COVID-19 Related Facilitators and Barriers to In-Person Learning for Children With Intellectual and Development Disabilities: A Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and the staff who support them were largely in-person during the 2021-2022 school year, despite their continued vulnerability to infection with SARS-CoV-2. This qualitative study aimed to understand continued perceptions of weekly SARS-CoV-2 screening testing of students and staff amidst increased availability of vaccinations. METHODS: Twenty-three focus groups were held with school staff and parents of children with IDD to examine the perceptions of COVID-19 during the 2021-2022 school year. Responses were analyzed using a directed thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Four principal themes were identified: strengths and opportunities of school- and district-level mitigation policies; experience at school with the return to in-person learning; facilitators and barriers to participation in SARS-CoV-2 screening testing; and perceptions of SARS-CoV-2 testing in light of vaccine availability. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Despite the increased availability of vaccines, school staff and families agreed that saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 screening testing helped increase comfort with in-person learning as long as the virus was present in the community. CONCLUSION: To keep children with IDD in school during the pandemic, families found SARS-CoV-2 screening testing important. Clearly communicating school policies and mitigation strategies facilitated peace of mind and confidence in the school district.

COVID-19-Related Facilitators and Barriers to In-Person Learning for Children With Intellectual and Development Disabilities.

BACKGROUND: Schools provide essential functions for children with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), but their vulnerability to infection with SARS-CoV-2 are a barrier to in-person learning. This qualitative study aimed to understand how weekly SARS-CoV-2 screening testing of students and staff could best facilitate in-school learning during the pandemic. METHODS: Thirty-one focus groups were held with school staff and parents of children with IDD to examine the perceptions of COVID-19 during the 2020-2021 school year. Responses were analyzed using a directed thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Five principal themes were identified: risks of returning to in-person learning; facilitators and barriers to participation in SARS-CoV-2 screening testing; messaging strategies; and preferred messengers. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Staff and families agreed that saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 screening testing helps increase comfort with in-person learning. Screening testing increased family and school staff comfort with in-person learning particularly because many students with special needs cannot adhere to public health guidelines. CONCLUSION: To keep children with IDD in school during the pandemic, families found SARS-CoV-2 screening testing important, particularly for students that cannot adhere to mitigation guidelines.

The impact of responsible fatherhood programs on parenting, psychological well-being, and financial outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.

The objective of this study was to examine differences in parenting, psychological well-being, and economic outcomes between fathers receiving two different programs offered by Fathers & Families Support Center for economically disadvantaged fathers: (a) Family Formation (FF), a 6-week/240-h program focused on economic stability/mobility, responsible fatherhood, and healthy relationships, with case management and legal services; (b) Economic Stability (ES), a 4-week/80-h program focused only on economic stability with limited case management and legal services. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was used to compare fathers in FF (n = 350) vs. ES (n = 342). Surveys were administered at enrollment and 3- and 12-months postintervention. Linear and generalized linear mixed models were used to assess changes in program outcomes over time and across study groups. Four hundred and eighty-two fathers responded to either follow-up survey (251 FF, 231 ES). Nearly all (98%) were non-white (93% Black, 5% other/mixed race) and were on average 34 years old. Approximately 46% attended ≥75% of program sessions (FF 48% vs. ES 44%). Both FF and ES groups experienced improvements in parenting, psychological well-being, and financial outcomes after the programs, but changes in outcomes over time did not differ significantly by program. The lack of difference in outcomes between fathers in FF and ES groups could be due to a similar core focus on employment-related curriculum for both groups. Gaining financial stability could have contributed to positive improvements in other fatherhood domains. Implications for future research and practice are discussed herein.

El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar las diferencias en la crianza, el bienestar psicológico y los resultados económicos entre padres que recibían dos programas diferentes ofrecidos por el Centro de Apoyo a los Padres y las Familias (Fathers & Familiares Support Center) para padres desfavorecidos económicamente: (a) Formación de una Familia (Family Formation, FF), un programa de 6 semanas/240 horas centrado en la estabilidad/movilidad económica, la paternidad responsable y las relaciones saludables, con gestión de casos y servicios legales; (b) Estabilidad Económica (Economic Stability, ES), un programa de 4 semanas/80 horas centrado solamente en la estabilidad económica con poca gestión de casos y servicios legales. Se usó un ensayo controlado aleatorizado para comparar a los padres de FF (n=350) con los de ES (n=342). Se realizaron encuestas en la inscripción y a los 3 y a los 12 meses posteriores a la intervención. Se usaron modelos lineales y modelos mixtos lineales generalizados para evaluar los cambios en los resultados de los programas con el tiempo y entre los grupos de estudio. 482 padres respondieron a cada encuesta de seguimiento (251 FF, 231 ES). Casi todos (el 98 %) eran de color (el 93 % negros, el 5 % de otra raza o de raza mestiza) y tenían, en promedio, 34 años. Aproximadamente el 46 % asistió a más del 75 % de las sesiones de los programas (el 48 % de FF frente al 44 % de ES). Tanto el grupo de FF como el de ES tuvieron mejoras en la crianza, en el bienestar psicológico y en los resultados económicos después de los programas, pero los cambios en los resultados con el tiempo no variaron significativamente por programa. La falta de diferencia en los resultados entre los padres del grupo de FF y los del grupo de ES podría deberse a un enfoque principal similar en un currículo relacionado con el empleo para ambos grupos. La adquisición de estabilidad económica podría haber contribuido a mejoras positivas en otras áreas de la paternidad. Se comentan las consecuencias para la futura investigación y la práctica.

