Aflatoxicosis, infectious bursal disease and immune response to Newcastle disease vaccination in rural chickens.

To investigate the immunosuppressive effects of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and aflatoxin in indigenous chickens of Uganda, Newcastle disease (ND) seronegative chicks were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Group A chicks were injected intramuscularly at the age of 3 weeks every 2 days up to four times with 0.250 mg aflatoxin B1 per bird, group B was infected occulo-nasally with IBDV 3 days prior to vaccination, while group C was left as a control group. All the chicks from the three groups were then vaccinated with Hitchner B1 vaccine at 21 days of age followed by a secondary vaccination with La Sota vaccine 3 weeks later. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were assessed by measuring antibody levels and delayed hypersensitivity reaction post vaccination. Growth performance in the three groups was assessed by weekly body weights while evidence of excretion of vaccinal ND virus was detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.A significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the haemagglutination inhibition of ND antibody titre following initial priming with Hitchner B1 and subsequent booster with La Sota vaccines and a delayed hypersensitivity test following sensitization with dinitrochlorobenzene showed aflatoxin to be a more potent immunosuppressant than IBDV. Aflatoxin exerted its maximum effects during primary antibody response in the second and third weeks post vaccination. Aflatoxin and IBDV did not affect growth rates (P > 0.05) but prolonged La Sota vaccine virus excretion in faeces. Under our experimental conditions, aflatoxin and IBDV do not significantly affect the immune response of rural chickens to ND vaccination.

Immunogenicity of a locally produced Newcastle disease I-2 thermostable vaccine in chickens in Uganda.

A locally-produced Newcastle disease (ND) I-2 thermostable vaccine of embryo-infective dose (EID50) 10(8.5) per ml was administered to 100 laboratory chickens in four test groups, each of 25 birds. It was given by the eye-drop method, in drinking water, in drinking water freshly medicated with levamisole, or using millet grains as a vaccine carrier. A fifth control group consisting of 25 birds received the heat-sensitive La Sota vaccine (EID50 10(9) per ml) by the eye-drop method. The immunological responses were monitored by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) ND antibody technique using serum samples collected from 18 birds in each group at 3-week intervals for 3 months. The overall mean ND antibody log(10) titres and percentage positivities were 3.1, 88%; 2.9, 70%; 3.0, 83%; 3.2, 87% and 3.3, 87%, respectively. The use of water alone or medicated with levamisole for vaccine administration produced significantly lower ND antibody titres only in the first 3 weeks. The immunogenicity shown by the I-2 vaccine as a potential vaccine is discussed in relation to free-range poultry management conditions in Uganda.

Serological response and virus shedding of chickens inoculated with reovirus via different routes.

A comparison of the serological responses to a reovirus administered by the eye-drop, intramuscular, oral and subcutaneous routes was made in three-week-old chickens. Their patterns of virus shedding were also compared. All four routes resulted in an antibody response and no virus excretion in faeces more than two to three weeks after administration. The oral route represented the most favourable route for live reovirus vaccine administration.