Identifying risk factors for postoperative ileus following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following major abdominal surgery. The majority of the data available regarding POI after abdominal surgery is from the gastrointestinal and urological literature. These data have been extrapolated to vascular surgery, especially with regard to enhanced recovery programs for open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. However, vascular patients are a unique patient population and extrapolation of gastrointestinal and urological data may not necessarily be appropriate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to delineate the prevalence and risk factors of POI in patients undergoing open AAA surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-institution study of patients who underwent open AAA surgery from January 2016 to July 2023. Patients were excluded if they had undergone nonelective repairs or had expired within 72 hours of their index operation. The primary outcome was rates of POI, which was defined as the presence of two or more of the following after the third postoperative day: nausea and/or vomiting, inability to tolerate oral food intake, absence of flatus, abdominal distension, or radiological evidence of ileus. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients met study criteria with an overall POI rate of 8.9% (n = 11). Patients who developed a POI had a significantly lower body mass index (24.3 kg/m2 vs 27.1 kg/m2; P = .003), were more likely to undergo a transperitoneal approach (81.8% vs 42.0%; P = .022), midline laparotomy (81.8% vs 37.5%; P = .008), longer total clamp times (151.6 minutes vs 97.7 minutes; P = .018), greater amounts of intraoperative crystalloid infusion (3495 mL vs 2628 mL; P = .029), and were more likely to return to the operating room (27.3% vs 3.6%; P = .016). Proximal clamp site was not associated with POI (P=.463). Patients with POI also had higher rates of postoperative vasopressor use (100% vs 61.1%; P = .014) and greater amounts of oral morphine equivalents in the first 3 postoperative days (488.0 ± 216.0 mg vs 203.8 ± 29.6 mg; P = .016). Patients who developed POI had longer lengths of stay (12.5 days vs 7.6 days; P < .001), a longer duration of nasogastric tube decompression (5.9 days vs 2.2 days; P < .001), and a longer period of time before diet tolerance (9.1 days vs 3.7 days; P < .001). Of those who developed a POI (n = 11), four (36.4%) required total parental nutrition during the admission. CONCLUSIONS: POI is a morbid complication among patients undergoing elective open AAA surgery that prolongs hospital stay. Patients at risk for developing a POI are those with a lower body mass index, as well as those who had an operative repair via a transperitoneal approach, midline laparotomy, longer clamp times, larger amounts of intraoperative crystalloid infusion, a return to the operating room, postoperative vasopressor use, and higher amounts of oral morphine equivalents. These data highlight important perioperative opportunities to decrease the prevalence of POI.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular vs surgical arteriovenous fistula creation in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: In the United States, an estimated $2.8 billion annually is spent on vascular access and its complications. Endovascular arteriovenous fistula (endoAVF) creation is a novel, minimally invasive alternative to traditional surgical AV fistula (sAVF) creation in ≤60% of patients. Although cost effective in single-payer systems, the clinical and financial impact of endoAVF in the United States remains uncertain. METHODS: We constructed a decision tree followed by a probabilistic cohort state-transition model to study the cost effectiveness of endoAVF vs sAVF creation. We conducted a systematic review to obtain input parameters including technical success, maturation, patency, and utility values. We derived costs from the Medicare 2022 fee schedule and from the literature. We used a 5-year time horizon, an annual discount rate of 3% for costs and utilities (measured in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and the common willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000. One-way and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed varying technical success, patency, reintervention, cost, and utility parameters. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, endoAVF ($30,129 average per-person costs, 2.19 QALYs gained, 65% patent at 5 years) was not cost effective compared with sAVF ($12.987 average per-person costs, 2.11 QALYs gained, 66% patent at 5 years), generating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $227,504 per QALY gained. In one-way sensitivity analyses, endoAVF becomes cost effective when the initial cost of sAVF creation exceeds endoAVF by ≥$600 (eg, if endoAVF creation costs ≤$3000 relative to the base-case sAVF cost of $3600), the additional QALYs gained from endoAVF exceeds 0.12 QALYs/year (eg, 0.81 QALYs gained/year from endoAVF compared with base-case sAVF 0.69 QALYs/year), the endoAVF maturation rate is >90% (base case 78%), or the sAVF maturation rate is <65% (base case 78%). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that sAVF remained the optimal strategy in 71% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS: EndoAVF is not cost effective compared with sAVF when modeling 5-year outcomes. The main driver of sAVF remaining cost effective is the four times higher up-front cost for endoAVF creation, as well as a relatively low additional increase in quality of life for endoAVF. It will be important to establish how the endoAVF learning curve contributes to upfront costs and, given the annual cost attributed to vascular access nationally, a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Association between heart failure and arteriovenous access patency in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Heart disease and chronic kidney disease are often comorbid conditions owing to shared risk factors, including diabetes and hypertension. However, the effect of congestive heart failure (CHF) on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and AV graft (AVG) patency rates is poorly understood. We hypothesize preexisting HF may diminish blood flow to the developing AVF and worsen patency. METHODS: We conducted a single-institution retrospective review of 412 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent hemodialysis access creation from 2015 to 2021. Patients were stratified based on presence of preexisting CHF, defined as clinical symptoms plus evidence of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (<50%) or diastolic dysfunction on preoperative echocardiography. Baseline demographics, preoperative measures of cardiac function, and dialysis access-related surgical history were collected. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were performed for primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency using standard definitions for patency from the literature. We assessed differences in patency for patients with CHF vs patients without CHF, patients with a reduced vs a normal EF, and AVG vs AVF in patients with CHF. RESULTS: We included 204 patients (50%) with preexisting CHF with confirmatory echocardiography. Patients with CHF were more likely to be male and have comorbidities including, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and a history of cerebrovascular accident. The groups were not significantly different in terms of prior fistula history (P = .99), body mass index (P = .74), or type of hemodialysis access created (P = .54). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency, primary-assisted patency, or secondary patency over time in the CHF vs non-CHF group (log-rank P > .05 for all three patency measures). When stratified by preoperative left ventricular EF, patients with an EF of <50% had lower primary (38% vs 51% at 1 year), primary-assisted (76% vs 82% at 1 year), and secondary patency (86% vs 93% at 1 year) rates than those with a normal EF. Difference reached significance for secondary patency only (log-rank P = .029). AVG patency was compared against AVF patency within the CHF subgroup, with significantly lower primary-assisted (39% vs 87% at 1 year) and secondary (62% vs 95%) patency rates for AVG (P < .0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In this 7-year experience of hemodialysis access creation, reduced EF is associated with lower secondary patency. Preoperative CHF (including HF with reduced EF and HF with preserved EF together) is not associated with significant differences in overall hemodialysis access patency rates over time, but patients with CHF who receive AVG have markedly worse patency than those who receive AVF. For patients with end-stage renal disease and CHF, the risks and benefits must be carefully weighed, particularly for those with low EF or lack of a suitable vein for fistula creation.