Building a National Framework to Pair Scientists and Schools During a Global Pandemic.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced the suspension of in-person education in schools serving students in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) across the United States. As time passed, teachers, students, and parents struggled with remote education. With limited guidance at the federal level, physicians and school leaders across the country collaborated to develop local solutions for schools. This article describes the lessons learned from the development of 4 academic-community partnerships and collaboration among these partnerships to provide national leadership on managing COVID-19 mitigation in the K-12 environment. In addition, we describe a pathway forward for using academic-community partnerships to improve child health.

Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework.

BACKGROUND: Public health programs can only deliver benefits if they are able to sustain activities over time. There is a broad literature on program sustainability in public health, but it is fragmented and there is a lack of consensus on core constructs. The purpose of this paper is to present a new conceptual framework for program sustainability in public health. METHODS: This developmental study uses a comprehensive literature review, input from an expert panel, and the results of concept-mapping to identify the core domains of a conceptual framework for public health program capacity for sustainability. The concept-mapping process included three types of participants (scientists, funders, and practitioners) from several public health areas (e.g., tobacco control, heart disease and stroke, physical activity and nutrition, and injury prevention). RESULTS: The literature review identified 85 relevant studies focusing on program sustainability in public health. Most of the papers described empirical studies of prevention-oriented programs aimed at the community level. The concept-mapping process identified nine core domains that affect a program's capacity for sustainability: Political Support, Funding Stability, Partnerships, Organizational Capacity, Program Evaluation, Program Adaptation, Communications, Public Health Impacts, and Strategic Planning. Concept-mapping participants further identified 93 items across these domains that have strong face validity-89% of the individual items composing the framework had specific support in the sustainability literature. CONCLUSIONS: The sustainability framework presented here suggests that a number of selected factors may be related to a program's ability to sustain its activities and benefits over time. These factors have been discussed in the literature, but this framework synthesizes and combines the factors and suggests how they may be interrelated with one another. The framework presents domains for public health decision makers to consider when developing and implementing prevention and intervention programs. The sustainability framework will be useful for public health decision makers, program managers, program evaluators, and dissemination and implementation researchers.

Referrals among cancer services organizations serving underserved cancer patients in an urban area.

Significant racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities exist nationwide in cancer screenings, treatments, and outcomes. Differences in health and social service provision and utilization may contribute to or exacerbate these disparities. We evaluated the composition and structure of a referral network of organizations providing services to underserved cancer patients in an urban area in 2007. We observed a need for increased awareness building among provider organizations, broader geographic coverage among organizations, and increased utilization of tobacco cessation and financial assistance services.

Systems analysis of collaboration in 5 national tobacco control networks.

OBJECTIVES: We studied 5 members of the National Network Consortium on Tobacco Control in Priority Populations. These networks, which consist of governmental and nongovernmental organizations, targeted lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons; Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders; American Indians and Alaska Natives; African Americans; and persons with low socioeconomic status, respectively. METHODS: We used statistical network analysis modeling to examine collaboration among these national networks in 2007. RESULTS: Network size and composition varied, but all 5 networks had extensive interorganizational collaboration. Location and work area were significant predictors of collaboration among network members in all 5 networks. Organizations were more likely to collaborate with their network's lead agency; collaborations with other agencies were more likely if they were geographically close. Collaboration was perceived to be important for achieving the goals of the national network. CONCLUSIONS: The similarity of collaboration patterns across the 5 networks suggests common underlying partnership formation processes. Statistical network modeling promises to be a useful tool for understanding how public health systems such as networks and coalitions can be used to improve the nation's health.

Evaluating the strength of school tobacco policies: the development of a practical rating system.

BACKGROUND: School tobacco control policies vary widely in their strength, extensiveness, and enforcement. Currently, no standardized method exists to assess the comprehensiveness of school tobacco policies. The purpose of this study was to develop a new practical rating system for school tobacco policies, assess its reliability, and present preliminary validation data. METHODS: This study presents the systematic development of a rating system to assess the strength of school tobacco policies. Based on the empirical literature and the expertise of an advisory panel consisting of educational leaders and tobacco control advocates and practitioners, a "gold standard" school tobacco policy was developed and guided the content of the 40-point rating system. The 4 domains of the School Tobacco Policy Index were: Tobacco-free environment (14 points), Enforcement (12 points), Prevention and treatment services (6 points), and Policy organization (8 points). RESULTS: The Index was pilot-tested using 95 Missouri public school district tobacco policies and proved to be highly reliable among coders. The evaluated policies varied greatly between school districts, with the lowest total policy score of phi and the highest score of 21. School district policy scores were significantly related to a number of county-level tobacco policy characteristics, including support for a tobacco excise tax increase. CONCLUSIONS: The Index is a user-friendly, practical tool for tobacco control professionals and educators, providing them with the ability to easily evaluate their own school policies. Their evaluation efforts will be useful in strengthening existing policies and developing new comprehensive policies to protect the health of students, staff, administrators, and visitors.

