Cardiac MRI findings to differentiate athlete's heart from hypertrophic (HCM), arrhythmogenic right ventricular (ARVC) and dilated (DCM) cardiomyopathy.

To provide clinically relevant criteria for differentiation between the athlete's heart and similar appearing hypertrophic (HCM), dilated (DCM), and arrhythmogenic right-ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in MRI. 40 top-level athletes were prospectively examined with cardiac MR (CMR) in two university centres and compared to retrospectively recruited patients diagnosed with HCM (n = 14), ARVC (n = 18), and DCM (n = 48). Analysed MR imaging parameters in the whole study cohort included morphology, functional parameters and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Mean left-ventricular enddiastolic volume index (LVEDVI) was high in athletes (105 ml/m2) but significantly lower compared to DCM (132 ml/m2; p = 0.001). Mean LV ejection fraction (EF) was 61% in athletes, below normal in 7 (18%) athletes vs. EF 29% in DCM, below normal in 46 (96%) patients (p < 0.0001). Mean RV-EF was 54% in athletes vs. 60% in HCM, 46% in ARVC, and 41% in DCM (p < 0.0001). Mean interventricular myocardial thickness was 10 mm in athletes vs. 12 mm in HCM (p = 0.0005), 9 mm in ARVC, and 9 mm in DCM. LGE was present in 1 (5%) athlete, 8 (57%) HCM, 10 (56%) ARVC, and 21 (44%) DCM patients (p < 0.0001). Healthy athletes' hearts are characterized by both hypertrophy and dilation, low EF of both ventricles at rest, and increased interventricular septal thickness with a low prevalence of LGE. Differentiation of athlete's heart from other non-ischemic cardiomyopathies in MRI can be challenging due to a significant overlap of characteristics also seen in HCM, ARVC, and DCM.

Expression of anaphylatoxin receptors on platelets in patients with coronary heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: Inhibition of components of the complement system or of its receptors has been postulated as a concept for primary and secondary prevention in atherosclerosis and was applied in clinical trials. Although the anaphylatoxin-receptors C3aR and C5aR are commonly associated with inflammatory cells, in vitro studies suggested their expression also on platelets. METHODS AND RESULTS: Expression levels of C3aR and C5aR were measured by flow cytometry in a collective of 302 patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD) including patients with stable CAD (n = 152), unstable angina (n = 54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, n = 70, ST elevation MI, n = 26) or healthy controls (n = 21). Patients with stable CAD, unstable angina or AMI had significantly higher expression of C5aR on platelets in comparison to healthy controls (MFI 14.68 (5.2), 14.56 (5.18) and 13.34 (4.52) versus 10.68 (3.1)); p < 0.001). In contrast, the expression of C3aR on platelets was significantly enhanced in patients with stable and unstable CAD but not in patients with AMI compared to controls. While there was a strong correlation between the soluble ligands of these receptors C3a and C5a, we observed only a weak correlation with their receptors on platelets. Similarly, agonist induced aggregation (MEA, ADP, and TRAP) showed only a weak correlation with the expression level of anaphylatoxin - receptors on platelets. Of note, the expression of both anaphylatoxin-receptors on platelets strongly correlated with platelet activation as assessed with the surface activation marker P-selectin (r = 0.47, p > 0.001 for C3aR, r = 0.76 for C5aR, p < 0.001). Likewise, we observed a positive correlation of C3aR with other molecules associated with platelet activation such as SDF-1. CONCLUSION: In summary, we observed a positive correlation between the expression of anaphylatoxin-receptors C3aR and C5aR with platelet activation in patients with CAD. Further investigations are needed to study the clinical and mechanistic relevance of these findings.