart Failure (RICA), a multicenter, prospective registry that enrolls patients admitted for decompensated HF and follows them for 1year. Patients were divided into quartiles according to osmolarity levels. Primary endpoint was the combination of all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions for HF. RESULTS: A total of 2568 patients (47.46% men) were included. Patients with higher osmolarity were older, presented more comorbidities (especially diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease), and consequently had higher levels of glucose, urea, creatinine and potassium. During the 1-year follow-up, mortality among the quartiles was 18% (Q1), 18% (Q2), 23% (Q3) and 28% (Q4), p<0.001. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, high serum osmolarity was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, p<0.001). We also found a significant increase in the combined endpoint of mortality and readmission among quartiles with higher osmolarity (p<0.001). Diabetes, eGFR, Barthel index, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, hemoglobin, NYHA class and beta-blocking agents were also independently associated with the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: In patients admitted for decompensated HF, high serum osmolarity predicts a worse outcome, and is associated with a higher comorbidity burden, supporting its use as a candidate prognostic target in HF.

Clinical characteristics and one-year survival in heart failure patients more than 85 years of age compared with younger.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is frequent in elderly patients, but few studies have focused on patients older than 84 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate major comorbidities and 1-year survival in HF patients aged ≥85 years compared with younger age groups. METHODS: Patients included in a prospective national registry of HF (RICA) were evaluated. Sociodemographic data, Charlson comorbidity index, cognitive status, basal functional status, body mass index, NYHA functional class, and left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) were recorded. Patients aged ≥85 years were compared with the rest using the Cox regression model to detect independent predictive factors of 1-year survival. RESULTS: Of the 1172 patients included, 224 (19%) were aged over 84 years-old, mostly women, with hypertensive heart disease (46%, p<0.001) and preserved LVEF (68.7%; p<0.001). Diabetes (p<0.001), dyslipidemia (p=0.03) and obesity (p<0.001) were less prevalent in this group of patients. One-year mortality in the oldest old patients was 26.3%, which was higher than the rest (p<0.001). By multivariable analysis, a higher NYHA functional class (p=0.038), anemia (p=0.037), absence of obesity (p=0.002), and a worse functional status (p=0.049) were related to a worse 1-year survival in the oldest HF patients. CONCLUSIONS: The oldest old HF patients have differential characteristics with lower prevalence of diabetes, dyslipidemia and obesity and a lower 1-year survival. Independent factors related to a worse 1-year survival in the oldest age group were a higher NYHA class, a worse functional status, presence of anemia and absence of obesity.

Síndrome de secreción inadecuada de hormona antidiurética asociado a hepatocarcinoma / Hepatocellular carcinoma producing syndrome of inappropiate antidiuretic hormone secretion

No disponible

Enfermedad de Castleman multicéntricacon afección cerebral reversible / Reversible brain involvement in multicentric Castleman´s disease

No disponible