RESUMEN
Locating the lowest energy conformer is crucial for the accurate computation of equilibrium properties of molecular systems. This paper examines the performance of efficient low-cost methods in terms of the alignment and relative energies of their energy minima against the benchmark revDSD-PBEP86-D4/def2-TZVPP//MP2/cc-pVTZ potential energy surface. The low-cost methods considered include GFN-FF, GFN2-xTB, DFTB3, HF-3c, B97-3c, PBEh-3c, and r2SCAN-3c composite methods against a diverse test set of 20 compounds including alkanes, perfluoroalkyl molecules, peptides, open-shell radicals, and Zn(II) complexes of varying sizes. The "3c" composite methods are generally more accurate, but are at least 2-3 orders of magnitude more expensive than tight-binding methods which have energy minima that align well with the benchmark potential energy surface. The findings of this paper were further exploited to introduce a simple strategy involving Grimme's CENSO energy-sorting algorithm that resulted in up to an order of magnitude reduction in computational time for locating the lowest energy conformer on the revDSD-PBEP86-D4/def2-TZVPP//MP2/cc-pVTZ surface.
RESUMEN
Calculation of molecular geometries and harmonic vibrational frequencies are pre-requisites for thermochemistry calculations. Contrary to conventional wisdom, this paper demonstrates that quantum chemical predictions of the thermochemistry of many gas and solution phase chemical reactions appear to be very insensitive to the choice of basis sets. For a large test set of 80 diverse organic and transition-metal-containing reactions, variations in reaction free energy based on geometries and frequencies calculated using a variety of double and triple-zeta basis sets from the Pople, Jensen, Ahlrichs, and Dunning families are typically less than 4 kJ mol-1, especially when the quasiharmonic oscillator correction is applied to mitigate the effects of low-frequency modes. Our analysis indicates that for many organic molecules and their transition states, high-level revDSD-PBEP86-D4 and DLPNO-CCSD(T)/(aug-)cc-pVTZ single-point energies usually vary by less than 2 kJ mol-1 on density functional theory geometries optimized using basis sets ranging from 6-31+G(d) to aug-pcseg-2 and aug-cc-pVTZ. In cases where these single-point energies vary significantly, indicating sensitivity of molecular geometries to the choice of basis set, there is often substantial cancellation of errors when the reaction energy or barrier is calculated. The study concludes that the choice of basis set for molecular geometry and frequencies, particularly those considered in this study, is not critical for the accuracy of thermochemistry calculations in the gas or solution phase.