Seeing the forest and the trees: using network analysis to develop an organizational blueprint of state tobacco control systems.

In the United States, tobacco control activities are organized primarily in state tobacco control programs. These programs are comprised of public and private agencies working together to reduce tobacco use. The human, financial, and informational resources that go into state tobacco control programs are documented, and the outcomes of these programs have been studied in terms of health and health behavior. However, little is known about the organizational infrastructure that transforms the human, financial, and informational resources into positive health outcomes. This study examined the inter-organizational relationships among key partner agencies in eight state tobacco control programs. The state programs varied in terms of funding level, funding stability, and region of the country. Using a network analytic approach we asked an average of 14 agencies in each state program about their contacts and partnerships with the other key tobacco control agencies in their state program. Using network visualization and statistics we determined that the state networks shared some common features such as a highly central lead agency, but also had differences in network structure in terms of density and centralization. Using blockmodeling we found that, despite differences in state and program characteristics, there was a common organizational structure among the eight state programs. Understanding the inter-organizational relationships and the common organizational structures of state programs can aid researchers and practitioners in enhancing program capacity and in developing strategies for organizing effective public health systems.

Getting the word out: multiple methods for disseminating evaluation findings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of different strategies for disseminating evaluation results to program stakeholders. METHODS: The results from a process evaluation of eight states' tobacco control programs were disseminated to the state programs that were assigned to one of four dissemination conditions: print reports only, reports and web site, reports and workshop, or all three dissemination modes. Key measures included levels of usefulness of the evaluation results and satisfaction of participation by study participants. RESULTS: Although exposure to the web site and workshop individually did not provide a statistically higher degree of usefulness, a clear upward trend was observed in usefulness as the number of dissemination modes increased. Participants who engaged in all three dissemination modes found the results more useful (P < .05) for their work and the work of their agency than participants using one or two dissemination modes. Participants who engaged in the three dissemination modes also appeared to be more likely to share the results with their colleagues (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that disseminating evaluation results through multiple, active modes increased usefulness, satisfaction, and further dissemination of the results. Evaluators should consider implementing more than one mode of dissemination to share findings with stakeholders.

Successfully maintaining program funding during trying times: lessons from tobacco control programs in five states.

Despite negative financial conditions in recent years, several states were able to successfully maintain funding for tobacco prevention and control, which provided an opportunity to understand the factors associated with success. One explanation may be the level of long-term program sustainability in some states. According to a model developed by Saint Louis University researchers, the five elements critical to tobacco control sustainability are state political and financial climate; community awareness and capacity; program structure and administration; funding stability and planning; and surveillance and evaluation. Five states (Nebraska, New York, Indiana, Virginia, and Colorado) maintained funding for their tobacco control programs. Four of these states gained additional legislative appropriations or prevented a massive reduction; Colorado used a statewide ballot initiative to increase funding. On the basis of the sustainability framework, case studies, and prior research, the major lessons learned for maintaining funding were the importance of (1) strong and experienced leadership, (2) broad and deep organizational and community ties, (3) coordinated efforts, (4) strategic use of surveillance and evaluation data, (5) active dissemination of information about program successes, and (6) policy maker champions. The sustainability framework and lessons learned may provide valuable insights for other public health programs facing funding threats.

The best practices: use of the guidelines by ten state tobacco control programs.

BACKGROUND: The Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs by the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention was the first national resource to define the nine required components of a comprehensive state tobacco control program. This evaluation examined how states used the guidelines in their program planning, and identifies strengths and weaknesses of the guidelines. METHODS: During 2002-2003, data were collected and analyzed from ten state tobacco control programs on familiarity, funding, and use of the guidelines. Data were collected via written surveys and qualitative interviews with key tobacco control partners in the states. The typical number of participants interviewed was 17, representing an average of 15 agencies per state. RESULTS: Lead agencies and advisory agencies were the most familiar with the guidelines, while other state agencies were less aware of the guidelines. Participants' prioritization of the nine components was closely related to the lead agencies' estimated category expenditures. Three states modified the guidelines to develop more-tailored frameworks. Major strengths of the guidelines included providing a basic program framework and state-specific funding recommendations. The guidelines did not address implementation strategies or tobacco-related disparities, and had not been updated with current evidence-based research. CONCLUSIONS: The guidelines are important recommendations for state tobacco control programs. To continue to be useful to states, the guidelines need to be updated to address implementation and tobacco disparities, and include additional evidence-based examples. Active dissemination of updated guidelines needs to be increased beyond typical consumers to other tobacco control partners such as coalitions and other state agencies.